The Moral Glory of Jesus As Evidence of His Deity

By Mike Willis

The number of unbelievers in America seems to be increasing every year. Whether the greater majority of those who no longer attend worship services are real infidels or only practical infidels, I cannot tell. However, there is always a need to present evidences of the deity of Jesus that men might believe that He is the Christ, the Son of God. We could consider this subject from a variety of viewpoints, such as: the miracles, prophecy, His teaching, or His resurrection. However, a little used evidence of the deity of Jesus Christ is His moral glory. Jesus was the sinless Son of God.

His Relationship To Sin

When we consider the relationship which Jesus had to sin, we are impressed with His moral glory. Jesus condemned self-righteousness in His parable about prayer as He criticized the Pharisee who went up to the Temple to pray (Lk. 18:9-14). Yet, although He condemned self-righteousness, He never once confessed a sin, prayed for forgiveness of a sin, or apologized for any of His conduct. Even when the Jews came to Him saying that He made Himself to be equal with God, He never apologized for it or withdrew the claim.

Indeed, He went a step further; He challenged anyone to point to a sin in His life. He said, “Which of you convicts me of sin?” (Jn. 8:46). No one has yet to lay a sin at the feet of Jesus. He stood above the race as the only sinless man to ever live. He “was tempted in all things as we are, yet without sin” (Heb. 4:15). Jesus Christ, our High Priest, is “holy, innocent, undefiled, separated from sinners and exalted above the heavens” (Heb. 7:26). He was offered in sacrifice for sin as a “lamb unblemished and spotless” (1 Pet. 1:19); He “offered Himself without blemish to God” (Heb. 9:14). He was guilty of no sin.

Furthermore, He claimed to have the power to forgive sin. The miracle which He performed in healing the paralytic borne of four was done to demonstrate that the “Son of Man has authority on earth to forgive sins” (Mk. 2:10). He was either the most egotistical person on earth or the sinless Son of God. No one but God alone has the authority to forgive sins. The fact that Jesus claimed to have that authority must be reckoned with; He was either the Son of God or an egotistical blasphemer.

The Testimony of His Enemies

1. The Jews. When the Jews presented Jesus to Pilate for crucifixion, they had so few charges that even Pilate could recognize that Jesus was a just man. This fact cannot be ignored as it points to the moral glory of Jesus Christ.

For three long years the Pharisees were watching their victim. As another writes, “There was the Pharisee mingling in every crowd, hiding behind every tree. They examined His disciples, they cross-questioned all around Him. They looked into His ministerial life, into His domestic privacy, into His hours of retirement. They came forward with the sole accusation they could muster-that He had shown disrespect to Caesar. The Roman judge who ought to know, pronounced it void” (W. G. Morehead, The Fundamentals, Vol. III, p. 47).

2. Pontius Pilate and His wife. The Roman procurator who sentenced Jesus also testified to the innocence of Jesus. The records state:

When he (Pilate) was set down on the judgment-seat, his wife sent unto him saying: Have thou nothing to do with that just man; for I have suffered many things this day in a dream because of him (Mt. 27:19).

When Pilate saw that he could prevail nothing, but that rather a tumult was made, he took water, and washed his hands before the multitude, saying: I am innocent of the blood of this rust person; see ye to it (Mt. 27:24).

Both Pilate and his wife pronounced that Jesus was a just person. In order to avoid guilt with reference to Jesus, Pilate washed his hands of the matter. Indeed, he washed his hands but not his heart.

3. The Roman centurion in charge of crucifying Jesus. As this Roman soldier witnessed the events of the death of Christ, he uttered these two statements as reported by the evangelists:

Now when the centurion, and they that were with him watching Jesus, saw the earthquake, and those things that were done, they feared greatly, saying: Truly this was the son of God (Mk. 27:54).

Now, when the centurion saw what was done, he glorified God, saying, Certainly this was a righteous man (Lk. 23:47).

Not even the Roman officer who executed Jesus was able to accuse Him of sin. No doubt, the seven sayings of Jesus while hanging on the cross were impressive to him.

