Truth Magazine

By O. C. Birdwell, Jr.

David lamented the fall in battle of king Saul and his son Jonathan and taught Israel a lamentation which three times said, “How are the mighty fallen! ” (2 Sam. 1: 19,25,27). Later, speaking of the untimely death of Abner, he said, “Know ye not that there is a prince and a great man fallen this day in Israel?” (2 Sam. 3:38).

These great and mighty men of Israel fell through physical death. That is not, however, the only way the mighty have fallen, or can fall. David himself is a good example of this, as we shall show, and he should serve as an example and warning to men of God in our generation.

An abbreviated account of David’s sins in the Bathsheba, Uriah affair is given as follows:

And it came to pass, at the return of the year, at the time when kings go out to battle, that David sent Joab, and his servants with him. . . . But David tarried at Jerusalem . . . . David arose from his bed, and walked upon the roof of the king’s house: and from the roof he saw a woman bathing; and the woman was very beautiful to look upon . . . . And David sent messengers, and took her: . . . And the woman conceived . . . . And David sent to Joab, saying, Send me Uriah the Hittite . . . . And David said to Uriah, Go down to thy house, and wash thy feet . . . . But Uriah slept at the door of the king’s house with all the servants of his lord, and went not down to his house . . . . And when David had called him, he did eat and drink before him, and he made him drunk; and at even he went out to lie on his bed with the servants of his lord, and went not down to his house . . . . David wrote a letter to Joab and sent it by the hand of Uriah. And he wrote in the letter, saying, Set ye Uriah in the forefront of the hottest battle, and retire ye from him, that he may be smitten, and die (2 Sam. 11:1-21).

One might ask, “What in the world got into David to cause him to do what he did?” The answer could correctly be given in the words of Luke when he said, “And Satan entered into Judas” (Lk. 22:3). Satan seeks to influence and destroy. He will use his subtly to cause the fall of kings, apostles, elders, preachers, and all others who are not constantly on guard. Seemingly, with him, the greater and mightier, the better. No wonder Peter admonishes, “Be sober, be watchful” (1 Pet. 5:8).

Paul wrote, “Now these things happened unto them by way of example; and they were written for our admonition, upon whom the ends of the ages are come” (1 Cor. 10: 11). This statement might also serve to encourage us to learn a lesson from David’s sad and sordid affair. Since it is recorded, let us use it to help us avoid some of the problems in our society. The following are just a few instructions we may receive from this account.

(1) Anyone can fall. A young, good to look upon, eighth son of Jesse the Bethlehemite was searched out by Samuel. When David was found, Jehovah said unto Samuel, “Arise, anoint him; for this is he.” He was anointed, and “the Spirit of Jehovah came mightily upon David from that day forward” (I Sam. 16). When David faced Goliath his attitude was, “for the battle is Jehovah’s and he will give you into our hands” (I Sam. 17:47). Due to his success against the Philestines, David became an honored hero in Israel. The woman sang, “Saul hath slain his thousands, and David his ten thousands” (1 Sam. 18:7). He became king over all Israel and successfully led Israel against her enemies. Then, at the height of his glory, and pinnacle of his power, and at a time when he may have felt he could do no wrong, he sinned against God and man. “How are the mighty fallen!” If one so great could fall into so obvious a sin, surely no one today is exempt from the possibility. Paul gave us some pointed warning that should be heeded when he said, “Be not high minded, but fear” (Rom. 11:20), and “Let him that thinketh he standeth take heed lest he fall” (1 Cor. 10:12).

(2) One needs to stay busy with his work and family duties. The following is said of David:

And it came to pass, at the return of the year, at the time when kings go out to battle, that David sent Joab, and his servants with him, and all Israel; and they destroyed the children of Ammon, and besieged Rabbah. But David tarried at Jerusalem (2 Sam. 11:11).

Does this statement indicate that David was not where he should have been? Many feel that it does, and that his sin was, at least in part, caused by his failure to be busy at his work. In times past he would have been with his army. He now tarries at Jerusalem. The kingdom has been stabilized and fortified. Responsibilities are delegated to others. In the evening David sleeps and walks on the roof. He has time to let his eyes rove and his mind wonder. This is the ideal time and place for Satan to do his work.

Christians need to avoid idleness, and be busy doing the right things. One of the requirements for being a “good minister of Christ Jesus” is to “exercise thyself unto godliness” (1 Tim. 5:6,7). This means that we are to not only preach godliness, but are also to put it into practice in our own lives. Just recently, in South Carolina, a Baptist preacher was convicted of assault with a baseball bat, and sentenced to three years in prison. A rather lengthy list of names might be made of gospel preachers, elders, deacons, and other members of the church, who in the past few years have been guilty of shady and sinful business dealing, stealing, fornication, and other forms of immorality. This can be avoided if Christians will exercise themselves unto godliness. Be busy at study, teaching others, worship, and be ready unto every good work.

