Have Ye Not Read?

By Hoyt H. Houchen

Question: Why do brethren sometimes have such a hard time getting along with one another?

Reply: At the root of dissension is the devil. We must always be aware that he is around and active (1 Pet. 5:8). He is pleased when he can divide brethren. He is very pleased if he can cause brethren to fuss, feud and fight because that weakens the church. The devil is opposed to Christ and there is nothing he had rather do than destroy His church. Continued bickering and strife will soon destroy the church in any community. Paul warned the Galatian brethren, “But if ye bite and devour one another, take heed that ye be not consumed one of another” (Gal. 5:15). Biting denotes the wounding effect of wranglings and continuous devouring depicts destruction. This is certainly incompatible with love. The Hebrew writer urged his readers, “Let love of the brethren continued” (Heb. 13:1). Hate engenders strife and division; love engenders peace and harmony. The devil wants the former; God wants the latter.

Selfishness is a major reason for brethren not getting along with one another. Usually, trouble results because somebody wants to have his own way about something. He is not willing to abide by the wishes of others in matters of judgment. We have enough worldly forces and religious error to combat, without fighting among ourselves. There is a small church in Colorado which only recently has suffered its third split. What must the community think when it witnesses such conduct among those who call themselves Christians? Such situations are deplorable.

When brethren truly love one another and manifest a spirit of humility they will be able to get along with one another. Unity will prevail. Jesus said to His disciples, “A new commandment I give unto you, that ye love one another; even as I have loved you, that ye also love one another. By this shall all men know that ye are my disciples, if ye love one another” (Jn. 13:34,35).

To show that selfishness is a source of dissension, James asked his readers: “Whence come wars and whence came fightings among you? Come they not hence, even of your pleasures that war in your members? Ye lust, and have not: ye kill, and covet, and cannot obtain: ye fight and war; ye have not, because ye ask not” (Jas. 4:1,2). Wars and fightings among men come from their pleasures, the desire to have their lusts gratified. Their lust is often for power. They want to rule and have their say. Their lust is for a place of prominence and influence. They covet what others have. These are the basic causes of fighting. This is not only true of men in the world, but sadly it is true of some in the church. Clashes among brethren will cease only when self is sacrificed in the interest of others. Prayer is often amiss, and thus not granted. Too often men do not pray for what is best but for what they want in order to satisfy their own selfish desires and interests. Prayers should be constantly offered in behalf of others in the interest of good will and harmony. Brethren should never forget to pray. One commentator made the statement, “there are not only unanswered prayers, there are also unasked prayers!” There is power in prayer. James wrote, “The supplication of a righteous man availeth much in its working” (Jas. 5:16).

If brethren are to get long with each other, they must make an effort to do so. When brethren manifest love, a spirit of humility and work in the interest of peace, they can get along and the devil will not have his way.

Guardian of Truth XXX: 24, p. 741
December 18, 1986

Worshiping God Acceptably

By Jimmy Tuten

Introduction:

1. In the church we have placed great emphasis upon worshiping God acceptably according to the N.T. pattern. We have engaged only in those things that are authorized in the Word of God. This is right and it should continue.

2. It is apparent, however, that we have overlooked some other aspects of worship that are also important.

(a) Simply going through a form of worship, even if it is the correct form, is insufficient to please God.

(b) Our lives and our attitudes must be acceptable (cf. Judah, who worshiped according to the Law, but their lives did not measure up to the standard). So God rejected their worship (Isa. 1:10-17).

3. When we draw nigh to worship God, we should realize that while we live always in His presence, we are drawing near to Him in a very special way. We assemble together for the specific purpose of calling on His name in prayer offering up songs of praise to Him and studying His Holy Word.

4. To help facilitate this, preparation is required on the part of the song leader and those in the assembly. The assembly should be in readiness for the announcing of the first songs and join heartily in the singing. The song leader should select and conduct the singing of songs that the assembly knows and can sing.

5. Since worship, just like any other important event in our lives, requires preparation in order that we might enter into it fully and in a manner well-pleasing to the One who is worshiped, certain suggestions should be followed. This will insure that our worship is correct and that we are getting the greatest strength from it.

Body:

I. Look at some stumbling blocks to meaningful worship.

A. Ritualism. If our worship is cold, formal, mechanical and/or ceremonial, then this involves ritualism. It means that we have fallen into a rut by having the same order and procedure each time we meet (explain). Worship becomes a mere routine each Sunday. Then we go away thinking we are right with God for another week. God forbid!