4. Judas. The disciple who betrayed Jesus could not live with himself after committing that horrible deed. Judas had opportunity to be with Jesus day in and day out for three years; he knew whether or not Jesus could be charged with sin. After committing his horrible deed for thirty pieces of silver, Judas returned the money to the Jews who bought him saying, “I have sinned, in that I have betrayed the innocent blood” (Mt. 27:4). He recognized the innocence of Jesus. Not being able to live with himself, he went out and hung himself.

We could add to this list the testimony of many others who are enemies of the Lord Jesus Christ. Even those today who deny the deity of Jesus testify to His moral glory. The Jews who deny that Jesus is the Son of God recognize Him as a good moral man. The modernists who reject the deity of Jesus say that He was the best man who ever lived. Many of those who have written atheistic books still recognize that Jesus was morally clean.

The Moral Balance of Christ

Jesus was also unique in that His life was’ not morally lopsided. I have seen men so full of love that they had no appreciation for disciplining their children; others with whom I have had contact cared so much for discipline that they manifested no real love for their children, although I am sure they loved them dearly. Jesus did not manifest these lopsided attributes in His moral character.

There have been those who have displayed distinguished traits of character; those who by reason of extraordinary gifts have risen to heights which are inaccessible to the great mass of men. But who among the mightiest of men has shown himself to be evenly balanced and rightly poised in all his faculties and powers? In the very greatest and best, inequality and disproportion are encountered . . . . In Jesus Christ there is no unevenness . . . . His justice and His mercy, His peerless love and His truth, His holiness and His freest pardon never clash; one never clouds the other. His firmness never degenerates into obstinacy, or His calmness into indifference. His gentleness never becomes weakness, nor His elevation of soul forgetfulness of others . . . . “He never speaks where it would be better to keep silence, He never keeps silence where it would be better to speak; and He always leaves the arena of controversy a victor” (Ibid., p. 50).

He is justly compared with the lion in strength, and with the lamb in meekness. He equally possessed the wisdom of the serpent and the simplicity of the dove. He brought both the sword against every form of wickedness, and the peace which the world cannot give. He was the most effective, and yet the least noisy, the most radical, and yet the most conservative, calm, and patient, of all reformers. He came to fulfill every letter of the law; and yet he made all things new. The same hand which drove the profane traffickers from the Temple blessed little children, healed the lepers, and rescued the sinking disciple; the same ear which heard the voice of approbation from heaven was open to the cries of the woman in travail; the same mouth which pronounced the terrible woe on hypocrites, and condemned the impure desire and unkind feeling as well as the open crime, blessed the poor in spirit, announced pardon to the adulteress, and prayed for his murderers; the same eye which beheld the mysteries of God, and penetrated the heart of man, shed tears of compassion over ungrateful Jerusalem, and tears of friendship at the grave of Lazarus (Philip Schaff, The Person of Christ: The Miracle of History, pp. 87-89).

A Cause Without An Effect

Those who deny the deity of Jesus Christ are in the unenviable position of admitting the effect, the moral glory of Christ, without believing in a sufficient cause to have produced it. They deny that Jesus was the Son of God. If the moral purity of the character such as Jesus can be produced without supernatural causes, why has it not been produced in others than Jesus. The truth is that no other man has even touched the hem of the garment of Jesus’ moral perfection. No other man can because no other man is God incarnate.

Conclusion to closing, I would like to append this exceptional tribute to our great God and Savior, Jesus Christ.

His greatness is singularly unostentatious, modest, and quiet; and, far from repelling the beholder, it attracts and invites him to familiar approach. His public life never moved on the imposing arena of secular heroism, but within the humble circle of every-day life, and the simple relations of a son, a brother, a citizen, a teacher, and a friend. He had no army to command, no kingdom to rule, no prominent station to fill, no worldly favors and rewards to dispense. He was an humble individual, without friends and patrons in the Sanhedrin or at the court of Herod. He never mingled in familiar intercourse with the religious or social leaders of the nation, whom he had startled in his twelfth year by his questions and answers. He selected his disciples from among the illiterate fisherman of Galilee, and promised them no reward in this world but a part in the bitter cup of his sufferings. He dined with publicans and sinners, mingled with the common people, without ever condescending to their low manners and habits. He was so poor, that he had no place on which to rest his head. He depended, for the supply of his modest wants, on the voluntary contributions of a few pious females; and the purse was in the hands of a thief and a traitor. Nor had he learning, art, or eloquence, in the usual sense of the term, or any other kind of power by which great men arrest the attention and secure the admiration of the world. The writers of Greece and Rome were ignorant even of his existence, until, several years after the crucifixion, the effects of his mission, in the steady growth of the sect of his followers, forced from them some contemptuous notice, and then roused them to opposition.

