Jainism

By Doug Lancaster

One of the more obscure of the world’s religions is Jainism. This system of thinking is not as common to the ear as Hinduism or Buddhism, yet it is the oldest personally founded religion in India. Presently, there are around 1,300,000 Jains. Their beliefs are exclusively Indian, since they are a non-competitive people who do not care for the spreading of their ideas. One can see the expressed hope for a universal religion in some of the Jain literature, but that plan has been abandoned. It seems the founder supposedly received divine encouragement to propagate a religion of supreme benefit to the whole world, but as we will see throughout, many ideas have been dropped. Jains were first called Nirganthas (those who have been loosed from bondage) and later Jain and Jaina in honor of their “conqueror” or Jina. The role of the conqueror is to preach the religion since he has overcome evil. A Jain would tell you his belief is eternal.

In 599 B.C. near Patna, India a second son was born to a Rajah. The child was named Vardhamana and was to be twenty-fourth in the line of the Jinas. Being the son of a Rajah, the first 30 years were years of luxury in the palace, as the Jain scriptures show. Vardhamana “was attended by five nurses: a wet nurse, a nurse to keep him clean, one to dress him, one to play with him, one to carry him, being transferred from the lap of one nurse to that of another” (SBE 22:192-193). During this time he took up specialized studies such as Astronomy, Philosophy, Science and Architecture. He also took a wife in his late 20’s, and shortly, a daughter was born to them. At some point in this first thirty years he decided to live the life of an ascetic in accord with a Hindu method of salvation. He was, however, considerate of his parents and waited until age 30, when his parents died, before he took the vow: “I shall for 12 years neglect my body” (SBE 22:200). All at once he cast off his worldly possessions, which included a wife and daughter, plucked out his hair in five handfuls and vowed absolute holiness. The twelve years are perhaps best explained in an account from the Jain scriptures. Vardhamana would go into a field and squat with his head between his knees where he allowed passers by to hit him and spit upon him and animals to gore him, yet he sat quietly with no retaliation. “With supreme knowledge, mildness, patience, control, contentment . . . the Venerable one meditated on himself for twelve years” (SBE 22:263). For the first year and a month he wore clothes and thereafter was naked in his asceticism.

After twelve years of suffering he believed he had reached Nirvana. He thought he had gained complete control over the body and the world. He then became “Jina the conqueror,” and began to preach and propagate the religion known as Jainism for 30 years. With his conquering of the body he became known as Mahavira or “Great Hero,” in 557 B.C. This is the date most scholars assign to the founding of Jainism since it was the first year he began preaching. According to Jain literature, 557 B.C. was not the beginning of their religion but simply a restoration. However, there is no evidence to support their claims. In the Jain scriptures, Mahavira is said to have been planned before and preexisting. “He descended from heaven, the Venerable ascetic Mahavira descended from the great Vimana (place of the gods).” He is also viewed by his followers as omniscient. “He knew the thoughts of all sentient beings” (SBE 22:200). “He possessed supreme, unlimited, unimpeded knowledge and intuition” (SBE 22:257). For a reference point remember that the southern kingdom of Judah was taken captive by Babylon in 586 B.C. and the first group of returnees to the land of Canaan left in 536 B.C., so the times overlap. Also, Mahavira was contemporary to Buddha, Confucius, Lao-Tze and Zoroaster, as well as the prophets Ezekiel and Daniel.

Mahavira died in 527 B.C. at Pava, India, and since that time Pava has been the destination of a yearly pilgrimage made by his followers. He is said to have been supernaturally placed in his mother’s womb in fulfillment of 14 prophetic dreams.

Mahavira was protesting the following points of Hinduism: (1) The domineering of the Braham priests, (2) The claimed authority of the Sanskrit Vedas (wise sayings), (3) The cruel system of bloody animal sacrifices, (4) The absolute monism of the Upanishad Philosophies. At first he had in mind the restoration of Hinduism, but his methods led to the formation of a new religion.