1. Mal. 1: 7-13.

2. Is God’s name honored by routine, half-hearted prayers, for “ample? Do we rob Him of our offerings? Do we believe that any empty gesture is acceptable to Him when we come before Him?

B. General distractions. Judging from the way some behave, some view worship like a social event where one can come and go as he sees fit. Some make it a note writing period, some giggle at the imperfections of our singing, etc., while others seek rest quite literally and have to be resurrected by their mates, while others are too busy playing peek-a-boo with the sweet babies to worship acceptably. Add to this the fact that the nursery is abused by making it a play pen for children and a chatting session for mothers, and one can see why worship has lost its punch.

C. Limited concepts. Some feel that you have to sing all verses of all songs before the songs are accepted. Others feel that you can’t use normal pronouns in addressing God (“this is disrespectful,” we are told). You must use “thee,” “thou,” “thy,” and “thine” or prayer is too chummy or buddy-buddy with God. By some quirk of reasoning the King’s language of the KJV is the only scriptural language now! To some in the 80’s the Old English of 1611 is degrading and we have no right to bind a foolish opinion on another (one has a personal right to use the KJV terminology, if he so desires, but not to bind it on others).

D. Late comers and early leavers. Few will seek their places in the midst of prayer. Yet, some think nothing of doing this during singing. Too, it is a shame to see some coming in late Sunday after Sunday, with the same old excuses as if nothing has been done that is wrong. And what a migration takes place at the rear of the building after the last song is sung. Even before the “Amen” books start falling into the racks with a chatter. When the “Amen” does come, the dash for the doors is as if someone yelled “fire!” With such distractions it is no wonder the worship has become a drudgery for some.

E. Sin. When we are involved in sin our prayers, songs, etc. are hindered. Our communion troubles our souls, the Word of the Lord pierces our hearts and our guilt cries out against us (Jas. 4:7-10).

1. Isa. 59:1-2.

2. God lashes out at such an abomination (Isa. 1:11-17).

F. Brethren, let’s remove these stumbling blocks. To refuse to do so is to sin against the brethren and God (1 Cor. 8:12). Let’s honor the Father and find strength by making worship meaningful!

II. Stepping-stones to meaningful worship.

A. An awareness of God. Israel and Isaiah trembled as they approached God (Isa. 6:5). Thunder, lightening, smoke, earthquakes and rumbling waters are symbols used to picture man’s feelings in the presence of God.

1. Our greatest problem: lack of awareness concerning God’s presence. This is due to the “me and me alone” mentality. We need a fresh recognition of the holiness, wrath, power, majesty, grace and compassion of God (“a mighty fortress is our God”).

2. Another problem is our limited view of God. To some God seems to be a forgetful, gentle, old grandfather who smiles at almost every sin in the book. To others He is cold, austere and a brutal monster that delights in our sins and who looks forward to casting us into hell. No wonder worship has little or no appeal. We must do more than whisper about God’s holiness, justice and wrath (Heb. 4:14).

B. Thoughtful preparation. The Jews had a “day of preparation” for the Passover (Ex. 12) and the Sabbath (Ex. 16:5, 22-24). This enabled them to be ready for the Lord’s bidding and facilitated their obedience to His commands.

1. While in the N.T. there is no command for such a day, the fact that we are commanded to assemble on the Lord’s Day shows that preparation should be made. Those who do not prepare for class are not usually edified; those who do not prepare for attendance usually are the latecoming disturbers whose children are fretful and restless; those who do not prepare are usually possessors of improper attitudes and whose influence is poor.

2. Those who have public part in worship should prepare. For example, who does not tire at repetitious prayers, the same songs, etc.? Would you tolerate the preacher preaching the same sermon week after week? Greater effort should be put forth by the preacher and song leader to unify their efforts. (Sermon on “baptism” should not be preceeded by a song on “to the work.”)

3. Other examples could be given, but these are sufficient to show that for worship to be holy and meaningful it must be preceeded by thoughtful and serious preparation.

C. Self-Examination. The principle (true in the Lord’s Supper) is also true in other areas of worship (1 Cor. 11:23ff). Much spiritual sickness is due to lax attitudes toward singing, etc. Giggling, flirting, whispering, etc. during worship will rob us of our richness in worship.

D. Words of Encouragement. “Men do better when taught better.” In the assembly words of encouragement should be expressed often. We must not only be against additions to worship; we need to be for the right things in worship. We need to preach more about the great need for worship.

