Truth Magazine

By Ken Green

Brother Mike Willis has asked me to write a few comments regarding the call-in type radio program. I’ve decided to follow the same general outline that I used for this topic in the ’73 Florida College Lecture Series. For some five years I hosted such a program in Louisville, Kentucky. This was a Monday through Friday 30-minute program, aired at 2:30 each afternoon. Since moving to Owensboro, Kentucky, I have conducted the same type radio broadcast each Tuesday from 6:00 to 7:00 p.m. This type program has demonstrated itself in many ways to be more fruitful, more appealing, and more prone to attract and hold attention than the straight preaching, conventional gospel broadcasts.

This type work was first brought to my attention by an article in the Gospel Guardian by Lowell Williams regarding their call-in program in Seattle, Washington. He referred to this medium as “a modern-day marketplace.” Shortly after, I discussed the matter with Peter Wilson who participated on such a program in Portland, Oregon. He sent a sample tape of one of their broadcasts, and the elders of the South End congregation in Louisville decided to increase our radio time from 15 to 30 minutes and give the new idea a try.

There were three of us on that first program: Rodney Miller, Bobby Witherington, and myself. I cannot speak for the others, but I have never felt more inadequate, unnecessary, and just plain scared in my life than I felt awaiting that first call-in program! I had already decided that I would make it clear that we did not claim to know all the answers, and that we would quickly admit it if we did not know an answer. But then, I asked myself, “What if I don’t know any of the answers?” or “What if we receive no questions?” Somehow we got through that one. We had plenty of questions, and we knew the answers! I have always started these programs by requesting that callers deal in principles, not personalities; that they be brief in their comments; and limit their calls to one per week. Most callers have complied with those ground rules.

Type Questions Received

Most of the calls that we receive contain the type questions that we are often told nobody’s asking. Questions such as: “Why do you say there is just one church?” or “What about the thief on the cross if baptism is necessary?” or “Do you baptize in the name of Jesus?” or “Why don’t you use instruments of music?” or “What do you mean, the Old Testament is no longer binding?” or “What does the Bible teach about falling from grace?” This type broadcast has reinforced my convictions that many people are still interested in such “doctrinal” questions.

Often, specific scriptures are quoted by callers which they believe will support their doctrines: `Don’t you believe that according to Matthew 24, the second coming is imminent'”; “You say children of God may fall from grace. What about 1 John 3:9 (or John 10:28, or Romans 8:35-39)?” or “If instrumental music is not right in worship, please explain Psalm 150.”

Sometimes people give vent to bitter feelings prompted by prejudice and emotions. How we deal with such calls is extremely important in view of the entire listening audience. For example, one lady asked why God put all the snakes and spiders and flies here.

“I don’t really know,” I confessed. “Do you reckon it was just to worry and aggravate us?’1 she asked. She then went into a rather lengthy description of how “aggravatin’ ” flies were, “especially,” she emphasized, “the old green flies!” She made her point. I laughed, and took another call.

Brethren have often asked, “How do you keep your temper?” “I’d blow my stack,” some have said. But we are not there to lose tempers, blow stacks, and let off steam. We are there to teach the word and try to save souls. Sometimes when a subject has been driven in the ground for some time, I may get tired of hearing the same old thing. But I must remember that people are listening, and the manner in which I react will make an impression for good or bad.

On many occasions, opportunities for direct dialogue are presented. Some callers do not want to argue their point, but some do. I have always found that a program is much more interesting to the listening audience when some dialogue between the callers and us takes place.

Timely questions and issues often arise. In recent years many callers have raised questions on such subjects as abortion, ecumenicity, law and order, ERA, etc. Several questions were asked regarding scriptural teaching on capital punishment during the Gilmore controversy in Utah. And then some incidents occur that are quite humorous. My “preacher’s tales” have multiplied exceedingly as a result of many of the programs I have participated on. Such incidents do no harm. In fact, they increase the interest of the audience.

