Gospel Guardian Changes Hands

By James W. Adams

The news which follows may bring joy or sadness to the heart of the reader depending upon your attitude toward Gospel Guardian. Whatever your reaction, we want you to know that it is not something that was done without due consideration and prayerful thought. Due to Brother Theron N. Bohannon’s advancing age, his health, Sister Bohannon’s health, and his personal affairs, the editor of Gospel Guardian has been for the past year urging Brother Bohannon, is some way or the other, to get himself out from under the burden which continued publication of The Gospel Guardian imposed. Several courses of action were considered. The editor of the paper had first chance at buying and continuing to operate the paper himself. He considered it, but ruled that course out due to insufficient capital and his own age. Had I been ten years younger, I would have bought the company and continued to publish it myself, despite my finances, but unfortunately I am not ten years younger. The paper could have been given or sold to a Non-profit Corporation which we had set up with that it view. In fact, the corporation had already achieved both State and Federal (IRS) 4pproval and was ready to be activated. Several considerations caused this to be rejected. Brother Bohannon finally decided to sell The Gospel Guardian, Inc, lock, stock, and barrel, to The Cogdill Foundation. This became an accomplished fact, September .19, 1980, but it will not pass from one to the other until December 31, 1980. Until that time, the company and paper will continue to be operated as it has been for the past five years.

Theron N. Bohannon has unselfishly underwritten the company and the paper for five years. He has sacrificed thousands of dollars of his personal funds to do this. He has given the editor an absolutely free hand with the paper’s publication. Our relationship has been close and brotherly in every sense of the word. It remains so at this moment and w”continue to remain so as the years pass whether few or many. I regret that we did not achieve our goal of getting the paper operating in the black financially. We were approaching this goal, but only by the editor giving his time to the task without remuneration, except for reimbursed expenses. This is how we have operated throughout 1980. I leave the paper with no regrets and by choice. My reasons are strictly personal, hence no person’s business except my own. Beyond this statement, I plan to make no comment. I would appreciate not being asked, and I shall consider any speculation, publicly or privately voiced, as unwarranted meddling in other men’s matters, hence will dignify all such with the contempt of silence which it deserves. I regret the necessity for having to say this, but knowing the disposition of some, I deem it proper and necessary.

I shall make no comments concerning the future, either of the paper or the bookstore, but shall let the new owners of the company and paper make whatever statements they care to make and reveal whatever plans they have in mind for the future. I shall only assure our subscribers that all subscriptions will be fulfilled satisfactorily by those who assume ownership. This was a part of the sale agreement. We have no unpaid obligations beyond current operating expenses which will all be satisfied.

During my tenure as editor of the paper, my daughter, Patricia Spivey, has efficiently and faithfully operated the bookstore. It has been a great experience for her. She is a university graduate and competent, hence could have made more money elsewhere. I could not have managed the operation without her, so she made a large contribution to my editorship in this respect. I enjoyed writing for the paper and doing the work of an editor, however imperfectly. I trust that good was accomplished. May the Lord bless the good and overrule anything that was otherwise. A special thanks to our faithful readers for the hundreds of letters I have received encouraging me in my efforts, for those who may have respectfully written criticizing this or that about our efforts, and for your subscriptions and book business that helped us continue.

As to my future: I shall continue, as I have for more than forty-five years, to “do the work of an evangelist.” I work fill time with the good church at Huntington, Texas, in which labor I am most happy. I shall continue in this capacit~, will hold a few meetings each year, and plan to do some writing of a more permanent nature that I have contemplated for a number of years. When I perceive, as I will inevitably if I live long enough, that my powers of mind and body are waning to such an extent that my work is no longer productive, I shall retire from public work and dedicate the remainder of my life in simply living for God so as to go to heaven when I die and to take as many with me as possible. I hope it will be in the Piney Woods of East Texas that I spend these years. Though not a native of this section, I regard it as home!

