Have Ye Not Read?

By Hoyt Houchen

Question: Is it proper for the one leading the congregational singing during worship services to sing harmony, tenor or bass, rather than the melody? I am not referring to those hymns with a tenor or base lead in the chorus.

Response: It makes no difference which part of the song (soprano, alto, tenor or bass) the song leader sings as long as he is directing the singing. When he is standing in front of the assembly and directing the singing, he is the song leader. What part of the song he may choose to sing himself while he is leading is incidental. The song director is to pitch the song, start it and then continue to direct it. Should he decide to sing bass or tenor (he may have a throat condition, or may not for some reason, be able to sing certain notes) would be optional. There is nothing in the Scriptures which teach that anyone must sing one part of a song only; in fact, in the early church there were no notes for music as we have them today. We are simply commanded to sing (Eph. 5:19; Col. 3:16; Jas. 5:13). All of us should sing the very best we can, following the song director so that we will all be singing in unison and also singing the same tempo and pitch. Each one should sing his own part to the best of his ability, regardless of what part the song leader himself may be singing.

It is believed by some that, when the song director sings some part other than the melody, the lead is being transferred to the women. This is not the case, because usually some men in the congregation are singing the melody also. All the melody is not necessarily turned over to the women; but even if it were, it would not be a violation of scriptural teaching because the man leading the singing continues to be in charge. His changing to tenor or bass does not turn the song leading over to women. It may not always be the best judgment for the song leader to sing a part other than the melody, because of the effect that it might have upon the quality of the singing; but it is not unscriptural for him to do so.

All of us should be careful that we do not bind our opinion upon others and thereby become contentious about matters of judgment or indifference.

Guardian of Truth XXVIII: 9, p. 260
May 3, 1984

The Golden Rule

By Raymond E. Harris

Matthew 7:12 reads, “Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that men should to do you, do ye even so to them . . . . ” This verse expresses an attitude that has won for it the designation “The Golden Rule. ” Simply stated the principle is: “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.”

It is interesting how some try to set certain bounds or limits to what is obviously a universal principle. The attempts to exercise such exemptions or exclusions clearly manifest areas of rebellion and selfishness.

For instance it is not uncommon to hear someone say, “Yes, the Golden Rule is a noble principle but after all business is business.” It does not take a Solomon to perceive that anyone who would make such a statement is serving mammon and not God. Truly, the love of money is the root of all evil.

But let’s now move into another area where the Golden Rule is neglected. One such area is most assuredly the home. In some cases people treat total strangers with more understanding and kindness than they do their own companions, children or parents.

Invariably, when I see where a divorce suit has been filed, I immediately know that one or both parties involved violated the Golden Rule. Put another way, there would have never been a divorce in the history of the world, if all husbands and wives had always kept the Golden Rule.

Some feel there is no better definition for the word “love” than the Golden Rule. Truly, if we love God, our companions and all our fellow men as we should, we will do unto them as we would want them to do unto us.

To illustrate the application of the Golden Rule in marriage:

1. We should not criticize our companions in the presence of others.

2. We should not nag.

3. We should not stir jealousy by being flirtatious.

4. We should never do anything out of spite.

5. We should do everything possible to control our own selfishness.

Verily, we would a live happier lives if we could always remember, on all occasions, and, in all circumstances, to keep the golden rule!

Guardian of Truth XXVIII: 9, p. 264
May 3, 1984

Look On The Bright Side

By J.F. Dancer. Jr.

There is a tendency on the part of most of us to see only the bad in this life. Part of this can be blamed on our own news media who seem to think that for a thing to be “news” it must be bad! Part can be blamed on our own negative thinking. We need to look at the good in life. No, we cannot ignore the sin and expect it to go away but we can keep out eyes on the Lord and on doing his will.

The January 1984 issue of Pulpit Helps had this little note that is worthy of consideration: “Thirty million couples in the U.S. have been married ten years or more without a divorce! Over ten million teenagers in America have never tried marijuana or any form of dope and twice that number have never been arrested or accused of breaking any law!”

