Truth Magazine

By Ron Halbrook

Fighting to the Finish

Out of step with the compromising spirit of this age, Gardner S. Hall took seriously the battle between revealed truth and speculative error. Unlike some other brethren who have wearied of battle, he did not intend for the recent false doctrines on grace and unity to go unchallenged. Neither the encroachments of age nor the pain of. terminal sickness could stop him. So long as he could preach at all, he contrasted the doctrine of Christ with the doctrines of men (Matt. 15:7-8; 2 Jn. 9).

False doctrine on grace and unity was not new to Brother Hall, nor did he take its dangers lightly. He said that the work of exposing “Ed Fudge” was much needed. Brother Hall explained, “He is in error and is leading other young men away. I didn’t know about his errors until you brought them to our attention.”(1) That remark was made in 1974; some time later I gained more insight into why Brother Hall was deeply concerned about this false doctrine. A review of some history supplies the background and context for his concern.

Premillennialism and Unity-In-Diversity

In 1915, R. H. Boll and F. W. Smith crossed swords in the Gospel Advocate over premillennial speculation, as did H. L. Olmstead and F. B. Srygley. Boll (1875-1956) and Olmstead (1883-1958) were joined in time by Stanford Chambers (1876-1969), Don Carlos Janes (18771944), E. L. Jorgenson (1866-1968), and others, as the millennial faction matured. Fighting for its sectarian life, this group repeatedly tried to justify its existence by profuse use of such terms as “grace,” “peace,” and “love,” and by use of the denominational unity-in-. diversity argument. Almost every issue of the leading millennial paper among brethren, Word and Work(2), carried such appeals and arguments. A spokesman recently summarized.

To me the millennial question was only the battleground. The real issue dividing us was the grace of God. I found many who were depending upon their correct doctrinal position for salvation, with a resulting uncertainty about their salvation.

On the other hand the premillennial brethren had a great hope. They would not come into judgment. The grace of God covered all their sin, including errors in doctrine.(3)

In his discussion, the author applied this unity-in-diversity concept of grace and fellowship (1) to “subgroups” such as “charismatics” among premillennial churches,(4) (2) to other “restoration groups” such as those which use instrumental music,(5) and (3) to “fundamental evangelical” denominations, especially those which teach immersion.(6)

Not only did advocates of premillennial doctrine make the unity-in-diversity argument, but also a number of opponents to millennial theories fell for the argument. Following the line that error in doctrine is automatically forgiven anyway, a group of sympathizers arose to plea that these false teachers be accepted in the fellowship of the saints as they were in unity with God. For instance, J. D. Tant was told by a successful furniture dealer in Chicago named Norman Davidson “that the remainder of his life was going . to be dedicated to the removing of the ‘ban’ against Brother Boll and ‘showing up’ the ‘high-handed popery’ which led to his being disfellowshipped all these years. He said all the opposition to Boll through the years had arisen out of preacher jealousy ….”(7) A major part of his effort was an article also distributed in tract form under the rubric of a Christian business man, thus offering himself as an unbiased observer.

“A Christian Business Man Writes His Brethren” was submitted to Word and Work,(8) on the one hand, and, on the other, to the Gospel Advocate,(9) Firm Foundation,(10) Apostolic Doctrine,(11) and others. After castigating brethren who regarded Boll as a “dangerous teacher” for mistreating, misquoting, and misunderstanding him,(12) Davidson said under the heading “Mistakes By All,”

I have told of mistakes which we have made. Now I would say that I sincerely feel Brother Boll has made a mistake in featuring his views as I feel he has. As a Christian brother, I have told him so ….