Preacher brother, if you are married, give attention to your wife and her needs and desires. Spend much time with your children and maybe your grandchildren. You are charged to bring them up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord. If you entertain the idea that to be a preacher and do the Lord’s bidding you must neglect your wife and children, you are sadly mistaken. In fact, through such neglect you disqualify yourself from serving as an elder or deacon, and also from being an effective evangelist. Who wants to hear a preacher who neglects his family and cannot get along with his wife? Through family neglect and failure to be busy in spiritual and secular work, one puts himself into a position where he may be more easily enticed to sin. Such, it seems, was the case with David.

(3) Man cannot successfully cover his sins. Obviously, David’s servants and guards must have known about his sin. If Uriah did not know, he would have, had he been permitted to live. Joab knew about the death plan for Uriah. It is near impossible to cover sins from our associates, friends, and neighbors. There is no way sin can be hidden from God. More than anyone else, David should have known this. During his period of success and greatness, could he have just overlooked this fact? Or, is it possible that because of his prosperity and position he thought that both man and God would overlook his sin and not take it into account?

it is disturbing that in our society so many people in high position and with great authority and power readily violate the laws of our land and the laws of God. It disturbs still more that in the church there are respected and highly regarded brethren who will engage in immoral acts, try to cover them up, and become rather indignant when the sin is uncovered. Friend, be sure that your sin will be revealed. God knows even if no one else does. Remember too, that one’s position or greatness will have no influence on God’s judgment.

(4) Consequences of sin are real and will remain. Seemingly, some people who have good eyes are not able to see beyond the end of the nose, and cannot think beyond the present in order to weigh the consequences of their actions. Especially is this so when it comes to their own lusts and camal desires. Esau thought he was about to die from hunger and, for a mess of pottage, sold his birthright to Jacob. The Israelites cried, “give us a king,” and until it was too late, completely disregarded the consequences of having a king. Judas, who loved money, betrayed his Lord for thirty pieces of silver, giving no thought to the consequences of so vile a deed. Why can we not learn a lesson from David and all these other Biblical examples? Let us awake and take warning. Sin, unrepented of, will bring eternal condemnation. Sin, even when there is repentance with many tears, will.often bring dire consequences to our lives. David said, “I have sinned against Jehovah.” Nathan responded, “Jehovah also hath put away thy sin.” David was forgiven. Yet, he suffered many consequences. He said, “My wounds are loathsome and corrupt, because of my foolishness,” and “my sorrow is continually before me” (Ps. 38:5,17). God told David that the sword would never pass from his house and from his own house evil would be raised up against him.

Conclusion

There is a concluding point and lesson we need to learn from David. When his sin was vividly pictured unto him by Nathan, he responded by saying, “I have sinned.” He said that one who would be so guilty was worthy of death. By God’s grace, however, he was permitted to live and was able to render useful service for God and his people.

Christians today who succumb to camal desire and worldly lust should repent and confess their sins as did David. God will forgive. Their brethren should also forgive and help restore them to a useful place in the Lord’s service. Surely a faithful preacher or elder should not forever be placed on the shelf because he has made a mistake from which he-has turned with sorrow and a contrite heart.

My friend in Christ, do all you can to avoid sin. If sin is committed, however, repent of it and make all possible correction. Then, do not live in the past. Start from where you are to again render faithful and diligent service for God.

Guardian of Truth XXVIII: 1, pp. 21-22
January 5, 1984

By S. Leonard Tyler

We are dealing with a very weighty, explosive and, yet vital proposition. A preacher sins, recognizes his terrible transgression, sincerely repents, confesses his sin, asks forgiveness, prays to the Father and gives every manifestation of reparation. How can he get back into preaching? Every Christian and local church may well have to deal with this proposition. Each one, properly understanding, should desire to act scripturally, lovingly and with due consideration toward the offended, offender, babes in Christ and innocent victims, in order that proper correctional measures can be followed for the edification and salvation of all. If any action should be impartial, unselfish and absolutely harmonious with the Lord’s directions, this proposition deserves full consideration. It deserves our most sincere and reverent concern and action.

Some Thoughts To Consider

1. Can Christians single out any one work of the Lord and classify all who participated as a special group with special laws, demanding special treatment or judgment? Special treatment and judgment must not be confused with special qualifications required of elders or deacons (1 Tim. 3; Tit. 1). Should not each Christians be impartially judged and accepted or rejected as faithful or unfaithful, according to the truth? Paul teaches that God will s o judge, “Who will render to every man according to his deeds …. For there is no respect of persons with God …. Tribulation and anguish, upon every soul of man that doeth evil . . . . But glory, honor, and peace, to every man that worketh good, to the Jew first, and also to the Gentile” (Rom. 2:5-11; see also Eph. 5:3-7).

2. Can Christians (scripturally) classify sin as big and little, forgivable and unforgivable, or “mortal and venial”? Is stealing a little car of less consequence than stealing a big car? Is drunkenness less damning than lying, stealing, fornication or adultery (Gal. 5:19-21)? “Sin is lawlessness … a transgression of the law” (1 John 3:4). The consequence of sin when it is finished or “full grown,” regardless of the person, place served, or work done in the church, is death (Jas. 1: 13-15). If and when one sins, God’s law determines the consequences or correctional measures applicable to any of His children.

