Old and New

By Judson Woodbridge

Old Covenant –Heb. 8:13; Ex. 34:28; I Kgs. 8: 9, 21– New Covenant.
Old Testament — Heb. 9: 15 — New Testament.
First Testament — Heb. 10: 9 — Second Testament–Heb. 8: 7.
Moses Gave Old– Heb. 10:28 — Christ Gave New.
Blood of Animals– Heb. 10:4–Blood of Christ–Heb. 9:14.
For Jews Only — Deut. 5.1-15; Ex. 31:16, 17 — For All the World–Mk. 16:15.Done Away–Rom. 7:1-6; 2 Cor. 3:1-6– In Force—Heb. 9:17. Gal. 3:23-25; Eph. 2:14-16; Col. 2:14; Heb. 8; 9:15-17.

Wrong Examples

Mt. 8: 6- 13 . Faith
Lk. 7: 36-48 ……... Love
John 8: 4- 11..Repent
Mt. 19:16-22..Give
Lk. 23:43 . Confessed

Right Examples

Acts 2–B, R, B, equals Rem. of Sins.
Acts 8–H, B, B, equals Rejoice
Acts 9–B, R, B, equals wash away sins. (22: 16.)
Acts 10 and 11–B, R, B, equals Life.

Wrong DayEx. 31:16, 17.
Right DayLk. 24:1, 7, 21, 46; Acts 20:7; 1 Cor. 16:2.

Wrong Acts
Sprinkle clean water–Ezek. 36:25.
Animal sacrifice.
Incense burning.
Going to Jerusalem to worship.
Build a Tabernacle.
Dance–2 Sam. 6:14.
Play on Instruments–2 Sam 6:5.
Infant Members.
Feast Days.

Right Acts

Baptize–( immerse)–Rom. 6 :3.
Christ, our sacrifice.
Pray–Rev. 8:4.
Worship in spirit and truth–Jno. 4:21-23.
Sing–Col. 3:16; Eph. 5:19.
Teach–Acts 2:42; Acts 20:7.
Lord’s Supper Acts 2:42; Acts 20:7.
Give–I Cor. 16:2.

There are many people who do not know how to read the Bible. Many think the Old Testament is in force today. The above passages should show conclusively that it is not. When this is learned people will stop going back before the cross for examples of conversion; stop going back to the Ten Commandments to get the Sabbath day (7th day of the week); and will stop going back after David’s instruments of music. The Lord in the New Covenant tells us what to do to be saved today and how to worship.

A man is indeed inconsistent who will take the stories of Christ forgiving sin in his personal ministry as cases of conversion, and then reject the Jewish Sabbath. He is inconsistent who will take David’s instruments and refuse his dance. The truth is, all are on the wrong side of the cross. David lived under the law of Moses and not under the law of Christ. Since that is true, if it could be proven that David used the instruments with the approval of God, which would not prove that one could use them today with God’s sanction. If he would sanction them he would surely say so in the law he has for us today.

In the personal ministry of Christ he could speak sins forgiven if he so desired; but did he say to me that I could be forgiven like the woman who washed his feet? I must be concerned about the conditions of salvation as they are expressed in the New Testament. In fact, no one would ever have thought about using these stories of Christ’s forgiveness if they had not been trying to get around a plain command; and the commands is, “Be baptized.” Why try to escape a command of God? It certainly would be foolish to so do. Let all be willing to go to the right place for these commands, and then let all be willing to obey them.

Truth Magazine VI, 12, pp 20-21
September 1962

Redeeming the Time

By Thomas C. Mickey

We are living in an age when, it seems, that but few even of the members of the Lord’s church are cognizant of the importance of our “redeeming the time.” I would to God that something could be said or done that would cause Christians to awake to this need. The burden of current problems within the church has heaped discouragement upon the work in many places, thus contributing to indifference. The problems which we are facing serve to emphasize the need for more (as well as more effective) teaching both within and without the church. Let preachers accept this challenge to de-emphasize eloquence and re-emphasize the message. If because of extra-curricular interests less study is to be done in the home, then we must combat this by doing more teaching from the pulpits.