Further, I am sure those featuring the “Pre” views have caused trouble in several places, gone to extremes, and in some cases, have been guilty of “drawing lines.” As I have not upheld or defended mistakes made by those with whom I agree, neither do I uphold or defend those made by Brother Boll and those agreeing with him. Nevertheless, 1 see nothing in the past which should prevent us from being brethren; in all that word means, in the future.(13)

In a letter to Boll with his copy of the article, Davidson hoped that “you won’t mind” sharing some blame since “the psychology will be better to place some blame on both sides.”(14)

Davidson’s warm sympathy for premillennialists was not lost on them, that is, they welcomed the influence of such men, took advantage of it, and continued in the path of error. Editor Showalter lamented,

It is a pity that Brother Boll persists in his obstinacy to teach his false and speculative theory; and it is also a pitiful thing to see men like Brother Norman Davidson who says he does not believe the teaching of Boll’s Premillennialism himself, try to bolster up and hold up the teaching, nevertheless, by defending Brother Boll.(15)

Referring to Luke 12:51-53 (“I am come to bring ….division”) and 2 John 9-11 (“If any cometh unto you, and bringeth not this doctrine ….”), Showalter added,

As for discord there will always be discord when any part of the membership of the church of the Lord departs from

the sound teaching of the New Testament, and the cure for it is not to fellowship and unite with the false teacher but to oppose the false teacher and his false teaching. This must be done in the spirit of Christ, ‘but must not be neglected …. To do otherwise in order to be at peace with some false teacher is to betray the Master and surrender to the forces of evil.(16) Those who do not believe false teaching are obligated to oppose it.

Political compromise has no place in God’s plan. Diplomacy cannot barter divine revelation for the sake of peace. Peace by sacrifice of principle is victory for evil, as Europe learned shortly after British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain returned home from the betrayal of Czechoslovakia in 1938 to declare, “I believe it is peace for our time.” The blood of Britain and the world was the price for appeasement in 1938. “We didn’t feel then that there was anything wrong with it. ‘Appeasement’ has a gentle, conciliatory sound-like `reasonable’, `well-meaning’, ‘agreeable'”.(17) Christ is betrayed by appeasement of false teachers and the price is paid in lost souls (Ezek. 3).

Compromisers often believe that by ignoring error and defending errorists they will be won over by such a display of friendship-thus error is to be defeated without a fight. “Catch more flies with honey than vinegar.” Other brethren feel sorry for the false teacher who is in the heat of battle, because they have not studied the issue sufficiently to see its danger. Or. sometimes personal friendship or family ties outweigh a person’s love for truth and loyalty to Christ (Matt. 10:3439). The tragedy is that false teaching advances under the protection of excuse-makers; they provide a handy buffer zone in battle. The sympathizers’ ranks included such men as F. L. Rowe, who used Boll as a contributing writer in the Christian Lea-der .after the Gospel Advocate dropped him in 1915; J. N. Armstrong of Harding College, who carried on voluminous correspondence with Jorgenson under a veil of secrecy so as to shield the school; and Jimmy Lovell, Action editor whom Davidson found to be “in full sympathy.”(18) Because Boll and his friends would not repent and because compromisers offered comfort rather than rebuke, the premillennial sect among professed churches of Christ persists to this day.(19)

Gardner S. Hall Tested By His Father’s Stand

Gardner S. Hall did not join the compromisers who debated against debate, criticized criticism, and defended the “sincerity” of false teachers while impugning the motives of sound brethren. But Brother Hall faced the test of Matthew 10:34-39 (“I am come to set a man at variance against his father”), because his own father aided and appeased the millennialists. Flavil Hall (1876?-1952?) never became an ardent proponent of premillennial propaganda but he warmly admired the Davidsons among brethren and warmly defended the Jorgensons. The millennialists were so sweet-spirited and Christ-like; their opponents were so harsh and unkind. From his home in Pine Apple, Alabama, Flavil Hall embraced and encouraged millennialists by means of unity-in-diversity.