E. The following are suggestions for making worship more meaningful.

1. Take up the cross and live for Christ daily (Lk. 9:23).

2. Spend a few minutes with God each day (1 Thess. 5:17).

3. Begin preparation for worship on Saturday by planning the clothes you will wear, your contribution, etc. “Give of your best to the Master.”

4. Arrive in plenty of time for the assembly. You can help greet the visitors and engage in meditation.

5. A few minutes before worship begins cease your conversation, quietly take your seat and reflect on a passage or hymn.

6. Fight every temptation to be distracted and to distract. Do not put on your coat or place the song book in the rack until the “Amen” is said and done.

7. Enter into worship with your whole mind, soul and strength. Sing with the understanding, meditate on the Lord’s Supper, give willingly, etc.

Conclusion:

1. Worship is a deep and special privilege that children of God should enjoy.

2. It will be special to you if you make the effort to enter into it with the right motivation and attitude.

Guardian of Truth XXX: 23, pp. 720-722
December 4, 1986

Model Prayer (1)

By Johnny Stringer

What is usually called the Lord’s prayer is really not. Jesus was not offering it as His prayer to God. Rather, He was teaching His disciples how to pray, giving an example of what a prayer should be like – a model to guide us in our prayers.

Nor were His words in this model prayer intended to be recited by memory in the stead of our own prayers. We are to express to God our own concerns and feelings.

“Our Father Which Art in Heaven”

In addressing God as our Father, we are expressing our confidence that He will listen as a loving, caring father. We are not carrying our concerns to a cold, detached being who would rather not be bothered (see Matt. 7:7-11).

We fail to fully appreciate what a marvelous privilege it is to come before the Almighty Creator of this universe and all things therein, and address Him as our Father. Men consider it an honor to be the son of some man who is great in this world, but that does not compare with the honor of being a son of the One Who created this world.

Surely, we do not deserve this privilege. Our sins against Him make us deserving of His wrath. Nevertheless, He has lovingly taken us into His family and lavished upon us the blessings given His children. With John, we should marvel at such love (1 John 3:1).

To approach God in prayer is more wonderful than approaching our earthly fathers, for He is our Father “which art in heaven.” This exalted position should cause us to approach Him with the greatest awe and reverence, and with full confidence in His ability to respond to our prayers in whatever ways He sees best.

“Hallowed Be Thy Name”

We should desire that God’s name be hallowed; that is, regarded as holy, reverenced, held in the highest esteem. It is significant that before mentioning personal needs, this model prayer expresses the desire that God’s name be given the respect it is due.

It would be inconsistent to express in our prayers the desire that God’s name be reverenced, yet speak of God in ways that are irreverent. It is profanity to speak of the heavenly Father as “the man upstairs,” for it puts God on man’s level. And those who reverence the name of God cringe when they hear someone say “Oh my God” in a light, irreverent way. God’s name is holy and it should not be used except with supreme reverence.

“Thy Kingdom Come”

When Jesus taught His disciples to pray for the kingdom to come, the Jewish people had been waiting for hundreds of years for their Messiah to come and establish a great kingdom in fulfillment of divine prophecy. Now the time had come for those prophecies to be fulfilled. The long awaited kingdom was soon to be established (Matt. 3:1-2; 4:17; Mk. 1:14-15; 9:1).

No doubt the disciples of the Lord did pray for His kingdom to come, and their prayer was answered; His kingdom came. On the first Pentecost after the Lord’s resurrection from the dead, Peter announced that Jesus had been raised to sit on the throne in fulfillment of prophecy (Acts 2:29-36). Paul said that he and the Colossians were in the kingdom of Christ (Col. 1:13). The exalted place of rule which Jesus occupies is repeatedly affirmed in the New Testament (Eph. 1:19-23; Phil. 2:9-11; 1 Pet. 3:22).

Since the kingdom has come, why do multitudes continue to pray for it to come? This is what people do when they recite this model prayer, making it their prayer to God. It is unscriptural to pray for the kingdom to come, because the Scriptures teach that the kingdom has already come.

The problem is, men do not know enough about the Scriptures to know that the kingdom has already come. Many do not think it has come, because they think of it as an earthly, political kingdom, and it is clear that God has no such kingdom now.