Why should we learn to think about good more than evil? So we won’t become so despondent that we give up all hope of finding any good. Paul encouraged the saints at Philippi to learn to think properly (Phil. 4:8,9). He wanted them to find happiness in serving God and to rejoice in all the good that they received from God’s hand. He was not encouraging them to ignore the sin of the world. He is not saying, “. . . . life is a bed of roses.” But he is saying that saints can find happiness in this life if they trust God and that they can make some changes by teaching the gospel of Christ to the lost. It is the power of God lo save (Rom. 1: 16,17) and thus the power of God to change the world. Paul was a prisoner at the time he wrote this letter, but he is not despondent, he is not bitter, he does not feel that serving God is a waste of effort and time. He is happy to be a Christian (in spite of his sufferings) and wants all to be as he is with the exception of some of his problems (Acts 26:29). Yes, he had learned to look on the bright side of life! He had learned to look to Jesus, the author and finisher of his faith (Heb. 12:2).

Sin abounds (Rom. 3:23) and contaminates us all. But one can be forgiven and cleansed of the guilt of sin (Mk. 16:15,16). Satan is powerful and has many followers but the God John served is more powerful than Satan (1 Jn. 4:4). People must see the ages of sin are not something to be desired (Rom. 6:23) and that the gift of God is above all we could ask or think (Rom. 6:23; Eph. 3:20). This will not remove all sin from the world. It is not going to take away all afflictions in this life. Satan is alive and doing well on the earth but his end is coming and he knows it very well!

Yes, we must learn to look for the good in the lives of our fellow men. We must seek good and do it. Faith in God and in His word will help us in this. But we must learn to look on the bright side of things. We must look to Jesus and to His word. We must obey that word and one day we will be rewarded.

Guardian of Truth XXVIII: 9, p. 268Z
May 3, 1984

Thinkin’ Out Loud: He Is Just Like All The Others

By Lewis Willis

Well, the great one came to Northeast Ohio. I guess he saw Northeast Ohio. And I suppose he is probably persuaded he conquered Northeast Ohio. What did Northeast Ohio get out of it? After all of the prancing, preaching and designed-for-television hysteria which he carefully created, he left his audiences poorer. They were still in the pauperism of darkness, the destitution of sin and the poverty of ignorance. Oh, lest I forget, he left with something else. He left with his treasury bulging and some wallets in Northeast Ohio depleted. With “the sleight of men and cunning craftiness, whereby they lie in wait to deceive” (Eph. 4:14), he professionally picked the pockets of his audiences with a skill far surpassing the old time huckster of medicine show days. Some of you will remember the fellows to whom I refer – the purveyors of magic elixirs. I recall hearing about one as a kid. He said before he started taking Hadacol, he could hardly spit over his chin. Now after taking only 186 bottles of Hadacol, he could spit all over his chin. This fellow who came to Ohio has become so professional in his act that one would scarcely realize the two came from a common background.

The modem carnival man to whom I refer is Jimmy Swaggart. Newsweek Magazine (5/30/83) called him a “show biz professional.” At age 48 he “surpassed the other electronic apostles” and has “become king of the television evangelists.” The Newsweek article was entitled “King of Honky-Tonk Heaven.” As long as the Lord has friends like Jimmy, He doesn’t need any enemies. Can you imagine the Apostle Peter’s actions producing such a headline. The Akron Beacon Journal (10/23/83) referred to him as “the No. I preacher in the land,” according to the latest ratings charts. Newsweek quoted him as saying, “It takes business sense and many of the tactics used by the Fortune 500” to achieve the success he has realized. In 1982 his revenues topped $60 million. It is indeed big business! A Baton Rouge, LA television station, WBRZ, reported on the family corporation he had formed for his ministry. They said 10 members of his family received more than $400,000 in annual salaries. Swaggart took out a rebuttal ad saying it ain’t so. He has 14 members of his family making less than $350,000! Sure glad we got that straightened out. WBRZ reported that in 1981, Jimmy made $68,000, his wife made $50,526, his son made $58,000, and a brother-in-law made $50,000. That was two years ago. Who knows what he is making now. The son is the kid on his television program who announces upcoming crusades. He has all the personality and skill of Deputy Dawg, the cartoon character.