Almost a year before Davidson’s tract appeared, Flavil Hall gave his consent and advice to the project. While on the road in Selma, Alabama, in a waiting room and without a dictionary-. (“I don’t do so well with one, so don’t like to be without one”), he felt compelled to write Jorgenson. Hall was more than a little upset by R. L. Whiteside’s attacks on Jorgenson in the Bible Banner-“it cannot be conceived” that Whiteside was honest in his misrepresentations. Jorgenson was right in saying that “his adversaries had fabricated” charges against “premillennial brethren” and Hall wished that he himself could take more hand in “exposing them.” But, alas, like J. W. McGarvey on instrumental music in worship, “I have whistled until I have no whistle with which to whistle ….But I cannot act wholly as if the evils did not exist.” In view of Norman Davidson’s intention “to go to much expense” in exposing “the perverseness of your adversaries,” let him be cautious and careful in wording . . . . “for the least lack of accuracy will be used with telling effect upon the unwary and to your injury.” Davidson “must” stress “That the a-millennialists are often past masters in advocating opinions and speculations” on such matters as war and Revelation 20.(20) In other words, let, premillennialism be dealt with by means of unity-indiversity. Whether through Hall’s advice or not, Davidson made his very appeal.(21)

On 11 December, 1977, I discussed with Gardner Hall by phone his father’s correspondence with Jorgenson. Brother Hall said that he appealed to his father on a number of occasions to give up the denominational unity-in-diversity plea. “My father was wrong,” he said, “but I could not get him to see it. I showed him that his argument could as well be applied to those who worship with instrumental music or to those who are not scripturally baptized, as to premillennialism.” They had some rather heated exchanges over the matter.

When we talked, Brother Hall had been reviewing Journey Toward Jesus(22) on his radio program. The concepts and arguments of the “new” unity movement were not new at all, he explained. They had an old familiar ring to him. He could not countenance them when he first heard them from his father and he did not intend to now when he was hearing them from others. Hiram Hutto later judged these radio lessons “some of the best preaching that I ever heard him do ….”(23) The broad denominational implications of unity-(n-diversity were obvious to Brother Hall. It is interesting to notice that when Leroy Garrett started his journey toward denominationalism, he and Jorgenson clasped the right hands of fellowship in proclaiming Billy Graham a gospel preacher rather than a dangerous false teacher. Graham was mildly rebuked for his error on baptism but sound brethren were severely thrashed for not recognizing him as a gospel preacher.(24)

What Will We Leave Behind?

The passing of men like Gardner S. Hall, Sr. is a great loss for us, a great gain for them. Well did Paul say that he was “in a strait betwixt two, having a desire to depart, and to be with Christ,” yet seeing the work which needed to be done here (Phil. 1:23-24). When such men leave us, we miss their counsel (Prov. 11:15; 24:6). Yet where they have taught and encouraged us in the truth, we still have their counsel. What they have left behind enriches us still, if we keep it in mind.

The life and work of Gardner Hall reflect a healthy blend or balance of inner piety, sincerity, and purity with warm love for truth and hatred of error. Personal purity and devout living are not to be separated from doctrinal purity and militant opposition to error on every hand. In fact, these are simply different elements of the same faith, “without which no man shall see the Lord” (Heb. 12:1-3, 14). Whether these imprints of Divine truth have come to us directly from Brother Hall or by reading about him, they should become more deeply imprinted in our hearts each day. And, then, some day we too can leave behind the same lessons: (1) the need to adorn as well as to preach the doctrine of Christ; (2) the privilege of blessing the unborn: (3) the plea to sin not against children; (4) the importance of prayer; and, (5) the imperative of fighting to the finish.

Truth Magazine XXII: 33, pp. 539-542
August 24, 1978

1. Gardner S. Hall letter to Ron Halbrook, 9 Sept., 1974.

2. R. H. Boll became editor of Word and Work after Stanford Chambers brought it to Louisville, Ky., from New Orleans in 1915. After Boll’s death in 1956, E.L. Jorgenson and J.R. Clark (d. 1968) shared the editorship until about 1964 when Gordon R. Linscott took the job. Since January of 1976, Robert Heid has been editor. The paper is still published in Louisville, in connection with Portland Christian School and Portland Ave. Church of Christ, though actually printed by Heid Printing Co.

3. H.E. Schreiner, “Of Love and Labels and the Thousand-year Reign,” Mission Magazine 9 (Apr. 1976):5-8. This is the Schreiner who debated Robert C. Welch on premillennialism 5-9 November, 1956 in Louisville, Ky.; see The Welch-Schreiner Debate, 5th edition (New Albany, Ind.: Faith and Facts Press, 1972).