3. Can Christians (scripturally) evaluate the sins of a person, according to the place filled or work done in the church, and thereby regulate the discipline accordingly (Gal. 6:7-8)? The response to this is usually clear and correct, but the execution of it is apt to follow afar off. Their reasoning seems to be, if the person sinning is an “ordinary” member, he should be entreated, taught respecting the wrong, and advised as to what the Lord’s word teaches one to do in order that he may be forgiven. When and if one submits, the church must forgive him, accept him, encourage him and rejoice with him in the Lord (Luke 15:7, 10, 32). But if he is an elder, deacon, preacher or a child of one of these, what then? “My brethren, have not the. faith of our Jesus Christ, the Lord of glory, with respect of persons” (Jas. 2:1).

What Is A Preacher?

This question is deliberately asked to impress and focus attention. There are many and varied concepts regarding the definition, work and position of a preacher. The varied concepts lead to corrupt attitudes, mixed feelings and divided actions. Some deliberately and emphatically state, “I don’t think a preacher is any smarter, better, more righteous or holier than I or any other Christian.” I am inclined to agree. But isn’t it a little peculiar that, if some transgression is committed, this same person will cry out, “And he was a preacher!” “She was a preacher’s wife (or son or daughter)!” Is a preacher, his wife, son or daughter in a special class, with special laws, demanding special judgment or discipline? Are these to receive different correctional measures? Does God look upon preachers and their families differently from other Christians? One replies, “But he should know better.” Shouldn’t you? There can be no doubt but that maturity, wisdom, knowledge, and experience have much to do with one’s evaluation and emotional actions toward any situation or problem. But is not this true regarding any and all Christians (Heb. 5:12-14)?

This kind of reasoning classifies the preacher and his family as in a special-group, with special laws, demanding special judgment and treatment. Is not this whole approach or philosophy of human origin? It certainly is not biblical? The Lord’s people, His church, is not divided up into “the clergy and laity.” Some preach, teach, serve as elders, deacons or janitors but we are all servants, saints, Christians and brethren in Christ (Gal. 3:26-29). We all live and are amenable to the same Lord under one law, “the law of the spirit of life in Christ Jesus” (Rom. 8:1). We are individually responsible to Christ, as Paul wrote of himself, “Being not without law to God, but under the law to Christ” (1 Cor. 9:21). Each Christian is to fill his place and use his ability to the glory of God, if he receives the salvation “ready to be revealed in the last time” (1 Pet. 1:1,9; 1 Cor. 9:12).

The preacher is a Christian, for the same reason you are, to be saved. He became a Christian, just as you did, through faith, repentance and baptism (Mark 16;15-16; Acts 2:38-41; Gal. 3:26-27). Therefore, being added to the church, he is a member just as others, with the same blessings, obligations, opportunities and responsibilities (Acts 2:27; 1 Cor. 12:18). “But now are they many members, yet but one body . . . . Now ye are the body of Christ, and members in particular” (1 Cor. 12:20,27). He preaches but that does not scripturally change him into some “professional” to be “doctored or reverend” or treated with awesome respect nor as a “half-citizen” or “adopted servant” or “a hired hand.” We are workers together with God not as the “high and low, boss and servant” but as faithful servants of Jesus Christ our Savior (2 Cor. 6:1). God has so designed the body “that there should be no schism in the body, but that the members should have the same care for one another” (1 Cor. 12:24-25). Jesus said, “But he that is greatest among you shall be your servant” (Matt. 23:8-12).

Sin And The Consequence

If ever the pieces are to be brought together, all involved must confront the reality that scattered them. “Sin is to blame for it all.” Sin is destructive and damnable (Isa. 59:1-2; Rom. 6:23). Sin can, and is the only thing that can, cause one to be eternally lost (Ezek. 18:4,20; Jas. 1: 13-15; Rev. 20:11-15). All should recognize sin for what it is and what it will do! The sooner one learns this, the more fortunate he is. The Lord’s word will supply this information (Jn. 8:31-32). Paul said that he did not know sin, but the law came and sin appeared very sinful (Rom. 7:7-14). When Jesus promised His apostles the Holy Spirit, He said, “He will reprove (convict) the world of sin, and of righteousness, and of judgment” (John 16:8). The real tragedy is that every heartache, sorrow, broken home and even death caused by sin today is but a foretaste of the terrible consequences to come in the eternal world (Matt. 25:41,46).

Therefore, no effort is made to lighten or cover sin’s ugly face or disastrous consequences. To do so would be more tragic and inhumane than camouflaging a fateful pit which might cause a little child to plunge to an agonizing death. The Scriptures identifies the sin, that all must watchfully guard, for she lurks on every side beautifully dressed, with radiant personality, and enticing appeal (Prov. 6-20-35; 7:5-27; 9:13-18). Here are some of them:

(1) That which is not of faith is sin (Rom. 14:23). (2) “Flee fornication. Every sin that a man doeth is without the body; but he that committeth fornication sinneth against his own body” (1 Cor. 6:18). (3) To follow one’s lust, is to sin (Jas. 1: 14-15). (4) The one who knows to do good and does not do it sins (Jas. 1:17). (5) Whosoever transgresses God’s law sins (1 Jn. 3:4). (6) There is the sin unto death and sins not unto death (1 Jn. 5:16). (7) “All unrighteousness is sin” (1 Jn. 5:17). (8) Paul lists sins and their consequences in Galatians 5:19-21 (see also Eph. 5:3-7) with “and such like” which means things of like fashion or some class or kind. It also includes all unrighteousness, although not specified in this text, and adds, “they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God.”