I call your attention in this study to Paul’s words to the Colossians, “Walk in wisdom toward them that are without, redeeming the time.” (Col. 4:5.) Exposition of this passage depends primarily upon consideration of four key words; “wisdom,” “without,” “redeeming,” and “time.”

The word “wisdom” is from sophia (Gr.) and means “wisdom, skill” according to Robert Young. Thayer defines the word as “wisdom, broad and full intelligence.” (page 581, Lexicon.) The term is the same one which is so widely used in I Corinthians 1 and 2. Thayer’s comment on the usage of the word in Col. 4:5 is “a devout and proper prudence in intercourse with men not disciples of Christ.” (ibid, 581.)

Our text, then, teaches that we ought to conduct ourselves wisely toward those who are not Christians. The wisdom that we are to possess is a wisdom that comes from God. James taught that those who lacked wisdom should pray for it. (James 1:5.) He further taught that the wisdom which is from God will manifest itself in an individual through his good behavior (James 3:13) and that a wise man will be pure, peaceable, gentle, easy to be intreated, full of mercy and good fruits, without partiality, and without hypocrisy. (James 3:17.)

We learn that the apostles preached wisdom among those who were perfect. (I Cor. 2:6.) Thus, we are constrained to believe that wisdom may be obtained through study of the word of God. Further, “walking in wisdom” involves the exercise of discretion in addition to humble obedience.

“Without” is from “exo” (Gr.), which literally means “without; outside.” “Without” signifies those who are without the body of Christ, i.e. those who are not Christians. In Colossians 1:13 Paul speaks of being translated into the kingdom of God’s dear Son. Those without are they who have never been translated into this kingdom and they are the ones with whom the apostle is concerned in Col. 4:5.

“Walking in wisdom toward them that are without” involves teaching them the truth. It involves the fulfillment of our Lord’s command in the great commission. “Go ye therefore into all the world and preach the gospel to every creature.” Many will be disappointed to learn that this precept was not spoken for the benefit of preachers alone. This fact is more clearly seen from Matthew’s account of the commission. In Matt. 28:19 the order is (1) teach, (2) baptize, (3) teach to observe. Note the following syllogism:(1) All baptized believers were to be taught to observe “all things whatsoever I have commanded you.” (Mt. 28:19.)

(2) The disciples were commanded to teach. (Mt. 28:19 – Mk. 16:15.)

(3) Therefore, baptized believers are commanded to teach!

While members of the church emphasize the Lord’s Supper and baptism, they are prone to neglect the duties of personal evangelism. It has been said that there are only about twenty-two verses dealing with the responsibility to eat the Lord’s Supper, and only about one hundred and twenty dealing with baptism, but there are over one thousand verses which show the Christians’ responsibilities in teaching the gospel. As we note the word redeeming,” we find it to be composed of two words; “ex” and “agorazo,” thus, “ex-agorazo.” Young defines the term as, “to acquire out of the forum.” Thayer defines it as “to redeem; to buy up.” He says the meaning in Ephesians 5:16 and Colossians 4:5 seems to be “to make a wise and sacred use of every opportunity for doing good.” (Lexicon, p. 220.)

Christians should regard as holy every opportunity to accomplish good. The textual application, of course, deals with opportunities to teach those who are without the body of Christ.

Once Jesus told some men to learn the meaning of an expression: “I will have mercy, and not sacrifice” (Mt. 9:13 et al.) Among other things, it appears to me that this expression reveals that God is not pleased with legalism alone, but that one’s heart and attitudes must also be pleasing. God requires men to love the souls of the lost. If we love the souls of the lost we will work to teach them the truth. Being letter-perfect will not save us unless our hearts are also right. We must be merciful toward the unbelievers and teach them God’s will. To lift an expression from its context, James said, “He shall have judgment without mercy that hath showed no mercy.”

The last key word in the passage is “time” from “kairos” (Gr.) and meaning “A fixed time or season” (Young’s Ana Con.). Time always signifies limitations. Time is a difference between mortality and immortality.