4. In 1934, Boll defended Virgil E. Smith and O.S. Boyer, who reported that the baptism and other miraculous manifestations of the Holy Spirit accompanied their preaching in Brazil. Though Boll disavowed the doctrine of these brethren, he claimed “a love that will not let them go” (July, 1934 Word and Work). Beginning in the mid-1960s, Pres. LaVerne Houtz at Southeastern Christian College (Winchester, Ky.) Led the school toward open acceptance and promotion of the charismatic movement. Finally, in 1970, President Houtz and ten of the fifteen faculty members where asked to resign by the Board. The church have not disfellowshippped the charismatic. By the mid-1970s, they and their opponents had forged an uneasy peace of unity-in-diversity, accepting one another without endorsing each other’s doctrine on the Holy Spirit.

5. The premillennial Highland church in Louisville, Ky., used the well-known Christian Church preacher S.S. Lappin for a tent meeting on their lawn 13-29 July, 1941. Lappis was premillennial; he and Jorgenson agreed in principal that they could exchange pulpits though it might be inexpedient (S.S. Lappin letter to Don Carlos Janes, 13 Nov., 1941). Men of mature years and young preachers alike say that preaching against instrumental music in worship has virtually disappeared from premillennial pulpits (personal interviews with LaVerne Houtz and Paul Kitzmiller, son of long-time Word and Work staff writer Carl Kitzmiller, 13-14 Apr., 1976).

6. ” ” ” ” ” ” ” “

7. J.D. Tant letter to G.H.P. Showalter, 3 June, 1946, published in Firm Foundation 63 (20 Aug., 1946):8.

8. Davidson sent Boll a copy, plus one for Jorgenson. “I hope you may approve my article,” Davidson began (Norman Davidson letter to R.H. Boll, undated: cf. Gospel Advocate LXXXIX (31 July, 1947), which refers to Davidson’s tract being mailed and which dates the letter October or November of 1946 when taken with another remark in the letter).The trusted advisors may have approved the article but did not print it. It was certainly to their advantage to let the opposition fight among themselves, without getting involved.

9. Rather than print the article, owner and publisher Leon McQuiddy allowed Davidson to send his material in tract form to the Advocate mailing list; Editor B.C. Goodpasture commented in the 31 July, 1947 issue and began a review on 7 August (p. 577).

10. The article was printed 22 July, 1947 (vol. 64, pp. 8-13) with comments by Editor G.H.P. Showalter, followed by additional comment in the 29 July issue (pp. 8-13) which included an advance printing of James A. Allen’s review (see next note).

11. Editor James A. Allen published the article in July of 1947 and reviewed it in the August issue (Vol. 16, pp. 168-172).

12. Davison “shuddered” to see among Boll’s opponents “rapid doctrines of intolerance, bigotry, discord, bitterness, and strife” supplanting “love” and Peace.” He wrote under the heading “Boll Falsely Accused,” “I would say that good men just misunderstood each other.” A Christian Business Man Writes His Brethren (Chicago, Ill.” 225 N. Michigan Ave., [1947]), pp. 9-11.

13. Ibid., p. 11. Emphasis added by R.H.

14. Davidson letter to Boll, Oct. or Nov., 1946.

15. “The Promised Review,” Firm Foundation 64 (29 July, 1947): 8.

16. Ibid.

17. Barrie Pitt (British military expert), “The Climate of Appeasement” Britain 1935/1939″ in History of the Second World War, Part 1, ed. Pitt (England and U.S.A.” Marshall Cavendich Ltd., 1972), p.iv.

18. Davidson letter to Boll, Oct. or Nov., 1946.

19. For further study on the origin and nature of the premillennial movement among churches of Christ, see Foy E. Wallace, Jr., The Gospel for Today: An Extended Edition of the Certified Gospel (Nashville Tenn.” Foy E. Wallace, Jr., Publ., 1967), pp. 392-494.

