Truth Magazine

By Ronny Milliner

The first eleven chapters of the book of Romans is Paul’s treatise on how both Jew and Gentile may be justified in the

same way “for there is no partiality with God” (Rom. 2:11). The twelfth chapter begins the practical part of the book. Here is where Paul begins to make application of the facts previously taught. In this section of Scripture we find the Christian’s duty to (1) God (12:1); (2) the world (12:2); (3) the brethren (12:3-16); (4) his enemies (12:17-21); (5) the government (13:1-7); (6) his neighbor 4:34). He wants ears sacrificed to feet will be restrained from evil (Psa. (13:8-14); and (7) weak brethren (14:1-15:13).

The Toil Of The Sacrifice

Our basic duty to God is to sacrifice ourselves in His service. The action of this sacrifice is represented by the word “present” in Romans 12:1. The word literally means “to place beside or near” or “to set at hand.” We must make ourselves available to God. We must be near to Him, so we can readily be used in His cause. “Draw near to God and He will draw near to you” (Jas. 4:8a). Every Christian must present himself as a present to God.

The Thing Of The Sacrifice

The thing or the object which is to be sacrificed is one’s body. All of the body must be presented to God. Presenting the body includes presenting the mind. We must have a mind set not on the flesh, but on the spirit (Rom. 8:7). We should be noble-minded like the Bereans in receiving the word (Acts 17:11). We are admonished to be of the same mind with our brethren (Rom. 15:5). And we must have the humility of mind like Jesus (Phil. 2:3-5).

Presenting the body to God as a sacrifice includes presenting the eyes. We must have eyes that look to God (Psa. 145:15). We need a clear eye, not a bad eye (Mt. 6:22-23). Our eyes need to see (Lk. 10:23), and be enlightened (Eph. 1:18). Eyes which are lustful are not being sacrificed to God (1 Jn. 2:16).

Presenting the body to God as a sacrifice includes presenting the eyars. God is not pleased with itching ears which desire tickling by men (2 Tim. 4:3-4). He wants ears sacrificed to Him which are quick to hear what He has to say (Jas. 1:19).

Presenting the body to God as a sacrifice includes presenting the mouth. Our mouths must be acceptable to God (Psa. 19:14). This type of mouth will be a mouth which is willing to confess (Rom. 10:9-10), which edifies (Eph. 4:29), which boldly preaches the gospel (Eph. 6:19), and which is seasoned with grace (Col. 4:16). The sacrificed mouth will bless and not curse (Jas. 3:10).

Presenting the body to God as a sacrifice includes presenting the hands. God wants hands that are clean (Psa. 24:4), and He desires hands which minister (Acts 20:34) and labor (Eph. 4:28). We also present our hands to God by lifting them up in prayer (1 Tim. 2:8).

Presenting the body to God as a sacrifice includes presenting the loins. Only loins which are girded with strength (Prov. 31:17) and truth (Eph. 6:14) can prove to be useful to God.

Presenting the body to God as a sacrifice includes presenting the feet. Feet used by God will visit the needy and distressed (Mt. 25:36) and will carry the message of the gospel wherever they go (Rom. 10:15). The feel will be restrained from evil (Psa. 119:101).

We may be selective in which organs and body parts we may wish to donate to others at our death, but God demands them all.

The Toehold To The Sacrifice

Notice the word “therefore” in this verse. The word connects the exhortation with the arguments and instruction that have preceded it. Thus what Paul said previously about all men being sinners, God’s grace, the gospel, Christ, justification, faith, etc. are reasons why we should sacrifice ourselves to God.

Paul also bases his urging on “the mercies of God.” Paul had spoken earlier in the book about God’s grace (Rom. 3:24; 5:20-21) and God’s love (Rom. 5:5-8; 8:35-39). He had just finished speaking about His mercy (Rom. 11:30-32). So, because of what God has so graciously, lovingly, and mercifully done for us, let us return our love and appreciation to Him by presenting our bodies in sacrifice to Him.

The Type Of The Sacrifice

Paul uses four phrases to describe the kind of sacrifice we are to offer to God. First, we are to offer “living” sacrifices to God. He no longer wants the offering of dead animals. Paul had exhorted earlier in the book, “And do not present your members as instruments of unrighteousness to sin, but present yourselves to God as being alive from the dead, and your members as instruments of righteousness to God” (Rom. 6:13).