Therefore, preachers, being human, are tempted; they are subject and susceptible to sin. Much like Paul, each of us must buffet his own body and bring it into subjection to Christ’s teaching, “lest that by any means, when I have preached to others, I myself should be a castaway” (1 Cor. 9:27). Brethren, never forget that you are human and keep Paul’s warning ever before you, “Let him that thinketh he standeth take heed lest he fall” (1 Cor. 10:13). All Christians should remember that preachers are just as other Christians, human and prone to sin. Deal with them in the same spirit that you deal with others. I hasten to say, preachers, don’t stop preaching because you have sinned. Stop sinning, make things right, regardless of the cost, and keep preaching.

What Must A Preacher Do When He Commits Sin?

This question is relative to “Putting The Pieces Back Together.” It seems that, in matters like these, our understanding gets so far ahead of our practice that we think that it is applicable only to others. We need carefully to observe two passages: “Cast out first the beam out of thine own eye,” and “He that knoweth to do good and doeth it not, to him it is sin” (Luke 6:42b; Jas. 4:17).

We are studying about real people being Christians and understand that, “All have sinned, and come short of the glory of God” (Rom. 3:23). John wrote “that ye sin not, and if any man sin, we have an advocate with Father, Jesus Christ the righteous: And he is the propitiation for our sins: and not for ours only, but also for the sins of the whole world” (1 John 2:1-2). Thus all have sinned and must of necessity be forgiven, if they are ever saved. There are no exceptions. Therefore, whosoever sins – whether he be an elder, deacon, teacher, house cleaner or preacher – must comply with God’s divine arrangement to be forgiven (2 Pet. 3:9). When one complies with God’s divine plan, God will forgive him and the local church must also forgive, receive and encourage him to go on to perfection.

Simon the sorcerer sinned and was in the gall of bitterness and in the bond of iniquity. He had neither part nor lot “in this matter.” But he was told what he should do and responded, “Pray ye to the Lord for me, that none of these things which ye have spoken come upon me” (Acts 8:13-24). Paul directed the Corinthians to forgive the adulterer after he had repented, “lest perhaps such a one should be swallowed up with overmuch sorrow” (2 Cor. 2:6-11). If he will not repent and return unto the Lord, “deliver such a one to Satan for the Lord Jesus” (1 Cor. 5:5). James instructs us, “Confess your faults one to another, and pray one for another that ye may be healed. The effectual fervent prayer of a righteous man availeth much” (Jas. 5:16).

What Is Forgiveness?

It is not a toleration of sin. As Paul wrote the Corinthians, “Purge out therefore the old leaven . . . . A little leaven leaventh the whole lump” (1 Cor. 5:5,6,7). Sin is corrupting and contagious; if tolerated, it will contaminate the whole church. “Behold, how great a matter a little fire kindleth” (Jas. 3:5).

No Christian should flauntingly display his piety, purity or righteousness to condemn and execute judgment upon an erring child of God (Gal. 6:1). Neither must Christians overlook or intentionally minimize sin. Let sin appear sinful, condemning as it really is, so the victim can understand and be brought to repentance for his salvation (Rom. 6:23; Jas. 5:16; 1 Pet. 1:3-9). The first consideration given for going to one who has trespassed against you, or one who is overtaken in a fault, is to save that person (Matt. 18;15; Luke 17:3; Gal. 6:1).

A good definition of forgiveness is, “An attitude of heart which erases the deed or sin, and restores the offender to the former state and affection of the offended one.” Forgiveness, to me, means as the writer states in Hebrews 10:17, “And their sins and iniquities will I remember no more.” So far as you are concerned, his sins are as never committed. One must never bring them up again.

Jesus said, “If thy brother trespass against thee rebuke him: if he repents forgive him” (Luke 17:3). Which is more important, “Rebuke him” or “Forgive him”? How many times should one forgive another? If he repents seven times in one day and asks forgiveness, “forgive him” (Luke 17:4), and Matthew adds, “Until seventy times seven” (Matt. 18:22). 1 can well understand why the apostles said to the Lord, “Increase our faith.” Jesus is not minimizing sin or justifying the sinner. He is teaching forgiveness. We must forgive to be forgiven (Matt. 6:12,14,15). The way brethren and local churches teach and act regarding a preacher who sins, will have much to do with his “getting the pieces back together,” saving his soul, ability, knowledge and experience for the good of all.

What about Peter? He was wrong. Paul withstood him at the face but he did it to help Peter get right and keep preaching (Gal. 2:11-14). Apollos was doctrinally wrong. He was taught the way of the Lord more perfectly and sent on his way – preaching Jesus (Acts 18:24-19:1-5).