Truth Magazine XXIV: 44, pp. 705, 715
November 6, 1980

The New King James Bible

By Bobby L. Graham

In 1979, one hundred nineteen international scholars combined to produce the New Testament of the New King James Bible (NKJB). Their purpose was to preserve the beauty and purity of the original King James Version (1611) while bringing the grammar and vocabulary up to modern practices. Quotation marks were added and pronouns referring to God were capitalized.

While the technical devices used by the translators are under consideration, let it be noted that italics was dropped in the case of interpolations. “Many of these additions are now unnecessary and have been omitted,” according to the Introduction. I do wonder, however, whether many interpolations have been made, without being noted in italicized letters.

An Improvement

Acts 12:4 is an instance in which this revision has improved the renderings of the original King James Version. Whereas the 1611 version read “Easter,” the NKJB has “Passover.” Such is an improvement because of the complete lack of justification in the 1611 work; in fact, every other case in which the same word occurred, it was translated Passover in 1611. Acts 12:4 was the lone exception.

Some Failings

Romans 7:5 is an instance where interpolation was done without italics. The word aroused is supplied but there is no indication given to the reader. I am not sure that I can agree with the point made by the sentence when the word is inserted, but its addition certainly should be signaled. Paul’s point is not that the Law produced sinful passions, but that it defined and condemned such passions as sinful.

1 Corinthians 16:2 is another verse in which there is a failing in the NKJB. “On the first day of the week let each one of you lay something aside, storing up as he may prosper, that there be no collections when I come.” This rendering does not say “at home,” but I do get that dinstinct meaning when I read the verse, because of the combination of “lay something aside” and “storing up.” Of course, the purpose clause in the latter part of the verse (“that there . . . come”) prevents such a meaning being drawn from the verse; but I would still classify-this-as a poor choice of words.

The differences that I have noted in the NKJB are not as numerous or as serious.as those found in most of the newer and more recent efforts. I do think that it has much to commend it, but it should used in comparison with other reliable versions.

Truth Magazine XXIV: 43, p. 698
October 30, 1980

The Games People Play

By Keith Sharp

A few years ago a popular song was entitled, “The Games People Play.” The crooner jeered of hucksters who “sock it to you in the name of the Lord.” Sadly, this skeptical view of religious people is reflected in the lives of too many professed Christians.

Following Christ is not a game. True Christians are not “putting on a show” to either fool others or to amuse themselves. The real disciple has “obeyed from the heart” the gospel (Rom. 6:17, 18). He has forsaken all for Christ (Lk. 14:33). He is “crucified with Christ” and lives his entire life “by the faith of the Son of God” (Gal. 2:20). To him, being a Christian is serious, constant business, not an amusing, occasional game.

Dear ones, how earnest are we about our religion? If we profess to be His disciples, yet use foul language (Eph. 4:29), cheat in business (Rom. 12:17), dress immodestly (1 Tim. 2:9, 10), give grudgingly (2 Cor. 9:6, 7), fail to assemble with the saints (Heb. 10:24, 25), fail to study the scriptures, (2 Tim. 2:15) or fail to teach the gospel to our friends and neighbors, (Jn. 15:1-8), are we really serious about living for Christ?

“Play-acting” at righteousness is, by definition, “hypocrisy.” The scriptures indicate the Lord takes an exceedingly dim view indeed of such actors (Matt. 15:7-9; 23:13-36). Their threatened lot in eternity is horribly desperate (Matt. 24:51).

I wonder how amusing it will be to hear the Judge of the universe sternly pronounce:

Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels (Matt. 25:41).

How serious are you, dear Christian, about following Christ?

Truth Magazine XXIV: 43, p. 697
October 30, 1980

“New Works” and Problems

By Name Withheld

In April, 1979, an announcement appeared in some of “the papers concerning a new work in F________ , California. It was a grand and, from all appearances, successful beginning, on December 24, 1978. However, before the announcement appeared problems had begun to show up. Other than a hint here and there, I received no warning whatsoever concerning these problems. While I am convinced that such silence was dereliction, to say the least, I shall leave it at that point and permit God to take care of whatever failures my brethren here demonstrated. This is a personal story, though shared by others of our local group. I would like to share the experiences of the past year and one-half with the readers of this publication, in the hopes that it will be both interesting and helpful to many.