We must also offer up “holy” sacrifices to God. The Jews could not offer what was blemished to God (Deut. 15:21), and neither can we. We must avoid sin as the plague it is.

Our sacrifice which we offer will also have to be “acceptable to God.” We may not offer to God what we think He will be pleased with, but rather we must offer what He has said He will be pleased with. Many people fail at this point. They think they are pleasing God, but like Saul of Tarsus, they are not obeying His will.

Finally, this sacrifice we make to God is, Paul affirms, “your reasonable service.” The word translated “reasonable” means “rational; agreeable to reason.” It is the Greek word logikos from which we get our English word “logic.” The word translated “service” was used of the work of the priests in the tabernacle, and was also used of hired service. Here it refers to “the intelligent service of believers in presenting their bodies to God” (Vine, p. 349). Let no one tell you that the life of a Christian is not a rational way of life. The wise man Solomon, after pursuing a number of different avenues in search of the purpose of life, rationally concluded, “Fear God and keep His commandments, for this is the whole duty of man” (Eccl. 12:13).

Conclusion

For what or whom are you sacrificing? Are you willing to “go out of your way” for God? Remember Jesus said, “If anyone desires to come after Me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross daily, and follow Me” (Lk. 9:23).

Guardian of Truth XXIX: 8, pp. 238-239
April 18, 1985

By Tim Fleeman

In our day and age, we are hearing more about homosexuality than ever before in this country. My son brought home a book given to him at school and homosexuality was mentioned as one of the choices people make in sexuality. Nothing was said of it being sinful or wrong. Those living in this sin are demanding that their way of life be accepted as an alternate life style. Homosexuals are teaching our children in public schools and filling the pulpits in some religious organizations.

It is alarming to see many good people, even religious people, who will stand up and defend those who are living in this sin. In a discussion at work, the following statement was made on this subject: “You mean the Bible says something about homosexuality?” Evidently the religious leaders of our day have failed to proclaim the oracles of God on homosexuality. Does the Bible address this subject? The answer is yes!

Condemned In Both The Old And New Testaments

The first mention of homosexuality in the Old Testament is found in Genesis 19:1 -11. God sent two angels to Sodom to deliver Lot and his family out of the city before he destroyed it. Lot asked these angels to accept his hospitality and spend the night in his home (Gen. 19:1-3). Before they went to bed, men from every quarter of the city came to the door of Lot’s house. They called unto Lot, and said unto him, “Where are the men which came in to thee this night? Bring them out unto us, that we may know them” (Gen. 19:5). The phrase, “That we may know them” means to have a sexual relationship with them (Gen. 4:1, 25; Matt. 1:25). Because of their wickedness, God destroyed these wicked cities (Gen. 19:23-29). God meted out vengeance on Sodom and Gomorrah because they committed fornication in seeking after strange flesh (Jude 7). Webster’s dictionary says that those who practice sodomy are called Sodomites.

“Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination” (Lev. 18:22). Under the old law, homosexuals were put to death (Lev. 20:13). God did not tolerate the whore or the sodomite (Deut. 23:17-18).

Paul spoke of the lesbian and the homosexual in Romans 1:24-32. “For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompense of their error which was meet” (Rom. 1:26-27). God’s judgment against men and women who practice this sin is that they are worthy of death (Rom. 1:32).

“Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, not adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God” (1 Cor. 6:9-10). God here specifies four sexual sins that will keep one from inheriting the kingdom of God. W.E. Vine defines “effeminate” as a male who practices forms of lewdness and persons guilty of addiction to sins of the flesh, voluptuous. Thayer defines “effeminate” as a catamite, a male who submits his body to unnatural lewdness. “Abusers of themselves with mankind” is defined as lying with a male (homosexuality).

Paul told Timothy that those who defile themselves with mankind (homosexuals) are acting contrary to sound doctrine (1 Tim. 1:8-11).

From this study we see that God has condemned homosexuality in both the law of Moses and the new Testament. Prior to the giving of the law at Mount Sinai, God turned the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah into ashes, condemned them with an overthrow, making them an example unto those that after should live ungodly (2 Peter 2:6).

Are These People Harmless?