Finally, it seems to me, there can be no question about what attitude Christians must have toward a brother who manifests sincere repentance and the reparation of life. It must be an attitude of forgiving, receiving, encouraging and rejoicing in the Lord. For this our brother was dead and is alive again; he was lost and is found. Let us make merry and rejoice with the angels of heaven (Luke 15:7,10,21-24). May the elder brothers, as given in Luke 15, be few and may they learn before it is eternally too late, “But if ye forgive not men their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive your trespasses” (Matt. 5:15).

When Can A Preacher Get Back To Preaching?

This is not an imaginative, fictitious question. I only wish it were. But its reality touches almost every Christian’s heart and many local churches. It challenges the strongest and the weak blunder over it. The mature Christian, “who by reason of use have their sense exercised to discern both good and evil,” should come to the aid of the weaker ones (Heb. 4:14; 1 Cor. 14:22-23). We need to learn that God forgives His child when he sincerely repents and complies with His will – or none of us, no not one, can be saved. How wonderful! God will forgive us! But what about our forgiving our brother? If one refuses or claims inability to forgive, can he expect to be forgiven (Matt. 6:15)?

One may exclaim, but fornication is involved! Jesus forgave the woman of John 8:11. Paul taught the Corinthians to forgive the adulterer and said that he would also forgive him upon repentance (1 Cor. 5; 2 Cor. 2:7). One should also note: Paul did not teach that only fornicators are to be disciplined. Read 1 Corinthians 5:11-13 and Paul’s conclusion takes meaning, “Therefore put away from among yourselves that wicked person.” But, if he repents, forgive him – preacher or whoever!

Does this mean that he should continue preaching at the same place? Forgiveness must be granted but other circumstances, people and weaknesses must be considered. The preacher or any one, who sins and voluntarily repents and humbly obeys God’s will, will be forgiven by God. If and when this is done, do I or the local church have a choice in the matter but to forgive, receive, and encourage to please the Lord? If God forgives one, who am,I to withstand God (Acts 5:39; 11:17). He is freed from guilt, his birth right restored; we must accept him in the same manner (1 Jn. 1:9). But what about his influence in the church and community where the sin was committed and stamped deeply into every heart?

The local church must make the decision. The decision should be determined in consideration of the prevailing circumstances and conditions surrounding the whole affair. What is most edifying for the cause of the Lord, the church: To keep him? Or let him go to another community? This is not running away from sin. The sin is forgiven and must not be brought up ever again, but his influence is lost before the church and community. A preacher should be strong in the faith, example in life, and pure in character; but the sinning brother has destroyed his influence in this respect. He must rebuild, establish himself, again in the hearts of these people to be an example (1 Tim. 4:12). This may lead through fiery trials of his faith but it must be done with patience, love, and sincere desire (1 Cor. 3:13; 1 Pet. 1:7; 2 Cor. 4:17, James 1:34).

The preacher should understand this and recognize the need for him to remove himself for at least a while. His is not limited to one community in which to work. If he is sincere, honest and understanding, I believe that he will quietly, gracefully, and, for the love of the Lord, move to another work.

Can he ever preach for this local church again? This is a matter of liberty and expediency and the local situation will weigh heavily upon the decision- If his sin caused a big uproar, confusion, much gossip and division, the judgment is very complicated. If, on the other hand, only a few were directly involved with little gossip, no division, handled wisely and the repentance touched the hearts and was gladly accepted by the church, it might soon be profitable for him to preach there again. The local church has the responsibility to make the decision. The church should seek to save and encourage the preacher, but the church is more important than any one person. Thus, the decision should be made with full consideration of all concerned and rendered for the good, edification, and salvation of all.

Conclusion

The fact that all Christians depend upon God to forgive them and are saved to help save others by teaching His word (2 Tim. 2:2), should make us humble, contrite in heart, and thankful. We must be careful lest we become as the unforgiving servant (Matt. 18;23-25) or like the church at Corinth, ignoring every sin in the Book (1 Cor. 5:1-2). We must act confidently and firmly, but lovingly and sacrificially toward all (1 Cor. 12:20-25). We prove our love through faithful service, seeking to save the lost and wanderers from the fold (Luke 15). We must stand with open doors and arms to any one who will listen to truth. We are not the Judge but servants (Jas. 4:11-12). Jesus invites all who will hear to come and promises them life (Rev. 22:17; Matt. 11:28). John wrote, “If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us. If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness” (I Jn. 1:8-9, NKJB).

Please read Romans 12:16-21 with the emphasis upon, “Be not overcome of evil, but overcome evil with good.” “But watch thou in all things, endure afflictions, do the work of an evangelist, make full proof of thy ministry” (2 Tim 4:5). “Take heed unto thyself, and unto the doctrine; continue in them: for in doing this thou shalt both save thyself, and them that hear thee” (1 Tim. 4:16). This will assemble the pieces and you, through faithful living and service, can put them back together. If God be for us who can stand against us? Pick up the pieces and go on unto perfection. Brethren, these need our prayers, forgiveness and help.

Guardian of Truth XXVIII: 1, pp. 17-20
January 5, 1984

By Irvin Himmel

Four words in the title of this article are defined for the sake of clarity. I want the reader to understand the thrust of this essay.