20. Flavil Hall letter to E.L. Jorgenson, 14, Aug. 1946.

21. A Christian Business Man, pp. 3-4, 9.

22. Bruce Edwards and Edward Fudge, A Journey Toward Jesus: 16 Letters on Salvation by Grace through Faith, and its Implications for the People of God (Athens, Ala.: Edward Fudge Publ., 1977).

23. “Gardner Hall,” Sentry Magazine, 4 (31 May, 1978): 7-8.

24. E.L. Jorgenson, “About Billy Graham – Again,” Word and Work, LI (May, 1957): 128-31.

By Bob Dodson

The “inspired word of God” (2 Tim. 3:16-17) pays royal tribute unto God’s “grand and glorious” son as the “one and only” big name preacher who ever graced this earth by His “sinless life and truthful message” (1 John 3:5; John 18:37). The purpose of this article is to “glorify” the Lord Jesus Christ and “praise” Him for the monumental achievements that He accomplished. There never has been nor ever shall be “another gospel preacher” that reached the pinnacles of “divine approval” as did Jesus Christ (Matt. 17:5). Below you will find listed for your consideration and study many of these great and notable deeds which the Lord “only” has performed, and which none other could ever do (Acts 2:22-24). It is our prayer and desire that this study will lead us to using the expression “big name preacher” correctly. Since in “all things” Jesus Christ does have preeminence according to Scripture (Col. 1:18), He most assuredly is preeminent among “gospel preachers.” He “alone” deserves this exaltation and none shall ever be his “equal!” For us to refer to “mere mortal” (that is any gospel preacher of the past, present, or future) as the big name preacher surely constitutes “robbery!” This “robs” Jesus Christ of His distinction of being worthy of “all” glory, and honor, and praise, and blessing (Rev. 5:9-12). He alone has a “name” that is above every other name (Acts 4:12).

Origination

The beloved apostle Paul declared by the Spirit that Jesus Christ was the architect and builder of this great universe (Col. 1:15-17). He surely did “create the heavens and the earth and all things therein!” He is both the originator of the universe, and the “original” cause of all creation (John 1:1-4). His work as the Creator gives Him the right to be “blessed forever” (Rom. 1:25). This “monumental task” absolutely beyond measure “evidences” His everlasting power and deity (Rom. 1:20). Moreover this big name preacher “upholds all things” (sustains this living and intelligent universe) by the “Word of His power” (Heb. 1:3)!

Predestination

John the beloved reveals the “high and holy” purpose of the Son of God as that of “destroying ‘the Devil and his works” (1 John 3:8). Jesus Christ was “predestined for greatness” by virtue of the most important “task” and most difficult “task” ever given to anyone in the history of “time” (Heb. 2:9-15)! He met every challenge that He faced in the form of “temptation” and was found without sin (Heb. 4:15). He fought with Satan and “bound him” and He “spoiled his goods” (Matt. 12:27-30). He was God’s prophet (Deut. 18:15-22) who revealed unto “mankind” the exceeding riches of God’s grace (Eph. 2:4-10). He fulfilled God’s eternal purpose in building and establishing the “church” of Christ (Eph. 3:1-11) which is the “Kingdom of God” (Col. 1:13-14). Jesus Christ was “predestined for supremacy” and never once faltered in obeying His Father, and hence God has exalted Him and given Him a name greater than all others (Acts 4:12)! This big name preacher “heads” all principalities and powers (1 Pet. 3:22).

Divestation

Truly the “greatest” account of humility in all history is that of Jesus Christ manifesting “sacrifice without equality” (Phil. 2:5-11). He “emptied” Himself of being deity and clothed Himself with the “likeness” of humanity. The great Creator became the “creature” (Gen. 1:26-28). Being God He was to be served, but He became Himself a “servant” in order to die for the sins of men (Matt. 26:28). This is truly “divestation without. limitation” (2 Cor. 8:9)! He was truly rich but for the sake of sinful man He became poor, that man might through His poverty become “rich” indeed spiritually! He “humbled Himself” and became obedient unto the “death of the cross.” Surely He does possess the right to demand of us to “deny ourselves” to follow Him (Luke 9:23). This big name preacher “tasted of death” for every man (Heb. 2:9).

