Truth Magazine

By Dennis C. Abernathy

In this article we wish to notice the parable of the lost (or sometimes called “prodigal”) son. We are not interested just here in a detailed study of what a parable is, but will give the following, which will be helpful. A parable is a narrative true to nature or to life which is used for the purpose of conveying spiritual truth to the mind of the hearer. As the Bible class teacher may convey to her small students: “It is an earthly story with a heavenly meaning.”

This parable of the lost son is found in Luke 15:11-32 and is said by many to be the most beautiful of all the parables. It is filled with human sympathy and love. It touches the innermost part of man–his very heart. It is a very moving story, filled with practical applications for us. It is normally called the “Parable of the Prodigal Son,” although the word “prodigal” is not used in the narrative.

The two preceding parables (the lost sheep and the lost coin) help to introduce this parable. They were spoken in the presence of “publicans and sinners” and the “Pharisees and scribes.” The publicans and sinners had drawn near unto Jesus “for to hear him” (Lk. 15:1). But the scribes and Pharisees “murmured” (v. 2), and were there to spy, criticize and accuse the Lord. These parables show us God’s attitude toward and love for the sinner as compared to the sinful attitude toward and lack of love and compassion for sinners on the part of the scribes and Pharisees. They exhibited the “holier than thou” attitude and were trusting in their own righteousness (Isa. 65:5; Rom. 10:1-3).

In the first parable, the lost sheep strayed of itself; but a piece of money (coin) could not be lost of itself. In the one, attention is fastened upon the condition of the thing lost; in the second case, attention is fastened upon the sorrow of the one who lost it. But in our parable under study, there is blame to be attached to the one that is lost.

Now, with your Bibles open, we shall focus our attention on this young man and try to glean some needful lessons from this parable.

1. This young man desired to be free from his father’s house. He was no longer content with his father’s home (sick of home – as compared to homesickness later); in fact, we might say he was very much dissatisfied. His father’s love, care, concern, protection and provision was not treasured very highly by him. He was ready to contemptuously cast aside his father’s guidance, counsel, and association. He wanted to have his own way. He longed for the far country.

Young people, you had better think hard and long about this very thing. You want to get out on your own. You want to do you own thing. You want to break away from all the restraints of home. You are tired of being told what to do (or bossed), so now you want to make your own decisions. Are you ready? This young man thought he was.

But man so often falls into this grievious error in this life here on this earth. Hence God warns, “Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him. For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world. And the world passeth away, and the lust thereof; but he that doeth the will of God abideth forever” (1 Jno. 2:15-17). It is man who forsakes God; it is man who leaves Him. God does not desire it (1 Tim. 2:4). But man follows his own desires, leading him into sin, which brings death (Jas. 1:14-15; Rom. 6:23). You want to know why and how man sins? Well James tells us that we are responsible for our own sins. “When he is drawn away of his own lusts, and enticed.”

2. This young man wanted what was his – right now. He had a right, by law (Deut. 21:17) to his portion (a third, being the younger); but he had no right to claim it during the father’s lifetime. But he made his request (or perhaps made his demand). We see the father (isn’t he typical of most) willingly sharing with him, even though he did not have to do so.

This young man is typical of mankind and his conduct toward God – Man selfishly petitioning God to give in to their every whim – and do it now. The young man’s father granted his request – but it was not best for him. God will allow man to have his desires, if he, in his stubborness, persists in the attainment of them. We see this in His dealings with Israel. He “gave them their request; but sent leanness into their soul” (Psa. 106:3-16). Also, their request (or demand) to “give them a king” like their neighbors round about them. (1 Sam. 8:19-22). Dear reader, both the boy and they got what they asked for, but it wasn’t best for them.

3. This young man took his departure into the far country – away from all restraints. He was free at last, He thought. Free from his father’s influence, guidance, and counsel. He was now “his own man.” He could now “do his own thing.” He could now make his own life.

