Truth Magazine

By Jody Broyles

Leadership is a much talked about subject in the Lord’s church today. Some have striven to set aside the divine plan because of abuses they have seen. Others have merely gone on as usual and closed their eyes to problems that do in reality exist.

Neither of these choices are viable options for those striving to please the God of heaven. There is a dire need for men (and women) from the tribes of Issachar and Zebulun to arise in this generation. These men were part of a large company that came out armed for battle in support of David. “And of the children of Issachar, men that had understanding of the times, to know what Israel ought to do. . . Of Zebulun, such as were able to go out in the host. . . and were not of double heart” (1 Chron. 12.32-33).

Understanding of the Times

The men of Issachar possessed great sagacity. They could see beyond the events of the hour, with penetration they were able to perceive needs that existed beneath the surface. They were keenly aware in having an “understanding of the times.”

Today, men are needed who can see beyond the trials and problems of yesterday to what the church is facing today -and may face tomorrow. Men are needed who will awake out of slumber and open their eyes to the needs of both saint and sinner in the 1980’s.

A grave and often warranted concern of many people is that those who are leaders in the church don’t understand them or what they are going through. They feel like the elders and preacher are “Out of touch” and living in a bygone era. Men who have an “understanding of the times” can better know the trials people of today are facing, in their daily lives.

Knowing What Ought To Be Done

The men of Issachar not only understood the happenings of the day, but they knew “what Israel ought to do.” Their sagacity was coupled with a clear cut knowledge of what needed to be done.

Too often, even if men have enough wisdom. to see problems looming – they don’t know what to do about it, so they do nothing at all. Others wait too long (many times out of fear), and let Satan’s work of destruction go unchecked. And still there are others who want to do something to help, yet not knowing what is the right thing to do, try resulting in even more problems.

The household of God needs men who know what course of action the church needs to take in the days ahead – men who can teach everlasting principles of truth in a language suited to the day, yet without compromise; men who will rise up in the face of error and call sin “sin”; men who know how to reach troubled young people, tired elderly members, and struggling families with the healing message of Christ.

Singleness of Heart

The men of Zebulun were also ready for the task before them, for they were “not of double heart.” They had their eyes clearly fixed on making David the one king over all of Israel. Scripture has always commended those who possessed singleness of heart. It has constantly been a requisite for acceptable service to the true and living God. Doubleminded men are “unstable in all of their ways” (Jas. 1:8), and a man with his heart divided cannot serve Christ for “no man can serve two masters” (Mt. 6:24).

The church needs more men who possess the desire to make the Lord and his work their primary function in life — men who will not have minds clouded with the trivial, insignificant, and transitory things of this life; men who want to see the cause of Christ march valiantly into the future and will do whatever it takes to see that happen; men who can truly say with Paul “for me to live is Christ” (Phil. 1:21).

Men (and women) who understand the times, know what to do, and do it with singleness of heart are and will continue to be effective leaders in the church of God. “Leaders” who do not know what’s going on, don’t know what to do, and serve with divided allegiance are and will continue to be thieves of vitality and interest – impeding the progress of the church.

Guardian of Truth XXXII: 15, p. 457
August 4, 1988

By Mike Willis

Let not your heart be troubled: ye believe in God, believe also in me. In my Father’s house are many mansions: If it were not so, I would have told you. I go to prepare a place for you. And If I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again, and receive you onto myself; that where I am, there ye may be also (Jn. 14:1-3).

This beautiful text as comforted many a troubled heart, driving away the dark clouds of gloom and bringing in the sunshine hope of eternal life. We would do well to learn its lessons in the peaceful hour so that its lessons will sustain us through the storms of life.

Hearts Are Troubled

The Lord recognized that circumstances arise which do trouble the heart, for his own heart was sometimes troubled. At the tomb of Lazarus, Jesus wept as he witnessed the weeping and groaning of his friends. The text says, “When Jesus therefore saw her weeping, and the Jews also weeping which came with her, he groaned in the spirit, and was troubled” (Jn. 11:33). In John 12:27, as he spoke of his death, he confessed, “Now is my soul troubled; and what shall I say? Father, save me from this hour: but for this cause came I unto this hour.” When he spoke of Judas’ betraying him, “he was troubled in spirit” (Jn. 13:21). Consequently, Jesus was well aware that man’s spirit can be troubled.