And yet this Jesus of Nazareth, without money and arms, conquered more millions than Alexander, Caesar, Mohammed, and Napoleon; without science, and learning, he shed more light on things human and divine than all philosophers and scholars combined; without the eloquence of schools, he spoke such words of life as were never spoken before or since, and produced effects which lie beyond the reach of any orator or poet; without writing a single line, he set more pens in motion, and furnished themes for more sermons, orations, discussions, learned volumes, works of art, and sweet songs of praise, than the whole army of great men of ancient and modem times. Born in a manger, and crucified as a malefactor, he now controls the destinies of the civilized world, and rules a spiritual empire which embraces one-third of the inhabitants of the globe. There never was in this world a life so unpretending, modest, and lowly in its outward form and condition, and yet producing such extra-ordinary effects upon all ages, nations, and classes of men. The annals of history produce no other example of such complete and astounding success, in spite of the absence of those material, social, literary, and artistic powers and influences which are indispensable to success for a mere man. Christ stands, in this respect also, solitary and alone among all the heroes of history, and presents to us an insolvable problem, unless we admit him to be more than man, even the eternal Son of God (Ibid., pp. 47-50).

Truth Magazine XXII: 23, pp. 371-373
June 8, 1978

The Bible – God’s Revelation to Man

By Wayne Walker

Christians believe the Bible is the “word of God, which liveth and abideth forever” (1 Pet. 1:23). A question that is sometimes asked is “How do you know God would reveal Himself to man? And if He would, how do you know the Bible is His method of doing it?” Actually, this question is very old; but recently, it has been raised again as an outgrowth of the interest in oriental religions and occultism. Our purpose in this short article is to show that the Bible is God’s revelation of Himself to man.

If a person grants that God exists, then revelation from God is entirely within the realm of possibility, “for with God nothing shall be impossible” (Luke 1:37). With this understanding, logic and the very nature of God then show the probability of revelation. If God exists, then we are His offspring (Acts 17:28) and He will expect us to give Him an account of our lives someday (2 Cor. 5:10). It is unreasonable that a father would hold his children accountable for something he did not tell them, and the same is true of God. Since sin separates man from God (Isa. 59:1-2) and since God wants all men to be saved (2 Pet. 3:9) from eternal death in hell (Rom. 6:23), then it is only reasonable that He would reveal unto man how to rid himself of sin and live so as to gain eternal life. Jesus said He did-through the word of Christ (Matt. 11:27; John 12:48).

Not only is revelation possible and probable, but it is also necessary. Man cannot save himself-salvation does not come from within man (Jer. 10:23). Human intuition will not bring him to God, for “there is a way which seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death” (Prov. 14:12). Neither will man’s own wisdom (1 Cor. 1:21). Our own works, devised by our own minds, are worthless in God’s sight (Eph. 2:8-9; Tit. 3:5). We must turn to something outside ourselves. Many turn to nature. While it is true that nature reveals the existence and deity of God (Rom. 1:20), man left solely to nature for his information concerning God usually degenerates into worshiping and serving “the creature more than the creator” (Rom. 1:25). The reason is that the physical universe does not reveal the mind, the will of God. So a special revelation from God to man is a necessity.