Everybody is seeking freedom today from something. Every minority group, women’s group, gay rights group, etc. all want to be free from the “shackles that bind them.” All of this freedom (so-called) is not what it is built up to be. To be able to smoke, drink, curse, fornicate, take drugs – is this freedom? Do not be deceived! This is slavery of the grossest sort – slavery to one’s own indulgence. “While they promise them liberty, they themselves are the servants of corruption: for of whom a man is overcome, of the same is he brought in bondage” (2 Pet. 2:19).

But back to this lad’s father for just a moment. We see his loving care to the end. He “divided with them his living.” He was very unselfish witholding nothing from his son; he gave them all he had. Does not this portray the Heavenly Father’s love for man (Read John 3:16 and Rom. 5:8)? He loves us, hence, He gave. Love gives. The author of “every good and perfect gift” has simply provided and still provides for us.

But so many are not content with His provisions; they want to throw off all restraint (do their own thing in religion). They do not want to follow a pattern and very boldly announce that they “do not need authority for all they do.” My friends, they are on their way to the far country. They think they are free from the restraints (legalism, antism, etc.), but this young man thought he was free too.

4. This young man wasted his sustenance in riotous living. But remember, dear reader, this is the kind of life he wanted (the “good life,” he thought). Just look what he gave up for this life of “riotous living.”

Think of the countless multitudes, who squander all they make on a life of sin, given over to every sinful pleasure to fulfill their lusts. This seems to be the philosophy that the majority live by today. “You only go around once in life, live it with all the gusto you can.” What a pity, what a waste!

Yes, the “far country” of sin offers revelry and good times, but the Book says that the pleasures of sin are but “for a season” (Heb. 11:24-25). Such pleasures are never satisfying or lasting and ultimately bring only heartache and pain.

What about you? Will you waste your life or will you resolve right now that you will spend the remainder of it in the service of the Lord? Just think of the wasted time, energy and talent you have already thrown away in the service of our worst enemy, the devil (Jn. 8:44). This young man went out full (with abundance) but in the far country, it did not take him long to come up empty. Do not learn this lesson the hard way. Dealing with the devil will always leave you short changed.

5. This young man was in want, where will he turn? He has squandered all he had and now, possibly for the first time in his life, he is confronted with a real need. Where are his fair weather friends now? Have they all deserted him? (His money, their ticket to a good time, is gone and so are they.) In time of need, one does not turn to the ones responsible for his distressing plight. The alcoholic does not turn to the brewery to get help. Alcohol has made millions of alcoholics, but has not befriended one yet. Yes, when people are down and out, they turn to good people, they turn to the church – these are the ones who can help.

So it is with the sinner. He must turn from the devil to escape his bondage, and turn to the Lord, in order that he might find rest for his soul. “Come unto me, all ye that labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest” (Matt. 11:28). Until the sinner turns to God, there is no hope all is lost.

6. This young man has now sunk to a shameful life. He is now forced into the employ of a heathen and, not only that, but he is in the field to feed the swine. Think of the stigma of his job – a Jewish boy feeding swine, unclean animals. The account says that if he could have, he would have eaten from the hog trough.

He has arrived. This is the good life in all its glory. This is the finished product of the brewers art. Here are the rewards of the good life in the far country. What does it get you? Drinking, drugs, illicit sex, dancing, immodesty – what does it get you? I will tell you – the hog pen in the mud and mire of sin just like it got this young man. Sin is filthy. (I am afraid we do not view sin as God does. We laugh it off, pass over it lightly, and rationalize it away.) “Let us cleanse ourselves from all filthiness of the flesh and spirit . . . .” (2 Cor. 7:1).

How this typifies the plight of all who turn from God to a life of sin (read 2 Pet. 2:20-22). Not a pretty picture is it? It has been aptly put: “If you don’t want to be classed with the hogs, don’t wallow with them in the mire.”

Here is this young man. He had a good home and a father who loved him; he threw it all away, and now he has hit rock bottom. He is at the end of his rope; he is in the gutter. Sad to say, this is the plight of many who were fine, healthy, outstanding young people who have tried the wares of the devil. They thought they could “make a mock at sin,” but they are fools (Prov. 14:9).

