Truth Magazine

By James Bond

The June edition of Contending For The Faith, edited by brother Ira Y. Rice, Jr., discussed the unity meeting conducted in Joplin, Missouri in 1984. 1 am not a regular reader of this magazine edited by brother Rice, and know little about his convictions in regard to these unity meetings. A concerned brother asked me to read this edition. After reading this magazine I was startled at the fact that these two parties were on the bank of becoming one body. I had not been keeping current on the changes the liberal brethren have made, and was amazed at the great distance they have traveled in the last half century. My first response was, “No way can these two groups unite, because of their differences.” But after taking pencil and paper, and enumerating some of the things that the liberal churches of Christ have in common with the Christian Church, regrettably I found very, very few differences. Briefly, I call attention to practices both parties have in common.

(1) Both have the same attitude toward the Scriptures in that they act upon the silence of God’s word. Anything not expressly forbidden is permissible. Christian church preachers defend instrumental music with the “God did not say not to” argument. Liberal brethren use the same argument to defend their unscriptural practices.

(2) Both believe and teach that there is no set pattern in the Scriptures in regard to worship, work, cooperation and fellowship. Both parties believe it’s a matter of judgment.

(3) Both implement the work God enjoined upon the church through human institutions.

(4) Both activate the church universal through a sponsoring church arrangement.

(5) Both engage the church in the following unscriptural works: entertainment, recreation, business, politics, etc.

(6) Both have money raising gimmicks apart from the first day of the week contribution.

(7) Both take up collections on days other than the first day of the week.

(8) Both have special “singers,” apart from the congregation, who sing while the church listens.

(9) Both have youth ministers, directors, youth rallies, etc.

(10) Both have special services on Christmas, Good Friday, etc.

(11) Both have fellowship halls (kitchen).

(12) Both have the attitude of tolerance toward erroneous practices.

(13) Both fellowship denominations on a limited basis.

(14) Both have a better attitude toward denominations than they do toward conservative churches of Christ.

(15) Both are apostate churches in that they have abandoned the faith once revealed unto the saints (Jude 3).

(16) Both believe that instrumental music in worship is simply a matter of judgment.

What Doctrinal Difference Are There To Hinder Them From Uniting?

None. It was said in the magazine that no doctrinal issue was discussed. The truth is “there is none to discuss.” The liberal preachers said on page 10 of the magazine that the instrument was no problem to them, and if this be true there is nothing to keep them apart.

The Warning Of Jesus, Apostles And Sound Men Of Our Era Went Unheeded

Indeed it’s sad to see the condition that exists in liberal churches but these brethren closed their eyes, ears and hearts to the word of God, the only thing that would keep them in the strait and narrow way. The warning of Jesus went unheeded. “Take heed and beware of the leaven of Pharisees and of the Sadducees” (Matt. 16:6). Paul warned, “Your glorying is not good. Know ye not that a little leaven leaveneth the whole lump?” (1 Cor. 5:6) Some older preachers that now lament the condition that they are now in were the ones who advocated the “no pattern doctrine” in order to get the colleges, orphan homes and Herald of Truth in the budget of the church. Now they are harvesting the fruits from that digressive seed they planted many years ago. The Bible said, “You will reap what you sow” (Gal. 6:7). 1 can recall sitting at the feet of C.D. Plum, Roy Cogdill, Cecil Willis, Connie Adams, and a host of other sound men who warned them where the road they were !raveling would lead, but the warning went unheeded. Christians must be watchful in all things (1 Cor. 16:13).

Guardian of Truth XXIX: 23, p. 715
December 5, 1985

By Lewis Willis

For the first time in many, many years, researchers are reporting a decline in the number of divorces in this country. Through the 1960s and 1970s, the number of divorces being granted shocked the consciences of those who are spiritually-minded. A professor of sociology at Johns Hopkins University, Andrew Scherlin, said, “The climbing divorce rate had to stop somewhere or we’d find ourselves with 110 percent of all married couples getting divorced.”

This information was reported by the New York Times and printed in the Akron Beacon Journal (1/14/85). In 1981, the number of divorces reached a record high when “53 of every 1,000 people, or 5.3 percent, received divorces.” It is commonly said that there are about 215 million people in this country. If so, in 1981 almost 11.4 million of those people were divorced. The figure is shocking.

However, the last three years there has been a decline in the number of divorces to 49 out of every 1,000 people being divorced, or 4.9 percent. This means that 10.5 million people were divorced by the end of 1984. That’s a lot of people! However, there was a decline. Researchers are at a loss to explain this decline but they believe it is legitimate because it has sustained itself for three consecutive years. Some are even of the opinion that the institution of marriage might yet survive! Perhaps some people are beginning to think for themselves a little bit. We’ve heard so much about personal freedoms in recent years that many people became confused. Some people apparently have been turned off by such movements as the “gay rights” movement and the “women’s liberation” movement. We in the Lord’s church have tried to continually preach against the sin of divorce and remarriage as it is so commonly practiced in our society. I was just thinkin, do you suppose the message is beginning to have an effect? Let me share with you the following article from The Light (Vol. 16, No. 1, January 1985) entitled, “I Am A Tired Woman.”

