Truth Magazine

By Dick Blackford

Playboys are carefree and give the impression that they have total confidence that they have everything under control. But things are not as they seem. Should we all relax in the comfort that the “liberated” know what they are doing? Is ignorance really bliss or is it dangerous and destructive? Among the things most playboys don’t want to know are:

1. That VD is no longer epidemic, it is pandemic! That means it is out of control. Daily bad news is reported. In recent days the following information has emanated from the media. “Bacteria that causes gonorrhea are quickly developing resistance to another antibiotic, and the world may be running out of drugs to cure this common venereal disease” (Messenger-Inquirer, 7/30/87). “More than one in 10 Americans surveyed said they have personally known someone who has tested positive for A IDS virus, contracted AIDS, or died of the disease” (M&I, 7/30/87). “The chances of herpes sufferers contracting AIDS are triple the chances of those without herpes” (M&I, 7/30/87). These reports are from three different articles from the Associated Press.

Less than three decades ago only two such diseases were prominent. The number is now near 40. Solomon warned of the consequences that often follow fornication. “And thou mourn at the last, when thy flesh and thy body are consumed” (Prov. 5:11). David evidently referred to a sexually transmitted disease. “There is no soundness in my flesh . . . neither is there any rest in my bones because of my sin. . . My wounds stink and are corrupt because of my foolishness. I am troubled; I am bowed down greatly; I go mourning all the day long. For my loins are filled with a loathsome disease: and there is no soundness in my flesh” (Psa. 38:7-9).

Surgeon General C. Everett Koop has said: “When you have sex with someone, you must realize that, from the standpoint of disease, you are having sex with everyone that person has had sex with for the last 10 years, along with all the partners that those partners have had.”

2. That lust is the enemy of love. True love puts the welfare of others first. Lust puts selfish interests first and others last. The playboy who keeps score of sexual conquests is not doing anyone a favor when the rampage of VD with its crippling and killing abilities is considered. Through suave and shrewd means of persuasion he ruins one’s spiritual and moral standing before God. His high-mindedness harms himself and others. He is a loser. Young lady, “Be not deceived: Evil companionships corrupt good morals” (1 Cor. 15:33). Don’t be tricked into thinking that lust is love. True love is a commitment. That commitment is called marriage.

3. That pornography encourages sex crimes. Playboys don’t want to know that forcible rape increased 57 percent during the ten year period of 1965-1975.

“The city of Austin, Texas instituted an intensive study of adult entertainment and its effects upon the community. The results indicate a substantial increase in crime, particularly sex-related crimes in the area where adult bookstore are located. Sex-related crimes in the areas where there are no bookstores range from 65 to 88 percent below the city crime average. In contrast, sex-related crimes in the areas where the adult bookstores are located are substantially higher than the city-wide average, ranging from 117 percent to 482 percent higher” (Pulse, 10/86).

With the increase of pornography has also come an increase in the stealing of children who are later used for porno purposes. Over 50,000 children are known to have been so used since 1983.

If what one reads does not influence his thinking then why is the advertising industry one of the largest industries in every nation? The answer is obvious. They know people are influenced by what they see. That’s why most successful businesses are the ones that advertise. It is not a matter of whether pornography influences. The question is, does it influence for good or evil? Does it motivate the exalting of women or the raping of women? Why does a brewery repeatedly spend millions of dollars for a one minute TV commercial during the Super Bowl? It has been proven that such encourages drinking. Playboys don’t want to admit the obvious. Nor do they want to admit that organized crime is the major investor and supplier of smut.

4. That pornography contributes to the decay and downfall of nations. The breakdown of the home through divorce was the number one reason for the downfall of the Roman Empire, according to Edward Gibbon, author of The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire (in five volumes). Men are not encouraged to be more faithful husbands by viewing pornography. Porno entices one to experiment beyond the bounds of a lawful marriage and outside of marriage. A high percentage of homes break up because a third party becomes involved. Since the home is the very foundation of society, destroying it causes the nation to crumble – just as destroying the foundation of a building will cause it to fall.