If we were to close this story here (with the young man in the hog pen) in utter despair and need, it would be sad beyond description. But there is a cloud with a silver lining. This is a story with a “lived happily ever after” ending, as it were, as far as this young man is concerned. In the next article, we shall trace his steps back home. Stay with us.

Truth Magazine XXIV: 45, pp. 743-745
November 20, 1980

By Jimmy Tuten

The subject of death has captivated the minds and imaginations of men for countless generations. Physicians, medical and psychiatric authorities, preachers and funeral directors have written much and have made every effort possible to prepare the public’s mind for the grief and bereavement most people face when confronted with this major emotional crisis in their lives. Over against this aspect of death, there is the religious implication which involves more than pent-up interest or curiosity. Looking at death from a religious standpoint, involves a true attitude based upon what the Bible teaches. Since various theories about death which are strictly taboo have been in existence for some time and since these theories tend to cloud and block proper understanding to truth with reference to death, it would be well to study carefully what the New Testament teaches about death.

Theories Concerning Death

Among present-day theories, one will find the earliest to be invented by man, is the theory known as “psychopannychia,” which claims that at death the soul of man sleeps in a state of unconsciousness. The founder of Seventh-Day Adventism (Ellen G. White) borrowed this idea from the Reformation period and made it a pillar in her system. “At death,” Adventists say, “man becomes unconscious. During the time between death and the resurrection, he is asleep.” When Jesus come the second time, the claim is that only the “saints are raised, clothed with immortality and borne to their glorious home in the city of God” (The Bible and the Immortal Soul, Pacific Press Pub. Assoc., Mountain View, Calif., p. 8). As for the wicked, Seventh-Day Adventism teaches that they are annihilated! Another group known as Christian Scientists teach that “matter, sin, sickness and death have no reality;” therefore, they deny the existence of death. Jehovah’s Witnesses claim that man is wholly mortal, and that he is annihilated at death. Death, they say, “is utter cessation of conscious, intellectual or physical activity, human or otherwise” (Make Sure of All Things, N.Y., Watchtower Bible and Tract Society, 1953, pp. 86-90).

What Is Death?

The theories stated above, if true, place our English and American scholars in a bad light. If death is unconsciousness or annihilation, then various reputable lexicographers have erred greatly, for not a single recognized New Testament scholar defines death as unconsciousness or annihilation. Such is, therefore, purely an assumption offered without truth.

“Death” is the translation of the Greek word thanatos, which conveys the primary idea of “separation.” First, let us notice the definition of the word: W.E. Vine says that “death” has reference to the following: (1) “the separation of the soul (the spiritual part of man) from the body (the material part), the latter ceasing to function and turning to dust;” (2) “the separation of man from God . . . `conscious existence in communion with God,’ so spiritual death is `conscious existence in separation from God”‘ (An Expository Dictionary of the New Testament, Vol. 1, p. 276). Thayer says that death means “separation (whether natural or violent) of the soul from the body by which the life on earth is ended” (Greek-English Lexicon, p. 282).

When used in a spiritual sense, death means the separation of man in sin from God (Gen. 2:17; 1 Tim. 5:6; Matt. 8:22). When used in a physical sense it has reference to the separation of the soul of man from the body, “for the body without the spirit is dead . . .” (Jas. 2:26). When the soul is separated from the body, the body goes back to the dust and the soul returns to God (Eccl. 12:7).

That man in death is not unconscious is proven by Matthew 23:32: “I am the God of Abraham and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob. God is not the God of the dead, but of the living.” Though Abraham, Isaac and Jacob had passed from the earth in death, their spirits returned to God and they were not out of existence, nor in a state of unconsciousness. God is a God of the living; God is the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob; therefore, Abraham, Isaac and Jacob live! While many other passages could be cited to demonstrate further the inconsistencies of psychopannychia, this one is sufficient to show that unconsciousness is not a part of death. Neither is physical death annihilation. One passage will be sufficient to clearly point this out. In Luke 16:19-31, we have the record of. a rich man and Lazarus. The rich man died and was in torment, while Lazarus, who also died, was carried to Abraham’s bosom. If these two were annihilated in death, how do we account for the fact that they still existed after death? The rich man could see (v. 23), he could speak (v. 24), could feel pain (v. 25), and could remember (v. 27-28). These two men were dead, yet perfectly conscious of their surroundings, able to talk about things remembered on earth and they realized that they were in a different place from that of their former existence (vv. 27-28). Can anyone produce the passage that teaches that the spirits of men are unconscious or cause to exist at death?