Particularly on that occasion were the disciples tempted to anxiety. Jesus had told them of his departure saying, “Yet a little while I am with you” (Jn. 13:33). He had foretold the crucifixion on several previous occasions but only now was his leaving them understood. He foretold that one of the very twelve would betray him (Jn. 13:18-30). He also revealed that Peter, a leader among the twelve, would deny Jesus three times before the break of day (Jn. 13:38). In addition, he previously had announced the persecution which would come to them because they were his disciples and had foretold the complete overthrow of the Jewish state. Indeed, their hearts were tempted to anxiety, to be troubled.

Troubles come to every heart. There are the troubles which come to us because we are men: death, sickness, war, and famine. Job testified that “man that is born of woman is of few days, and full of trouble” (14:1). There are troubles which come uniquely to Christians: persecution, rejection, the apostasy of loved ones, etc. Each of these troubles assaults the heart – the seat of man’s emotions, reason, and will.

Nothing is gained by minimizing the troubles which confront us as men and Christians. James Montgomery Boice wrote,

Sometimes when a person comes to us with a problem, as people do to me constantly, we want to minimize their problem. We want to say, “But that is not so bad. Think how things could be worse.” We may even want to tell stories of those we know who were in even worse circumstances. But we must not do this. Nothing is gained by minimizing the problems. Instead, we must hear the troubled soul out, and we must acknowledge that in many, if not all, cases there is that which rightly troubles him (The Gospel of John, Vol. IV, p. 92).

George Arthur Buttrick spoke of the philosophy which tries to see something positive in every adversity; he said, “The multifarious and multitudinous facts of pain must be faced. . . . Pollyanna, who looked for ‘the silver lining’ until she convinced herself that we can have the lining without the black cloud, is a nasty little girl. She is a liar, and she peddles a mirage” (George Arthur Buttrick, God, Pain and Evil, p. 16).

The Pollyana approach to life has been “sanctified” by being parroted by those who claim to be Christians. “It would not be necessary to make so much of this point if it were not that there is a kind of Pollyanna Christianity in our day which seeks to deny it (i.e., that there is cause to be troubled for any truly surrendered child of God). . . . This view is unrealistic and uninformed, for evil does exist” (Boice, The Gospel of John, Vol. IV, p. 91).

Christian Science tries to deny that troubles exist by affirming that they are merely illusions. One poet quipped this reply to the delusion of illusion parroted by the Christian Scientists:

There was a faith-healer of Deal

Who said, “Although pain isn’t real,

When I sit on a pin, And it punctures my skin,

I dislike what I fancy I feel.”

The Bible is a book which faces life realistically. The Lord recognizes that troubles exist in life and that those troubles assault the heart. The Scripture before us calls on Christians who are in the face of trouble to, by a deliberate exercise of the mind in which he brings Bible truths to his remembrance, calm his troubled heart through faith. By thinking of the Father and Jesus, remembering his promises and his power to perform what he has promised, the Christian strengthens his faith in order to survive the storm.

How To Calm The Troubled Heart

1. Faith in God. The AV reads “ye believe in God.” The verb can be either indicative or imperative. The AV follows the indicative translation; the reading “believe in God” of the RSV makes the sentence imperative, commanding one to believe in God to clam his troubled soul. Remembrance of God does calm the troubled soul.

As I face the troubles of my life, I should remember them in the context of my relationship and service to God. Regardless of what happens to me, God is the Almighty God in total control of his universe. He loves me, as demonstrated by the sacrifice of his Son’s life for my redemption (Jn. 3:16). He watches over me, even numbering the very hairs of my head and keeping me from being tempted above my ability to bear. Reminding myself of these truths does not remove the trouble from me but it does reassure my troubled heart. I can face the troubles with the knowledge that God has not forsaken me.