Jain monks and nuns soon left the homeless approach Mahavira preached and began living in monasteries. There were no philosophic disputes for several years, but in the 4th and 3rd centuries B.C., the Jains divided into two groups over rules for monks. One group, the Digambaras or naked “sky-clad” sect felt the saint should own nothing, including clothing, while the Svetambara or “white-clad” sect embraced the traditional views of Jainism. Most of the Jains who belonged to the “sky-clad” sect lived in the southern half of India where it is warmer. The “white-clad” sect lived mostly in the northern half of India where it is cooler. The Digambaras are also different in that they do not allow the possibility of salvation to a woman until by reason of good living she is reborn as a man.

In about A.D. 1474 another split occurred from the Svetambaras, when a would be reformer discovered that no reference was ever made to idols in the Jain scriptures. Hence, began the Sthanakvasi sect. They have divided into I I subsects and the Svetambaras have divided into 84 subsects.

Eventually all the Jains returned to the more traditional views of Eastern religion. Today the only distinguishable point is the prohibition from killing any living creature. Jams are very wealthy compared to Easterners, mostly due to their shrewd business tactics. They also have achieved the highest social status in India.

Philosophy of the Religion

The chief virtues of Jainism are asceticism to the point of death and non-injury. Jain monks and nuns represent ideal Jainism. They try to avoid worldly contact as much as possible. The only items they may have in their possession are a broom to sweep the bugs from their path, a bowl to beg food, a robe and a walking stick. The broom and bowl are the symbols of Jainism. The highest goal is to cease all bodily functions and die of starvation. The perfect Jain is inoffensive, humble, unvindictive and certainly an ascetic. They are forbidden to make any type of attachments so love as well as hate must be abandoned. “By conquering love, hate and wrong belief he will cut off his fetters of Karma” (SBE 45:172). No other religion goes as far as Jainism where life is concerned. They are forbidden to till the soil for fear they might injure or kill earthworms, and may only drink water through a cloth strainer to avoid killing any invisible organisms in the water.

Mahavira enjoined upon his followers the five great vows (Mahavrata). They consist of: (1) Non-injury, (2) Abstention from lying, (3) Non-stealing, (4) Chastity and (5) Lack of possessions. While Mahavira called for all his followers to make and keep these five vows, only the monks and nuns are faithful to them. The Jains have also written into their scriptures the Anuvrata (5 small vows). These are provided for the ones who are not willing to abide by the Mahavrata. They consist of: (1) Abstinence from gross violence, (2) gross falsehood, (3) gross stealing, (4) contentment with one’s own wife and (5) limitation of one’s possession. Though these were given for convenience sake, still the good Jain will anticipate the day when he makes the Mahavrata.

Jains believe the world is infinite and was never created. “Those who on arguments of their own maintain that the world has been created do not know the truth” (SBE 45:245). They say the universe is divided into two independent categories: living substance (Jiva) and non-living substance (Ajiva). The Ajiva would include all of time, space and matter. Through the center of the universe runs the region of mobile souls in which all living beings live. Above this central region exists the upper world containing 16 heavens and 14 celestial regions, and below it exists the lower world consisting of hell.

The sacred scriptures of Jainism are read and chanted in the temple regularly by the monks and nuns, but only the pious laymen read them. Most Jains are ignornant of their scriptures. The authority of their scriptures is another point of difference between the two sects of Jains. The Sthanakvasis recognize 33 as canonical while the Svetambaras recognize 45. Jains use their scriptures very little. Jains believe in universal tolerance, that is, non-criticism of other religions.