Ecclesiastes 9:4-5 is often cited in an effort to disprove the account of the rich man and Lazarus. It reads, “For him that is joined to all the living there is hope: but the dead know not anything, neither have they any more reward; for the memory of them is forgotten” (emphasis mine, J.T.). To chant that “the dead know not anything,” is unfortunate, in that it fails to take into consideration the fact that verse six of his context modifies the sense in which the dead know not anything, i.d., “neither have they any more a portion for ever in any thing that is done under the sun.” The meaning is this: when men pass from this life and dwell no longer under the sun, they can no longer attain to a reward because their period of probation is past. They can do nothing, their reward and their destiny is sealed. This is the very point demonstrated by our Lord in the account of Luke 16.

Conclusion

Death, which entered into the world because of sin (Gen. 2:17; 3:19, 22-24), universally reigns (Heb. 9:27). “Death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned” (Rom. 2:12). For every birth there will be a death some day, for death is the fate of all descendants of our first parents. However, the picture is not so dark after all, for the work of Jesus on earth brought about our deliverance from death (Jn. 10:10). “Forasmuch then as the children are partakers of flesh and blood, he also himself likewise took part of the same; that through death he might destroy him that had the power of death, that is, the devil; and deliver them who through fear of death were all their lifetime subject to bondage” (Heb. 2:14). Christ, through His resurrection, demonstrated His mastery over death (Rev. 1:18). Now through Christ one can say, “O death, where is thy sting? O grave where is thy victory?” If one is a chili- of God through obedience to the commands of Jesus (Mk. 16:15-16), he can view death calmly and mildly, and not share with the world the fear of death. “Blessed are they who die in the Lord” (Rev. 14:13).

Truth Magazine XXIV: 45, pp. 742-743
November 20, 1980

By Mike Willis

In the last several years, brethren have witnessed churches becoming involved in any number of activities which they were not heretofore involved, though the denominations were involved in them for many years. Formerly gospel preachers mentioned this as one distinguishing point between the Lord’s church and human denominations. Today many churches of Christ could not be distinguished from the neighboring denominations on the basis of the programs of work in which they are involved.

Has God Given The Church A Mission?

The great God of heaven who planned the church from all eternity (Eph. 3:10-11) had a purpose for creating the church. He gave it a work to do. All of the work which God has given to the church, as collective work, is to be done through the local church. He has given no work to the universal church; he has revealed no officers or qualifications for officers for the universal church. Hence, when I speak of the work which God has given the church to do, I am speaking of the work which every individual local congregation has to do. What are those works?

Years ago, N.B. Hardeman wrote, “The work of the church can be stated under three heads: (1) the building up of every member in it; (2) the work of benevolence; (3) the preaching of the gospel to sinful humanity” (Hardeman’s Tabernacle Sermons, Vol. V, p. 52). I believe that the Scriptures will sustain this statement. These are the works in which God has revealed that the local church is to be engaged. Let us look at them more closely.

1. The work of edification. The work of “building up every member” is the work of edification. In Ephesians 4:11-12, Paul wrote that God had given apostles, prophets, evangelists, pastors and teachers for the purpose of “perfecting the saints.” This work is to be done so that the saints grow into mature men and no longer be children tossed to and fro and carried about by every wind of doctrine (Eph. 4:13-16). Hence, the early church was involved in the work of edifying its members.

Saints are built up through the study of God’s word. They must be fed the milk of God’s word that they may grow thereby (1 Pet. 2:2). Hence, when Paul departed from Miletus, he told the Ephesian elders, “And now, brethren, I commend you to God, and to the word of his grace, which is able to build up, and to give you an inheritance among all them which are sanctified” (Acts 20:32). The word of God is what builds a man up. The assembly of the saints has, as one of its purposes, the teaching of God’s word in order to edify the members (1 Cor. 14:12, 26).