“Teacher” is used here of one who publicly imparts knowledge; an instructor who exerts a broad influence in the church and outside the church; a gospel worker such as a bishop or an evangelist. I include deacons under this term, although teaching is not necessarily a function of such servants.

“Community” refers to the people outside the body of Christ who reside in the particular area where a congregation is located; the general population of the town, neighborhood, or vicinity. I am not referring to the community of believers but to the people sharing common interests due to geographic location..

“Impact” means the force of impression; the effect or influence; power over the minds and conduct of others.

“Sin” is to be understood in the sense of a misdeed or wrong that attracts public attention. I am not referring to a secret or private transgression. I speak of sin in terms of a trespass, offense, or violation of God’s law that involves others or is known generally; such an act as drunkenness, adultery, theft, child molestation, or embezzlement.

Teachers As Examples

Teachers in the church fill a role making it doubly important that a good influence be exerted. Outsiders tend to expect more of a leader than they do of others in the church. God expects preachers, deacons, elders, and teachers (such as class instructors) to guard against conduct that is unbecoming, and to remember that their force of impression on the public is weighty.

A bishop “must have a good report of them that are without” (1 Tim. 3:7). This is essential, not only at the time of his appointment, but throughout his years of service. If he acts so that his reputation in the community is damaged, the congregation’s effectiveness in outreach is hindered. Corruption in the conduct of a shepherd gives the flock a bad name.

Paul admonished the preacher Timothy to keep himself pure (1 Tim. 5:22). He told the young evangelist to take heed to himself and the teaching, for in so doing he would save himself and his hearers (1 Tim. 4:16). Titus was told to be “a pattern of good works” (Tit. 1:7). That would leave no evil thing for others to say of him. Obviously, the preacher’s influence on outsiders as well as believers is brought into focus in these passages.

Teachers Who Sin Leave Ugly Scars

When a teacher or church leader goes bad it may take years for the congregation to overcome the evil effect produced on the minds of people in the community. A teacher who sins openly has disgraced himself and the cause he represents in the public mind. The community may not be as charitable as the Lord in forgiving and forgetting. It is true that the whole church should not be judged by the misdeeds of an immoral preacher, or a deacon who acts unrighteously, or an elder who falls into sin, but a community often talks more about one rotten leader than the good folks who have not disgraced the Lord’s name. This is the case especially in smaller towns where everybody knows everything that occurs.

W.E. Brightwell once said in his succinct style:

A dishonest or cowardly preacher is the most inconsistent, excuseless, and senseless thing of which one can conceive. Few start crooked. Should we force every one entering the ministry to sign a pledge that if he ever feels himself slipping in faith or moral integrity he will voluntarily give up preaching? He could do that much for religion – he could quit preaching! Anybody who has ever preached should have that much respect for religion.

It is too much to expect preachers to be stronger than other Christians. I suppose they can be forgiven as readily as others for disgracing themselves. But what a terrible doom must await the preacher who disgraces his religion along with himself! (“The Notion Counter,” Gospel Advocate, Dec. 9, 1937). Years ago, quite by accident, I learned of a preacher who had run up bill in a certain city then left without paying them or making any arrangements. He moved to work with a congregvation with which I had formerly worked. I felt compelled to write to one of the brethren and inform him of this, but for some reason he withheld the information from the rest of the church. I understand that the preacher pulled the same stunt in that community, leaving the church with a marred reputation.

Overcoming the Impact on the Community

How does a congregation overcome the influence of an ungodly teacher? If a deacon is arrested for a felony and the newspaper publicizes the affair, how does the church handle the problem? If a preacher commits adultery, how can the church deal with the situation to minimize the bad impact on the community? If an elder who happens to be the church treasurer appropriates church funds to his personal account, what course shall be followed for the sake of preserving honor in the community?

These questions are easier to ask than to answer. The reader is offered the following suggestions to consider:

(1) Make efforts to bring about repentance and restoration. Any Christian who sins needs to repent. The teacher or leader may need admonition, rebuke, and warning just as anyone else may need help from others in being brought to repentance. Concerning elders, Paul said, “Them that sin rebuke before all, that others also may fear” (1 Tim. 5:20).

(2) Forgive the penitent. Our obligation to extend forgiveness applies to all who have repented. The sins of teachers are not to be treated as if unpardonable. A congregation may be stunned and shocked if it becomes known that an elder has committed adultery with one of the sisters, but if they repent we must forgive them.

(3) Withdraw from the unrepentant. The brother who sins and refuses to repent, whether church leader or not, must be marked and avoided if we are to carry out the -teaching of the Scriptures. Teachers are not exempt from the rules of discipline outlined in the New Testament. If the sinful person skips town, as some preachers have done when they refused to meet their financial obligations, the church should warn others of their misdeeds.

(4) Do not resort to cover-up. A preacher who becomes immoral always hurts the church. The impact of his wickedness on the community will not be lessened by attempting to sweep the whole mess under the carpet. If the church acts according to the Scriptures in disciplining him, this will help to preserve the honor of God’s people. If withdrawal becomes necessary, it should not be done in secret. The church must let the community know that sin is not condoned, even in the lives of leaders who have been highly respected.