Conclusion

Those who follow the Playboy philosophy live as though there is nothing but a physical realm, ignoring that there is a moral/spiritual realm. This philosophy treats women as things – as mere objects, not as people. Nothing is farther from the truth than the idea that women like to be exploited, used, and abused. And nothing is as clear a violation of the Golden Rule than the Playboy philosophy.

Fornication is a sin against God. Joseph said, “How then can I do this great wickedness and sin against God?” (Gen. 39:9) It is a sin against self. “He who commits sexual immorality sins against his own body” (1 Cor. 6:18).

God has called us all to a higher and nobler purpose than the animal world. He has placed sex in the boundaries of marriage where it is lawful, right, good and wholesome. Therefore, “Flee fornication” (1 Cor. 6:18).

Guardian of Truth XXXI: 21, pp. 647-648
November 5, 1987

By Rodney Miller

“In living color” used to be the standard line for the films and television shows of the age when “Black and White” entertainment was dying out. Without a doubt “living color” does add a great deal to the reality of any event. So it is with our Bible study. We need to see the very things that the biblical writer saw. We need to feel the emotions that participants in the narratives felt. All in all, we need to perceive the Bible as real live history that happened to people just like us. In short, we need to “see it in living color.”

As we seek to discern the cross of our Lord we need, as maybe in no other event, to see it in “living color.” There were four major colors of the cross that vividly race across the screen and grab our attention.

Black

I. The first color at the cross was black because it was sin that nailed him there. Mark 15:33 tells us that darkness fell over the whole land until the ninth hour. We sing the song, “My sin, oh the bliss of this glorious thought. My sin not in part, but the whole. Is nailed to this cross and I bear it no more, Praise the Lord, Praise the Lord, oh my soul.”

Yes, sins of the night time, sins of the day time, sins of school, sins of work, sins of business and sins of pleasure, sins of eyes, hands, feet and ears. Sins that mountains can’t hide, that oceans can’t drown and that fire can’t burn. They are all nailed to his cross and we bear them no more. And because of all that sin there were charred marks around the cross of titanic struggle between good and evil. The earth quaked and the sound of grinding rocks was heard. The black darkness fell and the sun refused to show its face. This is the same sun that watched 780,000 died in the Crimean wars, that saw only 20,000 short of 800,000 die in our civil wars. The same sun that witnessed 32 million die in the wars of Gingus Kan. It watched 80 million die in the crusader war and over 180 million fall to the slashing sword of the Roman legion. That same sun observed 25 million die of the black plague in the 14th century and in London in one day saw 74,000 fall to the plaque. But that sun could not watch one single, lonely man die; it could not shine.

The blackness at the cross shows that God is deadly serious about my sin. Yes, he is serious about yours as well and about those lost in the erring religious world and about those dulled and numbed by pagan lust and pleasure but yet, the cross says that he is serious about my sin. It was my sin that platted that crown of thorns, that drove the spikes into his feet and that caused the spittle to dry on his face. As we hear his groaning in the seven statements from the cross we can know that God is serious about sin.

When Adam was expelled from the garden and the presence of God it was to tell me that God was serious about sin. The mark was emblazoned on Cain to show me that God would not tolerate sin. The voice of the prophets thundered God’s disapproval with sin. But none of it was enough! It was not until the Holy Spirit revealed in the inspired pages the blackness of sin by way of the cross that I can really see what I have done. As the owner of a dog who has killed one too many chickens rubs the dog’s face in the stench of the dead chicken so does the Spirit of God force me to see the blackness of my sin.

White

II. The second color was white because of the purity of the sacrifice. Nowhere do we see the purity of Jesus any plainer than that in the Hebrew letter. The Christian to whom the Hebrew writer is speaking has given every thing up for his Lord. But when they are called on to do it again they are in danger of shrinking back to destruction in their faith (Heb. 10:38,39). So to motivate them to hold fast the writer says, “Consider Jesus” (3:1). But what did they see when they focused in on Jesus?

Tempted in all points like we are yet without sin (4:15). They saw a High Priest “holy, harmless, undefiled, separated from sinners, and made higher than the heavens” (7:26).

