There is One Mediator

By Mike Willis

In 1 Tim. 2:5, Paul wrote, “For there is one God, and one mediator also between God and men, the man Christ Jesus.” This was a novel idea expressed by God to the pagan world. The pagan world not only imagined a number of gods, they also imagined that a number of intermediaries existed between God and man. For Paul to teach that there was only one God was not new; they had been acquainted with Judaism for years. However, to go the next step to speak of one mediator between God and man was new.

Jesus is the only mediator between God and man. “The word `mediator’ is meshes, `one who intervenes between two, either in order to make or restore peace and friendship, or to form a compact or ratify a covenant.’ Our Lord is a mediator in that He interposed Himself by His death, and made possible the restoration of the harmony between God and man which had been broken by sin” (Kenneth S. bluest, Word Studies in the Greek New Testament, Vol. II, “The Pastoral Epistles,” p. 41). Jesus is our mediator. Whereas we once were enemies of God (Rom. 5:8-10), we are now God’s adopted sons because of the reconciliation made possible to us through Jesus Christ.

Since there is but one mediator between God and man, man can be saved only through the reconciliation made possible through Jesus. Jesus recognized this when He said, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life; no one comes to the Father, but through Me” (Jn. 14:6). Jesus is man’s only access to God. Any religion that tries to approach God in any other way than through Jesus Christ is worthless. Hence, Buddhism, Hinduism, Mohammedanism, etc. are just so many worthless and false religions. One can have access to God through the one mediator between God and man, Jesus Christ.

There is no other way to approach God.

Within the Christian religion, men have added other mediators in addition to Jesus Christ. I would like to mention just a few of these; perhaps others can add cases to the list which I have left out. However, these are cases of instances in which man must approach God through some mediator in addition to Christ.

1. The Catholic Priest. The Catholic system of worship places the priest between God and man as the dispenser of salvation. He has the right to grant absolution from sins. Absolution, in Roman theology, is the act by which the priest declares the sins of penitent persons to be remitted to them. The Council of Trent gave the priest the right to remit the sins of penitent sinners. Hence, the Catholic who sins must go to the confessional booth, confess his sins, and allow the Catholic priest to absolve him of the guilt of his sins.

One of the major doctrines which Protestantism rebelled against was the doctrine which gave the priest the right to forgive sins. Whereas Catholicism has a standing priesthood in distinction to the laity, Protestantism believes in the priesthood of all believers. According to Protestantism, every Christian has direct accessibility to God and can get forgiveness by appealing directly to God for it. We need no mediator other than or in addition to Jesus Christ. Quite properly, the Protestants emphasized that there is only one mediator between God arid man.

2. The Baptismal Formula of Jesus-only Pentecostals. Sometimes, men place mediators in addition to Jesus Christ between themselves and God quite unconsciously. The Jesus-only Pentecostals have done this. According to their theology, one’s baptism is not valid, regardless of how sincere a believer and how penitent the person might have been, unless the proper formula is said over the person being baptized. Hence, one’s salvation depends, not only upon one’s own faith, repentance and immersion in water, but also upon a formula being said over the subject to be baptized. Unless the proper formula is said, the baptism is invalid. Hence, the person saying the formula stands between the sinner and God. He is a mediator in addition to Jesus Christ.

Any system which posits a mediator in addition to Jesus Christ is a corrupt system which has departed from Jesus Christ. Sometimes the putting of mediators between God and man occurs in subtle manners. We must always be on the look-out that we do not allow such things to happen to us.

The Public Confession

I am afraid that some among us have gotten the idea that the church stands as a mediator between man and God with reference to public sins. Hence, in the eyes of some, the church has become the dispenser of salvation rather than the recipient of salvation. I have talked with saints who thought that they could not obtain God’s forgiveness without making a public confession. Their concept was that the church stood between them and God.

My brethren, there is but one mediator between God and man, the man Jesus Christ. The church is not a mediator between God and man. It cannot confer forgiveness upon anyone. It is a recipient of salvation rather than the dispenser of it. Once we begin to look upon the church as the dispenser of salvation, there is but a short step until we begin to look upon preachers as set-apart ministers who give out salvation to the sinners. Therefore, we need to reconsider what the purpose of a public confession is lest we end up placing the church between the sinner and his salvation.

The passage generally appealed to as authority for a public confession is James 5:16; it says, “Therefore, confess your sins to one another, and pray for one another, so that you may be healed. The effective prayer of a righteous man can accomplish much.” The prayers that are made when one confesses his sins to one another are not to be viewed as being necessary for one’s salvation. Otherwise, should the church refuse to pray for a penitent sinner, he could not receive forgiveness. Rather, this is just the case of a man acknowledging his faults and requesting the prayers of his brethren to help him to overcome them. This is the intercessory type of prayer, whereby we ask something from God in behalf of a brother.