Saints must exercise themselves in order to grow. The mature saint is the saint who, having studied God’s word, “by reason of use” has his “senses exercised to discern both good and evil” (Heb. 5:14). By the study of God’s word, the Christian must grow to be able to discriminate between that which is good and that which is evil.

What are some programs of work in which the church may be involved to edify the saints? The Bible study programs, special meetings, lectureships, publication of bulletins, usage of tracts, etc. are just a few programs of work in which the church can be scripturally involved in helping to edify its members.

(2) The work of benevolence. The program of benevolence which was carried on by the local congregations discussed in the New Testament was that work of relieving the needs of the saints. Study Acts 2:44-45; 4:32-37; 6:1-6; 11:27-30; Rom. 15:25-26; I Cor. 16:1-4; and 2 Cor. 8-9. Each of these passages shows that the early church relieved the needs of its own members. The program of relieving the needs of the poor of the whole world was never given to the church, so far as our New Testament records.

In carrying out this program of work, the local church may give money to one of its needy members, purchase groceries for them, pay a medical bill, pay for the education of the children of the members, etc. The local church may even find it necessary, on occasions, to purchase a house in which some of its poor can live. All of these works would reflect the local church discharging its obligations before God in the field of benevolence.

(3) The work of evangelism. The local church has an obligation to spread the gospel to the lost world around them. The early church sent gospel preachers to spread the word of God (Acts 13:1-2; Phil. 4:15; 2 Cor. 11:8). The work of disseminating the gospel to the world is one of the works which God has placed upon the church.

In carrying out this work, the local church may print a bulletin to mail to the community, conduct a gospel meeting, print an article in the local newspaper, support men to work in the community, conduct a radio and/or television program, etc. The local congregation should use every means at its disposal to spread the gospel in its community.

Does This Constitute A Pattern?

These are the only works revealed in our New Testaments in which the church was involved. Does this constitute a pattern? The answer to this question is either “yes” or “no.” If the answer is “yes,” then churches for all times are obligated to follow that pattern. For the church to be involved in programs of work other than those revealed in the New Testament is sinful because the church acts without authority in so doing. If the answer is “no,” then the church has no pattern of work revealed to it. Where there is no law, there can be no transgression (Rom. 4:15). Consequently, any program of work would be just as good and pleasing in the sight of God as any other program of work. The church which decided to use its resources to build a money-making business enterprise would be just as pleasing as the church which used its resources to preach the gospel, if there is no pattern revealed for the work of the church.

God has revealed a pattern for the work of the church. That work is (1) the work of evangelism, (2) the work of edification, and (3) the work of benevolence. For the church to become involved in things not connected with these works is sinful because it is contrary to the pattern revealed in the Scriptures.

These Things Are Not The Work Of The Church

In order to make this as clear as possible, I want to list some works in which some denominations and some liberal churches are involved which are not the work of the church as revealed in the Scriptures.

1. Social Reform. In the early twentieth century, many denominations became involved in trying to effect reforms in our society through participation with labor disputes. More recently, many churches have been involved in the work of improving the living conditions of the black race. Though I am sympathetic with the desire to improve the living conditions of any people, the Lord never gave the church the work of improving social situations in a society. Though slavery was practiced in the first century, though the government was corrupt in the first century, though living conditions were sometimes deplorable, and though many other social problems needed corrected, the New Testament churches never were involved in proposing revolutionary of renovation programs or any of these activities. Social reform and improvement were not the works which God gave the church.

2. Recreation. God never gave the church the work of providing recreation for the young or the old people. Many denominations and denominational churches of Christ hire a “youth minister,” giving him the job of keeping a full schedule of recreational programs for their children. Churches spend thousands of dollars of the Lord’s money to erect “fellowship halls” in which the members can assemble for recreational programs. Some churches are building “family centers” which include gymnasiums and other recreational facilities. God has not given the church the work of providing recreation for its members.