Foreordination

The apostle Peter declared by the Spirit that Jesus Christ was “foreordained” before the foundations of the world to be the “atonement” for the sins of mankind (1 Pet. 1:18-20). John the Baptist said as he beheld Jesus walking, “Behold the lamb of God that taketh away the sin of the world” (John 1:29). Let us thank God that He has laid upon His Son the “iniquity of us all” (Is. 53:3-6). The “vicarious death” of the Lord Jesus Christ was a product of the “determinate counsel and foreknowledge of God” (Acts 2:22-24). Every event in the history of this world is “centered” around Jesus Christ as God purposed to “sum up all things” in Him (Eph. 1:10). Everyone who chooses to obey the “gospel of Christ” (Rom. 1:16-17) is adopted by God through God’s Son (Eph. 1:3-7). This big name preacher fulfilled every “prophecy” of Him (Luke 24:44).

Legislation

One of God’s seers prophesied that Jesus Christ would be a “governor” (Micah 5:2). Another great prophet of God said that the “government would be upon his shoulder” (Is. 9:6-7). He was prophesied to be the “governor” of the Kingdom of God that Daniel mentioned in his great book (Dan. 2:44). In the New Testament we find that the Lord Jesus Christ “openly states” that the “church” of Christ, is the Kingdom of God (Matt. 16:18-19). He was also prophesied to be the “governor” or ruler of the Kings of the earth (Ps. 2:512). Therefore, in “essence” Jesus Christ is the “legislator” of the “entire universe”, and His will surely “legislates” every event according to his divine providence (Rev. 1:5-7). He has “legislated” His will for all mankind in that which is called the “gospel of Christ” (Rom. 1:16-17). His “legislation” is law and must be obeyed by everyone in order to obtain everlasting life and escape eternal punishment (2 Thess. 1:7-9). This big name preacher will judge all (2 Cor. 5:10-11)!

Proclamation

In prophecy Jesus Christ is announced to be God’s messenger who would “proclaim” liberty from sin for a “sin-cursed world” (Is. 61:1-3). He is most assuredly God’s divine “proclaimer” (Luke 4:16-19) of the “mercy and long-suffering” of God toward man (2 Pet. 3:15). His “proclaimation” is the truth that sets men free from sin (John 8:31-32). Jesus Christ did “proclaim” very beautifully and accurately the way and the truth and the life that will lead each man from earth to heaven (John 14:6). This “heavenly proclaimator” has provided all mankind a “spiritual roadmap” that will lead them to everlasting happiness with God (Rev. 22:14). This map (New Testament) is so simple and easy to follow that “way-faring men though fools, should not err therein” (Is. 35:8). In this big name preacher is “hidden” all of God’s wisdom and knowledge” (Col. 2:3). Jesus Christ “proclaimed” that everyone who “hears his words and obeys them” is wise. But everyone who “hears his sayings and rejects them” is foolish (Matt. 7:24-27).

Interpretation

Truly the divine “announcement” from the angel of the Lord, concerning the Lord Jesus Christ at His birth, signifies His “greatness” (Matt. 1:18-23). He was called Emmanuel which is interpreted “God with us!” This was in fulfillment of (Isa. 7:14). The “God of eternity” (Ps. 90:1-2) became flesh and “dwelt among men” (John 1:14). He interpreted unto man the great “mystery of godliness” (1 Tim. 3:16). He is the “word” (John 1:1-2) who became “incarnate in man!” He “interpreted perfectly” God’s precepts unto man through the Holy Spirit (1 Cor. 2:9-13). This big name preacher surely interpreted unto man “God’s righteousness and true holiness” (Eph. 4:13-24).