In most conversations concerning homosexuality, people hold the opinion that if they wish to engage in this sin, that it really is not anyone else’s business. Most feel that homosexuals are harmless and pose no threat to society. Bible example will show as this sin increases, crime, abuse, and violence will also increase.

When the men of Sodom came to Lot’s house, he refused to send the two angels out unto them. They pressed sore upon Lot and came near to break the door (Gen. 19:9). These men were determined and certainly not harmless.

In Judges 19 and 20, a Levite and his concubine went into the city of Gibeah to lodge all night. An old man showed them hospitality and invited them into his home to lodge (Judges 19:20-21). The homosexuals of the city compassed, the house and beat, at the door saying, “Bring forth the man that came into thine house, that we may know him.” The old man offered them his virgin daughter and the Levite’s concubine, but they desired the Levite. Finally they accepted the concubine and they knew her and abused her all night until the morning and then let her go (Judges 19:24-25). The Levite later made this statement to the children of Israel: “And the men of Gibeah rose against me, and beset the house round about upon me by night, and thought to have slain me: and my concubine have they forced (raped), that she is dead” (Judges 20:5). The children of Israel were outraged by this sin and asked the tribe of Benjamin to deliver the homosexuals to them to be put to death. The children of Benjamin would not hearken to the voice of their brethren. They chose to protect these wicked men and give them sanctuary in the city. As a result, over 65,000 men were slain (Judges 20:149). It is alarming to see society, government, and churches condoning and protecting those who engage in homosexuality. These Bible examples demonstrate the violence and abuse that accompanies this sin. These people are not harmless. Homosexuality is running rampant in this country. Rest assured that abuse, property damage, crime, violence, rape, and murder will increase accordingly.

Homosexuality, A Sickness Or A Sin?

Some excuse the sin of homosexuality by saying it is just a sickness and these people cannot help themselves. We can read of several sicknesses in the Scriptures: palsy (Matt. 4:24), issue of blood or hemorrhage (Mk. 5:25), leprosy (Mk. 1:40-42). These, as well as many other sicknesses, are listed in the Scriptures. God has never referred to homosexuality as a sickness in His word. I know of no sickness mentioned in the Bible that would cause one to be damned in eternity. The Bible teaches that homosexuality is a sin, not a sickness.

How does God describe homosexuality in the Scriptures? To act wickedly (Gen. 19:7); iniquity (Gen. 19:15); abomination (Lev. 18:22; 20:13; Deut. 23:17-18); wickedness and folly (Judges 19:23); lewdness (Judges 20:6); evil (Judges 20:13); vile (Judges 19:24); uncleanness (Rom. 1:24); vile affection (Rom. 1:26); against nature, unseemly, error (Rom. 1:26-27). Homosexuals have a reprobate mind and do things which are not becoming (Rom. 1:28); worthy of death (Rom. 1:32); unrighteous (I Cor. 6:9); shall not inherit the kingdom of God (I Cor. 6:9- 10); contrary to sound doctrine (1 Tim. 1:8-10); ungodly, filthy, wicked, unlawful, unjust (2 Pet. 2:6-9).

Homosexuality is not described as a sickness in the Scriptures. God shows time and time again that it is a sin that will keep one out of heaven.

Can The Homosexual Be Saved?

The answer to this question is yes. Anyone can be saved that will comply with the law of God on salvation. Some of the Corinthians had been guilty of homosexuality but were saved from that sin. Paul said, “And such were some of you, but ye are washed, but ye, are sanctified, but ye are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God” (1 Cor. 6:9-11).

Sin separates one from God (Isa. 59:2; 1 Pet. 3:12). Sin causes one to be dead spiritually (Eph. 2: 1). We have shown in this issue that homosexuality is a transgression of the law of God and thus a sin (1 John 3:4). Homosexuals need to be reconciled to God and obtain His forgiveness (Eph. 2:16; Acts 5:31).

How is one saved from sin? God sent Christ into the world to be a sacrifice for sin (Heb. 9:12, 22-28). Jesus tasted death for every man (Heb. 2:9). Jesus came to save us from our sins (Matt. 1:2 1). The Scriptures teach that faith in Christ

is necessary to salvation (John 3:14-17; 8:24). The homosexual must repent of his sin in order to be saved (Lk. 13:31; Acts 17:30). When one truly repents he will make the needed changes in his life. Paul instructed men to repent and turn to God, and do works meet for repentance (Acts 26:20). A homosexual could not continue to practice that sin and be pleasing to God. Let every one that nameth the name of Christ depart from iniquity (2 Tim. 2:19). The sinner needs to confess faith in Christ (Rom. 10:9-10; Matt. 10:32-33). One must be baptized into Christ for the remission of sins (Acts 2:38). Jesus said, “He that believeth and is baptizedshall be saved” (Mk. 16:15-16).