This revelation would, of course, have to be understandable. Some, who claim to believe the Bible is God’s revelation to man, say that it is a book of mysteries. In order to understand it, the ordinary person needs the church to interpret the scriptures, or a trained clergy to explain them, or a special work of the Holy Spirit (such as a vision, experience, or feeling) to open his mind to the word of God. However, logic again refutes this idea. No sensible father would hold his children responsible for doing exactly what he told them when he spoke in ambiguous terms. Neither does God. Since He does expect us to do exactly what He commands (Matt. 7:21-23), then it must follow that He can be understood. This is precisely what the Bible teaches. Paul said that when you read what he wrote, “ye may understand my knowledge in the mystery of Christ” (Eph. 3:3-5). Jesus said if a man wants to do God’s will, he can know the truth (John 7:17, 8:31-32) and that being healed (saved) is conditioned upon understanding (Matt. 13:15-23). Everyone who so desires can understand God’s revelation to man-if he gives diligence to examine it (Acts 17:11, 2 Tim. 2:15).

But how does this show the Bible is God’s revelation to man? Well, God is no respecter of persons (Acts 10:34-35). For God to give a special revelation to one and leave another without that revelation would make Him a respecter of persons, since the apostle declares He has already “given unto us all things that pertain to life and godliness” (2 Pet. 1:3). It is only right that He give one standard to all men by which He reveals Himself to them. The Bible is the only record claiming inspiration that purports to be the revelation from God instead of just a revelation from God. It is the only book of religion that is completely consistent and reasonable; the only one that has been irrefutably validated by miracles and prophecy; the only one that is in full harmony with archaeology, topography, and science; and the only one that presents to the world a God who is worthy of the worship and service of mankind. We urge all men to accept the Bible as God’s revelation to man, and search its pages for His will for their lives.

Truth Magazine XXII: 23, p. 370
June 8, 1978

Sermon Outline on the Silence of God (Psa. 50:1-3, 7, 21)

By Jimmy Tuten, Jr.

Introduction:

I. Background of the Psalm: Asaph, chief of the Levites assigned to the ministry of the praise before the Ark, by David (1 Chron. 16:4-5).

a. Announces the appearance of God “out of Zion” in judgment upon the wicked. Heaven and earth are called to witness (vv. 1, 4).

b. Twofold address:

1. Righteous exhorted to worship (vv. 14-15), and warned against too much trust in sacrifice (vv. 8-13).

2. Wicked are reproved for hypocrisy, hatred for instruction, sins in action and speech, and their base idea of the nature of God (vv. 16-21).

II. The thought that stands out in the address is that God has kept silent, but He will speak out!

a. Many sermons on “God hath spoken,” etc., but little said about the silence of God.

b. We know that when God speaks, things begin to happen. Natural laws began and ceased; by His word things were created (2 Pet. 3:5, 7; Heb. 11:3); by His word the dead shall be raised (1 Thess. 4:16).

Body:

I. God Has Spoken Unto Us Today (Heb. 1:12}-Inherent authority.

A. Christ-Authority given (Matt. 28:18). In fulfillment of prophesy (Deut. 18:18-19; Lk. 4:16-21). Hence, Jesus spake for God (Jn. 12:48-49).

B. Apostles-delegated authority. Promised the Spirit (Jn. 16:7-8, 13; 14:25), Commissioned (Matt. 28:18-20), and spoke (1 Cor. 2:12-13; Gal. 1:11-12).

1. Put into writing the New Testament (2 Pet. 3:1-2; 2 Thess. 2:15; Eph. 3:3-5).

2. Completely confirmed (Heb. 2:1-4), no more miracles (Jn. 20:30-31).

C. He now remains silent. Hence, there are “revealed” things and “secret” things (Deut. 29:29). Some things belong to God, and some to Man. Man is out of place in attempting to teach on , or about things God has not made known (Example: Wm. Miller and time of Christ’s Coming). He is not allowed to “go beyond the things that are written” (1 Cor. 4:6).

II. What The Silence of God Indicates:

A. The infallibility of the Scriptures (Jude 3). This is sufficient, no need for another. Stress “once” and “delivered.”

B. Infinite Wisdom. He speaks of authority, an, arguing parent or teacher has no control. When they speak, and hush, it is time to act!

C. Infinite Mercy (2 Pet. 3:9) cf. Psa. 50:21.

III. When God Remains Silent, Men Sin:

A. Offered bad sacrifice (Psa. 50:14-15); failed to keep vows (50:14); take covenant in their mouths (v. 16); think God to be as they are (v. 21); hate instruction (v. 17); become partakers with adulterers (v. 18); frame deceit (v. 19) and have hatred against brother (v. 20).

