Truth Magazine

By Hoyt H. Houchen

There are different kinds of premillennialists, but whether they be historic or dispensational in their views, all of them agree that after the second coming of Christ, He will reign upon this earth for one thousand years before the final judgment. This teaching must not be regarded as harmless and merely speculative. It is a system of error and must therefore be dealt with accordingly. As other writers in this special series will be dealing with the doctrine itself, this treatise will be more concerned with its logical consequences.

 

The Scriptures teach that the church was built by Jesus Christ (Matt. 16:18), was purchased by His precious blood (Acts 20:28), is revealed in the New Testament and originated in the mind of God. It was eternally purposed by God (Eph. 3:11) and designed to be a part of God’s redemptive plan for man (Eph. 5:23). A distinguishing phase of premillennialism, however, is the view that the establishment of the church was not prophesied in the Old Testament. The idea is that the kingdom was foretold by Old Testament prophets and was announced by John the Baptist and by Christ, but because the Jews rejected Christ (the Messiah) it was postponed and the church was devised to serve as a substitute or contingent. The period in which we are now living is “the church age,” and is to continue until Christ cores again. Then there will follow the establishment of the old Jewish kingdom, at which time Jesus will occupy the literal throne of David in Jerusalem where He will reign for one thousand years. During this millennium the temple will be rebuilt, and even the Levitical sacrifices of the Old Testament will be re-established. This is the general structure of the premillennial view, and their distinction between the kingdom and the church is clear.

It Minimizes the Church

The premillennial position makes the -church a mere accident which is diametrically the opposite of what Paul wrote in Eph. 3:11. He declared that it was “according to the eternal purpose of God.” A serious consequence of the premillennial doctrine is that it destroys faith in the church of our Lord Jesus Christ.

R.H. Boll of Louisville, Kentucky was the leader of the premillennial movement among churches of Christ. He referred to the church as “a new spiritual contingent” (Word and Work, March, 1938). The word “contingent” means “a happening by chance or unforeseen causes” (Webster’s Seventh Collegiate Dictionary, p. 180). According then, to the premillennial theory, had it not been for the rejection of the Messiah by the Jews, the old literal kingdom of David would have been re-established and the church would never have been brought into existence. Who can believe that the church, purchased by His Son’s blood and filled with His Spirit, is accidental or by chance?

In the first place, the Old Testament prophets never foretold an earthly king nor an earthly kingdom. The Jews, including the apostles, were expecting a restoration of the literal kingdom of Israel (Acts 1:6) as are the modern day premillennialists; but Jesus did not come to establish a literal and earthly kingdom. The kingdom He established began on the day of Pentecost (Acts 2), the reign of Jesus is spiritual (1 Cor. 15:25, 26) and the very nature of the kingdom is spiritual (Jn. 18:36; Rom. 14:17). The terms “church” and “kingdom” are used interchangeable in the New Testament (Matt. 16:18, 19), and to be in the kingdom is to be in the church (Col. 1:18; Rev. 1:9). Jesus is the head of the church (Col. 1:18) and rules over His kingdom (1 Cor. 15:25, 26; Rev. 1:6). The idea that the kingdom was postponed because of rejection by the Jews, and the church is an “interruption” (“a parenthesis” as expressed by H.A. Ironside) was fathered by J.N. Darby in the latter part of the nineteenth century. He insisted that the church is distinctly not a part of God’s initial redemptive plan (Clarence C. Bass, Backgrounds of Dispensationalism, p. 27). This idea is generally believed by modern premillennialists. It was promoted in churches of Christ by R.H. Boll (as previously mentioned), and is popularized by C.I. Scofield in the publication of his Bible with premillennial notes. The church was not only in the mind of God (Eph. 3:11) but is spiritual Israel, fulfilling in Christ the promise to Abraham (Gal. 3). It manifests the manifold wisdom of God (Eph. 3:10), is a part of the “mystery” (the divine plan of redemption, vs. 6), and will remain as long as the earth shall endure (vs. 21).

It Minimizes the Gospel

Since the church is a part of the divine “mystery” (Eph. 3:5, 6), if the church is minimized, then so is the gospel; because the gospel is revelation of the “mystery.” It reveals the salvation of man in the church; therefore, to minimize one is to minimize the other.

It Nullifies God’s Promise

Both John the Baptist and Jesus preached that the kingdom was at hand (Matt. 3:2; 4:17). “At hand” is from the Greek word engizo, and is translated “nigh” or “near.” But if the kingdom was postponed, these prophecies failed and God would not be true to His promise. The result would be that what Jesus preached was not the gospel of the kingdom (Mk. 1:14, 15), for the kingdom did not come. Multitudes had responded in good faith that the kingdom would come. If it did not come, then God was not true to His promise. It should be noted also that not one word was uttered about national repentance being the condition that the kingdom would come. Furthermore, if God did not know that the kingdom would be postponed when He made His promise, then God would not be omniscient. God announced something that he did not know would be postponed. And, if the kingdom was postponed, then the veracity of Jesus would be impeached because He promised that which did not come. Remember, that He even said that some living then would not die before they would “see the kingdom of God come with power” (Mk. 9:1). Who can believe that God and Jesus made a false promise? Such is the serious consequence of premillennialism.

It Makes the Great Commission Void

Jesus said that all power was given to Him in heaven and on earth, and that His apostles were to teach all nations (Matt. 28:18, 19). Premillennialists contend that the “nations” referred to by Jesus at the judgment (Matt. 25:31, 32) does not mean the Jews, but rather the Gentiles. They think the “nations” mean the Gentiles as distinguished from Israel. But the commission says go and teach “all the nations.” If the term “nations” never refers to Jews, then Peter was preaching in vain to the Jews on the day of Pentecost in Acts 2. The consequences is that the great commission is nullified as far as the Jew is concerned. Where is the commission for the Jew? There is none, if this contention is correct. And, if Jesus does not exercise all power now, then the great commission is nullified. As to the contention that “nations” refer only to the Jews, is a mistake to begin with; because the Greek word ethnos that is translated “nations” in Matt. 25:32 is also the same form which appears in Lk. 24:47 and Acts 17:26. In both verses the context itself shows that all races are referred to – all men and not only Gentiles. Lk. 24:47 is fulfilled in Acts 2 when repentance and remission of sins were preached “in his name unto all the nations, beginning from Jerusalem.” The preaching at that time was to Jews; therefore, Jews are included in “all nations.” The gospel is God’s power to save everyone who obeys it, Jews and Gentiles alike (Rom. 1:16).