Guardian of Truth XXIX: 8, pp. 236-237
April 18, 1985

By Bobby L. Graham

In James 2:8, 9 the Lord has shown us that impartiality toward all is His will. The royal law of love for neighbor is equally applicable to the poor, the downtrodden, and the neglected. We must love them all and cannot afford to show partiality, for such respect of persons is defined in this passage to be sin and renders us transgressors of Divine law with the murderers, adulterers, and thieves of earth. Partiality is a respectable sin to many people, but God abhors it: He condemned powerful King David, the rich young ruler, and his own wicked priests (Nadab and Abihu) as quickly as He does the unlettered, the powerless, and the insignificant slave. In Jesus Christ there are no national, social, or sex distinctions as regarding worth: “There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is nether male nor female” (Gal. 3:28). All are the same before God. Partiality is more serious in God’s sight, more prevalent among church members, and more detrimental in its effects than we might think. It has caused people to lose interest in Christ and the gospel. Have you been responsible for such?

The Impartiality of God

The Bible portrays God as impartial. Deuteronomy 10:19 declares that God “regards not persons nor takes rewards.” Job 34:19 says of God that He “accepts not the person of princes, nor regards the rich more than the poor.” Matthew 4:45 indicates that He sends the physical blessings of rain and sunshine upon all, the evil and the just. In Acts 10:34, 35, Peter extolled God’s fairness in accepting all who fear God and work righteousness, whatever nation be theirs. In Romans 10:12, we learn that there is no difference with God between the Jew and the Greek, for the same Lord over all is rich unto all who call upon Him. James 3:17 shows that the wisdom from above, is without partiality. 1 Peter 1:17 pictures God as judging without respect of persons according to every man’s work. Such a portrait ought to impress us with God’s will for His spiritual offspring.

Partiality Forbidden

In God’s dealings with Israel the Old Testament stressed, “Ye shall do no unrighteousness in judgment; thou shalt not respect the person of the poor, nor honor the person of the mighty: but in righteousness thou shall judge thy neighbor” (Lev. 19:15). Malachi reproved the priests of his time for being “partial in the law” (Mal. 2:9).

Impartiality is also a New Testament principle. According to James 3:13, 17, the wise man, endued with knowledge, will show his works out of his good manner of life with meekness of wisdom, a trait of which is impartiality. Elders and deacons must be impartial in their determination of which men to use, in decisions of whom to help, and in the exercise of corrective discipline. Bible class teachers ought to show impartiality in their treatment of their students; preachers in their selection of lessons and forming of friendships; and all Christians in their encouragement, visiting, hospitality, help, and general treatment of others.

Three Areas of Biblical Applicaton

God’s Word makes specific application of the principle of impartiality to the areas of love, treatment of those in the assembly, and selection of workers in the church. In love, we must strive to be complete (not lacking) in love for both friend and foe, just as our heavenly Father is (Matt. 5:43-48). It is in this way that Jesus challenges His disciples to be “perfect, even as your Father in heaven is perfect.” What about your love, friend? Do you love even those who have mistreated you, slandered your name, or failed to love you? This is the zenith of love, demonstrated in God’s willingness to send Jesus to die for a rebellious people (1 Jn. 4:10, 11). Jesus’ teaching instructs us to love an enemy – that is, to show good will based on his worth and dignity; to do good – that is, to act for his good, not his hurt; and to pray for him, appealing to God for him to have a tender heart, for the two of you to be reconciled, for his physical and spiritual good, and for his eternal salvation. How impartial are you in love for your enemies?

In James 2:1-9 the principle of impartiality is applied to the attention and consideration given to people in the congregational gatherings. It isfeared that too much attention is sometimes given to preachers or to prominent members. Only the preachers are used in some churches for prayers. The word “brother,” denoting spiritual kinship, is regularly applied to preachers, but other male members often have to settle for “mister” and the preacher’s wife with “Mrs.” Many are fawning toward the rich, the powerful, the famous, the educated, or the best dressed. The amount of time given to these, the remarks made about them, the use made of them in public ways is often enough to nauseate fair-minded peple. Such was the case with Pat Boone in the ’50s and ’60s.