3. Business. God never gave the church the responsibility to enter the business world to make money. Many churches have purchased money-making businesses such as Burlington Mills, Christian Brothers Distilleries, and any number of other businesses. The Catholic Church holds interest in many businesses operated in the United States and other parts of the world. The Bible does not reveal that the church ever went into a money-making business venture.

4. Secular Education. Many, churches are in the business of providing secular education for the world and its members. Many denominations own “church schools” which are supported by contributions from the local denominations. The liberal churches of Christ are doing the same; schools such as David Lipscomb, Abilene Christian University, Harding College, and a number of others are receiving support from the churches of Christ. God never authorized any church to be involved in the work of secular education.

5. Politics. The work of the church is not that of politics. The Catholic Church was involved in politics for years; more recently, the Protestant denominations have tried to influence the politics of our country. The modernists have been influencing American politics for years. Now, when the conservative Moral Majority decides to enter the political arena, they are crying for separation of church and state! So a of the churches of Christ are entering politics in trying to clean up television. Though I am sympathetic to their goals, we must remember that God has not given to the church the work of political involvement or supervising public morals. Though we may work individually in politics as each of us judges best, the church as such cannot scripturally be engaged in politics.

6. Medicine. The Lord never authorized the church to be involved in the work of building hospitals and medical clinics or the work of supporting doctors and nurses. Though these are good works which we can and should be involved in as individuals, they are not works which God has placed upon the church. For years the denominations have been building their hospitals; around the country, there are hospitals reflecting this work–Baptist Hospital, Methodist Hospital, St. Elizabeth Hospital, etc. More recently, some brethren in the church have started calling upon churches to pay the bills for erecting and maintaining hospitals in foreign countries (if it is right to do it in Nigeria, it is certainly right to do the same thing in America). There is no scriptural evidence where any church ever used its contribution to build medical facilities.

Is This New To You?

To some people this article will be startling; they have never read anything like this before. The churches where they worship are involved in all of these works (this includes some churches of Christ). However, those who have been pleading for the restoration of the ancient order of things have been preaching this for years. In 1942, N.B. Hardeman wrote,

Now, may I ask, what is the purpose of the church of the Lord? Suppose I discuss the negative side first. I may say some things with which you do not agree, but I bid you hear me regardless. I do not consider it a part of the work of the church to try to run the government. I am taught in the Bible to be subject unto the powers that be, just so far as I think they do not conflict with some law of God. Again, I say to you, with caution and thought, that it is not the work of the church to furnish entertainment for the members. And yet many churches have drifted into such an effort. They enlarge their basements, put in all kinds of gymnastic apparatus, and make every sort of an appeal to the young people of the congregation. I have never read anything in the Bible that indicated to me that such was a part of the work of the church. I am wholly ignorant of any Scripture that even points in that direction. Furthermore, it is not the work of the church to try to adjust labor troubles, or to supervise our social conditions. It was never intended that the church should run politics, stop wars, supervise public morals, or to be any kind of collecting agency to pile up a large sum of money. The church should not go into the banking business (Hardeman’s Tabernacle Sermons, Vol. V, pp. 50-51).

We are preaching today what N.B. Hardeman was preaching then. Some of our brethren have departed from the plea to restore the New Testament church in order to involve the church in many activities for which they can give no Scripture.

The tactic of these liberals is simple: just label the work a “good work” and send the bill to the church! The result is that the church becomes a collecting agency for every human institution which someone among us decides is doing a “good work.” Colleges, orphan homes, unwed mothers homes, reform schools, hospitals, and who knows what else are now looking to the church for money to pay their bills.

Brethren, we need to be reminded of the work which God has given the church. The Lord only authorized the church to do the works of evangelism, edification, and benevolence. For the church to be involved in any other activities is sinful. Brethren may persuade the church to become involved in feeding and clothing humanity and providing good homes for them. However, if every man in the world lives in a beautiful home, wears expensive clothing, is educated well, and has good health, without the gospel he will still die and go to hell. The work which God has given to the church is more important than improving man’s conditions on the earth; the church is to be involved in spreading the word of God – taking the soulsaving gospel to a world doomed to hell. Let us not become diverted from this revealed program of work!