He was the most sensitive man to ever live. It is sin that hardens man so that he does not feel the pain of sin or does not see the vulgarness of sin. So he without sin was made sin on our behalf. One of the greatest miscarriages of human justice is when one who is innocent is charged and punished for the crime that he did not commit. Our Lord was totally innocent. When Satan called for the Lamb to bear my sin it was Jesus of Nazareth that stepped up and stood in my place. Every time I stand at the crossroads of temptation and choose lust, pride or materialism he stood at the same crossroads and chose righteousness. Every mistake of oversight that I commit he stood at the same opportunity and never forgot. He was perfect, not just good, or not just better but perfect. He is Lord simply because he deserves to be.

Red

III. The third color at the cross was red because of the blood that was shed. John 19:24 says, “There came forth blood and water.” Because of sin there had always been death and to symbolize death there has always been the shedding of blood. The Hebrew writer contrasts the Old Covenant with the New Covenant in the function of the priesthood. The Old Testament priest had to offer sacrifices daily because of sin. “And every priest stands daily ministering and offering time after time the same sacrifices which can never take away sin.” Notice three expressions that speak of the daily repetition of the sacrifices: (1) “stands daily,” (2) “offering time after time,” (3) “the same sacrifices.” But not so with Jesus Christ. “He once for all” offered himself up to be the sacrifice (7:27).

It was been well said that when Jesus Christ entered the Holy Place not made with hands that there was a rustling of the pages of the Law by the collective sign of all the priests that daily stood to offer the sacrifices. When a priest served in his course in the temple he would slaughter well over 100 animals a day! He would labor all day long covered in blood. His skin would be stained with blood. His nostrils would be caked with dried blood. The stench of blood would not leave his nostrils or his skin. He would serve in blood up to his elbows because sin demanded death and death demanded blood.

When one tells us that baptism is not important or necessary for salvation they are missing one of the colors seen at the cross. When the heavy drops of the Savior’s blood fell like a boulder to the ground, they formed a puddle beneath the cross that was red. And when one is baptized into his death, he comes in contact with the blood. When the blood of Jesus was shed at the cross, the Hebrew writer then says “it is finished.” The debt has been paid and redemption is real. It is totaled. It is complete.

Gold

IV. Finally the fourth color was gold because it was lined with forgiveness. Romans 5:8 says, “For God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for our sins.” The one factor that motivated our Lord, “was the joy set before him, he endured the cross.” That joy is the love of sinners and the willingness to forgive. A story that illustrates this type of love is that of the skid row drunk. A bum who smelled bad and was vermin covered. But he lived to tell the story that when “I was on the wagon I was a very successful business man.” Of course his fellow drunks did not believe one word of his often repeated story. One day in frustration he saw a long shiny limousine drive by slowly and stop. When the chauffeur opened the back door for the occupant the fellow could not stand it any more. “See him,” he cried, “He was my partner in business.” “So, if that is the case then go over there and get a hand full of money,” they chided him. As he walked up to the limousine, he covered his mouth and simply asked the fellow to act like you know me. It did not take long for the limousine occupant to size up what was going on. He opened up his arms and spoke in a loud voice, “Well, where have you been? It is so good to see you.” He took him in the limousine and bought him a new suit and good meal and put money in his pocket and then took him back to the street corner.

Now isn’t that like our Lord? He has forgiven me, a skid row bum. The death of Jesus was the golden crown of love and forgiveness holding out a crucified and bloody body to the hands of deeply entrenched hatred. The death of God not only says that God loves us, but it plainly tells us that God longs for us to love him in return. He loves and forgives not because I am so wonderful. We all know that we are not. I know what I am and you know what you are. And with all our prayers, songs, and suppers we know we still have lust, arrogance, materialism, covetousness, jealousy and envy rooted in our hearts. So it is not our greatness that draws him to us. Rather it is his greatness in love and forgiveness that draws him to us.

Conclusion

Without question it was a multicolored day at the cross. The cross was black because of sin. (2) It was white because of his total perfection. (3) It was red for the blood he shed. (4) It was golden because of his love and forgiveness.

Guardian of Truth XXXI: 20, pp. 635-636
October 15, 1987

By Mike Willis

The article appeared on page D-22, the last page of 30 September 1987 issue of The Indianapolis Star. The story was not headline news; rather it appeared under the section “People & Things.” A much needed lesson lies hidden in the story which I here reproduce and concerning which I now make comment.