The fact is, however, that our Lord’s kingdom is not a kingdom of that kind. It is spiritual in nature. Jesus explained to Pilate that His kingdom is not an earthly, political kingdom such as would be established and sustained through physical fighting; rather, it is a kingdom based on truth (John 18:36-37). The kingdom exists as Jesus rules through the truth (His law) in the hearts of men. This is what Jesus meant when He said, “The kingdom of God is within you” (Lk. 17:21). Jesus rules within men’s hearts through the truth. Those who submit to His rule are citizens of His kingdom (Col. 1:13).

If the kingdom has not come, Jesus was a false prophet; for on one occasion He predicted that it would come before the death of some who were in the audience to whom He spoke (Mk. 9: 1). Yet some are still praying for it to come.

While it is not scriptural to pray for the kingdom to come, it is certainly right to pray for the kingdom’s growth and well being. We are to pray to God about the things that concern us, and we should be deeply concerned us, and we should be deeply concerned about the growth and well-being of God’s kingdom. We should pray for the gospel to spread, for preachers and teachers of the gospel, for elders, for purity among God’s people, and for unity and harmony among brethren.

Consider how inconsistent it is, however, to pray for God’s kingdom, yet fail to do what we can to promote its wellbeing and growth. In such cases, our words say we care but our actions say we don’t.

More to come on the model prayer.

Guardian of Truth XXX: 23, pp. 723, 728
December 4, 1986

Institutionalism Within The Lord’s Church In Italy

By Gianni Berdini

I have written this article because I feel the necessity for the brethren in America to know of the serious problems that, through the years, have evolved within the Italian “missionary work.” The use of institutions to establish and develop the work of the local churches has divided churches by creating confusion, discouragement and the most complete apostasy.

Historical View

The work in Italy was started again in 1949 because of the preaching of some American Missionaries. We thank God for their sacrifices for their courage and zeal, as they faced persecution and made many efforts to bring the Word of God to the Italian people.

Unfortunately, in spite of their zeal and “good conscience” the methods used for the spreading of the Gospel were not scriptural as they should have been. The coined phrase “the end justifies the means” is not a biblical principle! Romans 3:8: . . . and why not (as we are slanderously reported and as some affirm that we say), let us do evil that good may come? Whose condemnation is just.”

In fact, at the beginning of the Italian work the center of all activities was an orphan’s home supported by the sponsoring church, Crescent Hill Church of Christ, in Brownfield, Texas. Preaching was made attractive to the people by “gift packages” (clothes, food, and so forth) coming from the States. Therefore, the majority of the “baptized” had their faith, not in Jesus Christ as the Son of the Living God, but in the “gift” they were receiving. Unfortunately, those means (or methods) did not cease after the “missions” were established. The American Missionaries who came some years later were less concerned with scriptural authority than those who came before them. Therefore, the development of many varied ideas was spread throughout Italy and the digression from the Truth was soon realized.

I would like to give you a brief summary of the escalation of these works:

1959 – This is the birth year of the “Florence Bible School of the Church of Christ.”

1963 – The birth year of the “Biblical Studies Center of the Church of Christ” in Milan (Seme del Regno, December, 1963, p. 520)

1968 – There is established in Genova a “Publishing House Company” supported by churches’ money. After a few good books they started to print Catholic and Protestant books. Then they spent something like 6 billion of lira (that is a very big amount in dollars, too) for printing an edition of the New Testament translated so badly by two Italian preachers, that this edition is not used even by those in the ranks of the organized Christian Church.

1969 – The open fellowship with the Christian Church was realized and practically imposed on many churches. This came about by the Florence Bible School, which was in desperate need of students in order to justify its role in the Italian work! A group of well known preachers went to hold some meetings at Bari in the South of Italy where the work of the Christian Church is concentrated. Their -opening” was published and spread abroad by their magazine Il Seme Del Regno. It is self-evident, I think, that the “opening” was nothing but a gross attempt of imposing the will of a few preachers on all the churches in Italy. Isn’t that something just short of Catholicism?

1970 – This is the birth year of the “Christian Camp” of Nepi just near Rome which caused tremendous and terrible divisions in many churches. It was referred to as a beneficial means for evangelism. In those years we started to question everything that was connected with the “new fellowship idea.” Note that all the “leaders” of the Italian institutions were also the chief actors in the “opening” enterprise. So “institutions” and “new fellowship” were walking arm in arm.