Jainism was founded on the premise that there is no supreme being. Mahavira rejected the whole Hindu polytheistic philosophy of supernatural powers. He condemned praying or talking to any deity. Mahavira made light of the idea of some, that a person needs any help from on high. “Man, thou art thy own friend. Why wishest thou for a friend beyond thyself?” (SBE 22:33) According to Mahavira, “There exists no object to be worshipped,” nor did he believe in the Vedas (Wise sayings) of Hinduism. He lived his life faithful to these thoughts. Surprisingly, within 150 years after his death he was regarded by his followers as a god. The teachings he left behind evidently were not enough for them. Even their scriptures revere him as having divine characteristics, and he is said to be sinless. “Having wisdom, Mahavira committed no sin himself . . . he meditated free from sin and desire” (SBE 22:86-87). “The great sage does not commit any wrong” (SBE 45:291). Though Mahavira did not believe in a supreme being, he did say there was a “god-class” of people know as Devas, who were responsible for assigning places of abode for the Jiva. Later, his followers incorporated a system of mythology consisting of several gods and goddesses. One can see in this system influence of the old Hindu philosophy.

Another Hindu thought that gave way to Jainism was the doctrine of Nirvana. It states that to reach freedom of Jiva one must rid the ego. The desire to end desire eventually developed into asceticism.

Jains are concerned mostly with physical evil (Ajiva). They contend that matter is permanently evil, and explain the cause of all misery as the linking of the vile, material body with the pure eternal soul. This doctrine is known as Dualism. Salvation, then, is possible only by suppressing the flesh and freeing the individual’s spirit. This explains their insistence on asceticism.

The Jiva is imprisoned in the body as a result of worldly contact so to be freed one must abstain from worldly contact as much as possible. This “Karma” flow that causes imprisonment can be stopped only by many lives of disciplined conduct. The final liberation is known as Nirvana or Moksha and when this is attained, there is perfect knowledge and bliss.

The complete method of salvation is called the “Three Jewels.” “Knowledge, Faith and Right conduct are the true causes of final liberation” (SBE 45:123). These are further explained in some of the Jain documents. Right faith is understanding that Mahavira overcame the world, found salvation and is now the refuge to believers. Right knowledge is the psychology of the religion. In other words, Mahavira’s thoughts are the right knowledge essential to salvation. Right living tells the Jain how to rid his soul of Karma by living according to asceticism.

Jains have been taught that immortality is inherently unavoidable with ultimate residence in either heaven or hell (upper or lower worlds). Incidentally, it is interesting to note the Digambara sect is the only group that refuses the possibility of women to have salvation, though in the Jain scriptures womankind is utterly condemned. For years the majority of Jains have had a separate monastic order for women to be nuns.

Superiority of Chrstianity

“The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God” (Psa. 14:1, 53:1). First, of the many discrepancies and illogical positions held by the founder and proponents of Jainism, atheism perhaps may be the most dangerous. After a study of world religions, one can see more clearly what Paul describes as “worshiping and serving the creature more than the Creator.” After listing several sins of which these folks are guilty he declares: “who knowing the judgment of God that they who commit such things are worthy of death” (Rom. 1:25-32). It is indeed sad when one denies the existence of God, and we are saddened even more when we read in the Book the punishment for those who do not obey him. The Bible is plain concerning God and his nature. Genesis I shows his eternal power, in that he spoke the world into existence. Paul also corroborates the testimony in speaking of Christ (who is God), by telling that all things were created by and for him (Col. 1:15-17). Realizing his position as supreme and almighty, one would think people would not fail to worship and reverence God, yet men still lean on their own understanding. Thus, we should read Jeremiah 10:23 and understand man is not capable of directing his own steps. Man needs help from on high and God is willing to give it if we submit to his righteousness. When our Lord was tempted, he responded by quoting from Deuteronomy, “Ye shall worship the Lord thy God and him only shalt thou serve” (Matt. 4:10). There will come a day that all men will finally realize there is a God in heaven and he is the one to be feared.