Personification

Jesus Christ “personified” deity on this earth, as He progressed through the “land of the living” (Heb. 1:1-3). His every thought and word and deed was a glorious tribute to the “majestic righteousness” of God (Eph. 4:20-24). Every personal circumstance of His life reflected that “God is no respector of persons” (Matt. 22:15-16). His “overwhelming compassion” for the sinner never caused the Lord to compromise the truth about “sin” (John 8:3-11). He truly could and did “read the hearts and the minds of men” (Mark 2:1-11) which is a “peculiar trademark” of God and Him “only” according to the scriptures (1 John 3:20)! As the “ambassador” of His Father, He certainly “personified” the greatest of truths (John 3:16-21). Truly Jesus Christ spoke the truth when He said that “he that hath seen me hath seen the Father” (John 14:7-9). Indeed the Lord “personified” deity through His condemnation of the “hypocrisy” of the “scribes and Pharisees” (Matt. 23:139)! This big name preacher demonstrated always that He “loved righteousness and hated iniquity” (Heb. 1:89)!

Determination

It has been said that “the worth and value of someone” can best be determined by the amount of opposition that it takes to defeat him. Jesus Christ passes this great test with “flying colors”, for our Lord never “gave place to the Devil” (Eph. 4:27). He was “more determined” to glorify His Father in heaven and do His will, than Satan was “determined” to deceive Christ and cause Him to “sin” (Matt. 4:1-10). It was by “sheer determination” that Jesus Christ was able to “die for the sins of men” apart from any assistance from His Father (Matt. 27:46). His “concentration” on the goal set before Him never waned (1 Pet. 2:21-24). By intensive determination He was the big name preacher who endured the cross, while despising the shame (Heb. 12:13)!

Authorization

Jesus Christ taught people as one “having” authority and not as the scribes (Matt. 7:28-29). He cast out the strongest and meanest of evil spirits by the awesome “power” of His word (Mark 1:27). He is the “possessor” of all “authority” in heaven and on earth (Matt. 28:1820). He delegated this “authority” in some measure to His apostles when He directed them to “go into all the world and preach the gospel” (Mark 16:15-16). Jesus Christ said that “he that believeth and is baptized shall be saved, but he that believeth not (this command) shall be damned!” Jesus Christ is the “author and perfecter” of the people on earth who chose to obey His teaching (Heb. 12:1-2). His divine “authority” comes from the Father and those who fail to heed His “doctrine” sever themselves from grace (Gal. 5:4, 2 John 9). When this big name preacher comes to judge the world in righteousness (Acts 17:31), He will have “put down” all rule and authority and power (1 Cor. 15:24). The last enemy “death” also will be destroyed by Him that hath the “keys of death and of hades” (Rev. 1:17-18).

Recognition

He “fully realized” that the scripture cannot be “broken” (John 10:34). Time and again He pointed to Himself and the events that transpired in His life as the “fulfilling” of the “scriptures” (Luke 24:44-49). He was able to “recognize” every appearance of evil that Satan sent against Him and resisted the Devil (1 Thess. 5:22, Jas. 4:6-8). He certainly “recognized” the need for continual learning of God’s divine laws (Luke 2:40,52). He amazed the lawyers in the Temple with His knowledge and wisdom of God’s word (Luke 2:42-48). This big name preacher possessed perfect recognition of His goal while He walked in the flesh (John 12:23-27).

Truth Magazine XXII: 34, pp. 549-550
August 31, 1978

By Larry Ray Hafley

This time we are drawing a bead on a Pentecostal charge of inconsistency. The charismatics say we are inconsistent for selecting New Testament cases of conversion and holding them up as examples while throwing out the miraculous content. They say this is like those who believe everything in the Bible except the miracles. If we are going to use the conversion accounts to bind baptism, then we ought to do the same with respect to miracles. Acts 2, 8, 9, 10, and 16 are prominent passages which are used to set forth the gospel conditions of salvation. To be consistent we must accept the miraculous activity, too, or so the Pentecostals alledge.