Truth Magazine XXIV: 45, pp. 739-741
November 20, 1980

By Eugene Crawley

Through the centuries many have spoken on conversion, a vital subject in regard to man’s salvation from sin, and proper relationship to God. That there is disagreement and division in their teachings is too evident to be overlooked or ignored. Far too many people have listened; and continue to listen, to the various and differing doctrines of men relative to this subject. And, too few have been sufficiently concerned to see what God has spoken on the matter. Apparently some have forgotten, or do not know, that God has spoken! It should, therefore, behoove us to seek to learn that which God has revealed unto man in the Bible, His inspired revelation. Our attitude should be one of willingness to turn to the inspired Scriptures and allow God to tell us what He requires of responsible persons on this great subject.

Speaking through His Son, He said, “Except ye be converted and become as little children, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven” (Matt. 18:3). In Matt. 7:21, He said, “Not everyone that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven, but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.” In Jesus’ conversation with Nicodemus, He said, “Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God” (John 3:3). And, notice in connection with these instructions, the statements in Acts 2:47, “And the Lord added to the church daily such as should be saved.” The church, according to Jesus’ statement in Matt. 16:18, 19, is the kingdom of heaven. Have you detected in these that each of them is equal to the same thing – entrance into the kingdom, the church?

To be born again = entrance into the kingdom

To be converted = entrance into the kingdom

To do God’s will = entrance into the kingdom

To be saved = entrance into the kingdom

What this means is simply this: Things equal to the same thing, as these are, are equal to each other. Thus, there should not be as much mystery about the new birth or conversion as some think and would have others to believe. If a person cannot understand the new birth, as some contend they cannot, then surely he can understand what is meant by doing the Father’s will; and remember, these are equal to the same thing and are, therefore, equal to each other; they mean the same, result in the same. Yes, to be born again is the same as being converted, doing God’s will, or being saved; there should be no difficulty at all here.

Man’s need for conversion, salvation, can be seen from these facts: all have sinned (Rom. 3:23); sin separates man from God (Isa. 59:1, 2); the wages of sin is death (Rom. 6:23). However, God has made provision for man to be delivered from such and to be translated into His kingdom. (See such passages as John 3:16; Rom. 5:8; Luke 19:10; Matt. 20:28; Heb. 2:9; Col. 1:13 and Phil. 2:7, 8.)

In the great Commission given by Jesus following His triumphant resurrection from the dead, He instructed His apostles to “teach all nations, baptizing them” (Matt. 28:18-20); to “preach the gospel to every creature” (Mark 16:15); and “that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in His name in all nations” (Luke 24:47). Thus, He would have the taught to believe the truth, repent of sins, and be baptized in His name for remission of sins.

To even further simplify the means by which man is saved from sin and to make it easy to be understood, God has included various examples of conversion in the book of Acts. In each case, the gospel in its purity and completeness was preached, responsible persons heard this message, repented of their sins, and were, upon confession of their faith in Christ, baptized in the name of Christ for remission of sins, or in order to be saved, born again, converted, and enter the kingdom. You may read these accounts and be even further impressed with the truth of God’s will, and its simplicity: Acts 2:22-47; 8:1-13; 8:26-40; 9:1-18; 10:1-48; 16:14, 15; 16:25-34; 18:1-8 and 19:1-6. Then, compare these with each other, and measure your conversion by that which these people did. Having done so, you can know whether or not you have been truly converted to Christ. Have you? If you have not met these same conditions of faith as they were required to meet you have not been saved; you should seriously consider the spiritual condition of your soul and your standing before God.

For God to save you, you must meet His conditions! Your soul is too valuable to risk being deceived in this life, and going to judgment unprepared to meet the Lord. So, be certain by searching the inspired Scriptures, and doing what they teach – nothing more, nothing less, and nothing else! Then you will become what the inspired word of God instructs – simply a Christian!

Truth Magazine XXIV: 46, p. 738
November 20, 1980