Valuable Possibilities

One of the great things about such programs is that we know people’s questions on the Bible are being dealt with. They are making these questions known. The specific matters which need greater emphasis at any given time will necessarily receive attention, for they will be asked about more often. We should not grow weary of answering the same questions over and over. People steeped in religious error may have to hear something fifty times before they really begin to consider it.

The great interest in this type programming is reflected in the increase in mail. On our 15-minute daily broadcast in Louisville which consisted of straight preaching, we rarely received a letter. The same was true of the Sunday morning, 30-minute program here in Owensboro. But several letters are usually received each week in regard to our call-in program. Both in Louisville and here in Ownesboro, I have heard from several who tape the programs and listen, to them again, or play them to others.

Another valuable service such broadcasts offer is the edifying of Christians. While many members of the church do not listen to the straight-preaching programs (though they ought to), it has been my observation that almost all members who have the opportunity listen to this type broadcast. Many are strengthened in their convictions by being witness to this constant confrontation of truth and error. Several have successfully used such programs as a springboard for conversations with neighbors and co-workers.

Measurable Good Accomplished

Here, as in most cases, we cannot know all the good that has been done. But we do know of some. In Louisville, close to fifty people that I knew of, obeyed the gospel as a result of our radio efforts. These were baptized in different congregations in the city. Of the first of these were Junior and Susan Bronger. This couple came out of the Nazarene Church. Junior is now preaching the gospel at Willisburg, Kentucky.

While some of these have fallen away, many are more stable than the average convert. They knew what they were doing and were well taught on the differences between the church and denominations. They are also aware of such matters as institutionalism, Bible teaching on divorce, premillennialism, etc., for they have heard these matters discussed many times.

Here in Owensboro, the program has not yet borne a lot of visible results. Some good has been accomplished, however, in teaching tie liberals. Three families have renounced institutionalism, and I have had opportunity to study with others. In my estimation, the call-in format is the best approach to radio work. It truly constitutes a “modern-day marketplace.” Used as a means to the end of reaching and teaching and persuading people, it is very rewarding.

Truth Magazine XXI: 28, pp. 437-438
July 21, 1977

By Mike Willis

Like most other preachers, I receive a number of church bulletins every week; approximately 75-80 bulletins cross my desk every week. These bulletins come from a number of different geographical locations and have different goals which they aim to accomplish. A large amount of the Lord’s money is being used each week just to get the bulletin mailed out to brethren. Just how much good is being accomplished through this medium of teaching?

Having personally edited a bulletin for six years, I feel somewhat qualified to analyze the amount of work which it takes to put out a, good bulletin. Too, I know something of the costs which are involved in putting out a bulletin. However, I felt that my personal exposure to bulletins might be too limited to make the general statements relative to bulletins which I wanted to make in this article. Therefore, I wrote a questionnaire which I mailed to those who are sending me bulletins; over half of those to whom I mailed this questionnaire responded. My analysis of bulletins is drawn from the 36 responses which I received and my own personal exposure to publishing a bulletin.

The Average Bulletin

Although there is no such thing as an average bulletin, I felt that I had to get some kind of average bulletin and then treat it as a specific case to make any sense out of this article. Hence, I averaged together the various statistics given to me from the 36 responses which I sent out to come up with this composite picture of the average bulletin.

The average bulletin published among us has 66 % circulation among Christians and 34 % circulation among non-Christians. Its mailing list is composed of 1269 names. The articles are written by the local preacher 69% of the time with the remainder being written by “anonymous” or “selected.” The preacher devotes approximately 10 hours of his time to what work he must do to get that bulletin in print. In the following assessments of the cost of bulletins, these figures will be used.

How Much Does Our Bulletin Cost?

Brethren, your local church bulletins are costing you a good bit more than most of you realize. From the bulletin statistics which I have compiled, let me show you how much it costs to publish a bulletin. If you went out and hired the printing done, you could get the job done for $29.84 per issue at one of the local quick printing establishments. Yet, one has to add the cost of labor on top of this expense. The preacher has already invested ten hours of his time to putting out that bulletin. I would suppose that the average preacher is getting close to $300 per week (housing allowance included); based on a forty hour week (when was the last time you saw one?), his labor is worth $75.00. Forgetting what labor has been contributed by the members and adding $10.00 for postage, your weekly bulletin would cost you $114.84.