Second, Christians have for years been represented by antagonists of Christ as “working our way to salvation.” A true example of this false idea is evident in Jainism. Mahavira declared that man is his own friend and that he needs no help whatsoever. The Jews seemed to have a similar attitude; hence Paul wrote much concerning salvation by virtue of grace. In Romans 10:1-13 Paul tells of the Jews establishing their own righteousness and overlooking the manifestation of God’s righteousness in sending Christ to die on Calvary’s cross. John said love prompted God to send his only begotten son to be the perfect sacrifice for man (Jn. 3:16). So many passages discuss the impossibility of “working your way to salvation” that space prohibits an examination of each. Notice however, Romans 3:27-28; 11:5-6; Ephesians 2:4-9. If man is granted salvation it will be based on God’s marvelous grace in supplying the blood of Christ for our pardon. God has given him (Christ) the name through which salvation comes. It will come by no other way. We may join Paul in his amazement that folks could be troubled by those who pervert the pure gospel of Christ (Gal. 1:6-9).

Third, Jainism is concerned primarily with the physical, external things and is concerned little with the heart. The Pharisees, Israel and many others were also interested mostly with the outside. Jesus told them to take care of the internal first and the external would follow (Matt. 23:25-28). God told Israel he was “full of sacrifices” (Isa. 1:11-16). In other words they were more concerned with ritualistic formalism than rending their heart in complete subjection to his will. Certainly the external things are important but they will benefit nothing unless the internal is right with God (1 Cor. 12:1-3,13).

Fourth, Jainism teaches the physical body and physical surroundings are evil and are punishment for wrong doing. It will do us well to examine Genesis 1. God used six days in which to create and make all he did. After he had finished, verse 31 tells us that he looked on his creation and said, “Behold it was very good.” As part of the creation, man was made on the sixth day and was given a living, physical body for his living, immortal soul (Gen. 2:7). We understand in the nature of God that he is totally good and so we also conclude that all he made was totally good. Israel was told the fruit of their bodies would be blessed if they were obedient (Deut. 28:4). Hence, the body is good, worthwhile and valuable to effect a purpose. Further, Paul instructed the Roman Christians to present their bodies a living sacrifice to God (Rom. 12:1). Our bodies are vessels given by God for use in his glorification. The body is not the source of all evil as it may be used righteously in service to the Almighty. Along these lines, Jains have a blatant disregard for the value of human life. God was concerned with human life in the beginning. When Cain killed his brother Abel, God was angry and punished Cain (Gen. 4). A few chapters later, God told Noah, if a murder was committed, the murderer was to be put to death because man is made in the image of God (Gen. 9:4-6). God valued and values human life. We would do well to value it also.

Finally, Jainism is a system of differing laws with different moral obligations for different people. Monks and nuns must live by a more stringent set of regulations than do the less pious Jains. Under the present reign of Christ, God does not have separate laws and standards of morality for different individuals and groups of people, even as some of our brethren would have us believe. The same standard is given for all. God is not a respecter of persons. He that sins before God and fails to repent will be punished (Col. 3:25; Rom. 2:11). Likewise, he who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved (Rom. 10:12-13). “There is neither Jew nor Greek, bond nor free, male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus” (Gal. 3:28).

While we have examined some of the many fallacies of Jainism and the superiority of Christianity, let us always remember to follow the words of Christ in the sermon on the mount. A disciple of Christ is to cast out the beam from his own eye, then he will be able to see clearly to help his brother remove the speck that troubles him (Matt. 7:3-5). While studying Jainism one particular point really hit home. In reference to their scriptures, “. . . only the pious laymen read them. Most Jains are ignorant of their scriptures.” Those of us who are Christians claim the all-sufficiency of the Bible to equip us for eternity. Many of us (maybe even most) cannot even tell someone what he must do to have salvation, let alone show him in God’s word. This is spoken to our shame. Of all men, we are most blessed to be in Christ, but all too often we fail in discharging the obligations God places on those who follow him. Let us continue to examine the religious world around us according to God’s infallible word. Let us see the mistakes our friends and neighbors make and learn from those mistakes how we may better serve the sovereign Creator.