I remember that I am created by God in his image for eternal habitation with him. “Temporary sorrows and difficulties all but disappear when they take their place in an immortal existence” Q.R. Thomson, The Pulpit Commentary on John, p. 237). Problems which appear so big today pale into insignificance when one sees them in view of eternity. What difference will going bankrupt make two hundred years from now? What difference will the manner in which I die, whether suddenly as in a car wreck or heart attack or slowly as through cancer or old age, make two hundred years from now? The records of human history will simply record that I died and the pain, grief, and suffering attending that death will have passed and been forgotten. By these words, I do not intend to minimize the pain, grief, or suffering, for they are real and grievous.

2. Believe in Jesus. The second means of calming the troubled soul is to remind ourselves of Jesus’ work in our redemption. He came to this earth and experienced all the temptations facing mankind that he might relieve us from the bondage of sin, give us the hope of the resurrection, and the assurance of eternal life in heaven.

The circumstances in which these words were uttered to the disciples highlights the meaning of the verse. Jesus had told the disciples that he was going away. “If Jesus were leaving them, would they not be helpless and friendless in the midst of a hostile city? Terror must have gripped them, and have appeared on their pale faces and in their frightened eyes” (Merrill Tenney, The Gospel of John, p. 212). Nevertheless, he told them not to be troubled. Even as they believed in God and trusted in him, they should trust that Jesus could be able to meet their needs in spite of the fact that he must be taken from their presence.

Jesus can meet our needs just as certainly as he met the needs of Peter, James, John, and the rest of the Twelve. We look back through the pages of the New Testament and see that he met their every need, sustaining them until they departed from this life and received the crown of life. He will meet my needs in the same manner as he met theirs.

3. Believe in heaven. The third means of calming the troubled soul is to believe in heaven. The assurance of heaven is as certain as the veracity of Jesus’ word. He promised, “In my Father’s house are many mansions: if it were not so, I would have told you. I go to prepare a place for you. And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again, and receive you unto myself; that where I am, there ye may be also.” Here are some things to believe about heaven:

a. There is a place called heaven. I am assured that Jesus has prepared a place for the righteous. Heaven is not a pipe dream, a belief in a “pie-in-the-sky” in the sweet by and by. Jesus has gone away to prepare this place for us. If his word can be trusted (and God cannot lie – Tit. 1:2), there is a place of reward for the righteous.

b. Heaven is our eternal home. It is the “Father’s house.” This is the city for which Abraham looked – “a city which hath foundations, whose builder and maker is God” (Heb. 11:10). My citizenship is in heaven (Phil. 3:20,21). Boice expressed man’s need for a home in these words:

This means that although earthly homes are necessary and valuable, they are nevertheless and at the best not permanent and that, consequently, the basic need for a home (going back to Eden) is fully met only when the Lord Jesus Christ Himself prepares a home for us in heaven. Now we ‘Are in a strange land, even in an enemy’s country. But in that day we shall be in the Father’s house and shall be home. This is our destiny (The Gospel of John, Vol. IV, p. 103).

c. Heaven is our permanent home. By the word “mansion” our thoughts are turned to spacious houses filled with expensive furniture. Such thoughts are not the emphasis of the word mone. A derivative of the verb meno (to abide) I the word mone means “a staying, abiding, dwelling-, abode” (Thayer, p. 417). The permanence of the dwelling is emphasized by the word. Heaven will not be a temporary dwelling place; it is the place where Paul said, “so shall we ever be with the Lord.” (1 Thess. 4:17).

d. Heaven is being with God. Again, the emphasis. of heaven is not a “mansion”; rather, it is on being with God. “I will receive you unto myself; that where I am, there ye may be also” (Jn. 14:3). The emphasis of heaven is the being in the presence of God and with Jesus.

When I return to East Texas, I drive my children by the house in which I was reared on the north loop off U.S. 287 in Woodlake, Texas. The house is still there but there is no attraction to me. Mother, Dad, and all of us children no longer are there. The attraction of the place in my memory is not the surroundings, it is the remembrance of the association with family members. A spacious mansion was not the attraction of heaven to the Twelve to whom Jesus spoke; the attraction for the Twelve was the reunion with Jesus and being in his presence forever. The same is true for those of us who, though not having seen him personally, love Jesus. We yearn to be with him forever. Fanny J. Crosby captured the idea in the song “Saved By Grace.”