“There is no mention here of absolution, either by a priest or any other person . . . . All that it can mean is that God promises pardon to those who are truly penitent, and this fact may as well be stated by one person as another. No priest, no man whatever, is empowered to say to another either that he is truly penitent, or to forgive sin. `Who can forgive sins but God only?’ None but he whose law has been violated, or who has been wronged, can pardon an offence. No third person can forgive a sin which a man has committed against a neighbor; no one but a parent can pardon the offences of which his own children have been guilty towards him; and who can put himself in the place of God, and presume to pardon the sins which his creatures have committed against him?” (Albert Barnes, James, pp. 95-96).

I am afraid that a number of Christians have misunderstood this text to the point that they believe that a public confession before the church is necessary so that the church can grant forgiveness to them. We need to be reminded that no one other than Christ can grant forgiveness. The church is the recipient of salvation and not the dispenser of it.

Conclusion

There is but one mediator between God and man, Jesus Christ. Neither the priest, a minister who utters a proper formula before baptism, nor the church stands between God and man. One has access to God only through Jesus Christ our Lord. Although public confessions of public sins need to be made, let us understand that the church is not the dispenser of salvation when public confessions are made.

Truth Magazine XXI: 26, pp. 403-404
June 30, 1977

A Rose by any Other Name

By Gregory V. Selby

Most people have heard of the expression: “A rose by any other name is a rose just the same!” I believe that this expression was derived from the following lines from Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet (Act. II, Scene ii):

“What’s in a name? That which we call a rose

By any other name would smell as sweet.”

It is thought by many people today that this same expression also applies to Christians. When used in this manner, the original expression becomes the following: “A Christian by any other name is a Christian just the same.”

Of course, this statement is true when the ‘other name’ is a name that is scriptural. One should speak where the Bible speaks and be silent where the Bible is silent, since “all scripture is inspired by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work” (2 Tim. 3:16-17).

In the New Testament, followers of Christ are called: Christians (Acts 11:26, 26:28), disciples (Acts 6:1), saints (1 Cor. 1:2), brethren (1 Cor. 15:6), children of God (1 Jn 3:1), sons of God (Rom. 8:14).

Such names as Methodists, Baptists, Episcopalians, Presbyterians, Protestants, and Catholics are names not found in the New Testament, and are, therefore, not authorized by God for Christians today. They are only names created by men.

A rose might smell just as sweet when called by another name, but when a Christian is called by an unscriptural name, the situation is just not the same. Names that are divinely given through the scriptures should not be changed, for man is commanded not to add to or take away from the Word of God (Deut. 4:2, Rev. 22:18-19).

The Bible teaches that names are very important. The first man was formed of “dust from the ground” (Gen. Z:7) and was called Adam, which means “red earth”. The first woman was called Eve, “because she was the mother of all living” (Gen. 3:20). She was called ‘woman’ because “she was taken out of man” (Gen. 2:23). Abram, which means “father”, had his name changed to “Abraham”, which means “father of many”, when the promise was given to him that he was to he the father of many nations (Gen. 17:5). Yes, there is something in scriptural names.

It was prophesied in the Old Testament that a new name would be given God’s people. “I will give them an everlasting name which shall not be cut off” (Is. 56:5). “You shall be called by a new name which the mouth of the Lord shall give” (Is. 62:2). In Is. 65:15, the Jews were told: “You shall leave your name to my chosen for a curse, and the Lord God will slay you; but his servants he will call by a different name.”

In the New Testament (Acts 11:19-25), we learn that Jews and Gentiles worshiped together for the first time in Antioch, and a great number of Gentiles turned to the Lord. It was there, in Antioch, that “the disciples were for the first time called Christians” (Acts 11:26). In 1 Peter 4:16, Peter writes: “If one suffers as a Christian, let him not be ashamed, but under that name let him glorify God.” In Acts 4:12, Peter shows how important a name is, when he speaks of Jesus in this manner: “There is salvation in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given among men, by which we must be saved.” Salvation is in the name of Christ-and in none other. The name Christian has been given us that in this name we may glorify God.

Is there something in a name? Yes! Yes, there is! The rose that is a Christian does not smell as sweet when it is called by an unscriptural name, if it is indeed a rose. For Christians, there is something in the name “Christian”. Those who are Christians will wear only that name that signifies that they belong to the Lord Jesus Christ.

Truth Magazine XXI: 26, p. 402
June 30, 1977

Great Principles of Our Salvation (I): How Grace Saves

By Ron Halbrook

Salvation prepared by God for man is the greatest story ever told! How truly “the goodness of God leadeth thee to repentance” (Rom. 2:4). “How shall we escape, if we neglect so great salvation?” (Heb. 2:3). As God’s people, we need to understand how we ourselves have been saved. We also need to prepare ourselves to teach others how to be saved.