Let us come back to the “Christian camp.” I remember that though my father was preaching against it, many brethren of the church in Aprilia, where I grew up, went to that camp. I remember very well what they said once they returned: “The camp is the place where the true Christian atmosphere can be enjoyed! It is such an edifying thing! It is not so important if members of the church (which, by the way, Christ died for) do not attend the regular meetings of the Church, if they attend “camp gathering.” Thus, when we are at the camp we are at church! In my opinion the least that one can say about these statements is that they are blasphemous.

1976 – The sad but necessary division of the Aprilia (near Rome) church. Twenty-five years of good work done by my father, Rodoflo, was destroyed in the name of the Christian Camp! A church of 98 members was, without pity, divided.

In the same year a meeting was held in Genova for the purpose of creating a “confederation of churches.” That occasion started the so-called “Political Gospel” (actually Marxism) and women preachers in the assembly! Many congregations today are still involved in that practice.

All these institutions were operated by American missionaries and received money from churches in the USA. At the same time, while these institutions were established, some missionaries had begun to teach that evangelists or preachers are not necemary in the churches (the very purpose of the Florence Bible School was not educating preachers but that of creating “more mature members of the church”). It was in that way that missionaries began a subtle psychological, mental and doctrinal control of local congregations. Justto cite only one example: Before the division of the church in Aprilia, several problems that actually caused the split came by the interferences from the Bible School Committee. Members of that Committee were engaged from several local congregations in Italy and were all “faithful” to missionaries here.

Liberalism Today

One cannot expect to sow to the wind and not to reap the whirlwind. Confusion and terrible chaos characterize liberalism today. If yesterday the problems were connected with those human institutions (how to use the Lord’s money, etc.), today we have before us nothing,but semi-Protestant people! Evil practices have borne evil principles:

“Let’s talk of the things that unite and not of those things which divide us.” (Isn’t that the typical old refrain of Catholics and Protestants?)

“Love is all we need.” (Doctrinal differences do not really make a difference!)

“After all, we cannot judge our brethren.” (They even have the courage to quote Romans 14 to maintain that principle!)

“After all, it is sufficient to believe in Jesus and be baptized by immersion. . . . ” (If Catholicism would start tomorrow to teach adult baptism, many of these our “brethren” would be in serious trouble.)

Some of the above mentioned institutions are no longer existing today.

The books printed by the Lanterna Publishing House of Genova are no more used today. According to a man (Paolo Mirabelli, from Rossano, South Italy) who visited the former meeting place of the Genova church, he found pentecostals meeting there, and he saw mountains of books printed years ago just left in some corners of the rooms, unused, bound to be ruined. (Among these books we remember the special edition of the NT translated by Italo Minestroni and Fausto Salvoni in the early ’70’s.)

The Nepi Church Camp, formerly presented as an extraordinary means of preaching, was sold. Today many consider the St. Peter in Bevagne’s Church Camps as the “camping of the church.” (Note that this camp is operated by Christian Churches.)

As far as we know, there are no more Italian students at the Florence School whose present director is Mr. Howard Bybee. We know that now there is a branch of the Pepperdine Christian College in Florence, and that once in a while American students come to visit and have Summer courses.

The Biblical Faculty of Milan was closed. We know for sure that the church building in Milan is used also for dancing courses. (Brother Rodolfo Berdini and Stefano Corazza saw an advertisement in front of the door saying: “This week dance lessons have a different schedule.”)

The church in Mestre (national center of Bible course) is no more existing. In the same meeting place there are today members of the Evangelical Pentecostal church. Consideration: when we open the door to error, it becomes impossible to close it. And the consequences are far more negative than in the past.

Examples of Further Digression in the Last Years

1982 – In October the Sunset Church of Christ in Lubbock (TX) organized the “World Mission Forum” to discuss and plan the “Mission Work In The World.” Mr. Italo Minestroni, who preaches in Italy in Bologna, participated in this meeting as the “National Representative of the Church” (singular) in Italy. Note that this forum has been defined by Earl Lavender, a young American missionary that worked at Cervignano just 25 miles from Trieste, as the Church itself, an assembly of Christians.

On that occasion Mr. Italo Minestroni asked for:

(1) Increasing the activity of the Florence Bible School in order that it might become the propulsive center of the Italian work.

(2) He asked for money to build a home for the old, “because, he said, this is very needed by the Italian churches.” (?)

(3) He asked for money to buy another printing house. Note, brethren, that they had wasted many dollars on the first one.

(4) He asked for money to install radio stations in the main Italian towns.

(5) He asked for money to buy several meeting places.

