An Example Of Values Clarification

By Wayne S. Walker

The recent hijacking of a Trans-World Airline flight from Athens, Greece to Beirut, Lebanon, and the subsequent holding of innocent American hostages by a group of radical Moslems are undoubtedly still fresh on the minds of many people. The majority of United States citizens, as well as those of all civilized, freedom-loving nations, denounce such an act as cruel, barbaric, inhumane, and unjust. However, are you aware that this despicable and horrendous deed can easily be justified by a process that is currently being taught in most of the public schools of our land? That process is known as “values clarification.”

The basic presupposition of this theory is that values are, in and of themselves, neither right nor wrong, that each individual must decide for himself, based only on the criteria of his own needs and wishes, what is best for him in any given circumstance. This underlying concept is called “ethical relativism.” Although it may not be overtly stated, it is nevertheless embedded in the presentation of values clarification, at least as presently practiced. But is it true? The Beirut hijackers felt that their needs in that particular situation dictated the action that they took. Yet, who will come forward to condone these criminals and defend their decision?

In order to arrive at his values, the student is taught to follow seven steps. The first is to choose freely, which the Moslem fanatics evidently did. They were not forced. Next, one must choose from alternatives. They obviously looked at all options and concluded that the one they took offered the best hope for gaining their goals. Then, the student is told to consider the consequences of his choice. The consequence of the hijackers’ choice was either achieve their objective if they succeeded, or go directly and immediately to paradise if they failed and were killed. They had little motivation to exercise inhibition whatever happened.

The fourth step is to prize one’s choice, which was most surely done in this case. Step number five is to affirm publicly the choice. This they accomplished quite satisfactorily via television and other media. Sixth, one should act on the choice, and the hijackers certainly did this by stealing the plane and holding the hostages. Finally, the student is to incorporate the choice into a pattern of life by acting repeatedly on it. A casual look at the news will reveal that this is definitely true with Moslem fundamentalists – in Lebanon, Iran, and all over the Middle East. This is what they had chosen. Therefore, it must be all right for them.

Thus, you can see that the steps of values clarification may be used to arrive at almost any type of behavior an individual might choose – cheating, lying, stealing, fornication, adultery, even murder – if the conditions are right. Many teachers of values clarification would deny this conclusion. However, other proponents openly admit it. The original promoters of values clarification had as their avowed intent to turn our society into a godless, amoral, subjectivist culture, and appear to be succeeding. They are after our young people! Parents, be aware of what your children are learning in school and oppose “every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God” (2 Cor. 10:5).

Guardian of Truth XXIX: 23, pp. 723-724
December 5, 1985

Growth Or Stagnation

By Don Givens

Growth is essential among healthy plants, animals, and humans. A lack of growth and proper development in our children, for example, is a grave cause of concern. By far the most important growth is spiritual. Its value and consequences far outweigh any other type of growth.

There are no “spiritual plateaus” which a person may reach and rightly say, “I have arrived. . . I need grow no more.” To stop growing in Christ is to stagnate. To stagnate is to begin decay. To stay in the process of decay is to rot, and to rot spiritually is to die and be eternally lost.

By means of adding the virtues of such characteristics as listed in 2 Peter 1:1-11 we “partake of the divine nature” and become participants in the very attributes of the Lord.

We must, as faithful disciples, “work out our own salvation” (Phil. 2:12,13) and crucify the flesh (Gal.(Rom. 12:1,2).

5:22-24). This must be done with diligence, bending every energy to become more Christlike.

In the Christian’s life there must be a steady moral advance; it must not be just “initial spasm” followed by “chronic inactivity.”

Diligence is literally: “haste, earnestness, zeal, and application.” No exertion must be spared to “cleanse ourselves from all defilement of flesh and spirit, perfecting holiness in the fear of God” (2 Cor. 7:1).

As pilgrims in the midst of a perverse generation, we must manifest a strong energetic faith; a faith that is able to overcome the world (1 John 5:4). It matters not whether we live in the “Bible belt,” a large metropolis, a rural village, or the islands of the Pacific, it takes courage to say “I am not ashamed of the gospel” (Rom. 1: 16) and it demands even more courage to live a life that proves the statement of our lips.

Our faith must produce virtue, manliness, vigor, or spiritual energy. This includes the courage to honestly confess Jesus before all classes of men, and the strength to be different from the world, not just because we desire to be “oddballs,” but because we live on a higher plane

Being grateful that we have “all things that pertain unto life and godliness, through the knowledge of him that called us by his own glory and virtue” (2 Pet. 1:3) may each of us strive to grow in grace and knowledge and partake more and more of His divine nature.

Guardian of Truth XXIX: 24, p. 741
December 19, 1985

Frustrating Our Singing

By Weldon E. Warnock

Not enough emphasis is put on singing in many congregations. Consequently, the singing has become drab, dull and dead. Singing should inspire, comfort, console and edify our hearts and lift up our spirits. God’s people have something to sing about and it ought to show in the manner in which we sing. But good singing can be frustrated in several ways.