It Denies “The Last Days”

Premillennialists deny that we are now living in “the last days.” They refer to this present period as “the church age” and “the last days” will not begin until after the return of Jesus from heaven. According to them, there is to be a literal one thousand years after the days called the last ones. But Peter identified the time of “the last days” when he declared on the day of Pentecost, “but this is that which hath been spoken through the prophet Joel: And it shall be in the last days. . .” (Acts 2:16, 17). Jesus came at the end of the Jewish dispensation (Heb. 1:1) and the day of Pentecost inaugurated the period known as “the last days,” the age in which we are now living. Peter was referring to this present age, not the end of time, when he referred to “the last days” in 2 Pet. 3:2. Mockers would occur throughout this present age. Paul speaks of “later times” in 1 Tim. 4:1, referring to this present age when some, would “fall away from the faith”; and then gave specific examples of how they would do so. There is a difference between the expressions “the last day” and “the last days.” Last days mean this present dispensation, whereas “the last day” means the end of it. All the dead are to be raised (both the righteous and the wicked): when Jesus comes the second time (Jn. 5:28, 29). This will take place on “the last day” (Jn. 6:44). Here we simply observe that if it is the last day, there cannot be 365,000 more to follow. Note also that the righteous and the wicked will be raised together, at the same time; therefore, there can be no intervening interval of one day between the resurrection of the two classes, much less an interval of 365,000 days as claimed by the premillennialists.

It Demotes Jesus From His Throne

When Jesus ascended to heaven, He occupied His throne, which is said to be forever (Heb. 1:8). But premillennialists claim that Jesus is not on His throne, but on His Father’s throne. Heb. 1:3 and 8:1 declare that He is on the right hand of the majesty “on high” and “in the heavens”. This earth is now His footstool (Isa. 66:1; Acts 7:49); so premillennialism demotes Jesus by bringing Him down to sit upon a literal, carnal, temporal and dilapidated throne on earth. It would bring Him down to His footstool.

That premillennialism demotes Christ, we consider Acts 2:30-32 where Peter said that Jesus was raised up to sit on David’s throne. He sits and rules not only upon His throne but also upon David’s throne. It is on this throne that He now reigns as Lord of lords and King of kings, and He will continue to reign until He has put the last enemy under His feet (1 Cor. 15:25). R.H. Boll is quoted as saying that “Jesus Christ is King de jure et potentia, but not King de facto et actu” (Latin, king by right but not in fact and in act (See N.B. Hardeman, Tabernacle Sermons, Vol. 4, p. 162; Boles-Boll Discussion, p. 174-75). So, according to this position, rather than Jesus being actually King in fact now; He only rules with the expectation of being King, consequently assuming more the role of a crown prince. It virtually denies that Jesus is, in reality or in fact, reigning now. But in Rev. 1:5, 6 we are said to be a kingdom of priests, and we are now reigning with Him on earth (Rev. 5:9, 10). Notice that we were made a kingdom (past tense) and we reign upon the earth (present tense). This present reign with Christ began when He ascended into heaven and will continue until His second coming. This will be the end when the kingdom is returned to the Father (1 Cor. 15:20-25).

It Denies Salvation To Gentiles

Israel became an established kingdom in 1095 B.C. Then the kingdom divided in 975 B.C. Two tribes remained with the house of David (tabernacle of David) and his seed continued on the throne until 586 B.C., when Zedekiah was dethroned. Amos prophesied that the tabernacle of David would be rebuilt (Amos 9:11). Jesus is of the seed of David and He was raised up to sit on the throne of David (Acts 2:30-32). This is a fulfillment of 2 Sam. 7:12. David had prophesied that, “of the fruit of his loins he would set one upon this throne” (Acts 2:30). Why was the tabernacle of David to be rebuilt? The answer is given in Acts 15:13-17, “that the residue of men may seek after the Lord, and all the Gentiles, upon whom my name is called.” This is quoted from the Septuagint, the Greek translation of the Old Testament. premillennialists say that the tabernacle of David will not be rebuilt until Christ returns, and will be set up on earth. But the tabernacle of David was rebuilt that the Gentiles might seek the Lord. We insist, therefore, that if Jesus Christ is not on David’s throne now, then there is no promise of any Gentile being saved now. The tabernacle of David exists in the church Christ is on David’s throne in heaven, not on earth. We stress that if the tabernacle, or lineage of David, has not been restored, then Gentiles do not have the privilege of seeking the Lord. Some consequences of premillennialism are that the Jews are not included in the great commission, the Gentiles cannot seek the Lord and, thus, the redeeming purpose and power of the gospel are destroyed.

Conclusion

The consequences of premillennialism are many and we have considered but a few. Premillennialists make the same mistake as did the Jews, when they expected Jesus to be a king like Caesar. The whole system is materialistic because it anticipates an earthly, temporal regime of an earthly millennium.

Jesus accomplished all that He came to do, and His mission is complete (Jn. 17:4). We are not looking for an earthly millennium but an eternal heaven.

Questions

1. Upon what do all premillennialists agree?
2. Why should the premillennial view be considered seriously?
3. What was eternally purposed by God as a part of His redemptive plan?
4. Why do premillennialists believe that the kingdom was postponed?
5. Name some events which they believe will take place during the future millennium.
6. What effect does the premillennial position have upon the gospel and the church?
7. In what way does the position exclude Jews from the great commission?
8. How do they make void the promises of God?
9. How does the premillennial position exclude Gentiles from salvation?
10. Distinguish between “the last days” and “the last day”?

Guardian of Truth XXVI: 2, pp. 18-20
January 14, 1982

By Earl E. Robertson

To answer this question seems superogatory. If the word of God can be believed, while having to totally reject the doctrines of men, this question can easily and quickly be answered. To answer the question poses no difficulty to any Bible student; getting one to accept what God says about the matter does present problems. Nearly every religious denomination is saturated with the premillennial web, which position has as a cardinal doctrine the contention that the land promise has not been kept.