Needless to say, they are doing the very same things they already have done in the past, without having learned anything from the past experiences. I frankly doubt they really believe what Paul teaches: “The gospel is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth” (Rom. 1:16).

On January 23, 1984, on the national TV station there was a broadcast by the Protestant Churches Federation. In that transmission the Church of Christ was presented as a Movement started in the U.S. between the 18th and 19th centuries by men like A. Campbell, B. Stone, and others. It showed the first meeting places in Kentucky, the pictures of the “founders,” and information on the movement mostly based on the human institutions which the movement has all over the world (hospitals in the state of Ghana, church camp in Nepi, which had already been sold in ’84, the Florence School, etc.). In that way the blessed church of the New Testament is becoming nothing but a denomination, at least in the minds of some people!

In ’84 a building was begun in a small village called Valmontasca (Tourin). It was all built with the money of an 80 year old man “converted” by some missionaries. He wanted to build his own church. Great men were invited for the occasion: Melvin Pownall, Italo Minestroni, Leoluca Bonanno, and others. We have pictures of that event and also pictures of the meeting place. It is a sort of Catholic temple, with a sort of altar in it, and with many signs. One sign quotes from John 19:27 and says: “Mary is the little mother of all the believers.” There are signs on eucharisty. There is a sign about the evangelical worship of Jesus’ brethren. There is a big star on the roof. (Pictures are available for all who may be interested.)

This building is presented as something very good. Few Italian church members have seen the place. And while it is commonly reported that there is a church there, the fact is that there is only this old man there. He and he alone, in a place absolutely desert. There are practically no people living there.

August 1985 – A Christian camp was organized by the church of Christ in Pescara in a place called Scarfano. LAppello Cristiano, a paper published by the Christian Church in Italy, reported that in that camp brethren from the Church of Christ, the Christian Church, the Church of Nazarene, the Church of God, and the Church of the Brethren enjoyed together the good side of the Christian life (LApello Cristiano, n. 1, 1985).

Prejudice and “Hierarchy”: A Sad Example

Months ago, brother Roberto Tondelli received calls from a man in South Italy. This man asked for literature, showing a good attitude and not involved with liberalism. Calls followed and he was always asking for some counsel or advice on doctrinal matters like: fellowship with Christian Churches, problems where the Florence School is involved, etc. Since the first call, brother Tondelli had tried kindly to let this man see the problems which have caused division among churches In Italy and the biblical solutions to such problems.

Telephone contacts went on to the point that this man (Paolo Mirabelli) seemed quite interested in having a personal meeting with us. After having made agreements for having this meeting, Paolo Mirabelli called brother Tondelli revealing to him that: “I am supported by a congregation in U.S. and the elders there have forbidden me to meet you or others like you.”

Note that he said in the same call that all the literature he was receiving is good and sound. But there was some kind of danger in meeting some of us.

The same behavior is followed in Italy by Catholic priests and Protestant pastors. Here is a clear and sad example of prejudice, and the established practice of hierarchy which hinders personal contacts and personal Bible study. Among other considerations, we may say that such behavior is contrary to 1 Pet. 3:15.

And is it not ridiculous that so-called liberal brethren in Italy say that we are preaching what we are preaching just for the sake of . . . money! That is an obvious example of how a psychological dependency (also a financial dependency) can be established on an eldership in the U.S. (obviously a “liberal” eldership). But we are bound to Christ, not to men.

Conclusion

We invite “liberal” brethren and elders to come to Italy and see with their own eyes the reality of what we are saying here. Many local churches are disappearing in the midst of problems and troubles of every kind: ignorance of the Scriptures, women preaching in public assemblies, worship on Saturday nights, fellowship with Protestant sects, the use of “Gospel pop-songs” to better attract young people to the gospel (but are they truly attracted to it?), and last but not least the obvious fellowship with those who use instrumental music in worship.

We hope and pray and work hard in order to regain the broken unity within some local churches. But this Unity must be based only on “Thy Word,” as Jesus prayed in John 17. However, we are not naive in working toward that objective. In fact, to obtain that blessed kind of Unity, it is necessary that people be honest with Scripture, be studious, and be truly interested in obeying and serving the Lord not men. So far, we have found very few people with such good attitudes.

We are persevering in “the good fight,” going to Catholics and atheists and Protestants. May the Lord help us.

Guardian of Truth XXX: 24, pp. 737, 752-753
December 18, 1986