First, we accept the miracles: I do not know of single Christian who denies the miracles of Acts or any other book in the Bible. However, if acceptance means occurrence today, who has heard the sound as of a rushing, mighty wind, but no one’s hair is blown out of place! Where are the cloven tongues like as of fire? Where are living apostles equal to Peter and John to lay hands on disciples that they might receive the Holy Spirit? Further, after Peter raised Dorcas from the dead, it was widely publicized and “many believed on the Lord” (Acts 9:40-42). Let us not stop with a few tongues; why not have some raising of the dead if we must have the miracles as well as the baptism, according to the Pentecostal charge.

Second, why do some Pentecostals deny the essentiality of water baptism but accept miracles? If we must have miraculous activity because miracles are recorded as a part of the conversion accounts, then they must accept the essentiality of baptism (Acts 2:38; 8:12; 8:35-39; 16:30-34; 10:47, 48). So, if we are inconsistent for accepting baptism but “denying” miracles, they are inconsistent for claiming miracles but denying the place of water baptism.

Third, we can show that water baptism is to continue until the Lord returns. Just as long as men need to be saved from their sins, just that long will baptism be necessary (Mk. 16:16). However, miracles were limited as to purpose. We can show when they were to cease (Mk. 16:17-20; 1 Cor. 13:8-13; Heb. 2:3, 4).

Truth Magazine XXII: 34, p. 546
August 31, 1978

By Carol R. Lumpkin

Have you been baptized as Jesus commanded? Jesus made baptism a must for all who would be His disciples. This was true in the first century, and remains true today. Jesus informed Nicodemus that baptism was a must in order to enter the kingdom of God. Nicodemus was a Jew, one of God’s chosen people; yet, he was not in God’s kingdom. Jesus said, “verily, verily, I say unto thee, except one be born of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God” (Jn. 3:5). The only birth which combines the elements of water with the Spirit of God is baptism in water.

Nicodemus was surprised when Jesus required a birth in water and the Spirit to enter God’s kingdom. Even today, people are surprised that Jesus requires baptism for salvation. In order for a lost .person (a sinner) to realize a new life in Christ, he must be born again. “Marvel not that I said unto thee, ye must be born anew” (Jn. 3:7).

Before Jesus left this earth for heaven, He said; “Go ye therefore, and make disciples of all nations baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit” (Matt. 28:19). We observe this in action when Peter said, “Repent ye, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ unto (for) the remission of sins; and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit” (Acts 2:38). “The like figure whereunto even baptism doth also now save us. . . ” (1 Pet. 3:21). The apostle Peter preached that baptism was necessary for one to be saved.

The apostles all preached the same gospel. This was unlike modern day preachers who differ in their preaching. One will teach that baptism is essential; while many others will say it is non-essential. Paul wrote on the necessity of baptism for those who would be saved; in fact he himself had to be baptized to be saved. “And now why tarriest thou? Arise, and be baptized and wash away thy sins, calling on the name of the Lord” (Acts 22:16). Baptism was a necessity for Paul to have sins washed away, or forgiven. Let us not believe it is not also necessary today.

Paul describes baptism in his letter to the Romans. “Know ye not, that so many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ were baptized into his death? Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death: that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life” (Rom. 6:3-4).

Jesus described baptism as a birth in water and in Spirit which brings the saved into a new life. Peter shows us that our salvation is a likeness unto Noah’s salvation. Noah was saved by water and so are we (1 Pet. 3:21). Paul shows baptism to be a burial in water and a resurrection there from to walk in newness of life.

There is no verse any plainer to be found in the New Testament than that in Mark 16:16. “He that believeth and. is baptized shall be saved.” This verse coincides with what Peter, Paul, and other inspired men said and wrote on the subject. Someone cries out, baptism is not a commandment; and therefore it is not necessary. Peter said: “And he commanded them to be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ (by His authority)” (Acts. 10:48).

Baptism is a must for every one who desires entrance into the kingdom of God. No person is permitted to enter the kingdom unless he first hears and obeys the gospel of Jesus Christ. Jesus declared that both “belief and baptism” saves (Mk. 16:16).

Truth Magazine XXII: 34, p. 553
August 31, 1978