Someday the silver cord will break,

And I no more as now shall sing;

But, O the joy when I shall wake

Within the palace of the King!

Someday my earthly house will fall,

I cannot tell how soon t’will be,

But this I know – my All in All

Has now a place in heav’n for me.

Someday when fades the golden sun

Beneath the rosy-tinted west,

My blessed Lord shall say, “well done!”

And I shall enter into rest.

And I shall see Him face to face,

And tell the story – Saved by grace;

And I shall see Him face to face,

And tell the story – Saved by grace.

The belief in heaven, the reward of the righteous given when Jesus comes again, is the hope of the Christian. The hope which is laid before us enables us to endure the darkness of the night, the pain of our sufferings, the emptiness of loneliness, the isolation of our ostracism, the uncertainty of tomorrow, and every other thing which troubles our hearts. Heaven is the light at the end of the tunnel, the sunshine after the rain, and the silver lining of the cloud which enables us to persevere in service to Christ.

Do you have the hope of heaven to calm your troubled heart? D.L. Moody related this incident:

There was a man who had great wealth. He was dying. When the doctor told him he could not live the lawyer was sent for to make out his will. The dying man had a little girl who was about four years old. She did not understand what death meant. But when her mother told her that her father was going away, the little child went to the bedside and looked into her father’s eyes and asked, “Papa, have you got a home-in that land you are going to?” Thequestion sunk deep into the man’s soul, for he had spent his time and energy accumulating great wealth. In this life he enjoyed a grand home, but now he had to leave it (Boice, The Gospel ofJohn, Vol. IV, p. 104).

Conclusion

“Let not your heart be troubled: ye believe in God, believe also in me. In my Father’s house are many mansions: if it were not so, I would have told you. I go to prepare a place for you. And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again, and receive you unto myself; that where I am, there ye may be also” (Jn. 14:1-3).

Guardian of Truth XXXII: 15, pp. 450, 468-469
August 4, 1988

By Aude McKee

Introduction:

I. In our lessons thus far, we have studied the establishment of the Lord’s church; its growth, departures from the divine pattern; the rise of the Catholic Church and some doctrines of Catholicism.

II. As the years rolled by, the Roman Catholic Church became more powerful and more corrupt. In this period from the 5th to the 15th centuries:

A. The Bible became virtually a sealed book. “The Bible was chained to the pulpit.”

B. Priest-ridden people were kept in ignorance.

III. As time went on, there were courageous voices raised against the corruption of Rome. These voices, protesting the excesses of Catholicism, eventually produced the “Protestant Reformation.”

Discussion:

I. The Underlying Causes of the Reformation.

A. Corruption within the Catholic Church.

1. Wicked popes.

a. The Catholic Question Box (pp. 483-4) readily admits that there were a “few unworthy popes.”

b. John XII was such a monster of wickedness that upon the complaint of the people of Rome, the emperor Otho caused him to be tried and deposed. The Pope’s reply was, “We hear that you want to make another pope. If that is your design, I excommunicate you all in the name of the Almighty, that you may not have it in your power to ordain any other, or even to celebrate mass.”

c. Benedict IX (1033) was more than once expelled from Rome by the people for his debaucheries, and finally sold his popedom to Gregory VI.

d. Alexander VI (1492) was elected through bribery, and history reveals no example of depravity that exceeds that of this “head of the church.” It is said that not one of the analysts of the Roman Church has breathed a whisper in his praise. Among his debaucheries, he is said to have given a splendid entertainment in the Vatican to no less than 50 public prostitutes. While popes never marry, yet this link in the “apostolic chain” is said to have acknowledged five children by a Roman matron.

2. Indulgences.

a. An indulgence was a document that could be bought for a sum of money and that would free one from the temporal penalty of sin.

b. During the dark ages, indulgences became a license to sin.

c. John Tetzel was the most notorious indulgence salesman.

B. Internal strife.

1. Division between the East and the West (1054).

a. When Constantine moved his capitol to Constantinople in 330, he paved the way for the separation of the Catholic Church into the East and West.

b. Difficulty arose over the use of the title “universal bishop.”

c. Then the two movements got at odds over:

(1) When to celebrate Easter.