Guardian of Truth XXXIV: 306-309
May 17, 1990

Sikhism

By Randy Pickup

Sikhism (pronounced “seek-ism”) is one of five major religions to be linked to the greatly populated country of India. Islam (the Muslim or Mohammedan faith) has the second largest number of followers in India, while Hinduism, Buddhism and Jainism, like Silkhism, all originated in the country. According to the most recent account I could find, it is estimated that there are 15 million Sikhs in India, which is roughly two per cent of the country’s 800-million population.(1) While there are adherents to the religion in other parts of the world, Sikhism is not a religion of universal appeal as are Buddhism, Islam and Christianity. Sikhism and its followers are mostly confined to one state in India called the Punjab.

As you study Sikhism and come to understand its close identity to the people of the Punjab, you soon realize the social, political and even militaristic connections with the religion. Though this article is to deal specifically with the “religion” of Sikhism, I think it necessary to consider, at least briefly, the internationally newsworthy events of nationalism and even terrorism associated with the Sikh faith. These things, I believe, just cannot be overlooked.

Especially in recent years, militant Sikhs have engaged in terrorist killings and other violent campaigns “to back their demand for the creation of an independent country – which they call Khalistan – in Punjab.”(2) In 1984, Indian Prime Minister Indira Gandhi ordered troops to attack these radical Sikhs at the Golden Temple in the city of Amritsar, Sikhism’s holiest shrine. The siege resulted in an estimated 1500 deaths, sparked protests and riots around the world with many more killings, and four months later led to the assassination of Gandhi by her Sikh bodyguards.(3)

Of course many devout Sikhs denounce the terrorism of their extremist “brethren,” but this has, in many cases at least, only “fueled the fire” of fear and extreme tension in India – Punjab in particular. Because these “terrorists have killed scores of moderates who dared to speak out, and those who survived have been pushed aside” from Sikh politics in favor of the radicals, few Sikh leaders are willing to publicly criticize them.(4) Also, because other Sikhs have “backed” (in political rallies, etc.) these violent actions in the name of their religion, Sikh terrorism has grown at such an alarming rate that it is being considered as among the most devastating in history.(5) But now, with these facts in mind, let us turn our attention to the “religious” history and aspects of Sikhism, showing not only the reasons behind some of the aforementioned religious and social/political, etc. ties, but also its interesting similarities and of course differences with the true religion of Jesus Christ.

The word sikh means “disciple,” and connotes specificaII3 the followers of ten religious leaders – called “gurus” who flourished from the fifteenth to the eighteenth century in the Punjab. The basic teachings of these gurus are found in the “Granth Sahib,” the bible of Sikhism.(6)

A Punjab native named Nanak (1469 to 1539 A.D.) was the first of these ten gurus and is unquestionably aknowledged as the founder of the Sikh faith and its most revered historical character. Nanak was considered an especially gifted child, and grew up in the Punjab under both Hindu and Muslim influences. Eventually however, Nanak’s independent personality and deep religious study and devotion led him to conclusions that were, in a very real sense, both a combination of, and yet at the same time distinct from Hindu and Islamic beliefs.

While still at a relatively young age (some say 29), and supposedly because of a mystical or miraculous “experience” with God, Nanak began preaching the simple but bold message – “There is no Hindu and no Muslim” meaning that both, and all people, were to be united under the One True God. As a result Nanak began extensive voyages throughout India (and beyond some say), visiting many religious shrines, preaching this new “gospel” and converting many. Because these journeys were so successful in impressing many religious and political leaders and making great numbers of faithful disciples, the Sikh religion began to thrive.(7)

While the tenet “there is no Hindu and no Muslim” was certainly the distinctive feature of Nanak’s message, becoming its “hallmark” as a new faith for mankind, it was of course only the foundation of other things he taught. As has already been implied, the doctrines of Nanak manifested both Hindu and Islamic influences, thus causing many to suggest that Sikhism was only a combination of the most attractive features (to Nanak) of India’s two main religions. Keep in mind however that Nanak constantly and publicly would denounce what he believed to be errors of both religions, always boldly proclaiming the will of his newly found true God, who he believed had directly called him to be his special servant and messenger.