(5) Re-evaluate qualifications for leadership. The teacher who sins may repent and be forgiven, but the effects of his wickedness are not automatically erased. One’s damaged reputation may make it inadvisable that he continue in the position of leadership which he has occupied. For example, a preacher who commits adultery may be forgiven and restored to the Lord, but if his reputation in the community is ruined he is wise to (1) quit preaching publicly, or (2) move to some place far-away. Forgiveness of a sin does not blot out the consequences of the act, and forgiveness will not cancel injury to reputation that bears on eligibility for effective impact on a community.

When a teacher goes bad, and it is happening over and over, the faithful must re-double efforts to maintain purity. Let us all walk humbly and circumspectly, considering ourselves lest we be tempted.

Guardian of Truth XXVIII: 1, pp. 16-17
January 5, 1984

By Hoyt H. Houchen

Churches are prone to absorb their social environment. The church at Corinth is an outstanding example. The ancient city of Corinth, with a population of about four hundred thousand in the time of Paul, was morally corrupt. During this Roman period it was notorious for its wealth and indulgence. The temple of Venus, with more than one thousand priestesses dedicated to harlotry, was located there. The immoral influence of that city infiltrated the church; and, in Paul’s first letter to the church in Corinth, he had to deal with such sins as fornication among those brethren (1 Cor. 5: 1).

Likewise, ungodly influences in our society have seeped into churches of our Lord. The church is composed of individuals; so, when a congregation is morally corrupted, it is because of sins committed by individuals. Materialistic thinking in the world permeates the church, and this concept in turn produces different forms of immorality. The desire for material things is fulfilled in the home when the wife starts to work outside the home. Then the race to “keep up with the Joneses” begins. This is very often the basis of martial problems. Communication between marriage partners decreases, the wife finds activities outside the home more interesting, she finds herself being admired by new acquaintances, she becomes independent and eventually divorce is the result. Hardly a week passes that we do not hear that some church member and his wife are divorced. Too often it is a preacher and his wife, and usually fornication is involved. Sin is sin, regardless of who commits it; but there is a greater impact upon the church when committed by a public teacher of the Bible. This essay is not addressing itself to any one particular sin of the teacher, but any sin.

The Teacher’s Responsibility

A teacher in the Lord’s church (whether he be an elder, deacon, preacher or a Bible class teacher) has a tremendous responsibility, not only for what he teaches but how he lives. Every Christian has this responsibility, but because of his position of leadership, the teacher is looked to for guidance, not only by instruction, but also by example. Every teacher should realize that he must not only teach the truth but that he be exemplary in conduct. Paul admonished his beloved child in the faith, Timothy: “Let no man despise thy youth, but be thou an example to them that believe, in word, in manner of life, in love, in faith, in purity” (1 Tim. 4:12). These words apply to every evangelist today. It is imperative that every teacher be prepared by diligent study to accurately and efficiently teach the word of God, and that his life be above reproach. James warned his readers, “Be not many of you teachers, my brethren, knowing that we shall receive heavier judgment ” (Jas. 3: 1). Speaking is an indispensable part of the preacher’s work; therefore, he must be cautious as to his words. This is why James continues his warning in verse 2, “For in many things we all stumble. If any stumbleth not in word, the same is a perfect man, able to bridle the whole body also.” This is the setting for the remarkable treatise on the tongue which follows. Jesus rebuked the Pharisees for evil speaking, warning them of the consequences. “And I say unto you, that every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment. For by thy words thou shalt be justified, and by thy words thou shalt be condemned” (Matt. 12:36, 37). The teacher is responsible for what he says; thus every time he speaks, he should remind himself that someday he will have to stand before God Almighty in judgment to give an account (Rom. 14:10-12; 2 Cor. 5:10).

The Power of Influence

What the teacher says is important. His speech is to be accurate, instructive and convincing; but it is equally important that his life be in conformity with his teaching. The man whose life is not commensurate with his teaching is inconsistent, and his influence is destructive. He has no respect from those who know what he does. Many young converts and those weak in the faith have been discouraged, shaken, and in instances, have left the faith because some teacher in whom they have placed their confidence has betrayed them by his conduct. We cannot respect the teacher who says: “Do as I say, but not as I do. ” Paul wrote to the church at Corinth: “Be ye imitators of me, even as I also am of Christ” (1 Cor. 11:1). Paul was d6ing just what we should all do. He was trying to follow Christ who is our perfect model. He, therefore, urged his readers to follow him as far as he followed Christ. Paul, having given no occasion for any man to stumble, commanded others not to do so (1 Cor. 10:32). He reminded Timothy of his own conduct and commended him for following it. “But thou didst follow my teaching, conduct, purpose, faith, longsuffering, love, patience, persecutions, sufferings; what things befell me at Antioch, at Iconium, at Lystra; what persecution I endured: and out of them all the Lord delivered me” (2 Tim. 3: 10,11). Paul not only had a tremendous influence upon Timothy and upon the churches, but his godly conduct continues to influence the countless thousands who read his biography and writings in the New Testament.