(2) Celibacy. Priests in the Eastern church I marry.

(3) Bowing before relics, pictures, etc. The Catholic Church in the East removed all crosses from their buildings so they could not be charged with idolatry.

d. In 1053 the patriarch of Constantinople condemned the church in the West for the use of unleavened bread in communion. After prolonged discussions, the patriarch was excommunicated. The patriarch was not to be outdone so he excommunicated the pope of Rome. From this time (1054) the Roman Catholic and the Greek Orthodox churches were separate.

2. “Babylonian Captivity.”

a. Early in the 14th century, a French archbishop was chosen pope due to a struggle over the right of kings to tax clergy and wage war. The headquarters of the Roman Church were moved to Avignon, France.

b. In 1377 the papacy was moved back to Rome and Urban VI was elected pope. He didn’t get along with the hierarchy, so they elected another pope, Clement VII, who moved the church capitol back to Avignon. But Urban VI continued to reign in Rome. Both popes claimed to be the legitimate successors of Peter and this split referred to as “The Great Schism” continued into the 15th century when the Council of Pisa (1409) deposed both the Avignon and Roman popes and appointed a third. The other popes refused to recognize this action and so for a while there were three rival popes. The Council of Constance (1414-1418) resulted in the elimination of all three and the election of one new pope — Martin V.

C. The Inquisition.

1. The Inquisition was an elaborate system of the Catholic Church to inquire into the beliefs of persons suspected of being heretics. People accused of being heretics were tried in the court of the Inquisition. If an accused person confessed and renounced his heresy he was reconciled with the Church on performance of penance. If he did not voluntarily confess,he would be subjected to torture, one of the most commonly used forms being the rack, which wrenched the legs of the victim. If torture failed to make the victim confess he was declared a heretic and turned over to the secular authorities to be burned at the stake.

2. The Inquisition existed from 1229 to 1834 and operated chiefly in Spain, Portugal, Italy, and France. Thousands were put to death because they dared differ with the Roman Catholic Church. In France, 930 Inquisitional sentences from 1308 to 1323 (15 years) show that 42 were put to death, 140 acquitted, and 748 were tortured.

II. Other Factors That Contributed To The Reformation.

A. The Renaissance – the re-birth of desire for learning.

B. Translation of the Bible into different languages so that the man in the street could read it.

C. Invention of the printing press by Gutenburg in 1454.

1. Prior to this, all books, including the Bible, were written by hand.

2. This made the price so high and the supply so limited that the common man could not afford to own any books -not even the Bible.

III. Forerunners of the Reformation.

A. Between 1000 and 1400 different groups arose as internal and external revolts to purify religion. Among them were:

1. The Albigenses.

a. They rejected the authority of the Roman Catholic Church. They put emphasis on the authority of the New Testament.

b. In 1208, a Roman Catholic Crusade was sponsored in an effort to wipe them out.

c. Not until the end of the 14th century was the Inquisition able to destroy them.

2. Waldenses.

a. A Puritan movement named after Peter Waldo.

b. Attempted to reinstate the Bible as authority.

c. The Roman Catholic Church reacted to this movement by excommunication, by forbidding the people to use Bible translations in their own Conclusion: tongue, and by the Inquisition.

B. Peter Du Bruys, France.

1. He contended for New Testament authority.

2. He opposed infant baptism, transubstantiation, etc.

3. He was burned at the stake in 1126.

C. John Wycliff (1320-13 84). England. “Morningstar of the reformation.”

1. “He anticipated the grand Reformation with a knowledge of the religious situation, with a perspicuity of genius, and by apostolic blows of radical reform, that shook the very foundations of the Papal edifice.”

2. He set aside Papal decrees by a direct appeal to the Word of God.

3. He denied transubstantiation, confirmation, extreme unction, auricular confession, indulgences.

4. He boldly asserted that presbyters and bishops were the same in the New Testament.

5. He translated most of the Bible into the English language.

6. He was excommunicated by the Catholic Church but he was allowed to die a natural death.

7. Some years after his death, Pope Martin V had his bones dug up, burned, and the ashes thrown in the River Swift. “The vicious spirit of apostasy would not let his bones rest in peace!”