The principal feature of Islam is that there is one eternal God who “has no companion or son (and) needs no helper in his rulership.”(8) In the Hindu faith there are many gods, some lesser, some greater. The Muslim name for God is Allah, while in Hinduism the name of the chief deity is Brahma. In Sikhism however, the one God who is possessed of all virtues is nameless; therefore it is improper “to think of Brahma . . . or of Allah . . . as adequate names for god. . . In this manner the deity of Sikhism is intended to supplant the gods of all other religions. The . . . god of Sikhism is absolute.”(9)

While the Sikh concept of God comes from Islamic beliefs, the new faith also accepted several key elements from Hinduism. First of all, Sikhs accepted a form of “maya” or illusion. This involves the belief that God is real, beyond all realities, but the creation or world as we know it is unreal. Actually, it seems Nanak might have only meant by maya that the world was “delusion” – i.e., not that it didn’t really exist, but that it is impermanent and full of evils, lusts and affections that were opposed to Truth, and would “delude” man, causing his separation from God.(10) (Shades of I Jn. 2, Col. 3, etc.!)

Nanak also taught the Hindu idea of “karma,” where supposedly every thought and action of this life leaves a definite impression upon the soul which affects one’s life beyond the present. This of course is directly connected with the Hindu notion of the “transmigration of the soul,” where the “individual is not obliterated at his physical death but proceeds from one bodily form to another.” Nanak accepted this doctrine, but taught “that . . . the believer is able to break through the bondage of karma and the transmigration of souls and attain a blissful existence . . . not like the worldly paradise of the Muslim . . . (but) rather . . . like the ‘nirvana’ of Hinduism by which the liberated soul is absorbed in god himself.”(11) (And you thought Shirley McClain started all this stuff!)

Tied to the above, one other Hindu related tradition that no doubt influenced Nanak and became part of the Sikh faith is the 11bhakti” – or devotion. The Bhakti involved some of the things already mentioned about the nature of God, etc., but it also contains the main elements to salvation and the worship of God. Basically, these elements are the need of having a spiritual guide, a guru, to help in the finding of God’s will, and that the best way of approaching God and having salvation is by meditation and repetition of His “Nam” (Name). As already noted, to Nanak and his followers, God was nameless, in the sense of a personal name like “Allah” (or “Jehovah”), but according to Sikhism, “The Name is the total expression of all that God is, and this is Truth. Meditate on this and you shall be saved. “(12)

As we mentioned before, Nanak also publicly criticized many Hindu and Muslim beliefs and practices. He opposed the various rituals of both faiths, and was strongly critical of Hindu pilgrimages, idolatry and the Indian caste system (social classes). Because Nanak believed these caste divisions were foolish contradictions to God’s will that all people are equal, to this day “Sikh women have . . . enjoyed rights similar to men through centuries, in direct contrast to” Hindu and Muslim practices.(13)

Considering some of the above facts, it should not be surprising that the religious services of the Sikhs are fairly simple. Osually the repetition (or meditation) of the name of God, the reciting or singing the scripture hymns, and the reading from the Adi Granth, the most sacred scriptures, are the main activities of worship. Similarly, the lives of the orthodox, devout Sikh are characterized by simple, honest virtues like hard work (farming is the main industry of the Sikhs in the Punjab) and sharing with and protecting the poor and oppressed. In fact these virtues are considered by the normal, anti-terrorist Sikh as fundamental and inseparable to his religion.(14)

But now this brings us back to the social, political and militaristic aspects of Sikhism discussed at the beginning of this article. Although Nanak’s teachings stressed individual virtues and piety related to one’s relationship to the True God, the religion after Nanak grew more and more nationalistic with an emphasis on military might.