Ungodly Preachers

Gospel preachers are teachers of the word of God as every Christian should be, but his public “position of the Scriptures from the pulpit focuses special attention upon him. It is for this reason that the cause of Christ has suffered immeasurable harm from those who teach the truth, but whose lives are ungodly. Men who have unusual pulpit ability, but whose lives are immoral, have been a great detriment to the Lord’s work. Some of us knew a preacher a few years ago who was sound in his preaching, but unknown to us, he had frequented bars and had been drinking for years. Many years ago this writer went to a community to preach, following a preacher who had not paid his bills because he was a “dead beat.” His impact upon the church was keenly felt. The tragedy is not only the condition of the souls of such men, but the great harm they do to the church. There is much more to being sound than just being so in the pulpit or in the class room. Hypocrisy, in all its forms, is despicable in the sight of God and denounced by Jesus (Matt. 23). Honesty is more than telling the truth. Truth that is spoken is made even more attractive by honesty in the life of its teacher. There is much to be considered in the old adage: “I’d rather see a sermon than to hear one any day.”

Perception can be practiced in more ways than one. Paul admonished, “Take thought for things honorable in the sight of all men” (Rom. 12:17). The Greek word for “take thought” (pronoeo) is translated “provide” (KJV), and is the same word found in 1 Timothy 5:8. It means to “pre-think.” It conveys the idea of careful consideration. The Christian is to take forethought; he is to provide things that are honest and right, and is to provide for his family. He should exercise forethought when he enters a business transaction to be sure it is not “shady.” He should be open and “above board” with all whom he deals. There are instances of preachers who have gone to some remote field to preach and receive their financial support from distant churches. Not under the oversight of elders and not being observed by the brethren who support them, they have taken advantage by engaging in businesses of one kind or another without the knowledge of the supporters. There is nothing wrong with a preacher “making tents” by reason of necessity; but it is another thing to be fully supported and practice deception. It is nothing short of dishonesty. And, this has been the practice of some who have been supported by congregations under elders, not in remote places. The preacher has operated a business without the elders knowing it. It might be amazing to know what some of these men have made on the side, in addition to the full support they have received from the brethren.

Ungodly teachers should be dismissed and exposed, if they refuse to repent. When elders of a local church receive inquiries about such men, they should be forthright in exposing them. This will help to guard against another congregation being hurt by the ungodly preacher’s influence. When brethren remain silent about a culprit, they are doing an injustice in allowing him to run loose, only to victimize some other good church. Sometimes brethren will not reveal the information that is needed because they either fear repercussion from the exposed offender or simply want to get rid of him. Silence in this case is deception. If brethren would withdraw from those guilty of disorderly conduct (2 Thess. 3:6) and then expose them , many churches could be spared mental anguish and irreparable damage. On the other hand, we have also known of instances where churches having received warning about a preacher, ignore the warning and hire him anyway. They pay the price, but it is too late. The damage to the church has already been done. Only recently we heard of a preacher who stole money from a church. Such a man should not be in the pulpit. It is characteristic of this kind to move about, never staying very long in one place, but unfortunately long enough to damage a church. When asked to leave, they usually stir a stink before leaving. Then there is the preacher who becomes involved with some woman other than his wife. It is not usually a one time thing with that kind, but they continue to preach and brethren support them. The influence of the church in some places has been almost annihilated because of the sinful behavior upon the part of its members, especially elders and preachers.

The Solution

The solution to the problem of sin committed by the teacher is the same as that of any other member of the church. (1) There must be an about face in attitude toward the Scriptures. They must be regarded as our complete and final authority in all that we do. When they are disregarded the door is opened for every form of disobedience. When they are ignored there will be no regard for the sanctity of marriage, the home, nor honesty and chastity. Material things become the priority of life. Only when our attitude is one of humility and wholehearted submission to the will of God, can our lives be pure and holy. (2) A proper attitude toward the Scriptures will result in the proper attitude toward the Lord’s work. Among other prerequisites, a young single man who plans to preach should seek a wife who is devoted to the Lord and who is aware of the sacrifice she will have to make. If she is dedicated to her own selfish interests, she does not qualify to be a preacher’s wife. Young man, if you plan to preach the gospel, then dedicate yourself to preach the truth without compromise and be determined to live a life above reproach. The Lord’s work is the most serious business in the world. Unless you plan to live what you preach, forget about preaching. Each and every teacher should read and ponder the following words of Paul: “thou therefore that teachest another, teachest thou not thyself? thou that preachest a man should not steal, dost thou steal? thou that sayest a man should not commit adultery, dost thou commit adultery?” (Rom. 2:21,22).

The prevalence of sin in the church is obviously the work of the devil. He can only be defeated when our attitude toward God’s word and His work is right. My brother, my sister, evaluate that act of sin before you commit it. Contemplate what it will do to your heavenly Father, to your soul, to your wife, husband, children, parents and other loved ones, and consider the impact that it will have upon the precious church of our Lord.

Guardian of Truth XXVIII: 1, pp. 14-15
January 5, 1984