D. John Huss (1369-1415), Bohemia.

1. Born of poor peasants – received a good education. Rose to the position of dean of the theological faculty of the University of Prague.

2. Came to appreciate the writings of Wycliff. “I am attracted to his writings, for all his efforts are to lead men back to the law of Christ.”

3. Pope then decreed that no one in the University could hold the doctrines of Wycliff. Huss continued his teaching in the chapel. He was then excommunicated.

4. He remained in the city and taught. Then the city was placed under interdict. Huss could not be harbored or fed. No priest could perform his duties in the city until Huss was expelled.

5. Huss then left the city but continued to preach in the country.

6. The Council of Constance (1414-18) brought him to trial. He was promised safe conduct and was supposed to be allowed to defend himself. His trial was a farce.

7. On his birthday, July 6, 1415, Huss calmly heard his sentence.

8. His priestly garments were ripped off, a miter of paper was placed on his head with this inscription, “A Ringleader of Heretics.”

9. His books were burned at the gate of the church and he was led to the suburbs to be burned alive.

10. As the flames leaped about him, he sang a hymn and then cried, “Jesus Christ, thou Son of the living God, have mercy on me.”

11. His ashes were then collected and thrown in the Rhine.

Conclusion:

1. Every movement of any consequence has had a foundation on which to build.

2. The Reformation was motivated by the corruption within the Roman Catholic Church.

3. The ground work was laid in renewed desire on the part of people to learn; in the invention of the printing press; and in the translation, publication and distribution of the Word of God.

4. But there had to be people; people who loved truth more than life!

5. There were men like Wycliff and Huss, but just as importantly, there were that host of common folk who wanted to know the truth and were willing to pay the price.

6. What kind of a person would you have been if you had lived back then?

7. What kind of a person are you now? Are you concerned about truth? Are you willing to pay whatever price is demanded in order to obey the Lord’s will?

Guardian of Truth XXXII: 15, pp. 454-456
August 4, 1988

By Harry R. Osborne

An interesting phone call came into my office this week. It seems one of the readers of our weekly newspaper articles recognized his church as the target of our words of admonition about worship. The article said that a church in this town, the name was not stated in order to protect the guilty, had invited a group to come in and pulverize blocks of ice in worship to God. Since he attends that church, our caller recognized that the article had it in mind. At first, he justified the practice by saying it was not a worship service. I referred him to their advertisement which said that it was and asked him to comment. He quickly decided that it was worship and wonderful worship at that in which he could see the Holy Spirit working. Although I would love to have been enlightened upon how one sees the Spirit working in ice cubes, wisdom dictated the need to get to more substantive matters. I asked how the Spirit of God could be active in the message of those whose speech opposed God’s Word. You see, the muscular ice bashers had preached that you need only “accept Jesus as your personal Savior” and you would be saved at the point of that belief. I then talked with him for a good while on what the Bible did teach about salvation.

After repeated admissions that he had no Bible passage upon which to base his thoughts, our caller began to get upset. Soon he took the position that all one needed to do was “love God and all men” and everything else did not matter. Further conversation made it clear that he did not have the biblical definition of love in mind, but a purely emotional “feeling of acceptance. ” When I asked why God would spend so much time in the Bible telling us to do things that did not matter, his answer was astonishing, He said, “All of that doctrine stuff about baptism, worship, and all that other stuff you’re talking about is just garbage! None of that matters at all!” I promise, that is exactly what he said.

I have thought about that statement repeatedly since the call and am still shocked. Can you imagine answering to God for calling doctrine of which he is the author “garbage”? The words of Jesus come to mind in this regard:

O generation of vipers, how can ye, being evil speak good things? For out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh. A good man out of the good treasure of the heart bringeth forth good things: and an evil man out of the evil treasure bringeth forth evil things. But I say unto you that every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment. For by thy words thou shalt be justified, and by thy words thou shalt be condemned (Matt. 12:34-37).

There is a reason our words will be called into judgment – they declare the attitudes of our heart. If one does not respect God’s Word in the heart, his speech will show it. Few will go so far as to call it “garbage,” but their lack of respect for it will show in their speech.