In the selection of elders and deacons and teachers, impartiality should guide our efforts. The elite have no priority with God, nor do the less conspicuous. The spiritual credentials make a difference with Him. The same context (1 Tim. 5:20, 21) emphasizes fairness in the condemnation of sin. Heinous sins or sins of the less powerful are sometimes severely denounced, while the “respectable” sins of the mighty (gossip, social drinking, materialism, and worldliness) are ignored. Brethren, we ought to be ashamed, for herein we, unlike our Father and our Example, have shown respect of persons.

All persons desirous of pleasing God and being like Christ will purpose to eliminate respect of persons from their lives. Remember that God respects character, not persons.

Guardian of Truth XXIX: 8, pp. 233, 244
April 18, 1985

By Ron Halbrook

In both private and public studies with people who claim the miraculous powers of the Holy Spirit today, we hear a message that is markedly different from message of the New Testament. In the first century, the Holy Spirit gave us the Bible as a perfect, complete and infallible revelation of God’s plan for our salvation (1 Cor. 2:1-13). But today the Spirit raises up men who contradict themselves, each other, and the Bible. At least men caught in these contradictions say the Spirit guides and illuminates them. Something is wrong when such confusion reigns supreme in the Spirit’s name. Who is responsible?

We would like to notice some arguments and claims today which Jesus never made. How can we explain those differences, since Jesus had the Spirit “without measure” (Jn. 3:34)? Why did Peter not contradict Himself when engaged in controversy, since “Spirit-filled” men do so today? Why did the Spirit not guide Paul to make arguments which Peter would deny, as occurs in discussions with various so-called “Pentecostals” and “Charismatics” today?

“Love” When They Do It, “Hate” When We Do It

When we talk with “Pentecostal” people about the Holy Spirit and miracles, we are soon charged with a lack of love. They speak plainly their positions and press their views. We do the same patiently, gently, and firmly, but then are accused of animosity. Why is it love for them to dispute and hate for us to do it? Does the Spirit lead men into such confusion?

Jesus said, “Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free” (Jn. 8:32). When we speak with deep conviction, with “all boldness,” and with “great plainness of speech,” it is a sign that we love men and are seeking to save them (Acts 4:28; 2 Cor. 3:12). It is amazing that men who claim miraculous guidance and illumination from the Holy Spirit do not understand that the Spirit expressly teaches us in the Bible to make the distinction between truth and error very plain. “Because the love of God is shed abroad in our hearts by the Holy Ghost,” we must be “ready to preach the gospel,” we are to be “not ashamed” of its power, and we should “earnestly contend for the faith” (Rom. 5:5; 1:15-16; Jude 3).

Christians and Brethren In All Denominations?

Our “Charismatic” friends are often offended because we no not consider them brethren in Christ. Their view of the Spirit working on an interdenominational basis obscures the conditions of pardon revealed by the Spirit in Scripture. Jesus said, “He that ________ and is _________ shall be ________” (Mk. 16:16). When we fill int eh blanks, we learn what it means to be “born of the water and of the Spirit.” Unless a person is baptized in water as an exercise of intelligent and obedient faith, “he cannot enter into the kingdom of God” (Jn. 3:5).

Jesus shed His blood “for the remission of sins” – which means our sins could not be forgiven without His death (Matt. 26:28). The Holy Spirit said through Peter that we must “repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the __________ ____ _______” (Acts 2:38). To fill in the blanks is to learn what we receive by grace when we are baptized – what we cannot receive before or without water baptism. Without it, we cannot be forgiven under the terms revealed by God.

But “Pentecostal” folks often speak of “getting the Spirit” – which indicates in their minds pardon from sin – while praying at the mourner’s bench, lying on the bed at home, or driving in a car. Many of them were later baptized in water, but without a scriptural understanding of the purpose of baptism. They are not saved, not in the kingdom of God, and not the recipients of the remission of sins. Did the Spirit tell people how to become Christians in the undenominational body of Christ during the first century and then tell modern “Pentecostals” a different way to become Christians in denominational bodies not even mentioned in the Bible? Who is responsible for this confusion?