The Promise

Here is the original promise that God made, “Now the Lord had said unto Abram, Get thee out of thy country, and from thy kindred, and from thy father’s house, unto a land that I will shew thee: And I will make of thee a great nation, and I will bless thee, and make thy name great; and thou shalt be a blessing: And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed. So Abram departed, as the Lord had spoken unto him . . . and they went forth to go into the land of Canaan; and into the land of Canaan they came . . . And the Lord appeared unto Abram, and said, Unto thy seed will I give this land . . .” (Gen. 12:1-7). While Abram “dwelled in the land of Canaan” the Lord said unto him, “Lift up now thine eyes, and look from the place where thou art northward, and southward, and eastward, and westward: For all the land which thou seest, to thee will I give it, and to thy seed for ever” (Gen. 13:12, 14-15). “In the same day the Lord made a covenant with Abram, saying, Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the river Euphrates” (Gen. 15:18). “And I will establish my covenant between me and thee and thy seed after thee in their generations for an everlasting covenant, to be a God unto thee, and to thy seed after thee. And I will give unto thee, and to thy seed after thee, the land wherein thou art a stranger, all the land of Canaan, for an everlasting possession” (Gen. 17:7-8).

Furthermore, Jehovah said, “And I have also established my covenant with them, to give them the land of Canaan, the land of their pilgrimage, wherein they were strangers . . . And I will bring you in unto the land, concerning the which I did swear to give it to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob; and I will give it you for an heritage: I am the Lord” (Ex. 6:4, 8). Moses, a man of faith in God, and “educated in all the wisdom of the Egyptians, and was mighty in words and in deeds” (Acts 7:22), some three centuries after the promise was made to Abraham he evidenced his confidence that soon the land promise would be fulfilled, saying, “And Moses said unto Hobab, the son of Raguel the Midianite, ,Moses’ father in law, We are journeying unto the place of which the Lord said, I will give it you: come thou with us, and we will do thee good: for the Lord hath spoken good concerning Israel” (Num. 10:29).

God Kept His Word The Land Received, (Joshua 21;43-45)

Joshua, the aged leader of God’s people, preparing to die, intensely told the Israelites, “The Lord gave unto Israel all the land which he sware to give unto their fathers; and they possessed it, and dwelt therein . . . There failed not ought of any good thing which the Lord had spoken unto the house of Israel; all came to pass” (Josh. 21:4.3, 45).

When God called Abram from the Ur of the Chaldees, Abram “departed as the Lord had spoken unto him.” This started the long and eventful trek which ultimately led to the seed “after him” receiving and dwelling in the land of Canaan. The apostle said, “By faith Abraham, when he was called to go out into a place which he should after receive for an inheritance, obeyed; and he went out, not knowing whither he went” (Heb. 11:8). Abram knew neither the “where” nor “when;” God knew, however. Stephen said, “The God of glory appeared unto our father Abraham, when he was in Mesopotamia… Get thee out of thy country, and from thy kindred, and come into the land which I shall shew thee. Then came he out of the land of the Chaldeans, and dwelt in Charran: and from thence, when his father was dead, he removed him into this land, wherein ye now dwell” (Acts 7:2-4). Abraham personally had no inheritance in the land, “no, not so much as to set his foot on” (Acts 7:5). Stephen’s speech carries Israel through the Egyptian bondage, embracing more than four hundred years, and then says, “And the nation to whom they shall be in bondage will I judge, said God: and after that shall they come forth, and serve me in this place” (Acts 7:7). “In this place” is the “land wherein ye now dwell” (vs. 4), being the very land that God had said “I will give.” So, the inheritance would be received after the bondage. But, further, Stephen says, “But when the time of the promise drew nigh, which God had sworn to Abraham, the people grew and multiplied in Egypt” (Acts 7:17). The time drew nigh!

Abraham could not personally inherit the land, but his seed “after him” would, following the serfdom, inherit the land and dwell in it. This is exactly what Joshua said about it. He said, “The Lord gave unto Israel all the land which he sware to give unto their fathers; and they possessed it, and dwelt therein” (Josh. 21). All the land promised the fathers was given and possessed by Israel – the seed after the fathers. This is what the word of God says about it! Stephen said God made this promise to Abraham “when as yet he had no child” (Acts 7:5). Emphasized in the promise is the seed of Abraham, not Abraham himself. Of this promised land of Canaan, Nehemiah testifies: “Thou art the Lord the God, who didst choose Abram, and broughtest him forth out of Ur of the Chaldees, and gavest him the name of Abraham; And foundest his heart faithful before thee, and madest a covenant with him to give the land of the Canaanites, the Hittites, the Amorites, and the Perizzites, and the Jebusites, and the Girgashites, to give it, I say, to his seed, and hast performed thy words; for thou art righteous” (Neh. 9:7, 8).

Possession Of Land Conditional

The possession of this land was conditioned on the Jews keeping the word of God. When Israel went into the land of Canaan and possessed it there were remaining in the land heathen peoples with their false gods and idolatrous worship. Joshua spoke unto Israel of “these that remain among you” (Josh. 23:7/, and warned the people of God “That ye come not among these nations;” “neither make mention of the name of their gods, nor cause to swear by them, neither serve them nor bow yourselves unto them.” Further, he said, “Know for a certainty that the Lord your God will no more drive out any of these nations from before you; but they shall be snares and traps unto you, and scourges in your sides, and thorns in your eyes, until ye perish from off this good land which the Lord your God hath given you” (Josh. 23:13/. The watchword was, then, “keep the words of God” or perish. Cf. Deut. 8:19, 20; Deut. 30:18. Often the sins of Israel caused them to lose the land; to be driven out and become slaves to the nations used by the Lord. As captives they lamented unto the Lord, and He, with pity, would bring them back into their land. A case in point to illustrate is David “recovering” the land. The record says, “David smote also Hadadezer, the son of Rehob, king of Zobah, as he went to recover his border at the river Euphrates” (2 Sam. 8:3). Also, “He restored the coast of Israel from the entering of Hamath unto the sea of the plain, according to the word of the Lord God of Israel” (2 Kgs. 14:25).