Larry Flynt, the wheelchair-bound Hustler magazine publisher, had to be rushed to Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles and have his stomach pumped after taking an overdose of drugs.

An ambulance raced to Flynt’s Hollywood Hills home just before 4 a.m. Tuesday to help Flynt, 44. He was later reported to be in stable condition. Hospital officials wouldn’t say what sort of drugs he had taken but a police spokesman said Flynt’s daughter, Lisa, 20, told officers that the overdose was an accident.

Flynt has been despondent since the death of his fourth wife, Althea, 33, who had AIDS and was found dead in a bathtub of the couple’s mansion on June 28. The Los Angeles County corner ruled she had accidentally drowned after taking drugs.

Althea once said Larry started taking drugs for the pain he suffered from an assassination attempt and that she started doing the same “to be like him.”

There is no rejoicing in any human’s suffering. Surely Larry Flynt is suffering! He is paralyzed as a result of an assassination attempt; he has endured three divorces; his wife suffered from AIDS; she drowned as a result of an overdose of drugs; he is despondent; he nearly died as a result of an overdose of drugs.

A Victim of His Own Lifestyle

Larry Flynt’s suffering has largely come as a result of his own free choice to live in defiance of the will of God. The Scriptures clearly forewarn mankind that sin leaves one’s life a shattered mess.

The fear of the Lord prolongeth days; but the years of the wicked shall be shortened (Prov. 10:27).

. . . the perverseness of transgressors shall destroy them (Prov. 11:3).

. . . the wicked shall fall by his own wickedness (Prov. 11:5).

. . . he that is cruel troubleth his own flesh (Prov. 11:17).

Behold, the righteous shall be recompensed in the earth: much more the wicked and the sinner (Prov. 11:31).

Whoso despiseth the word shall be destroyed (Prov. 13:13).

. . . every one that heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them not, shall be likened unto a foolish man, which built his house upon the sand: and the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that house; and it fell: and great was the fall of it (Matt. 7:26,27).

Mr. Flynt’s life has been spent in editing, publishing, and selling pornography. The Hustler magazine which he edits is reputed to be more hard core than Playboy or Penthouse. He has fought several court battles defending his civil right to publish and sell pornography. During these years, he amassed a financial empire. However, his financial successes have not protected him from divorce, his wife from AIDS or drug addiction.

He has sown to the wind and is now reaping the whirlwind. Like the prodigal son who found himself eating pig’s food, Flynt is suffering the fruits of his own choice of lifestyle. Flynt’s life is not attractive at the present. Whereas some might have looked at the way of sinners with envy while they are enjoying the pleasures of sin (Heb. 11:25), they are not envious when sinners reap the bitter harvest of sin. “The way of transgressors is hard” (Prov. 13:15).

God has given men free will. He has the power to choose good or evil. Our country has given man the liberty to choose whatever lifestyle pleases him. He can choose to believe in God and worship without governmental intervention. He can choose to reject God and wallow in moral filth. However, man cannot choose whether or not to accept the consequences of his choice. The consequences of our choices are inevitable. The man who chooses to be a homosexual cannot choose not to be separated from God by his sin and be susceptible to contacting the AIDS virus. These are the consequences of the lifestyle which one chooses.

The Deceitful Devil

As we witness the fall of Larry Flynt, we are also reminded that the Devil works to destroy the souls of man by promising fun, joy, happiness, and prosperity. He delivers sorrow, heartache, death, and destruction. Based on this newspaper clipping, would you conclude that Larry Flynt is happy? Although he has a financial empire, he does not appear to have inner peace, true joy, and contentment. His three divorces, confinement to a wheelchair, use of drugs, witnessing the suffering from AIDS and premature death of his wife (because of drowning while under the influence of drugs), and own despondency leads me to conclude that Larry Flynt is a miserable man. Should there be someone looking toward sin with longing eyes, thinking of how much fun he could have as a sinner, I would hope that Larry Flynt’s suffering would serve as a warning to him. Larry Flynt is the product which the Playboy lifestyle produces.

Jesus reminded us that the Devil “was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it” (Jn. 8:44). The Devil is working to slay Larry Flynt, just as he worked to slay Adam and continues to attack me and you. His purpose in life is to destroy the souls of men. He will promise man anything to accomplish that purpose. To prevent being deceived by the Devil’s promises, we must be sober and vigilant.