(1) Good singing can be frustrated if we do not sing. Some brethren never open their mouths in praise to God, including some preachers. The Bible says, “Speaking to yourselves in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing and making melody in your heart to the Lord” (Eph. 5:19). In Colossians 3:16, Paul states, “teaching and admonishing one another.” Paul did not say, “Listen,” but rather, “speak, teach and admonish.”

Too, some who do sing hardly speak above a whisper. Brethren, when we sing, “I Know That My Redeemer Lives,” let us sing it with exuberance and conviction – not with an apathetic gesture.

(2) Good singing can be frustrated by incompetent song leaders. Not everybody is a song leader. Some are not gifted with this particular talent, while others need training and developing to become adept. Some men who try to lead cannot pitch a song. Most of the time they pitch it too high or too low and this makes the song very difficult to sing.

Some leaders do not have the feel for the tempo of a song. They drag it “to death,” and the song loses its impact. For example, the song, “I Want to Be a Worker” must be sung with vitality to reflect the sentiment. On the other hand, some songs must be sung slowly and quietly.

Furthermore, song leaders need to be enthusiastic and take charge of the service. They are the directors. They must make the assembly follow them, not them follow the assembly. They should provide continuity from one song to another and from the song to the prayer, and not allow the service to be abrupt and chopped up as though the whole hour of worship is mechanically programmed. In other words, put your personality and heart into the service. We are people – not machines!

While we are speaking on song leaders, I have not understood why some brethren during a gospel meeting do not use exclusively the best they have to lead the singing. Churches pay hundreds of dollars to bring a preacher across several states to preach, but let any and everybody lead the singing during the meeting. Why not have gospel meetings with different speakers from the congregation? If the purpose of having different song leaders is to give everybody a turn to lead and not hurt anyone’s feelings, then why not do this toward preaching as well? We need to “put our best foot forward” for the Lord and use able song leaders on such occasions. In my judgment, the same song leader during a gospel meeting works better than three or four or more.

Several years ago song leaders traveled with some of the preachers for gospel meetings. Churches also invited song leaders from far and near to lead their singing during meetings. What great singing they had. We need to do the same thing today if we have no competent leaders.

A couple more things about song leaders. They need to dress in a way that reflects the dignity of the service and they need to sit up front. Some dress so casually, sporting their faded denim pants and jogging shoes with their shirts hanging out. Not a few like to sit back in the audience after they finish and then have to walk clear to the front to begin the invitation song. Those few seconds of silence seem like an eternity.

(3) Good singing can be frustrated by poor judgment in selection of songs. (This section could have been placed under point two as song leaders are responsible for selecting songs.) To select new songs for a gospel meeting or Sunday services my be catastrophic. Have you ever led a song with a tenor lead and when you got to that part – total silence? What an embarrassment! There should have been some previous practice before the song was used. Well-known songs are more appropriate under such circumstances. Otherwise, you may wind-up with a solo by the song leader.

Song leaders have distracted from the worship by choosing an unfamiliar song for the communion hymn or invitation song and then go over the notes before they sang. How unwise! One leader, after the preacher spoke on hell and painted a vivid picture of this awesome place, led for the invitation, “Are You Ready to Go?” Here is where the preacher and the song leader should work together in the selection of songs.

We will not go wrong in selecting some of the old songs that have warmed the cockles of our hearts through the years. No greater songs have been written than “Amazing Grace,” “Sweet By and By … .. Never Grow Old,” “Standing On the Promises,” “The Old-Rugged Cross,” “There’s Power In the Blood,” and a host of others that could be enumerated. Yes, let’s learn new songs, but let’s not overlook the old hymns of Zion in the meantime.

(4) Good singing can be frustrated if we are indifferent toward singing. Some brethren look upon singing as no more than a duty. But it should be a joy. The sweet singer of Israel said, “0 come, let us sing unto the Lord: let us make a joyful noise to the rock of our salvation” (Psa. 95: 1). James wrote, “Is any merry? let him sing psalms” (Jas. 5:13).

When we love to sing and place the emphasis on singing that it deserves, we will put forth the effort to improve the quality of our singing. We will have more singing schools and more practice sessions, and the members will learn the basics of music and the potential song leaders will also learn how to pitch and direct the singing.

A greater interest in singing will get us away from the routine of “two songs and a prayer,” and we can have a song service for 15, 20 or 25 minutes prior to preaching. A good idea is to gear the singing around the sermon topic. If the topic is “The Cross of Christ,” songs can be selected about the cross. Yes, we need a revival of interest toward gospel singing.

(5) Good singing can be frustrated by poor acoustics. Some how, some way, some of us have gotten in our minds that we need acoustical tile in the ceiling of the auditorium. This absorbs the sound and makes it difficult to blend our voices. The ceiling and the walls should be so constructed in order to have good reverberation. I know of some churches that removed the acoustical tile and replaced it with plaster or a hard tile to improve the sound. What a difference it made.

We plan on being in a church building for many years to come. Why hesitate to correct an acoustical problem because of the cost and sacrifice good congregational singing? We would not wait to correct some flaw in the building if it affected our comfort, but some of us hesitate if it affects the quality of our acts of worship. Sometimes we get our priorities out of the right order.