Having been involved in new works in Florida, Arizona, California, and Missouri, I might be able to offer a few profitable thoughts for those involved in similar works or planning to do so. My experience tells me that problems differ from place to place mostly as a matter of degree, though some would be peculiar to a given situation. The new work in Missouri proved to be the most enjoyable and problem free of any in my experiences while my present work in F______ has proven to be the most difficult. Sharing my F__________ experiences may serve a two-fold purpose. First, it shall provide a progress report; secondly, it may be helpful to those planning such works.

Discouraged: I soon realized that there were those that because of their experiences elsewhere were badly discouraged. Their talents were rusty, their attitudes unpredictable and they generally felt that they had not been permitted to grow and produce as they could have done under different circumstances. These “carry-over” feelings from past experiences were repeatedly hurting. However, this group did not prove to be a big problem. Once they were permitted and encouraged to be an active and productive part, they were on their way. Enthusiasm ran high in this group, but bad habits were not easily broken. I have nothing but compliments for this group. They have come a long ways and are still going.

Quitters: As might be expected in such cases, there were those who planned to simply “quit,” judging from observations, and merely signed up to assist in the new works to keep from being bothered. Their original congregation would think they had gone to the new work and the new work would see nothing of them. Of course, most of these did exactly what they had planned. We have managed to “salvage” a few, though question marks still abound. If possible at all, these should have been “weeded” out before we ever started. With few exceptions, I had no idea about the size or seriousness of this problem. Not knowing these people, I spent a lot of time trying to undo things that I supposed some of us must have done to discourage them. I doubt, however, that it was a complete waste of time; we did, after all, learn a few things therefrom.

Disgruntled: Some had come with the new work disgruntled because they had not gotten their way elsewhere (I have no doubt about the wisdom here). You guessed it! They wanted their way here also, and it did not seem to make a lot of difference how they go it. It does not take much of an imagination to guess what problems these could cause; thus I leave them to your imagination at this point.

I realize that one can expect a certain number of these sorts of people in any new work (and elsewhere). However, I was soon to realize that these were so prevalent and obvious that it caused a number of talented and dependable people to decline to assist with the new work, thinking we would have nothing but problems. I do not agree with this thinking, but that does not cause the problem to go away.

The new work begins; soon after fallacies began to appear. Some apparently viewed the new work as a “love nest” in which almost anything would be tolerated. Just about every kind of liberal was urged, “Come be a part of our new work.” Along with this attitude was the practice of some in frequenting the services of some of the “liberal” groups in our area. As expected, they came, but they did not stay long. I preached the truth; they did not like it. Of course, I was a culprit for “running them off” and I needed more love in my heart. Of course, we were blessed with those that were full of wisdom, who knew better than anyone else what should be preached, how it should be preached, and when it should be preached. But, they had a poor student; I did not learn too easily. There was a willingness and an effort to involve the congregation, as a congregation, in things that were none of our business. All I could do here was to say, “No, not me!” and to press the principles of truth that should be respected in all such cases. I am certain I have not mentioned everything up to this point, but perhaps the reader has the picture. Let us return to specifics.

Gossip and back-biting: Gossip was our first collective problem. Brethren, changing locations will not stop gossip. We managed to get this stopped momentarily. However, we did not accurately judge the stubbornness of those involved, and we under-estimated its source. Insisting upon firm and determined action was not easy under the circumstances, but it had to be done. This had been going on for some time but came to light because of the courage of some in reporting it at this point. Efforts to stop this proved almost completely vain; such would merely change their avenue of attack, deny their intent, and continue to do what they were doing. Again we failed to realize the “depth” of this problem. Perhaps a better explanation would be that we so badly desired it to be otherwise that we did not see too well. We were still wrestling with this problem when the next one surfaced.