Affliction To Save From Eternal Death

We can be thankful that God has chosen to hedge in the way of the wicked with thorns and thistles. The sorrow which such suffering brings will save a few souls from eternal death. Only when the prodigal son was suffering the consequences of his sinful choices did he come to himself and return to his father. The destruction of the flesh which sin brings has the salvation of the soul as its goal (1 Cor. 5:5). If Larry Flynt can realize that his sorrow and suffering are a result of his disobedience to God, perhaps he might be led to the repentance without which no one can be saved. We hope that his heart is not so hardened by sin that even this cannot bring him to repentance.

The Forgiveness of God

The good news of Christ is that forgiveness is available to every sinner, whether he be the self-righteous Pharisee (Lk. 18:11-12), the woman caught in the act of adultery (Jn. 8:1-11), the drug pusher, or the kingpin of a pornography empire. In his grace and mercy, God provides pardon for sinners. “The Lord is merciful and gracious, slow to anger, and plenteous in mercy. He will not always chide: neither will he keep his anger for ever. He hath not dealt with us after our sin; nor rewarded us according to our iniquities. For as the heaven is high above the earth, so great is his mercy toward them that fear him. As far as the east is from the west, so far hath he removed our transgressions from us. Like as a father pitieth his children, so the Lord pitieth them that fear him” (Psa. 103:8-13).

This is not a cheap grace. On God’s part the sacrifice of his Son on Calvary was necessary for the pardon to be effected. The sacrifice of the blood of animals could not atone for sin. The sacrifice of an ordinary man could not atone for sin inasmuch as man could only die for his own sins. The only way for atonement to be effected was by God to come in the form of a man and to sacrifice himself for sin.

This is not a cheap grace. Man’s forgiveness depends upon his repentance of sin. God does not offer to Larry Flynt (nor us) a forgiveness which allows him to continue publishing his pornographic magazine, to use body-destroying and mind-enslaving drugs, to divorce and remarry for any reason at all, or to abide in any sin. Forgiveness is conditioned upon repentance – a resolution to turn away from the practice of any sin and to turn toward the love and service of God. Larry Flynt cannot be a born again, saved, pornography publisher. If Larry Flynt is born again or saved, he will be come the former pornography publisher!

Conclusion

We would hope that this article would have a happy ending – an ending announcing that Larry Flynt had repented of his sins and obeyed the gospel. Knowing how sin entangles and enslaves, the likelihood of that ever happening is remote. Consequently, to hope that someone could benefit from reading what the Scriptures say about the way of the transgressor as he sees displayed in one man’s life the effect of sin is more realistic. I hope that good has been accomplished through this article.

Guardian of Truth XXXI: 21, pp. 646, 660-661
November 5, 1987

By L.A. Stauffer

“Enemies of the cross of Christ” is a thought that boggles the mind. Unimaginable! How could anyone oppose the most loving and unselfish act of human history?

The “cross of Christ” denotes the purposed, planned, voluntary death of Jesus to bear in his body the sins of the world (1 Pet. 2:24). He died not because he was a criminal, not because he was a sinner – but as a gift of God’s grace to atone for sin (Rom. 5:15).

“Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends” (Jn. 14:13). But Jesus laid down his life for enemies, for ungodly sinners, for murderers, liars, thieves, whoremongers, homosexuals, drunkards, child abusers, wife beaters, con-artists, and every despicable creature who has marred and effaced the God-like soul with which he was endowed (see Rom. 5:6-8).

Jesus did not die because men had the power to arrest him and nail him to the cross. He could have called twelve legions of angels to protect him, lest he dash his foot against a stone (Mt. 26:53; 4:6). He suffered the horrors of the cross because he decided to, because he willed to, because he was compassionate toward a wretched and doomed humanity (Rom. 7:24; 6:23; Rev. 21:8). What an act of selfless concern for others! He became poor that men might become rich (2 Cor. 8:9; Phil. 2:5-8).