Maybe you think that this figure is high because of the printing bill. Let’s compare the figures we receive by going the other route to see how much money is being saved by printing it ourselves. First of all, the church must make an initial investment of $1500-2500 to purchase the necessary equipment to print its own bulletin. This equipment will be used equipment. The weekly paper bill will be $6.02, if there is not one sheet of paper wasted. The church then must decide whether it is going to make its own plates or hire someone to have its plates made. If it decides to make its own plates, it will need a camera, dark room, and supplies; once this initial investment is made, making plates is relatively inexpensive. Four years ago, I was hiring our plates made for $9.00 which was cheap at that time. So, a person has at least $15.00 in supplies for doing his printing at the very least. Hence, the one doing the printing is making $10-15 per issue.

However, one should consider what quality of work will be produced by the preacher versus that which is produced by the professional printer. Frankly, I would be embarrassed to hand out some of the bulletins which I receive because of the quality of workmanship which has gone into the printing of the bulletin. I have seen very good material wasted because of the printing job which was being done. For me, I would rather see the bulletin hired, even if it costs a little more, in order that the quality of work will always be the very highest possible.

Someone counters that this cost is excessive because the preacher’s wages are added to the cost of the bulletin whereas the preacher must be supported anyway. While it is true that the preacher will be supported even if no bulletin is published, somewhere down the line brethren are going to have to grapple with whether or not it is a wise use of the Lord’s money to use the preacher to publish a bulletin. Having published a bulletin, I know from experience that there were many times when I needed to be preparing a lesson, going to visit someone, teaching a Bible class, etc. when I simply could not do it because a bulletin deadline had to be met. Hence, I was using my time typing, writing, or printing a bulletin when things more important needed to be done. Later in this article, I shall try to assess the good accomplished through bulletins.

The Reading Audience

I fear that most brethren whose money is being used to pay for our bulletins have the concept that these bulletins are going into the homes of unbelievers and are going to be effective in converting them to Christ. Of the 36 bulletins surveyed, only 6 had a larger percentage of readers who were non-Christians than it had as Christians. The average bulletin had a readership of 66% Christians out of the 1269 which were mailed. Since 1 do not know many congregations with memberships exceeding 1269 persons, I am forced to conclude that most bulletins have an audience of Christians all over the nation. Bulletins published by local congregations are going all over the nation and, I fear, that most of them are going into the homes of brethren who are already the strongest members in other congregations.

Frankly. I have serious doubts that the local church is much benefitted by a bulletin such as is our average bulletin. It will not likely reach any of the neighbors in the community to win them for Christ; it will not likely reach some unfaithful Christian in the neighborhood and make him want to be reconciled to his Lord. It will not accomplish these great goals because it is not being mailed to these people. Most bulletins, my brethren, are brotherhood papers, no more and no less!

The Purpose of the Bulletin

Why then are so many congregations publishing bulletins? In the survey which I mailed out, I asked the question of what was the aim of the bulletin, to edify the members, to reach the lost, or to relate congregational news events. The greatest percentage of responses related that the main purpose of the bulletin was to edify. Edify who? The local church? If so, why mail out 1269 bulletins all over the United States to edify 200 saints in a local congregation?

If edification is the main goal which is to be accomplished, let me suggest some less expensive alternatives. James E. Cooper publishes a weekly bulletin to be used by local churches which has the local congregation’s own name, address, and service information on the back for the very reasonable price of 40 per bulletin when mailed in a group and 50 per bulletin when mailed directly to the recipients. The quality of this bulletin is superior to that of 90% of the bulletins which I receive in content and appearance. It has a good balance of articles designed to reach the lost and edify the saints. For $10.00 a week, every member of the local congregation could receive a bulletin mailed directly to his home; that is considerably less expensive than the individually produced local church bulletins.