“Jesus Is All Positive”

When we open the Bible and show people the difference between Bible miracles and modem emotionalism, “miracles” falsely so called, we are likely to hear this, “I am very sorry that you can only see negative things. Jesus is all positive, not negative. The Pharisees were always negative like you all in the Church of Christ. You don’t look for anything positive in our miracles; you just deny the Spirit.” One such “all positive” individual recently charged me with animosity, negativism, ignorance, baffling people “with bull,” association with “every demon in bell,” passing out unchristian tracts, and lying.

Did the Spirit lead this so-called “Spirit-filled man” to say, “Jesus is all positive”? Jesus had the Spirit without measure and the Spirit inspired the records of Jesus’ life. The Jesus presented to us by the Spirit was both positive and negative. This Jesus was narrow and negative toward the idea that men can be saved without water baptism (Jn. 3:5), or that men can be saved without genuine faith in Himself (8:24), or that men can be children of God and lie like the devil (8:44).

Does the Spirit lead a man to say that we must be “all positive” to be like Jesus and never be negative lest we be like the Pharisees, and then lead the man to be negative toward negativism? If the person is for negativism, he cannot be “all positive,” and if against negativism, he still cannot be “all positive.” Poor, soul, he must be like the Pharisees in spite of himself! The false theories of modem “Pentecostalism,” not the Spirit of God, lead men into such total confusion and self-contradiction.

But, shame of all shames, this gentleman also called me “a professional debater” – a positive description, no doubt, since he is “all positive.” Though I have had so few formal, public debates as to be in the minor (very minorl) league, I got this sudden promotion by pointing out the dilemmas of his error. Who authored this snearing slur, “professional debater”? If this is some more illumination from the Holy Spirit, a few questions are in order. Perhaps the Spirit will illuminate further.

Was Jesus a “Professional debater” when He engaged in the heated controversies of Matthew 22 until His opponents were too ashamed to debate Him any further? Was Peter a “professional debater” in Acts 2 when he answered a false theory (y. 13) and accused his audience of murder? – in Acts 4 when his opponents ran out of arguments and resorted to physical beating? – in Acts I I and chapter 15 when he had no small dispute with his own brethren over their errors? Was Paul one of those slimy snakes and despicable demons – a “professional debater” – when “he disputed in the synagogue with the Jews, and with the devout persons, and in the market daily with them that met with him” (Acts 17:17)? Were Jesus, Peter, and Paul “all positive” or were they pointedly negative in these debates?

Debate can be private or public, formal or informal, but it represents the militant determination of our Lord and of the early Christians to spread the gospel into all the world and to every creature by every possible means. In debating as in sermons, Bible classes, tracts, radio lessons, or any other method of preaching Christ, we must be both positive on behalf of truth and negative in regard to sin and error. Both characteristics ought to be highly visible in all of our efforts to teach God’s Word. We should strive to develop these characteristics more and more, following the footsteps of Jesus and the instruction of the Spirit. Men do not learn to eschew debate by listening to the Spirit of God but to a seducing of Satan.

What About Apostles and New Scripture Today?

Modern “Pentecostals” unite in the claim that “Holy Spirit baptism and all the gifts of the Spirit are for us today. ” They emphasize “all gifts,” but if asked the right questions, they deny some giftss are for today and then contradict each other as to which ones are and which are not for today. Did the world receive new Scripture through the first apostles? – Yes; No. If no apostles today can give new Scripture, do we have “all the gifts” today? – Yes; – No.

Almost to a man, “Charismatics” deny that we can receive new Scripture today as was done in thefirst century, although a few concede it as a possibility (but even they do not know of any new Scripture “as yet”). What about the gift of apostleship – any living apostles today? Some “Pentecostals” say this gift had the purpose of revealing and confirming new truth. Since the Bible is complete, they tell us that the gifts of apostleship and of receiving new Scripture are not for us today! But other miraculous gifts are for us, they insist.