The “recovering” of the land was not a fulfillment of the promise; Israel had already inherited and possessed the land. Conditions causing the “recovering” was sin disobedience to God. All the later Israeli encounters have absolutely nothing to do with the promise God made to Abraham about the land. The Israeli war with the Arab Nations of June 5-10, 1967 has no connection whatsoever with the Abrahamic promise for Israel to inherit and possess the land. Our point of contention is: God kept his promise to Abraham. The rebellion and sins of the Jews afterward is the cause of their losing the land. The Assyrian captivity in the days of Tiglath-Pileser and Shalmaneser; with the great Sennacherib leading the capture of Samaria by Sargon; the Babylonian captivity under the leadership of Nebuchadnezzar, have nothing to do with God giving Abraham’s seed the land as He promised in Genesis 12. These captivities were the results of Israel sinning against God; their return to the land came about because of repentance of sin and their faith in God. When they returned to their land they did so by observing the law of tribal estates (Lev. 25:13-28). When these Jews returned from Babylon under the leadership of Zerrubabel, Ezra told them to obey God, thus, tribally, they dwelt in their cities (Ez. 2:70). Their awareness and ability to do this depended on their knowledge of genealogy. Contrary to the concepts now held by modern millennialists, these records of the Jews are unknown. The Holy Spirit moved Paul to write: “But avoid foolish questions, and genealogies, and contentions, and strivings about the law; for they are unprofitable and vain” (Tit. 3:9). Where would the premillennial put these Jews now scattered to every part of the world? Paul said, don’t try! The efforts are “unprofitable and vain”.

Present Pratings

David R. Reagan wrote in Word And Work, March 1980, p. 81, of the Jews returning to their land after the Babylonian captivity: “Unfortunately, Bro. Woods (Guy N., EER) did not bother to explain how these chapters were fulfilled by,the return from Babylon. They may have been prefilled in type by the return from Babylon, but they certainly were not fulfilled in any literal, sense.” No one, including Reagan, understands such to be anything but nonsense. Prefilled in type! Reagan’s theory of premillennialism demands “the regathering of the Jews to their homeland” to “be worldwide in extent;” “a future kingdom of regathered Jews in the land of Palestine;” that Jesus will be the earthly king over this kingdom of regathered Jews in Jerusalem, and that all of this will come to pass unconditionally! Reagan declares their re-entrance into Canaan by “recovery” was not literal. Yes, they literally entered the land and that was literally fulfilling the promise.

Charles C. Ryrie, in his book, The Basis Of The Premillennial Faith, says the Abrahamic and Davidic covenants have not been fulfilled. He says, “The unconditional character of the Abrahamic covenant is the crucial issue in making the Abrahamic covenant a basis for premillennialism. If the covenant is unconditional, then the national aspect of it must yet be fulfilled, and premillennialism is the only system of interpretation which makes a place for a national future for Israel in which she possesses her land” (p. 52). Again, on page 60, he says, “Since the coveant has never been fulfilled. in history, if language means anything at all, it must have a future fulfillment.” And among the things God promised Abraham which have not been fulfilled, he says, “specifically, the national promises.” He says there have been three dispersions of the Jews, “The third and last dispersion began in 70 A.D. and continues to the present day. Israel has not yet returned from this dispersion although the prophecies of her final regathering are manifold, which prophecies must be fulfilled if the ‘ Bible is the word of God . . . Israel’s regathering is surely future” (p. 74).

Premillennial teachers tie the Abrahamic promise (Gen. 12) to the Davidic covenant (2 Sam. 7:12-17), making the land promise literally received (but yet future) through the restoration of the Jews from all over the world and the establishment of the kingdom of Christ with a physical rule over these returned Jews; these re-gathered Jews being the kingdom of Christ, the subjects of his rule.

As we have shown, the Jews have already inherited and possessed the land. That promise has literally been fulfilled. The words of God through Nathan the prophet to David are: “And when thy days be fulfilled, and thou shalt sleep with thy fathers, I will set up thy seed after thee, which shall proceed out of thy bowels, and I will establish his kingdom. He shall build an house for my name, and I will establish the throne of his kingdom for ever” (2 Sam. 7:12, 13). The apostle Peter quotes this Scripture and makes an inspired application of it to the resurrection of Christ; to the exaltation of Christ to the right hand of the Father, and the Lord’s foes becoming His footstool. Upon these facts the Son of God was preached “both Lord and Christ” (Acts 2:36). In the “name” of this Lord salvation was offered through faith, repentance, and baptism to these Jews “out of every nation under heaven” (Acts 2:5, 36-38). Three thousand of these Jews did obey the Lord that day and were added to the church (Acts 2:41-47). The kingdom of the Messiah was established at Pentecost in Jerusalem; it was at this time the “throne of his kingdom” came into being; it was here the sovereign reign of the ruling Redeemer had its beginning over newly blood-washed saints who comprised His kingdom. He truly is the head of the church, which is His body (Eph. 1:22, 23; Col. 1:18, 24). Peter says that Jesus Christ “is gone into heaven, and is on the right hand of God; angels and authorities and powers being made subject unto him” (1 Pet. 3:22).

Conclusion

Though R.H. Boll taught the early church did for three centuries believe and teach “the millennial reign on the earth of Christ,” which “would be inaugurated at Christ’s return;” that the prophecy of Daniel (Dan. 2:44ff) could not be fulfilled by the first coming of Christ, but rather, “to be realized at His Second Coming,” we must go on believing the testimony of God as shown above. See, Kingdom Of God, pp. 11, 25.

Boll’s side-kick, Charles M. Neal, said in his book, Looking Into The Dark, “Israel’s restoration to the land is just as plainly and abundantly taught as the dispersion from the land. One is a fact of history, the other a fact of prophecy” (p. 56). Yes, but his explanation of the “fact of prophecy” stresses the “shalls” of Luke 1:31-33, and places the “reign of Jesus” in his Seventh period of history which is “the thousand years, Rev. 20” (p. 103). So, with Neal (like Boll) the restoration and reign are yet future. God says otherwise!