For just a little more expense, and probably for much less than is presently being spent on the local bulletin, magazines of 16 pages length can be sent to the home of every member. Truth Magazine, for example, will send 16 pages of good religious instruction into twenty homes four times a month for $10.00 a month. Bundles of Gospel Guardians can be sent to the local congregation at the price of 20″ for each copy. Searching The Scriptures will send thirty copies of their twenty-page magazine into your members’ homes for $10.00 per month. As a matter of fact, a local church could probably mail nearly every magazine published by conservative brethren into the homes of every one of their members on a regular basis for less than they are truly spending on their local bulletin. But, by hiding the costs (i.e., not considering the preacher’s wages, the initial investment cost of equipment, etc.), we persuade ourselves that the bulletins cost us very little.

What Is Being Accomplished Through the Bulletins?

This is undoubtedly the most difficult question to answer of the entire survey. I asked the question, “How many of the following have you gotten as a result of your bulletin in the last year? ___Contacts ___Home Bible Studies ___Baptisms __Restorations.” The results were pretty much as I expected. Very few of the bulletins could attribute any results directly to their bulletin. In the six years that I edited a bulletin, I established contact with one couple which resulted in the conversion of their soul.

Brethren are rather defensive about this aspect of their bulletins. I think most of us act toward our bulletins just as the general populace acts toward Congress. The general populace thinks that Congress is filled with a bunch of crooks; however, when election times rolls around, they re-elect their own congressman because they think that he is different from all the rest. Perhaps this is the way that most of us view our bulletins. Basically, we do not believe that bulletins are accomplishing much good (I hear a number of preachers tell how many of the bulletins which cross their desks end up in a garbage can after a hurried glance, but the one which we are working on is decidedly different; it is accomplishing untold good.

Frankly, I think that it is time for us to take a good close look at the money being spent on bulletins. Businessmen periodically assess whether money being expended in certain areas are producing any dividends to see whether or not it is profitable to sink more money into that work. Brethren need to learn a lesson from these men. We need to assess whether or not the thousands of dollars being spent each year are producing the results which we desire to accomplish. Brethren, look at your mailing lists. Do you really want to pay for sending bulletins to faithful Christians all over the United States? Brethren, look at the amount of time your preacher is having to spend in putting out your bulletin. Could that time be better used in some other field of labor? Look at the out-of-the-pocket expenses you are making on your bulletin. Could that money be used in another, more effective means of reaching the lost?

We are only discussing methods of reaching the lost and, since we are discussing methods, I am going to give my personal judgment, for whatever it is worth. I believe that bulletins at one time were very effective in reaching those among us who had headed down the institutional trail. Many families were saved from institutionalism through the work of faithful men publishing good bulletins. No doubt, some areas have had equally good success in reaching the people of their neighborhood through the printed page. However, there are more effective tactics available to you than those available through the local bulletin.

For example, consider the work of the Brown Street Church in Akron, Ohio. Just recently, they invested $6,500 to present thirteen weeks of a Bible teaching program which was aired on television at 7:00 p.m. on Saturday night. The thirty-minute program is divided into two segments: -the first part consists of a panel of three people engaged in a Bible contest patterned after the TV program “Jeopardy;” the second segment has one of the local preachers asking Brother Weldon Warnock questions pertaining to a given subject. Between these two segments, the congregation advertises its free Bible correspondence course. At the end of eight weeks, the program had enrolled 400 people in its Bible correspondence course. Now, brethren, compare the results you are getting from your bulletins with what is being accomplished in this program. Providing that this congregation uses a good follow-up program, many people in the listening area can be converted to Christ.

Conclusion

I am not trying to make any official pronouncements regarding whether any given local congregation should continue or discontinue its local church bulletin. Every congregation is autonomous; the editor of Truth Magazine cannot and should not try to dictate to churches what ways they should use their money. However, every eldership has a responsibility before God Almighty to use the money which is contributed in the first day of the week contribution in the best possible way. Hence, they have a responsibility to periodically assess what good is being accomplished through the means being used.

In the event that one method is producing no results, use the money that is being spent in that area to try something different. Let us not become so tied to given means and methods that we cannot experiment with legitimate alternatives.

Truth Magazine XXI: 28, pp. 434-436
July 21, 1977