The result of the cross for those in Christ is reconciliation to God. The fellowship with God that was broken because of sin was restored in Christ, through his blood, by the cross (Eph. 2:13-18). “Being therefore justified by faith, we have peace with God, through our Lord Jesus Christ” (Rom. 5:1). Does anyone wonder, then, why Paul knew nothing “save us Christ, and him crucified” (1 Cor. 2:2)? The “word of the cross” is unto men “who are saved . . . the power of God” (1 Cor. 1:18).

Why, then, should the cross of Christ have enemies? It has enemies because of ignorance, deception, unbelief, and self-indulgence. The life or teaching of anyone who hinders faith in the word of the cross, who perverts the meaning of the cross, or turns men away from the benefits of the cross is an enemy of the cross. This holds true for the first century and for today.

The First Century

l. Self-Indulgence. Paul mentioned enemies of the cross of Christ in the first century when he wrote to the church at Philippi. “For many walk, ” he says, “of whom I told you often, and now tell you even weeping, that they are the enemies of the cross of Christ: whose end is perdition, whose god is the belly, and whose glory is in their shame, who mind earthly things” (Phil. 3:18,19).

Who these people were specifically is immaterial to the purpose at hand. Whether Judaizers whose confidence was in the flesh (see verses 4ff) or antinomians who were consumed by fleshly passions, they were folks whose citizenship was not in heaven and who looked not to Jesus for salvation (see v. 20). Minding earthly things, serving the desires of the flesh (belly), and glorying in shameful deeds are antagonistic to Christ. The trail of spiritual destruction they leave brings tears to dedicated servants of the cross.

Other enemies of the cross are discussed by Paul in his first letter to the Corinthian church. Speaking of both Jews and Gentiles, Paul wrote: “Seeing that Jews ask for signs, and Greeks seek after wisdom: but we preach Christ cruci/led, unto Jews a stumbling block, and unto Gentiles foolishness” (1 Cor. 1:22,23).

2. Jews. The Jews looked for a Messiah of physical power. To them the cross was a sign of weakness. Even as Christ died, they challenged him to save himself, to come down from the cross if he be the Son of God (Mt. 27:40-43). How could their Savior be captured, bound hand and foot, and crucified as a common criminal? The death of Jesus was a stumbling block for the Jews, who became chief foes of the cross. Jesus is rejected as the anointed one of Old Testament Scripture. Yet, those Scriptures portray the Christ as a lamb led to the slaughter, as the servant of God whose hands and feet would be pierced, as the one whose soul must temporarily be captured by death and Hades (Isa. 53:7; Psa. 22:16; 16: 10). They did not see in the cross God’s power to save.

The Jews rejected Christ, sought by the law to establish their own righteousness, and sealed their doom (Rom. 10:13). Even the Jews who believed in Christ added circumcision, the feast days, and other commands of the law to the cross of Christ. In so doing they became adversaries of the cross, perverted the gospel, made it void, and caused themselves and Gentiles to fall from grace (Gal. 1:6-9; 5:14).

3. Gentiles. The Gentiles, who longed for wisdom, were not better. To them, the cross was foolishness. When Paul preached the Messiah at Athens, they mocked (Acts 17:32). They looked for a more profound system of thought. Greeks searched for the ultimate philosophy and drew men away from the efficacy of the Savior’s death.

Some Gentiles thought they found that philosophy in Gnosticism, an amalgamation of Christianity, Greek wisdom and Oriental speculation. Gnosticism, for example, preached a special gnosis (knowledge). They taught that men by mystical experience could obtain spiritual enlightenment directly from God and be redeemed by absorption of their spirits into deity. The philosophy saw no need for the cross, for apostolic revelation, and the sanctified life. Many were taken captive by it and became enemies of the cross (Col. 2:8-10; 1 John).

The Twentieth Century

The hostile views of both Jews and Gentiles are maintained even in modern times. But beyond these views are a variety of others that can be stated but briefly.

1. Humanist Infidels. The cross of Christ has no meaning to humanistic infidels of today. Christ in their view was just a human being and no such thing as divine revelation exists. Man, they affirm, is the center of the universe; all wisdom emanates from him and for him. Heaven, they say, is a figment of man’s imagination; life is limited to this earth. There is, then, no need for salvation. The highest good is what benefits man here and now. What good, therefore, is death on a cross by a human being some twenty centuries ago? They are antagonistic to faith in God, Christ, the Scriptures, and the power of the cross. The cross, they believe, is meaningless.