God made a promise to Abraham that “his seed” would possess the land of Canaan (Gen. 12); God kept His word, Israel possessed the land (Josh. 21). God promised David that He would raise up his seed (Gal. 3:16) and establish His throne and kingdom (2 Sam. 7); God kept His word by raising up the Christ, establishing His kingdom, and giving the Son the throne (Acts 2:30ff; 13:33; Col. 1:13).

The land promise has been fulfilled! Do not let the materialist deceive and confuse you by telling you all of this is yet future. Do not allow them to equate “inheritance” with “possession”. This they will attempt to do to show, as Ryrie put it, “The unconditional character of the Abrahamic covenant is the crucial issue in making the Abrahamic covenant a basis for premillennialism.”

Guardian of Truth XXVI: 1, pp. 11-13
January 7, 1982

By Mike Willis

The doctrine of premillennialism denies that Jesus is presently reigning as king in His kingdom. The doctrine asserts that Jesus will come back to this earth and establish a physical kingdom at some time in the future. He is supposed to reign over this physical kingdom on this literal earth for a literal 1000 years. Is this doctrine true or is Christ presently reigning as king over His kingdom? If it can be shown that Christ is presently reigning as king over His kingdom, the doctrine of premillennialism will be shown to be false.

Did Jesus Fulfill Messianic Prophecy

When one studies the prophecies regarding the coming of the Messiah, he is impressed that Jesus is the fulfillment of these prophecies. Consequently, he confesses his belief that Jesus is the Christ Messiah/. If Jesus did not fulfill the Messianic prophecies, He was not the Christ; He was a false Christ who deluded the people. Of course, we believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of the living God. However, let us notice the prophecies made concerning the Messiah. Isaiah foresaw the glory of Christ and predicted that He would reign as king over God’s kingdom. He wrote,

For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counselor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace. Of the increase of his government and peace there shall be no end, upon the throne of David, and upon his kingdom, to order it, and to establish it with judgment and with justice from henceforth even for ever. The Zeal of the Lord of hosts will perform this (Isa. 9:6-7).

Others foretold many of the same things. They wrote,

Behold, the days come saith the Lord, that I will raise unto David a righteous Branch, and a King shall reign and prosper, and shall execute judgment and justice in the earth (Jer. 23:5).

I saw in the night visions, and, behold, one like the Son of man came with the clouds of heaven, and came to the Ancient of days, and they brought him near before him. And there was given him dominion, and glory, and a kingdom, that all people, nations, and languages, should serve him: his dominion is an everlasting dominion, which shall not pass away, and his kingdom that which shall not be destroyed (Dan. 7:13-14).

The prophecies which foretold the establishment of God’s kingdom and the reign of the Messiah also foretold human opposition to that reign. The psalmist predicted the efforts which would be made to prevent the king from being appointed as king.

Why do the heathen rage, and the people imagine a vain thing? The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against the Lord, and against his anointed, saying, Let us break their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us. He that sitteth in the heavens shall laugh: the Lord shall have them in derision. Then shall he speak unto them in his wrath, and vex them in his sore displeasure. Yet have I set my king upon my holy hill of Zion (Psa. 2:1-6).

The prophecies which described the reign did not picture it as utopia – an era in which perfect peace would exist upon the earth. Rather, they foretold that Jesus would reign in the midst of His enemies.

The Lord said unto my Lord, Sit thou at my right hand, until I make thine enemies thy footstool. The Lord shall send the rod of thy strength out of Zion: rule thou in the midst of thine enemies (Psa. 110:1-2).

These and many other prophecies were made concerning the reign of the Messiah. Did Jesus fulfill these prophecies?

The Advent Of The Messiah

When Jesus entered this world, the angel announced unto Mary, “Fear not, Mary: for thou hast found favour with God. And, behold, thou shalt conceive in thy womb, and bring forth a son, and shalt call his name Jesus. He shall be great, and shall be called the Son of the Highest: and the Lord God shall give unto him the throne of his father David: and he shall reign over the house of Jacob for ever; and of his kingdom there shall be no end” (Lk. 1:32-33). The child born to Mary was to fulfill the Messianic-predictions of a king reigning over His kingdom.

When John labored in his ministry, he announced that the fulfillment of the kingdom prophecies was near at hand; he said, “Repent ye: for the kingdom of heaven is at hand” (Matt. 3:2). When Jesus began His ministry, He announced the same thing, saying, “The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel” (Mk. 1:15; Matt. 4:17). During His ministry, Jesus stated that the fulfillment of the kingdom prophecies was to occur within the lifetime of those who were living then. He said, “Verily I say unto you, That there be some of them that stand here, which shall not taste of death, till they have seen the kingdom of God come with power” (Mk. 9:1).

When Jesus stood before Pilate, the Roman procurator inquired, “Art thou a king then?” Jesus answered, “Thou sayest that I am a king. To this end was 1 born, and for this cause came 1 into the world, that I should bear witness unto the truth” (Jn. 18:37).

These statements must be understood in the context of the Messianic prophecies. Jesus, the Son of God, stated that He had come into this world to fulfill the prophecies which had been made centuries earlier by the prophets. The prophets had plainly stated that nothing mere man could do could thwart God’s purpose in establishing the Messiah as king over His kingdom. Hence, these promises were either fulfilled as the prophets predicted and as Jesus planned to do, in which case Jesus is the Messiah, or they were not fulfilled, in which case Jesus is not the Messiah.

Announcement of the Fulfillment

The early church believed that God fulfilled these prophecies when Jesus was raised from the dead and ascended into heaven to sit on the right hand of God. Their preaching contained the announcement of the fulfillment of these prophecies. On the day of Pentecost, Peter preached that Jesus was reigning on David’s throne. He said,

Men and brethren, let me freely speak unto you of the patriarch David, that he is both dead and buried, and his sepulchre is with us unto this day. Therefore being a prophet, and knowing that God had sworn with an oath to him, that of the fruit of his loins, according to the flesh, he would raise up Christ to sit on his throne; he seeing this before speaks of the resurrection of Christ, that his soul was not left in hell, neither his flesh did see corruption. This Jesus hath God raised up, whereof we all are witnesses. Therefore being by the right hand of God exalted, and having received of the Father the promise of the Holy Ghost, he hath shed forth this, which ye now see and hear. For David is not ascended into the heavens: but he saith himself, The Lord said unto my Lord, Sit thou on my right hand, until I make thy foes thy footstool. Therefore let all,the house of Israel know assuredly, that God hath made that same Jesus, whom ye have crucified, both Lord and Christ (Acts 2:29-36).