I Am A Tired Woman

. . . tired of being told that I am not happy, and that any illusions I might have to the contrary are indicative of a low mentality or at best a lack of originality or imaginative thinking.

. . . tired of being told by unmarried females that being a wife and mother is not rewarding.

. . . weary of those married females who, having made shambles of their own marriage, tell us that the institution of marriage won’t work, who having found themselves unequal to the task of finding happiness in marriage, intimate that we are less than adequate if we do not seek fulfillment outside of marriage.

. . . tired up to here with those who choose to ignore the basic and most apparent differences between men and women and their capabilities, thereby proving once more the truth of the old adage that “there is no one so blind as he who does not wish to see. “

. . . and full of pity for those who complain of being the playthings of men while they strut around in broad daylight in such a sad state of undress that they leave no doubt whatever as to what they consider their primary function in this life.

. . . tired of watching those who have never learned the art and grace of being a woman, yet seek to undermine everything that is feminine, trying to make men and women into carbon copies of each other, not for the betterment of mankind, but for the sole purpose of satisfying their own selfish desires.

. . . fed up with those who are so interested in their own so-called “rights” that they actually want to pass a bill making it illegal to treat us like women, stomping thus on the rights of those of us who have found fulfillment in being a woman, who know how to make not only ourselves happy, but also our husbands, our children, and those around us – who know what it really means to be a woman and to be treated like a woman.

. . . yes, but I am a woman. And I like it that way!

Author Unknown

Guardian of Truth XXIX: 23, p. 718
December 5, 1985

By Mark Mayberry

You’ve heard the saying, “Money is the root of all evil.” As they say in Tennessee, “It ain’t so, McGee!” We should realize that money is not inherently evil. Money itself is neither good nor bad. When used properly it can accomplish much good. However, for money to become the driving force in our lives is a perilous sin. 1 Timothy 6:10 says, “For the love of money is the root of all evil” (KJV). The text doesn’t say that money is the root of all evil; it says that the love of money is the root of all evil. Other translations give a slight variation to the last part of this verse: the NAS says money is “the root of all sorts of evil.” The NIV says it is “a root of all kinds of evil.” What are some of the dangers that come from a love of money?(1)

1. The desire for wealth becomes a thirst which is unquenchable. A Roman proverb said that wealth is like sea water; it doesn’t quench man’s thirst, it makes it greater. The more man gets, the more he wants! Christians are to have a vastly different attitude. “Godliness with contentment is great gain. For we brought nothing into this world, and it is certain we can carry nothing out. And having food and raiment let us be therewith content” (1 Tim. 6:6-8). Ecclesiastes 6:9 says, “Better is the sight of the eyes than the wandering of the desire . . . .” We should enjoy what we have rather than constantly be longing for more. Hebrews 13:5 says, “Let your character be free from the love of money, being content with what you have; for He Himself has said, ‘I will never desert you, nor will I ever forsake you… (NAS). The following popular song illustrates the concept we are talking about.

“A Satisfied Mind”(2)

How many times have you heard someone say,

“If I had his money, I could do things my way.”

But little they know, it’s so hard to find

One rich man in ten with a satisfied mind.

Once I was living in fortune and fame,

Everything that I dreamed of to get a start in life’s game.

Then suddenly it happened, I lost every dime,

But I’m richer by far with a satisfied mind.

‘Cause money can’t buy back your youth you’re old,

Or a friend when you’re lonely,

Or a love that’s grown cold.

The wealthiest person is a pauper at times,

Compared to the man with a satisfied mind.

When life has ended, my time has run out,

My friends and my loved ones I’ll leave, there’s no doubt.

But one thing for certain when it comes my time,

I’ll leave this old world with a satisfied mind.

2. The desire for wealth is founded upon an illusion. We think it will give us security, but it brings us anxiety. The more a man has to keep, the more he has to lose. We can easily become haunted by the risk of loss. “The sleep of a laboring man is sweet, whether he eat little or much: but the abundance of the rich will not suffer him to sleep” (Eccl. 5:12). “Instruct those who are rich in this present world not to be conceited or to fix their hope on the uncertainty of riches, but on God, who richly supplies us with all things to enjoy” (1 Tim. 6:17-18, NAS).

3. The desire for money tends to make us selfish. Our thoughts become fixed on ourselves. However, the Bible says we are to have concern for the needs of others. “So then, while we have opportunity, let us do good to all men, and especially to those who are of the household of the faith” (Gal. 6:10, NAS). “But whoever has the world’s goods, and beholds his brother in need and closes his heart against him, how does the love of God abide in him? Little children, let us not love with word or with tongue, but in deed and truth” (1 Jn. 3:17-18).