The fifth guru Arjan challenged the validity of the then reigning Mogul Empire, and before dying a martyr’s death it is said he told his son, “Sit fully armed on the throne and maintain an army to the best of your ability.” Arj an’s son Hargobind did continue this military path, formal uniting the religion and politics of Sikhism when he assumed the title “Miri Piri Da Malik” – Lord of the Secular and the Spiritual. The tenth and last guru, Govind Singh (1675-1708), reaffirmed the political aspects of Sikhism and extended Sikh military power, proclaiming “the sword was God and God was the Sword!”(15) 

When comparing Sikhism with the teaching of Christ in the Bible, it is hard not to focus on the differences manifested in the last references to the militarism associated with the Sikh faith. Clearly the terrorism of recent years is extreme, to say the least, but just as clearly, it has arisen (and is justified) from the teachings of these militant Sikh gurus. And yet even more clear is this fact: this “teaching” and these “practices” are against Christ, the true ruler in heaven and earth. (Matt. 28:18)

However, there are, of course, in spite of the obvious similarities, other differences. Nanak taught one true God, but that God is not the gocl of Sikhism, but the Uod of the Bible, not only of the Jews, but of “all nations of men . ~ . For in him we (all) live, and move, and have our being” (Acts 17:22-31). This one true and living God is not nameless; he is Jehovah, God Almighty, the great “I Am” (Exod. 6:3; Gen. 28:3; Exod. 3:14). The Lord God does not speak through gurus who are needed to guide men to finding him; he speaks to all men today through the word of his Son which is understandable, perfect and final (Heb. 1:1,2; 2 Tim. 3:16, 17; Jude 3; Eph. 3:1-6). Salvation from God is not found in the constant repetitious meditation of his “name,” but in the name of Jesus Christ, through faith and obedience to his will (Acts 4:10-12; Jn. 14:6; Rom. 1:16; Jas. 2:24; Mk. 16:15,16; etc.). The saving grace of the Lord is not some abstract, subjective “idea” that will release man from the “bondage of karma,” but is objective Truth that frees us from sin and eternal death (Tit. 2:11, 12; Jn. 8:31, 32; 1 Jn. 2:3; 2 Pet. 1:3-11; 1 Pet. 1:3-5; Heb. 9:27).

There is much more we could mention (perhaps it is good to let you do some of your own thinking here), but one final thought that goes back to the “military” aspects that are, whether some Sikhs like it or not, intertwined in Sikhism: Jesus said, “My kingdom is not of this world: if (it) were of this world, then would my servants fight . . . but now is my kingdom not from hence” (Jn. 18:36). What a wonderful and joyous privilege to be in the spiritual kingdom of God’s Son, the only “kingdom which cannot be moved” (Col. 1:13; Heb. 12:28). God forbid that “we at any time should let these things slip” (Heb. 2:1).

Bibliography

1. “Surrender at the Temple,” McCleans, May 30, 1988, p. 32.

2. Ibid.

3. Ibid.

4. “The Battle for Punjab,” McCleans, May 23, 1988, p. 19.

5. “Holy War Against India,” Atlantic Monthly, August 1988, p. 55.

6. Ibid., p. 57.

7. The Sacred Writings of the World’s Great Religions, S.E. Frost, Jr., p. 355.

8. Founders of Living Religions, Herbert Stroup, p. 83.

9. Ibid., p. 102-103.

10. Ibid., p. 103.

11. Guru Nanak and the Sikh Religion, W.H. McLeod, pp. 185-186.

12. Ibid., p. 196.

13. “The Sikh Way of Life,” Ecumenism, June, 1988, p. 19.

14. Ibid., p. 20.

15. “Holy War. . .” pp. 57-58.

Other Sources Used or Consulted

Encyclopedia Britannica.

U.S. News and World Report.

Bulletin of the Christian Institute of Sikh Studies.

Guardian of Truth XXXIV: 10, pp. 303-305
May 17, 1990

The Road to Troas

By Larry Ray Hafley

Later in the life of Paul, we will find the road to Rome fraught with doubt and danger, but the road to Troas was a first perplexity. Troas was the threshold of the “Macedonian call.” It was the prelude to the planting of the gospel seed in Europe. It was the Spirit’s summons to the side of lady Lydia. It was the introduction to perils and pitfalls leading to the house of the jailer in Philippi. From the riverside to the comforts of Lydia’s domicile to the dark dungeon of suffering, songs and salvation, Paul was led on the road to Troas.