In II Corinthians 6:2 we read … “now is the accepted time; behold, now is the day of salvation.” These words are often cited in pleading with aliens to obey the gospel. But, brethren, if now is the accepted time to obey the gospel, then now is also the accepted time to be teaching the gospel. If we have no guarantee of tomorrow, how hard we must work, for the task is not done; we cannot say, “It is finished.” “…I say unto you, Lift up your eyes, and look on the fields; for they are white already to harvest. And he that reapeth receiveth wages, and gathereth fruit unto life eternal: that both he that soweth and he that reapeth may rejoice together.” (John 4:35-36.)

“See then that ye walk circumspectly, not as fools, but as wise, Redeeming the time, because the days are evil. Wherefore be ye not unwise, but understanding what the will of the Lord is.” (Eph. 5:15-17.)

Truth Magazine VI: 12, pp. 10-13
September 1962

Marriage in the Eyes of God

By Thomas Icard

Many questions have been asked, many tracts and books have been written about this subject. I am simply trying to present what the Bible says about it. I believe the scripture that Paul wrote to Timothy and said, “Every scripture inspired of God is also profitable for teaching, for instruction which is in righteousness that the man of God may be complete, furnished completely unto every good work.” (2 Tim. 3:15-16.) Therefore, I believe all information that is necessary can be given with a “Thus saith the Lord.” I simply point to God’s word and ask you to believe that only. The trouble with the religious world today is simply this: People do not accept God’s word as absolute authority but mix into it their ideas and human creeds. I do not intend to base my convictions on the opinions of people I love and respect.

Let us remember to study God’s word and accept it as it is, not adding or subtracting from it. We can see God’s attitude in Revelation twenty-two and verses eighteen and nineteen. My main concern is what God will think of me in the judgment. My friends will have not the power to put me in or take me from heaven. I must answer to God in that day. Therefore, what he has said is my source of authority. I know that God has given us all the information He wills for us to have on any religious subject. It is good to study about the Bible but better to study the Bible. In I Cor. 13 we find that Paul says of the New Testament “When that which is perfect is come that which is in part will be done away.” Something that is perfect is not lacking in any of its parts. If we believe this, we will accept the scriptures as all sufficient for everything we teach or believe in religion. We find that l’eter tells us in I Peter 3:15, 16, “but sanctify in your hearts Christ as Lord: being ready always to give answer to every man that asketh you a reason concerning the hope that is in you, yet with MEEKNESS and FEAR: having a GOOD CONSCIENCE . . .” The Bible is the book that will give US the answers. We will have these answers if we “Give diligence (study) to present thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, handling aright the word of truth.” Let us do this just now as we gather together all the information and look at the subject of marriage as God has given it to us to study.

Many are teaching today that sexual intercourse is what makes marriage in God’s eyes today. If a man has sexual intercourse with a woman before a marriage ceremony has been performed, then he is married in God’s eye no matter how people look upon it. Let us see if this is true. If so, what would be fornication? The Bible recognizes a difference in fornication and adultery. In I Corinthians 6:9 both words are used to tell the Corinthians that such shall not inherit the kingdom of God. We see then God recognizes a difference in the two.

Webster’s New Collegiate Dictionary

1. Adultery: Voluntary sexual intercourse by a married man with another than his wife or by a married woman with another than her husband. (Page 13.)

2. Fornication: Elicit sexual intercourse on the part of an unmarried person. (Page 326.)If sexual intercourse made marriage, then there would be no such thing as fornication because the ones committing the act would become married in God’s eye. Then the next time he committed the act with someone else it would be adultery. If this were the case, the apostle Paul was wrong in using both words in I Cor. 6:9. Again let us hear what Paul says. Heb. 13:4: “Let marriage be had in honor among all, and let the bed be undefiled: for FORNICATORS and ADULTERI RS God will judge.” A fornicator is not married. Yet to be a fornicator one has to have had sexual intercourse. Someone says, “Oh, but love has to be involved.” I ask for the book, chapter, and verse. I can give book, chapter, and verse to show this is not true. (II Samuel 13: 15.) When Amnon forced his sister Tamar: “Then Amnon hated her with exceeding great hatred, for the hatred wherewith he hated her was greater than the LOVE wherewith he had LOVED her.” Would anyone claim that Tamar was Amnon’s wife? Certainly love existed betwetn these two. A love for the person and fleshly love on Amnon’s part. Again we see the Bible clearly expounding upon the subject. “And if a man entice a virgin that is not betrothed, and lie with her, he shall surely pay a dowry for her to BE his WIFE. If her father utterly refuse to give her unto him, he shall pay money according to the dowry of virgins.” (Ex. 22:16, 17.) When does she become his wife? After he pays the dowry. Again, if her father refuses, she is not his wife. Does this look as if intercourse makes marriage? Deut. 22:28, 29 also give this same law.