Some of the members of his staff severed their association with him over the family’s extravagance. Newsweek reported that his wife had an $11,000 desk in her office. As more and more of this information became public, Swaggart realized he could not continue to make himself available for interviews. Stuart Warner, of the Beacon Journal staff quoted a spokesman as saying “we just got burned too many times … so we’ve made it a policy (of not talking to media people).” The spokesman, referring to the Newsweek article, said, “the whole thing was a mess.” The reason the article was a mess is because the operation is a mess. It is a shyster operation from the word go. You know, you can’t make a pig-pen look like a rose garden. So any report on a mess has to be a mess.

The three day campaign at the Coliseum was expected to draw over 50,000 people. I suspect they succeeded since over 14,000 people were present the first night. One is led to believe that the organization pays all of the expense for these campaigns. Not so. Mr. Warner reported that local churches involved in the Crusade contributed $10,000 for advertising and recruited more than 1200 volunteers. Mr. Warner told me in a telephone conversation that Swaggart told the crowd he expected to raise at least $50,000 Friday night, and Warner was persuaded he exceeded that. Swaggart’s budget is $350,000 a day and “we’re in the red every day. I need your help. If I were to tell you how much, it would scare you.” Jimmy, maybe you need to lower some family salaries.

Naturally he taped the event for broadcast on his television program where additional appeals would be made for funds. On hand at the rally were staff people who could tell the audience how to use life insurance policies, wills, and savings plans to contribute to the ministry. Books and records were sold. He has sold more than 12 million albums. One lady from Cleveland was asked about his money oriented activities. She responded, “I don’t care how much money he makes … not as long as he continues to preach the word.” And this is precisely where the rub comes in. These people are not capable of distinguishing between the word of God and the word of Jimmy Swaggart. If he’d ever start preaching the truth, his entire approach would have to be changed. This would require that he repent of his sins. But, having watched him for a number of years, I see no evidence that he is likely to do that. He is the charismatic movement’s reigning star at this time, having replaced Oral Roberts, Rex Humbard and Jim Bakker. But he is headed for a fall. The crest of public favor he now enjoys will soon dissipate as his self-enriching exploits are exposed. By the time the media catches up with him, he’ll be so rich that he won’t care what they say as he falls. Oh, you’ll hear the usual Humbard type appeals to save his ministry but others will soon take his place. He is just like all the rest. He now needs to be ushered around by security guards. But the time is coming when he will be forgotten. I always wonder from whom those guards are protecting him. Is it his faithful audience? The security he needs cannot be bought with money. It is the security that comes only when men have obeyed the Gospel and been saved from their sins. Maybe they protect his gold Rolex watch, his Lincoln Continental or Frances’ $11,000 desk.

At the Coliseum he said God “is so sick of dead preachers preaching dead sermons to dead congregations.” “I was just thinkin’,” God must at least be nauseated with these television boys who use false doctrine to effectively steal money from their audiences in the name of God. The Wall Street tactics of such men are a far cry from that of the apostles. “And 1, brethren, when I came to you, came not with excellency of speech or of wisdom, declaring unto you the testimony of God. For I determined not to know any thing among you, save Jesus Christ, and him crucified. And I was with you in weakness, and in fear, and in much trembling. And my speech and my preaching was not with enticing words of man’s wisdom, but in demonstration of the Spirit and of Power: That your faith should not stand in the wisdom of men, but in the power of God” (1 Cor. 2:1-5).

Guardian of Truth XXVIII: 9, pp. 265-266
May 3, 1984