This sermon announced the fulfillment of the Messianic prophecies that God would raise up a descendant of David, namely Jesus, who would reign on David’s throne. The sermon contained several Messianic prophecies, including Psalm 110:1.

In Acts 4, the saints applied the prophecy in Psalm 2, regarding God establishing the Messiah as king on His throne despite the concerted efforts of the unbelievers to thwart that reign, to the events surrounding the cross. Luke records their prayer,

And when they heard that, they lifted up their voice to God with one accord, and said, Lord, thou art God, which hast made heaven, and earth, and the sea, and all that in them is: who by the mouth of thy servant David hast said, Why did the heathen rage, and the people imagine vain things? The kings of the earth stood up, and the rulers were gathered together against the Lord, and against his Christ. For of a truth against thy holy child Jesus, whom thou hast anointed, both Herod, and Pontius Pilate, with the Gentiles, and the people of Israel, were gathered together, for to do whatsoever thy hand and thy counsel determined before to be done (Acts 4:24-28).

They understood Psalm 2 to be fulfilled. The efforts to stop the coronation of Jesus on David’s throne were those of the Jews, Gentiles, Herod, and Pontius Pilate. These efforts failed because God raised Jesus from the dead and set Him at His own right hand. He is presently reigning in heaven.

Consequently, gospel preaching contained the announcement of the establishment of the kingdom of God. Philip preached “the good news about the kingdom of God” (Acts 8:12, NASB) in Samaria. The good news was that the long awaited kingdom of God had come, not that it had been postponed indefinitely. Paul related that God had “delivered” the Colossians from the power of darkness, and hath translated us into the kingdom of his dear Son” (Col. 1:13-14). The author of the Hebrews reported that the Hebrew Christians had received a kingdom which cannot be shaken (i.e., an eternal kingdom, Heb. 12:28), the kind of kingdom foretold by Daniel (2:44). John stated that he and the saints in the seven churches of Asia were in the kingdom of God (Rev. 1:9).

In addition of these plain statements that the prophecies were fulfilled and that the kingdom was established, the New Testament authors also stated that Jesus had all authority given to Him after His resurrection. Jesus said, “All power is given unto me in~heaven and in earth” (Matt. 28:18). God placed everything under Jesus’ authority. Paul told how God had subjected all things to Christ as he stated, “. . . which he (God) wrought in Christ, when he raised him from the dead, and set him at his own right hand in the heavenly places, far above all principality, and power, and might, and dominion, and every name that is named, not only in’ this world, but also in that which is to come: and hath put all things under his feet, and gave him to be the head over all things to the church” (Eph. 1:20-22; cf. Col. 2:16). Everything, both in heaven and on earth, has been subjected to Christ since He was risen from the dead and was seated at the right hand of God. If everything is already subject to Christ, what more authority could be given to Him at some future date? He already has all authority! Hence, He is presently reigning as the monarch over His kingdom.

The period of Christ’s reign is misunderstood. Hence, some believe that it has not yet begun, that it will begin at some future date, and that it will last for a literal thousand years. However, the Scriptures state that the reign of Christ began when He took His seat on the right hand of,the throne of God. Notice these Scriptures which teach that the, period of Jesus reign is from His ascension into heaven (Acts 1:9) until His second coming. When Jesus ascended into heaven, He “sat down on the right hand of the Majesty on high” (Heb. 1:3). He was to sit on the right hand of God until God made His enemies the footstool of the His feet (Heb. 1:13; 10:12-13). Paul wrote on this subject in his discussion of the resurrection of the body. He said,

But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ’s at his coming. Then cometh the end, when he shall have delivered up the kingdom to God, even the Father; when he shall have put down all rule and all authority and power. For he must reign, till he hath put all enemies under his feet. The last enemy that shall be destroyed is death (1 Cor. 15:23-26).

Notice these facts gleaned from this passage: (1) Jesus is presently reigning; (2) He will continue to reign until the last enemy is destroyed; (3) The last enemy to be destroyed is death which enemy will be destroyed when the dead are raised; (4) After that occurs, the kingdom will be delievered up (not set up) to God; (5) Finally, Christ will “also himself be subject unto him that put all things under him” (1 Cor. 15:28).

At this present time, Jesus should be recognized as “the blessed and only Potentate, the King of kings, and Lord of lords” (1 Tim. 6:15). He presently has the key of David (Isa. 22:22; Rev. 3:7) and is reigning as King over His kingdom.

Mistaken Views Based On Misunderstanding of Kingdom

Those who do not believe that Jesus is presently reigning as King over His kingdom hold this conclusion because they misunderstand the nature of the kingdom which He came to establish. They have a physical, literal kingdom in mind. They think that Jesus came to this earth to establish a temporal government in the city of Jerusalem which would gain control of the entire earth. This government would establish a one thousand year reign of peace in which the physical nature of things in this world would be changed so thoroughly that the wolf would dwell with the lamb and the leopard would lie down with the young goat. Of course, that has never literally occurred. However, these passages were never intended to be understood, literally because Jesus never intended to establish a physical kingdom.

The nature of the kingdom which Jesus came to establish was spiritual. When Jesus stood before Pilate, He said, “My kingdom is not of .this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence” (Jn. 18:36). Again, He said, “The kingdom of God cometh not with observation: neither shall they say, Lo here! or, to there! for, behold, the kingdom of God is within you” (Lk. 17:20-21). When Jesus’ disciples tried to make Him an earthly king, He withdrew from their midst (Jn. 6:15), refusing to be an earthly king. The passage is thoroughly unable of explanation from a premillennial perspective. Premillennialists believe that Jesus wanted to be an earthly king. John 6:15 records that the people wanted to make Jesus an earthly king. Why did He refuse to allow them to make Him an earthly king? The premillennialist cannot give an answer, although the answer is quite simple – Jesus did not come to establish a physical kingdom!