2. Modernists. Modernists, despite their avowed faith, are infidels themselves. Jesus, in their thinking, is merely human. Since he is not viewed as God, his death cannot be an atonement for sin. They would accept him as a martyr, but view his death as the gift of himself to principles above self-interest. The atonement idea is theological garbage, arising from superstitious, paganistic religion. Jesus’ death, accordingly, is an example, a pattern of unselfish love in which he sacrificed himself for a greater good. No one is led by them to faith in the power of the cross for forgiveness, but to faith in Christ as an example of self-denial in the interest of others.

3. Millennialists. Dispensationalists accept the cross of Christ as an atoning sacrifice, but it is far from central to their theology. Sacrificial atonement, for “ample, was not the purpose of Jesus’ coming. The spiritual kingdom purchased by his blood (Rev. 5:9,10) is secondary to the demonstration of earthly-kingdom rule, a rule postponed, they affirm, until his return. Jesus’ death, by this theory, was not intentional but incidental or accidental. The spiritual kingdom came only because Christ was rejected by the Jews. Jesus must now come again to accomplish what he really set out to do in the first place: to restore the Jewish kingdom and fulfill the land promise to the Jews. The theory is Judaistic, a perversion of the gospel, and a rejection of the sufficiency of the cross and the spiritual kingdom.

4. Calvinists. All Calvinists do not accept the theory of “limited atonement, ” but some do. The disgraceful view that the Sovereign God particularly selected some to salvation and others to damnation is the basis for a distorted gospel. Christ, they say, did not taste of death for every man and was not a propitiation for the sins of the whole world (Heb. 2:9; 1 Jn. 2:1,2). Such enemies of the cross have turned many from the gospel in disgust. The gospel Jesus taught, is for all and all by their own choice may benefit from its offer of salvation (Mt. 11:28-30; Mk. 16:15, 16).

5. Denominationalism Denominational bodies of every sort have offered salvation to the world by “faith alone.” Since the days of Martin Luther, men have been deceived into believing that the benefits of the cross come to men before and without baptism; this despite the fact that men are not only baptized into Christ, but are baptized into his death (Rom. 6:3,4; Gal. 3:26,27). If man is saved by faith alone, he is saved outside Christ and without the power of the cross. In Christ men are reconciled to God by the cross, and teachers who distort this basic idea are hostile to God’s scheme for redemption.

6. Moralists. A host of moralists who, like the Jews, seek to establish their own righteousness by works have turned men away from the cross of Christ. Being good to one’s wife, doing an honest day’s work for a day’s pay, seeking a neighbor’s good, and giving to charitable organizations are a few of the standards men have set up as the means of justification before God. The cross is eliminated and God’s grace is made void. Need for the word of the cross by men like Cornelius, a just and devout man, has taught them nothing (see Acts 10:1,2,22,48; 11:13,14).

7. Eucharistic Mass. No one seemingly highlights the value of the cross more than Catholicism. Crosses and crucifixes are a ritualistic part of their superstitious paraphernalia. They cling to these wood or silver or gold emblems in every dire emergency. And at each mass is a re-enactment of the sacrifice of Christ. This “unbloody” offering points Catholics to a ceremony concocted and designed by men, rather than to the real sacrifice that was offered “once” for all (Heb. 9:24-26). Any re-offering of Christ is a reflection upon the sufficiency of the sacrifice originally offered. Belief that salvation comes through the priest and his alleged powers to call up the body and blood of Christ for re-offering is faith in the doctrines and commandments of men rather than in Christ and the word of the cross.

Space denies opportunity to speak of sprinkling for baptism, infant baptism, hypocrites in the church, division and a host of other religious conditions and viewpoints. Any system of thought or way of life that draws or repels men from the cross of Christ severs them from the atoning power that God graciously manifested for the salvation of the world. Such views and lifestyles are enemies of God and the cross, and in eternity will reap sudden destruction from the face of God and the glory of his might (2 Thess. 1:7-9).

Guardian of Truth XXXI: 20, pp. 639-640
October 15, 1987