Conformed To Our Image

The Bible teaches that man was made in the image of God (Gen. 1:26, 27).  As such, we are inferior to Him.  He is the Creator, we are the creatures, and therefore subject to His will.  However, some do not see it that way.

People want God to conform to their image.  They do not want a God of wrath, so they believe He is all love.  They do not want a God who is strict and narrow-minded, so their God is one who is permissive and tolerant of a wide range of behavior—including small infractions of morality.  They want a God who will accept their worship, no matter what, so they have a God who rejoices in man-made homage.

The Bible student will notice the attitude that conforms God to man’s image is idolatry.  Typical paganism has multiple gods.  The people we are talking about (including friends and family), have one god that fits all.  The Baptist, Methodist, Presbyterian, Pentecostal, Lutheran, and good Catholic are all acceptable to God—in their mind.  He is a multi-cultural, pluralistic God.

Contrary to this erroneous thinking, the Word of God states that He is strict, narrow, and has one truth for all men (Matt. 7:13, 14).  “Beloved, while I was very diligent to write to you concerning our common salvation, I found it necessary to write to you exhorting you to contend earnestly for the faith which was once for all delivered to the saints” (Jude 3).  There is only one faith, not many, just as surely as there is one Savior (Eph. 4:4-6).

Let us not try to conform God to our image, but let us be conformed to His.

— Steven F. Deaton | www.ImplantedWord.com

Episcopal Church Near Implosion

The link below is to an article about the Episcopal Church and how it is near implosion. It has rotted from within over many decades (really centuries) as it has abandoned the Bible as the basis of authority. The reality is, all denominations are doomed to this fate because they are inherently built on the authority of men, not God (Matt. 15:7-9).

Challenge: Read the article and note on how many points the Episcopal Church has violated the word of God. Post them in the comments section below by midnight Friday (July 20). Note: points of violation must come from the article & please number them – one per line. You must be registered and logged in to leave a comment.

The person with the most posts will win a free one-year subscription to the online version of Truth Magazine (PDF).

Episcopal Church Implosion

Word Study: Christ

Greek: Christos

Vine’s: “anointed, translates, in the Sept. [Greek translation of OT], the word Messiah…”

Thayer’s: “anointed…1. Of the Messiah…”

Christ is really not a proper name, though we commonly use it that way. Rather, it is a description or even a title, if you will. It simply means anointed, but as with many other terms in common use during Bible times, the Holy Spirit takes it and gives it a special use and/or meaning.

The idea of being anointed applied to prophets, priests, and kings in Old Testament times. These were men specifically chosen by God to serve Him and His people. The anointing with oil was a symbolic act used to indicate God’s decision.

Jesus is The Anointed One (Acts 4:27).

He is Prophet, Priest, and King. He is God’s Prophet in a similar manner to Moses (Acts 3:22, 23). He is the deliverer of God’s people and the giver of God’s law, the gospel.

He is the High Priest of all Christians (Heb. 3:1). He leads us in our spiritual lives and personally offered the once-and-for-all sin offering; Himself on the cross (Heb. 9:28).

Jesus is the King of kings (1 Tim. 6:15). He sits on His throne in heaven ruling over His kingdom until the end of time (Heb. 1:3; 1 Cor. 15:24).

Jesus was specifically chosen by God for these things before time began. He was anointed with the Holy Spirit, not to be endued with power, but as a sign that He was the Savior (Acts 10:38). This is how John knew who Jesus was (Jn. 1:29-34).

Since Jesus is the Anointed One of God, it is our duty to follow Him. If we reject the Messiah, we reject the One who sent Him. Therefore, let us respect and receive the Christ.

— Steven F. Deaton | www.ImplantedWord.com

Have Ye Not Read?

By Hoyt H. Houchen

Question: Do the Scriptures authorize using money out of the local church treasury to give members in order for them to pay their bills, or to loan them money for that purpose. I understand that money is not to be used from the church treasury for unauthorized works, as “fellowship” kitchens and benevolent institutions, but what about material aid to saints who are not needy or destitute; they just need to have their bills paid?

Reply: The Scriptures plainly declare what work the local church is to perform. It is threefold: (1) preaching the gospel (2 Cor. 11:8; 1 Tim. 3:14,15), (2) edifying the saints (Eph. 4:11-16) and (3) helping qualified needy saints (Rom. 15:26; 2 Cor. 9:1). Other passages could be cited as to this threefold work. The Scriptures only authorize the local church to spend money out of its treasury to do the work that God has assigned it to do.

The treasury of the local church is often abused. Money is taken from it to be used for things which are not the work of the church. This is unscriptural. It is not scriptural to use money out of the treasury of the local church to provide “fellowship” halls, recreational facilities and to support human institutions because these things are not the work of the church. It is the work of the church to provide for its needy saints for whom it is responsible, but not to pay the utility bills and house rent for members who are not needy or destitute. The church may provide food, clothing and shelter for needy or destitute saints, but to loan money to members and pay their personal obligations is another matter. Banks are in the business of loaning money. The church is not in the banking business. When brethren object to using money out of the treasury to loan money to members so they can pay their taxes, rent or make house payments they are not manifesting a lack of love and concern. It is simply a matter of respecting the authority of the Scriptures. Furthermore, if one member expects the church to pay his personal obligations, why cannot all the members expect the same? What a precedent this would set! Even from a mere business point of view, the treasury would soon be depleted and the congregation would be unable to do the work that God has given it to do.

The unscriptural use of money contributed to the Lord’s work, leads to other problems. Not only will members take advantage of the church, but non-members will soon learn that a church is loaning money to its members and paying their bills, house payments and rent. The door is wide open for these non-members to take advantage of an opportunity, and also to pass the word to others that, “If you want a loan, taxes and bills paid, just become a member of the church of Christ!” This is a consequence of the improper use of the money that is contributed by Christians to do the Lord’s work. Simply because we feel sorry for someone’s unfortunate circumstances, in the area under consideration, does not give us the right to violate the plain teaching of the Scriptures. Brethren (elders, where they exist) must decide upon each individual case of benevolence, and what provisions are to be made for needy or destitute saints. But abuse is what we are considering, using money out of the treasury to pay taxes, rent, house payments and utilities for members who get themselves into a bind but who are not really destitute or needy. Any of us can get into such situations. Sometimes, however, a husband may approach the church for financial assistance (a loan for a stipulated amount of money), and yet he and his wife both work and own their own home. They are not needy or destitute in the true sense (we all may need something). Rather than imposing upon the church, they should make arrangements with family members, friends, the bank or individual members of the church. Individual brethren may, out of their own pockets, come to the aid of other members whom they deem worthy; but to use the money out of the treasury of the church to pay the personal obligations of brethren is to misuse it. Spending money out of the treasury of the church is a great responsibility. We should use extreme caution to see that it is spent wisely and according to the Scriptures.

Again, the obligations of the church and those of the individual should be kept distinct.

Guardian of Truth XXXII: 14, p. 421
July 21, 1988