As a matter of fact, Jesus could not reign as a king on this earth for several reasons. The prophet Zechariah foresaw that the Messiah would occupy the position of both priest and king; he wrote,

Thus saith the Lord of hosts, saying, Behold the man whose name is The Branch; and he shall grow up out of his place, and he shall build the temple of the Lord: even he shall build the temple of the Lord; and he shall bear the glory, and shall sit and rule upon his throne; and he shall be a priest upon his throne: and the counsel of peace shall be between them both (Zech. 6:12-13).

This prophecy was difficult of interpretation to those who lived before Christ. The Messiah had to be a descendant of David (2 Sam. 7:11-14), of the tribe of Judah. Yet, Zechariah said that He would be priest on His throne. The priest had to descend through the tribe of Levi. The Jews, prior to the coming of Christ, did not understand how the Messiah was going to be both priest and king.

Jesus could not be a priest upon this earth. “For if he were on earth, he should not be a priest, seeing that there are priests that offer gifts according to the law” (Heb. 8:4). Consequently, the priesthood of Christ had to be a spiritual priesthood in which Jesus serves in heaven. Inasmuch as Jesus has to serve as a priest-king and he cannot serve as a priest on earth, He cannot serve as a king on earth as well.

This is further confirmed by Jeremiah. Jeremiah predicted that no descendant of Jehoiachin (also called Coniah) could occupy the throne of David in Judah. He wrote, “Thus saith the Lord, Write ye this man childless, a man that shall not prosper in his days: for no man of his seed shall prosper, sitting upon the throne of David, and ruling any more in Judah” (Jer. 22:30). Jesus is a descendant of Jechoniah (Matt. 1:11-12). Hence, Jesus could not sit upon the throne of David in judah. Jesus sits on the throne of David but He sits on that throne in heaven, seated at the right hand of God. He could not reign on this earth in a temporal kingdom.

If Jesus Is Not Reigning

There are some conclusions which follow from taking the position that Jesus is not presently reigning as King in His kingdom which we need to consider. Those who deny that Jesus is presently reigning are unwilling to accept these conclusions. Hence, these become additional evidences that Jesus is reigning as King over His kingdom. If Jesus is not reigning as King over His kingdom:

1. God broke His promise. In Psalm 2, Jehovah promised that He would establish His kingdom regardless of man’s attempts to thwart His purpose. Premillennialism teaches that the Jewish rejection of Jesus as an earthly king caused God not to be able to establish the kingdom in the first century. Hence, God’s promise failed. The next conclusion which follows is this: if the rejection of Jesus in the first century caused God to be unable to fulfill His promise, how can we be sure that a similar rejection at a later time would not have the same effect? This destroys confidence in the word of God.

2. Jesus is a failure. John 18:37 plainly states that Jesus came to this earth for the purpose of becoming a king. If He did not accomplish that which He set out to do, as premillennialists assert, He failed in His mission.

3. Dethrones Christ. Premillennialism dethrones Christ by denying that He is presently reigning as king over His kingdom. Hence, if premillennialism is true,’ we cannot confess that Jesus is Lord (Acts 2:36) or that He is King of kings and Lord of lords (1 Tim. 6:15). We could only state a conviction that He will become these things at some future date. Presently,’ however, Jesus does not have “all authority” if premillennialism is true despite the clear affirmations to the contrary (Matt. 28:18; Eph. 1:20-23).

4. The Apostles have no authority. The apostles were given “binding and loosing” authority in the kingdom (Matt. 16:18; 18:18). If the kingdom has not come, they have no binding and loosing authority. The words of the apostles would not then be the authoritative word of God for today. The New Testament looses its authority if premillennialism is true.

5. No need for a new birth. The new birth was the condition for one to have admission into the kingdom of heaven (Jn. 3:3, 5). If that kingdom has not come, there is no need for a man to be born again. Why be born again if there is no kingdom in which to enter?

Conclusions

Jesus is reigning! He is reigning in heaven today and will, continue to reign until the second coming at which time He will return to this earth, raise the dead, and judge the world in righteousness. He is presently Lord of lords and King of kings. Each of us needs to voluntarily submit ourselves to the Lord Jesus Christ and acknowledge His authority.

Questions

1. Explain how one can prove that premillennialism is false by proving that Jesus is presently reigning as King over His kingdom.
2. Describe the nature of the reign of the Messiah which was foretold in Psalm 110:1-2.
3. Could man thwart God’s purpose to establish the Messiah on the throne of God? Give Scriptures to confirm your answer.
4. Prove that Jesus came to this earth for the purpose of being a king.
5. If Jesus failed in His first effort to be a king, could we be sure that He would succeed in subsequent efforts to become a king?
6. Prove that Jesus taught that the kingdom would be established in the first century.
7. Prove that the early church believed that Jesus was presently reigning in their day.
8. Give the fulfillment of Psalm 2:1-6.
9. Cite Scriptures to prove that the kingdom is presently established.
10. How much authority does Jesus have today? How much more authority could He possibly possess in the future?
11. Give the duration of Jesus’ reign.
12. What kind of kingdom do the premillennialists expect and what kind did Jesus establish?
13. Why could Jesus never be an earthly king?

Guardian of Truth XXVI: 1, pp. 7-10
January 7, 1982

By Raymond E. Harris

Through the years premillennialist have differed on many points. However, they all agree on one major theme. They all deny that the establishment of the church fulfilled the kingdom prophecies of the Old Testament. This denial of the fulfillment of the kingdom prophecies has in turn spawned the myriad of complex false doctrines held by all varieties of premillennialists.

At this time we will consider some Old Testament kingdom prophecies and point out their fulfillment in the establishment of the church of Christ.

Daniel 2:44

The prophet Daniel, writing some 580 B.C., foretold the establishment of God’s Kingdom. As Daniel interpreted King Nebuchadnezzar’s dream, he revealed that Nebuchadnezzar’s kingdom would be followed by three great, but lesser, kingdoms. History has proven Daniel’s word to be true. Nebuchadnezzar’s kingdom, Babylon, was followed by the Medo-Persian, the Macedonian and the Roman Empires. Daniel revealed that in the days of the fourth (Roman) empire, God would set up a kingdom. Let’s look at the verse: “And in the days of these kings shall the God of heaven set up a kingdom, which shall never be destroyed: and ‘the kingdom shall not be left to other people, but it shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms, and it shall stand for ever” (Dan. 2:44).