The Bible teaches in Mark 16:15-20 that miracles (cast out demons, speak foreign languages, take up serpents, drink any deadly thing without harm, and heal the sick) would be performed in order to confirm the word. 1 Corinthians 12-13 gives the most complete list of such gifts: the word of wisdom, the word of knowledge, faith, gifts of healing, miracles, prophecy, discerning of spirits, foreign languages, interpretation of such languages, apostles, teachers, helps and governments. Such gifts were to “fail … .. cease,” and “vanish away” because they pertained to revelation “in part” -revelation part by part. “But when that which is perfect is come, then that which is in part shall be done away” (13:8-10). The thing “in part” is divine revelation in words. “That which is perfect” is the completion, maturity, or fulness of thesame thing – revelation in words.

The Bible is complete, and so the miraculous gifts which were a means to that end have passed away. Most “Charismatics” can see that point when it comes to receiving new Scripture today, many can see it in reference to apostles today, but none of them can see it in regard to the rest of the miraculous gifts! Is the Spirit responsible for this delusion and confusion?

Also, modern “Pentecostals” are “filled with the Spirit” to explain “that which is perfect” as a perfect age in the future, the perfection of heaven, our personal perfection in the resurrection, or the second coming of Christ. Why so many explanations – why cannot the Spirit decide on the right one, tell the “Pentecostals” what it is, and get them united on it? But the Spirit was not discussing an age, heaven, our resurrected state, or the second coming of Christ. Why so many explanations – why cannot the Spirit decide on the right one, tell the “Pentecostals” what it is, and get them united on it? But the Spirit was not discussing an age, heaven, our resurrected state, or the second coming of Christ “in part” and in perfection. It is miraculous prophecy, preaching in foreign languages, and inspired knowledge – divine revelation “in part” and in perfection. The Spirit who gave us I Corinthians 12-13 is not the same spirit which fills “Pentecostalism” today!

It is common for “Charismatics” who claim there are living apostles today to also confess that they do not know who those apostles are. It is also said that living apostles need not give new Scripture. We must know who these apostles are because it is their office to bind and loose what God reveals – we are “not of God” if we fail to hear them (Matt. 16:19; 18:18; 1 Jn. 4:6).

“All apostles did not write Scripture, and some like Mark ‘ Luke, and Jude were not apostles and yet they wrote Scripture, ” we are told. But some apostles did write new Scripture and some will do it today if we have all the same gifts. The above quotation is designed to show why we do not have to know who today’s apostles are, but it only shows that some who are not apostles today will write new Scripture – just like some who were not apostles did in the first century. Surely, somebody can – apostles or not – or else, we do not have all the same gifts! Which will it be? Did the Spirit of God fill men in order to leave them in this dilemma?

When All Else Fails, Shout!

When all else fails, “Pentecostals” shout or put in bold print, “Praise God For Ever More! Hallelujah, Brother! Praise The Lord!” If they shout long enough, will the Spirit tell them how it impossible to claim “all the gifts” and yet deny that we can receive new Scripture, have apostles, handle snakes, or drink poison without harm? How can we have and not have all, a-1-1, the gifts? Maybe shouting helps people ignore the contradiction. Or, will God ten other “Pentecostals” who ask in faith who their new apostles are? – which apostles can receive new Scripture? If modern “Pentecostals” ask in faith, believing all things are possible, will God reveal new Scripture to some who are not apostles – just like He did to Mark, Luke, and Jude?

We are ready to publish the following information, if some “Charismatic” will shout and ask God about it: (1) the names and addresses of apostles today, (2) the names and addresses of some apostles who receive new Scripture today, and (3) the names and addresses of some men who are not apostles but who receive new Scripture like Mark, Luke, and Jude. Will God supply this vital information if someone shouts, “Praise God For Ever More!”? If someone asks Him but there is “no voice, nor any that answered,” will He answer if they “cry aloud” even louder in faith, believing? “Either he is talking, or he is pursuing, or he is on a journey, or peradventure he sleepeth, and must be awaked.” Is it the Spirit of God who causes men to shout and who then remains silent, leaving them without an “answer to every man that asketh you a reason of the hope that is in you”?

We call upon so-called “Charismatics” and “Pentecostals” to realize that the confusion and contradiction which characterize your denominations are positive proofs that the Spirit of God is not among you. Your churches are never mentioned in the Bible. We plead for you to become just New Testament Christians, members of undenominational bodies called “churches of Christ” (Rom. 16:16). “Beloved believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God” (1 Jn. 4:1).

Guardian of Truth XXIX: 8, pp. 234-235, 242-243
April 18, 1985