After establishing churches in the faith and distributing the decrees of the apostles and elders in Jerusalem, Paul and his companions entered the highlands of Phrygia and Galatia, but were “forbidden” by the Holy Spirit to “preach the word in Asia” (Acts 16:6). Next, by taking a northern road, they determined to go into Bithynia which lay along the shores of the Black Sea. Again, the Spirit “suffered them not.” They could not go west; they could not travel to the northeast. Why not? What now? These questions must have crept into their minds. Not allowed to proceed either to the left or to the right, they went straight ahead. They took the road to Troas.

There they found Luke. That would have been reward enough for their thwarted plans and purposes, but there was more in store. There was, as we previously stated, the continent of Europe, and the future fond fellowship of the faithful Philippians.

Perhaps you are on a road to Troas. Paul could not foresee the matchless, marvelous blessings that would ultimately sustain and support him as he ventured into Philippi, but he often may have reflected on the route and the road to Traos that led him to the brethren who would become his “dearly beloved and longed for, (his) joy and crown” (Phil. 4:1). Likewise, you may be experiencing uncertainties and roadblocks on the path of life. You may feel a sense of consternation, aggravation and frustration as your every effort is stalled. It is time, then, to take the road to Troas. That does not mean that the woes of whippings and the stocks of injustice are past. No, all those things were in Philippi. They waited as surely as did sister Lydia and the comforts of her home. However, the lasting love and support of kindred spirits was to sustain Paul all the rest of his days. Your map may be garbled and confusing, but follow on in faith and prayer. God will direct you as you trust and obey him (Prov. 3:5-7). Only in this way will you find your Philippians who will nourish and cherish you.

First, though, you must take the road to Troas.

Guardian of Truth XXXIV: 9, p. 269
May 3, 1990

“Footnotes”

By Steve Wolfgang

Footnote 21 “Burnett’s Budget,” Gospel Advocate, XXXV11 (July 4, 1895), 419.

“Last week about a hundred preachers and fashionable women assembled at Gainesville, Texas, in a state convention, and wasted enough of the Lord’s money and time to have held a hundred protracted meetings, and converted a thousand sinners. They also spent enough money on extra fine toggery, to appear in style, to pay the expenses of a half dozen evangelists to preach the gospel in destitute places all summer. What was their business at Gainesville? Principally a good time and a fashionable blowout, and in addition to this, an effort to push forward the furor for societies and fads in religion, and to supplant the Lord’s plan of work and worship in the churches.”

Beneath the wrong practice of establishing a missionary society lay some wrong attitudes. The trap of all institutional reform is its tendency to diminish, rather than increase, the amount of work done. To Burnett, it was sinful to spend money lavishly to hold a convention for the supposed purpose of encouraging missionary work. Why not spend that effort to convert souls? He was right. Religious organizations – whether a missionary society, a church extension board or the Herald of Truth – ultimately use money rather than increase it. Mission money supports administrators and not missionaries.

Burnett also questioned the common sense and the religious integrity of the people involved in such programs. At best, such people missed the point of how the gospel could be spread. The subsequent histories of the Christian Church and the Church of Christ in Texas testify that pioneer preachers holding “protracted meetings” converted many more people than did the state missionary society. At worst, these people made a callous use of the kingdom of God for the gratification of their own ambitions. Disinterested people use the society to excuse themselves of their responsibility to teach. Proud men use the society to gain position and adulation. Of course, such motives are sometimes present in quite proper activities. In modern lectureships, political posturing and social frivolity sometimes absent more serious purposes.

Wrong practice is rooted in wrong attitudes. We must never practice our religion to be seen of men, nor make religion only a tool to cultivate our own vanity. Only if our sole purpose is to do God’s work will God’s methods seem best to us, for God’s methods bring glory to God and man’s methods bring glory to man. – Ed Harrell (From Perspectives, December, 1975)

Guardian of Truth XXXIV: 9, p. 270
May 3, 1990