Notice Daniel specified the time the prophecy would be fulfilled: “. . . In the days of these kings.” God’s Kingdom would come in the days of the Roman Kings. That should be plain and specific enough for anyone! The man of God said, God “shall” set up His kingdom in the days of the fourth great world empire, which We now know to have been the Roman Empire.

Now to the fulfillment. In Luke 3:1-3, we learn that John the Baptist came forth preaching “. . . in the fifteenth year of the reign of Tiberius Ceasar.” And so we have John preaching in the days of the Roman Empire, when Daniel said that God would set up His kingdom. Let’s consider now what John was preaching. Notice Matthew 3:1-2: “In those days came John the Baptist preaching in the wilderness of Judea, and saying repent ye: for the kingdom of heaven is at hand” (emp. mine, R.E.H.). Then, a short time later, Jesus said, “Verily I say unto you, that there be some of them that stand here, which shall not taste of death, till they have seen the kingdom of God come with power” /Mark 9:1). Hence, we find both John and Jesus, living in the days of the Roman Empire- declaring that the Kingdom of God was “at hand” and that that generation would see “. . . the Kingdom of God come with power.”

Thus the premillennialists find themselves in the very unenviable position of disputing and denying the fulfillment of prophecies made by Daniel, John the Baptist, and Jesus Christ.

Now let’s see what really happened. In Matthew 16:18-19, Jesus demonstrates that the kingdom and the church are one and the same. Look at the passage, “And I say also unto thee, that thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church (“assembly” or “called out body of people,” R.E.H.); and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. And I will give unto thee the keys /authority, R.E.H.) of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven; and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.” It should be obvious that Jesus uses the terms “church” and “kingdom” interchangeably. The kingdom is the church and the church is the kingdom.

You will remember that in Mark 9:1, Jesus said the kingdom would come in that generation with power. Then in Luke 24:49, He commanded the apostles, “. . . And, behold I send the promise of my Father upon you: but tarry in the city of Jerusalem, until ye be endued with power from on high.” In Acts 2:1-4, that promise was fulfilled as the apostles were filled with the Holy Spirit and received inspiration and power. Continuing on in Acts 2:14, we find Peter standing up with the other apostles; he began to preach the Gospel of Christ for the first time. In Acts 2:38 Peter told those gathered on that occasion what to do to receive the remission of sins. And verse 41, explains that “they that gladly received His word were baptized: and the same day there were added unto them about three thousand souls.” And verse 47 concluded the chapter by informing us that, the Lord added to the church daily such as should be saved.

So, the kingdom was to come with power /Mark 9:1). The power came on Pentecost (Acts 2:1-4/. The church came into existance on Pentecost (Acts 2:47. Hence, the church is the kingdom and the kingdom is the church!

Later, in Acts 8:12, Phillip went out, “. . . preaching the things concerning the kingdom of God”; and the people did the same things others did on Pentecost to get into the church (they were baptized/.

In Colossians 1:13-14, Paul noted that God, “. . . hath delivered us from the power of darkness, and hath translated us into the kingdom of His dear son; in whom we have redemption through His blood, even the forgiveness of sins.” Yet we remember that in Acts 2:38 people were baptized for the remission /forgiveness) of sins and so were added to the church (Acts 2:47). Hence, when one is baptized for forgiveness of his sins, he is added to the church and translated into the kingdom.

Further, you will .remember that in Daniel 2:44 the prophet said that God’s Kingdom “. . . shall stand forever.” In Hebrews 12:28, Paul testified, “Wherefore we receiving a kingdom which cannot be moved, let us have grace, whereby we may serve God acceptably with reverence and godly fear.” So, Paul states that God’s Kingdom which “. . . shall stand forever” or “which cannot be moved” had been received in his day.

And finally, in Revelation 1:9, the apostle John advised his readers that he was their brother and “. . . companion in tribulation, and in the kingdom and patience of Jesus Christ . . . .”

Hence a culmination of the foregoing passages indicate that:

1. If we can have any confidence in the integrity of Daniel as an inspired prophet of God, the Kingdom was established in the days of the Roman Empire.

2. If we can have any confidence in the integrity of Jesus as the Son of God, the Kingdom was established in His generation.

3. If we can have any confidence in the integrity of Paul and John as inspired apostles, they were in the Kingdom of God.

4. If we can have any confidence in the New Testament as the inspired word of God, the Kingdom of God is the church of God, the house of God (1 Tim. 3:14-15).

Additional prophecies of the Old Testament with their fulfillment in the New Testament could be pursued if space allowed. For your private study we suggest the following. They all have .to do with God fulfilling His eternal purpose in placing Jesus on the throne in the New Kingdom, which is also further designated as the church and the family or house of God.

Prophecy		Fulfillment
1. 2 Sam. 7:12-13	Christ raised up to sit on David’s throne	Acts 2:29-33
2. Dan. 7:13-14	Jesus receiving glory and a kingdom	Acts 1:9
3. Isa. 2:2-3	The establishment of the Lord’s house	1 Tim. 3:14-15
4. Jer. 31:31	A new covenant from the Lord	Heb. 8:6-13
5. Mic. 4:1-2	The law of the Lord was to come from Jerusalem	Acts 2:14-47

Questions

What basic mistake do all premillennialists make regarding God’s Kingdom?

1. How many world powers did Daniel see in Nebuchadnezzar’s dream?
2. During the reign of which world power, did Daniel foresee the coming of God’s Kingdom?
3. How long was God’s Kingdom to last?
4. John the Baptist and Jesus lived during the reign of what world power?
5. When did John the Baptist think God’s Kingdom would come if it was “at hand”?
6. What did Jesus say would accompany the coming of the Kingdom?
7. When did Jesus say the Kingdom would come?
8. What did Paul say those that had their sins forgiven had been translated into?
9. Was the apostle John a premillennialist? How do you know?

Guardian of Truth XXVI: 1, pp. 5-7
January 7, 1982