Now let us examine the passage of scripture that those holding this conviction use to prove their opinion (I Cor. 6: 16): “Or know ye not that he that is joined to a harlot is one body? For, the twain, saith he, shall become one flesh.” Let us leave this passage of scripture in its context. The apostle is explaining that we cannot remain faithful to Christ and live worldly. It is God’s intended purpose that each man have only one wife. (Matt. 19:4-9, Rom. 7:2-4; I Cor. 7:2.) It is God’s intended purpose that we remain faithful to Christ and him alone. If we serve and subject ourselves to the worldly pleasures, we are not one flesh with Christ but the fornicator or adulterer with the world. I do not believe the scriptures contradict each other and to take this passage to prove that it is authority for the opinion that intercourse makes marriage is to misuse the divine word of truth. How can we do this and honestly condemn the denominational world for doing the same thing with another scripture such as John 3:16?

We can see that God places no difference in the sins of fornication and adultery above or below any other sin. “Or know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with men, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revelers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God. Of such were some of you: but ye were washed, but ye were sanctified, but ye were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ, and in the Spirit of our God.” (1 Cor. 6:9-11.)

But of Gen. 24:67 someone says, “Doesn’t this look as if the intercourse was all that took place here to make marriage between Isaac and Rebekah ? ” Let us recognize the circumstances involved here. Were there any civil laws binding on Isaac and Rebekah at the period of time they were living? No. After the giving of the Law of Moses, there were certain laws given. Today we have civil laws given concerning marriage. God expects his people to obey the civil laws. (Rom. 13.) If we had no law of marriage in our country, then we could practice and follow the example of Isaac and Rebekah; but we do have laws of marriage and God commands that these laws (civil laws) be obeyed unless they conflict with His law. Marriage in the eyes of God takes place when both civil as well as religious law be obeyed. Anyone who engages in sexual intercourse today without a legal marriage license is either a fornicator or/and adulterer depending on whether he is legally married or not. He has violated God’s divine plan. (I Cor. 7:2; Rom. 13.) Anyone that violates God’s law is to be rebuked. Titus 2:15 gives me authority to rebuke or reprove. “These things speak and exhort and REPROVE with all AUTHORITY. Let no man despise thee.” If I have something against my brother, the Lord exhorts me to go to that brother. (Matt. 5:23.) In Matt 18:15-17: “And if thy brother sin against thee, go, show him his fault between thee and him alone: if he hear thee, thou hast gained thy brother. But if he hears thee not, take with thee one or two or more, that at the mouth of two witnesses or three every word may be established. And if he refuse to hear them, tell it to the church: and if he refuse to hear the church also, let him, be unto thee as the Gentile and the publican.”

Truth Magazine VI, 12, pp. 22-23
September 1962

Interesting Notes About Churches

By  Tarheel State

The church of Christ meeting on Ridgeway Road near Leaksville, North Carolina, had its beginning as a Christian Church in 1947. But the members soon learned the truth about the Lord’s church. They put instrumental music out of their worship and rejected societies doing the work of the church.

Many members left with the instrument, but a sufficient number were convinced of the truth and stood up for their convictions concerning the all-sufficiency of the scriptures and the Lord’s church. They removed all things for which they did not have a “thus saith the Lord.”

The Ridgeway Road church suffered through many problems incurred in their rejection of the Christian Church movement. But they weathered the storms.

Having rejected Christian Church innovations it was natural for them to steer clear of innovations like centralization of authority and funds, and church support of institutions. Brother Charles Crider worked with the group for three years and helped the brethren to a sturdy and sound stand against these innovations. Opposition to these innovations also brought many problems in the way of opposition from other congregations. But Ridgeway Road weathered these storms too.

J. O. Walter presently labors with this church and is working well with the brethren in an effort to spread truth and reach lost souls.

Truth Magazine VI, 12, p. 24
September 1962