4. The love of money can easily lead a man into wrong ways of getting it. There are right and wrong ways of gaining money. Many accumulate riches by dishonest, deceitful and immoral means. The Christian should not work at a job that brings disgrace upon the name of the Lord. We are not just talking about illegal activities. There are certain ways of earning money that are legal in the eyes of the state, but still wrong in the sight of God: i.e., gambling, producing and distributing alcohol, operating bars, night clubs or dance halls, etc. “Let him that stole steal no more: but rather let him labor, working with his hands the thing which is good, that he may have to give to him that needeth” (Eph. 4:28). “Better is a little with righteousness than great revenues without right” (Prov. 16:8).

Endnotes

1. Adapted from William Barclay, The Letters to Timothy, Titus, and Philemon, Rev. ed. (Philadelphia: The Westminster Press, 1975) p. 132.

2. Red Hayes and Jack Rhodes, “A Satisfied Mind” (Fort Knox Music Co. – BMI, 1955).

Guardian of Truth XXIX: 23, pp. 707-708
December 5, 1985

By Weldon E. Warnock

Members of the church of Christ are frequently referred to as “Campbellites” by some of their religious neighbors. Baptist preachers, particularly, appear to get a lot of satisfaction in using this derisive epithet. However, I have never seen a “Campbellite,” nor have I ever heard of one. No one else has, either! I will endeavor to show why I am not a “Campbellite” and why I choose not to be one.

First of all, I am not a Campbellite because I am not a disciple of Alexander Campbell. To be a Campbellite I would have to be a disciple and follower of Campbell. Some say we teach the same things that Campbell taught and are, therefore, followers of him. In many things we do teach what Campbell taught, but we do not teach them because Campbell taught them, but because the Bible teaches them.

Because Campbell taught something and I practice it does not necessarily make me a Campbellite. If this were true, then by the same token I would be a Baptist, Methodist, Catholic and Lutheran, as well as many more. For example, if teaching immersion for baptism makes me a Campbellite, it also makes me a Baptist because Baptists teach immersion. But I am not a Baptist because Paul taught immersion in Romans 6:3-5, Colossians 2:12, and I teach immersion because Paul did. If teaching that we should not have instrumental music in worship makes me a Campbellite, it would also make me a Greek Catholic because they do not use it. But I am not Greek Catholic because the Bible teaches that vocal music only is authorized in worship (Eph. 5:19; Col. 3:16).

Campbell taught some things that I do not believe. For example, he defended the missionary society through which churches may evangelize the world. If I were to accept Campbell’s conclusions regardless of his premises, then I might be a Campbellite. But if I accept only his premises when they are scriptural, then I am just a Christian, a follower of Jesus Christ.

Second, I am not a Campbellite because Campbell was not crucified for me and I was not baptized in his name. In 1 Corinthians 1:12-13, Paul shows there are two things necessary for ownership. First, is a crucifixion for, and second, is baptism in the name of the one crucified. Paul was showing the Corinthians that this would be essential for them to be a ” Paulite. ” Obviously, this would also be necessary for one to be a Campbellite.

It would do the Baptist preachers, and Lutherans, some good to take a little “peek” at this passage. John the Baptist was never crucified for anybody; neither was Martin Luther. Jesus was crucified for us, and if we have been baptized into His name, then we ought to be nothing else but just Christians.

Third, I am not a Campbellite because there is no salvation in the name of Campbell. He was only a minister at best. Paul says, “Who then is Paul, and who is Apollos, but ministers by whom ye believed, even as the Lord gave to every man? I have planted, Apollos watered; but God gave the increase. So then neither is he that planteth any thing, neither he that watereth; but God that giveth the increase” (1 Cor. 3:5-7). Salvation is only in the name of Christ. We read, “Neither is their salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved” (Acts 4:12). This eliminates Alexander Campbell, John the Baptist, Martin Luther, or any other mortal man.

Fourth, I am not a Campbellite because I reject all human names and designations. Human names are carnal and sinful. “For while one saith, I am of Paul; and another, I am of Apollos; are ye not carnal?” (1 Cor. 3:4) Any one who wears a name that cannot be found in the word of God falls into this category. Again, we read, “And whatsoever ye do in word or deed, do all in the name of the Lord Jesus, giving thanks to God and the Father by him” (Col. 3:17). A person cannot be a Campbellite or a Baptist, etc. and do it in the name of Jesus Christ.

Fifth, I am not a Campbellite because I am a Christian. The name “Christian” is the one we can read about in the Bible. A more beautiful name cannot be found. Every time the name is spoken, Christ is glorified. Yet, many find more pleasure in wearing human names that glorify mortal men than in wearing a name that glorifies our Savior and Redeemer. The name “Christian” has almost been completely hidden and overshadowed by the denominational and factional names adopted by the imaginations of men.

“Christian” is a God-given name. It was prophesied by Isaiah in chapter 62, verse 2. The prophecy was fulfilled in Acts 11:26 when “the disciples were called Christians first in Antioch.” King Agrippa said to Paul, “Almost thou persuadest me to be a Christian.” Peter wrote, “Yet if any man suffer as a Christian, let him not be ashamed; but let him glorify God on this behalf” (1 Pet. 4:16).

No, I am not a Campbellite. I am a Christian! It is a most worthy name by which we are called (James 2:7).

Guardian of Truth XXIX: 23, pp. 705, 727
December 5, 1985