B. Men presume to speak for God: (Deut. 4:2). When God says nothing, man must keep silent (Heb. 7:14).

1. Moses spake nothing about priests being permitted from the tribe of Judah. God did not allow, nor permit it; he said nothing! We are not left to guess what is right. Silence does not give consent; hence, Jesus could not have served in the temple while living (Heb. 8:4).

a. Since God specified priests from the. tribe of Levi, and said nothing about the others, they were prohibited from so functioning.

b. It is this “prohibition of silence” that is taught in 1 Cor. 4:6.

2. Where the Scriptures stop, our practice should stop. We are to do what God teaches, not what He has not taught. But look what man has done:

a. Washing hands (Mk. 7:1-13). Erred in directing to God an act which he had not called for, thus they went beyond what was written.

b. Sprinkling babies—countless babies are christened (sprinkled with water) as a religious act each year, though the scriptures do not call for it.

c. Mechanical music-God tells us to sing (Col. 3:16), but is silent about instruments, just as he was silent about Judah. Not wrong as such, but in worship it is unauthorized.

d. Societies, Guilds and institutions-God specified only one organization for saints to function in the doing of the work of the Lord-the congregation (Act`s 14:23; Phil. 1:1; Rom. 16:16). Just as silent about these as Judah! Jesus spake nothing concerning human institutions.

e. Extend oversight of one eldership-God specified the work of elders to be over “the flock which is among you” (1 Pet. 5:1-4; Acts 20:28). When such supervision is broadened to include area-wide and nationwide functions requiring financing of many churches, it is going beyond that which is written. No examples in Scriptures of churches pooling resources under one eldership to do a general work for all.

Conclusion: Brethren, we must respect reverently what God has not said!

Truth Magazine XXII: 22, pp. 364-365
June 1, 1978

Back on the Front Burner Again

By Larry Ray Hafley

For better or for worse and probably some of both, the grace-fellowship issue is on the front burner again. Frankly and personally, I would rather be attacked by a Campbellite-shouting Baptist accusing me of water salvation. Perhaps the readers of this journal would like it better, too. But an assault by a faith only Baptist is about as rare as an Indian attack on a covered wagon. Today, we skirmish with diplomats and make faces at one another with our missiles. It is not as exciting as the calvary coming to the rescue, but it is the reality of our modern age. So it is with the unity-in-diversity movement. The conflict is not as easily dealt with, but it is the reality of our day.

Some of you are tired of reading and hearing about “imputed righteousness” and similar expressions. You are weary of reading about Carl Ketcherside and his satellites. Well, welcome to ‘the club! There are those who are as tired of writing about such things as you are of reading them. However, that is where the struggle is in many places. It must be and it will be tended to. Subscriptions are not the point of concern. Scriptures are.

No, you are not against scriptural studies, but you deplore and detest the injecting of personalities into the fray. There may be too many personality conflicts, but remember this, false doctrines do not spring from the ground. They spring from men, and often men must be cited and indicted as they are closely tied and identified with a given controversy (3 Jn. 9; 2 Tim. 2:17). Sometimes Paul called names; sometimes he did not (1 Cor. 15:12). Good judgment may not always abound in this regard, but consider that your judgment may be the one that is not the best. This business of naming names is a two-edged sword. Being called a “legalist,” a “witch hunter,” and being accused and accursed as part of a political power structure for personal advantage has its sting, too. That is not a whimper, but articles appearing in Truth Magazine do not have a monopoly on the name calling market.

The present strife is not a mere “heretic Calvinist” versus “party power politics” shouting match. The issues are fraught with intense, serious consequences. The role of the sacrifice of Christ in the scheme of redemption, the nature of the church, the conditions of pardon from sin, the scope of fellowship in the truth, the purpose of the New Testament, these and other subjects are at the core of the current grace-fellowship discussion. Spoken kindly but candidly, if you do not recognize that these factors are at the heart of the very faith in and of Christ, then you do not know enough to pass judgment on those who are carrying on the fight.

Truth Magazine XXII: 22, p. 364
June 1, 1978