In conclusion, let’s strive to make our singing vibrant, lively, stimulating and spiritual so that God will be glorified and the saints edified. Singing can be a great influence in public worship, but also at home, at work and at play. Let us sing with grace and thanksgiving in our hearts unto the Lord.

Guardian of Truth XXIX: 24, pp. 739-740
December 19, 1985

Miscellaneous Matters

By Mike Willis

Words Of Appreciation To Johnny Stringer

This is the last issue of Guardian of Truth for 1985. The last issue generally contains the topic and author indexes for the year. These indexes make the material in the bound volumes of Guardian of Truth accessible for those who collect them. Johnny Stringer, faithful gospel preacher from Loudon, Tennessee, prepares our indexes for us. He is doing an excellent job, making the information in the bound volumes readily accessible for years to come. We appreciate the work which he does. Many of you appreciate the indexes; now you know who to thank for making them available.

Appreciation To Guardian of Truth Bookstore Customers

The Guardian of Truth Bookstore has just completed a record year in sales. We have picked up many new customers and new accounts. We appreciate the goodwill and encouragement which we receive from our customers. The sales which we enjoyed this year enabled us to print some more new books in the revision of the Walking With God material, to publish a new church directory for 1986, this magazine, and other materials. We appreciate your business because it enables us to continue producing material which is useful to faithful Christians. Other bookstores exist solely to make money; our bookstore exists to pay for publishing material which Christians cannot generally find elsewhere.

Brother and sister O.C. Birdwell, with their fine staff, continue to provide good service to our customers. Orders are generally mailed the same day they are received (at least within 24 hours), unless they require special attention (such as back ordering which places the customer at the mercy of the publisher). In my meetings, I hear brethren compliment the service they receive from our bookstore. Recently, a customer in West Virginia commented that he placed his order late on a Monday and received it on Wednesday. Customers appreciate that kind of service.

Our business is in better condition now than it has been in the recent past. We are delighted to be in our own building with suitable accommodations for walk-in business. Our financial situation is improving month by month. There are always books we would like to print if more money were available to us. We have several new works we would like to print and some classics we would like to reprint, if funds were available.

Guardian of Truth Foundation: A Service Organization

The Guardian of Truth Foundation remains a service organization. We are not an individually supported missionary society; we support no preachers and do not consider it our work to do so. We publish and market religious literature. The profits which are accumulated from this legitimate business enterprise, in keeping with our non-profit charter, must be used to publish more material. Those profits cannot be paid as stock dividends, for there is no stock in this company.

A dedicated Board of Directors donates their time and money to administer the affairs of this organization. The Directors receive no compensation for their time or travel expenses. Theirs is a labor of love. The men are respected preachers and business men from various parts of the country. We appreciate their sacrifices and good-will.

Some men mistakenly think that those who work for an organization such as the Guardian of Truth Foundation are in a glory position. Nothing could be further from the truth. There is no glory in packing books, filling a book order, sweeping a floor, and other jobs associated with running a bookstore. Our bookstore manager does this because he believes in what we are doing. There is no glory in proofreading articles, tracts, and books, addressing and mailing a magazine, maintaining a mailing list and accounts for subscribers and advertisers. I do this work because I believe in what we are doing – providing good literature for Christians to use in their teaching program and a magazine which provides a forum for Christians to discuss problems within and without the church.

Future Plans For Guardian of Truth

The year 1985 has been good for Guardian of Truth. We had so many new churches choosing to advertise with us that we had to add another page of advertising. Our subscription list remains stable. We had good response to our special rates for new subscribers and many names have been sent to us for samples copies of the paper.

We have several special issues planned for 1986. We will begin 1986 with a special issue entitled “Lest We Forget.” This issue will remind us of the battles which have been fought in the past with an admonition not to forget the important Bible truths which we learned in such conflicts as the church supported missionary society, church supported benevolent society, church supported college, use of mechanical instruments of music in worship, sponsoring church arrangement, church sponsored recreation, etc. We think you will want extra copies of this special issue for wider distribution.

Later in the year, we plan a special on “The Restoration of New Testament Christianity.” This special issue will remind us of our heritage, emphasizing our need to continually teach on the need for the restoration of the ancient order. Fundamental lessons, sermons which some are neglecting and omitting, on such themes as baptism, the Lord’s supper, the organization of the church, etc. will be presented in this special issue.

Other ideas for special issues are beginning to be worked on. We think that 1986 will be a good year for reading Guardian of Truth. You will not want to miss it.

Appreciation For Our Writers

I personally would like to close with a word of appreciation to the many brethren who have written for us in 1985. Our staff of writers includes some of the best preachers living. Their work is respected and appreciated all over this country. In addition, we receive many unsolicited manuscripts for publication. I appreciate every one of them. The brethren who take the time to write their lessons and share them without readers are appreciated. We appreciate their good-will, as seen in the fact that they chose us to publish their article. May their tribe increase.

Conclusion

We look forward to serving you in 1986. As 1985 draws to a close the staff at the Guardian of Truth Foundation sends you seasons greetings and wish you a Happy New Year!

Guardian of Truth XXIX: 24, pp. 738, 751
December 19, 1985