With that in mind, it occurs to me that our caller merely took the final consequence in speech of the attitude upon which all of denominationalism is built. They readily admit that they do not strictly adhere to the teaching about and example of the New Testament church. Those who strive to do so are chided as “legalists.” Instead of such stringent “legalism,” they throw away the doctrine of the New Testament and practice their own desires. If they throw away the doctrine of the New Testament for their own desires, do they not in practice consider that doctrine to be “garbage”?

Notice with me for a moment some of the various doctrines of God that men have discarded as garbage:

Inspiration of the Bible: The Bible claims that every Scripture is inspired of God (1 Tim. 3:16-17). Not one single prophecy come by man’s will; all true prophets spake and wrote because the Holy Spirit moved them to do so (2 Pet. 1:21). Many times, the writers did not even fully understand what they spoke because the Spirit was in control of their message (1 Pet. 1:10-12). The Spirit controlled their message even to the point of choosing the very words of that message (1 Cor. 2:10-13). Yet men have thrown this doctrine into their refuse piles as they teach that the Bible is inspired just as Shakespeare was – nothing miraculous. Denominational seminaries are filled with this teaching.

Baptism: Christ said that it is essential for salvation (Mk. 16:16; 1 Pet. 3:21). The apostles taught that it was for the remission of sins (Acts 2:28; 22:16). The Bible teaches that Christ’s cleansing blood is applied at baptism (Rom. 6:3-7). One is made to be in Christ at the point of baptism, according to God (Gal. 3:27). Yet men have trashed God’s Word for their own thoughts about salvation by “faith only” (cf. Jas. 2:14-26).

The Church: The Bible teaches of only one church which has Christ as its head (Matt. 16:18; Eph. 1:22-23; 4:4). In all things, that church is to listen to the authoritative instruction of Jesus Christ (Eph. 4:1-16; 5:24; Col. 3:17). Its mission is spiritual (Eph. 4:12-16; 1 Tim. 3:15). The only authorized earthly organization of those saved people as the church is a local congregation (Phil. 1:1; 1 Pet. 5:2; Acts 20:17,28). Yet denominationalism has established huge, worldwide organizations to legislate and facilitate work which God never authorized in the New Testament. The biblical pattern has been tossed out, just like a useless piece of garbage!

Righteous Living By Christians: The Bible says that Christians should live soberly, righteously, and godly in this world (Tit. 2:12). Children of God should be characterized by the fruit of the Spirit (Gal. 5:22-25). Even the Christian’s attire should manifest the sanctification of his life (1 Tim. 2:9-10; 1 Pet. 3:3-6). The disgusting lifestyle of sin which exists in the world ought to be shameful to God’s people (Eph. 5:3-12). Yet most of the denominational world accepts or fails to condemn such sins as gambling, drinking, premarital sex, homosexuality, unlawful divorce and remarriage, foul speech, and a host of others. The denominations organized an ecumenical group called the National Council of Churches. One of its members is the Community Church which advocates and advances homosexuality. They have embraced the sewage of sin while laying waste the Word of God!

Our caller may have expressed it boldly in his upset state, but the denominational world has lived by the principle all along. They have made the doctrine of God the garbage of men! They did it the first time they threw the Word of God with the divine pattern for faith and practice aside and replaced it with their own and Satan’s devices. They continue to do the same thing today. Let all of those unwittingly caught in these churches of men take notice. Those who are charting the path and leading the charge in denominationalism have thrown the book of God away.

That leaves those of us who call ourselves Christians after the pattern of New Testament teaching with a decision. Either we stand up and fight every digression of man that would trash our Savior’s will, or join the junking. Satan’s world with his allies, the denominations, are daily laying waste the Word of God. Apostasy after apostasy from among our brethren has joined them. The last major apostasy of our liberal brethren signaled their trashing of the Scripture by saying, “We do many things for which we have no Bible authority.” They will not be the last. I hear all too many today laying aside God’s terminology from his word and adopting the language of the sectarian world. Unless they change their hearts, by their words they shall be condemned. We must with Joshua of old stand up and say, “But as for me and my house, we will serve God!”

Guardian of Truth XXXII: 15, pp. 449, 470
August 4, 1988