Fornication: One couple, by their own request, talked with me about their marital situation, several months before the new work began. Their story was somewhat like the proverbial “fisherman’s” story, but I, nonetheless, accepted it at face value. Now, a few months after the new work was under way, concrete proof was voluntarily offered that this couple was living in adultery and had been for some twenty years. Like the “man without a country,” I was man without a choice if I was to please God. Dear reader, keep in mind that all these things were going on at the same time. I was soon to learn there were others, both congregations and individuals, that had “stuck their heads in the sand” in this matter and had permitted it to be dumped into my lap in the beginning of the new work. But, we cannot be accountable for the neglect of our brethren elsewhere. Action was taken, the couple were disfellowshipped. Alas, this couple had fellow-travelers. At least one insisted that they did not have to part in order to repent and correct their sins. Others openly defended them and opposed such action as was taken. We lost about twenty-five per cent of the families with which we started. I was accused of initiating such action for wrong motives. Have you ever initiated such action and have only one person in an area of 250,000 population to call and commend the action? If so, you know exactly how I felt. I shall never forget that one call! Excuses flew thick and fast! I have never seen so many “cautious” brethren in all my life; for the first time in my life I learned the danger in opposing sin-some one is going to think you “are taking sides”! I can assure you it would take a rather wild imagination to cover all that those who left us tried to do. Of course, after the action had the appearance of being successful (and it was), many were the compliments.

There is considerable aftermath of this last problem. I shall resist the temptation to tell such lest I be thought of as being unkind and harmful to my “good” brethren. One good illustration of attitudes was expressed by an elder’s wife when she asked, “Why didn’t O just destroy that evidence and forget about it?” The answer was supplied by my supportive wife, “And go to hell?” The full story in all this is almost unbelievable; what has happened to most of those that left us because of the action taken is a sad, sad story. I was to learn that some of them were fully aware of the fornication problem, but had not once opened their mouth to get such corrected; they wished it to be tolerated in our midst. And, if you were not willing to tolerate it, you just needed to have more love in your heart. We are still feeling repercussions from this problem, and probably will for some time to come.

I wish to have it clearly understood, I could not have gone through all this without the support of the majority of the brethren involved in the new work. I never cease to thank God for those that stood firm with me in this or these matters. They are good men, they are applying themselves, and should their efforts continue the new work will have a bright future.

Progress: O, yes, there are positive aspects, many good things! When it was evident that we would not tolerate such rebellion against God’s Word, a number of good brethren cast their lot with us; we are thankful for these. Maybe we needed to prove ourselves a bit. We lost most, if not all, of the original trouble-makers. We have baptized twenty-five since our beginning, most of them in recent months. More classes are underway now than ever, and it appears that the good news of our existence and our stand for truth and light is being noticed. We pray that the Cause of our Savior will reap much fruit as a result. Both attendance and contributions are on the increase, and interest is high with most. New converts are active and growing, a pride and joy to all of us.

We all recognize that there shall be “growing pains” and, no doubt, other problems. We hope that we can face such with the same determination with which the recent ones were faced. We have lost a lot of sleep, some weight, and maybe a few years; that is nothing compared with the price paid on Calvary. We were hurt, disappointed, and made ashamed of some of our brethren, but we did not quit. Unity now prevails, and if present progress continues, and I believe that it will, we will soon be reaching out to other places. We sincerely thank God for all the progress, we pray that it shall continue, and we solicit your prayers to that end. For those who get tired of fighting and wish to quit, we simply say, “You are in the wrong army!”

I have retraced my steps for the past one and one-half years many times. If I had it all to do over, I cannot think of one decision, one effort, or one point that I would like to change. Of course, I should hope to improve in anything that I do; but I could not change anything without feeling that I was betraying the Cause of my Lord. I trust that these have been helpful or encouraging to someone out there, somewhere, that is involved in the same or similar works. May the God of heaven bless you with wisdom and courage to continue!

Truth Magazine XXIV: 43, pp. 695-697
October 30, 1980