What Does the Bible Say About Grace?

In the first place, the Bible tells us what grace is. In Scripture, whatever gives joy, pleasure, or delight is “grace.” “Felix, willing to show the Jews a pleasure (the word for “grace,” RH), left Paul bound” (Acts 24:27). 1 Peter 2:19-20 uses the word for “grace” twice in reference to our suffering for the Lord at the hands of unjust men. To suffer for wrongdoing is not pleasing to God, but to suffer for the right is “thank worthy,” “acceptable, ” or pleasing. Grace carries the idea of favor or goodwill. In Jerusalem, many souls were converted to the Lord on the first Pentecost after Christ arose; their changed lives were such that they had ‘favor (the word for “grace”) with all the people” (Acts 2:47). Grace suggests the kindness of a master towards his inferiors or servants, especially of God toward man. Noah (Gen. 6:8, 22), Mary (Lk. 1:30), and David (Acts 7:46) all found “grace” in the eyes of God, i.e. they received His lovingkindness or favor. Paul sought this “grace” in behalf of the churches (Rom. 1:7; 16:20, 24).

Man does not deserve the favor and love of God which brings salvation from sin-“all we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned every one to his own way” (Isa. 53:6). This undeserved kindness is spoken of in Romans 3:23-24: “For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God; Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus.” God does not save those who would present a perfect record of having never sinned. “Now to him that worketh is the reward not reckoned of grace, but of debt. But to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness . . . . Therefore it is of faith, that it might be by grace” (Rom. 4:4-5). Many of the Jews were “disobedient and gainsaying,” so the Gospel was sent to the Gentiles. Does this mean that God wholly cast away His people? No. “Even so then at this present time also there is a remnant according to the election of grace” (Rom. 11:5).

In the second place, the Bible tells us how grace saves. The Father, by grace, purposed or planned salvation for man “before the foundation of the world.” His plan was to adopt “children by Jesus Christ to himself, according to the good pleasure of his will, to the praise of the glory of his grace, wherein he hath made us accepted in the beloved. In whom we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of sins, according to the riches of his grace” (Eph. 1:3-7).

God by grace sent the Son to die for our sins-“in whom we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of sins, according to the riches of his grace.” Christ “died for the ungodly . . . . while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us. Much more then, being now justified by his blood, we shall be saved from wrath through him …. much more the grace of God, and the gift by grace, which is by one man, Jesus Christ . . . much more they which receive abundance of grace and the gift of righteousness shall reign in life by one, Jesus Christ . . . . But where sin abounded, grace did much more abound: That as sin hath reigned unto death, even so might grace reign through righteousness unto eternal life by Jesus Christ our Lord” (Rom. 5:6-9, 15, 17, 20-21).

God by grace sent the Holy Spirit to provide the revelation of the message of grace. Thus Paul and Barnabus declared “the word of his grace” in Iconium (Acts 14:3). Paul, in his farewell to the Ephesian elders, commended them “to God, and to the word of his grace, which is able to build you up, and to give you an inheritance among all them which are sanctified” (Acts 20:32). When the Colossians heard “the word of the truth of the gospel,” they knew “the grace of God in truth” (Col. 1:5-6). “For the grace of God that bringeth salvation hath appeared to all men, teaching us . . . .(Tit. 2:11-12). The Holy Spirit guided in diving this revelation of the fullness of God’s grace (1 Cor. 2:13; 2 Tim. 3:16). The preaching of the message of God’s grace “bringeth forth fruit” as men obey the message (Col. 1:5-6; 2:12). After primary obedience, “the grace of God” continues to teach them to deny “ungodliness and worldly lusts” and to live “soberly, righteously and godly, in this present world” (Tit. 2:11-12). We come into God’s purpose of grace and receive the benefits of Christ’s death when we obey by faith the revelation of grace, the message of grace.

How Do Men Pervert Grace

First, consider the Catholic doctrine of a “treasury of merit.” Some now dead did more good works than God required for salvation, “such as accepting vows of poverty, celibacy and obedience” (E. F. Harrison, Baker’s Dictionary of Theology, article on “Merit,” pp. 348-349). These extra good works, or “merit,” can be transferred to the account of others, both living and dead (in purgatory). This doctrine did not originate with inspired men in the first century, but with Alexander of Halle in the 1200’s (J. L. Neve, A History of Christian Thought, Vol. I, p. 203; G. P. Fisher, History of Christian Doctrine, pp. 250, 259). This is a perversion of grace; nowhere does the Bible teach God will extend grace by transferring the faith or obedience or “merit” of one person to another. Actually, this meritorious works is foreign to Scripture.

Second, consider “Universalism,” which says the grace of God will eventually save all men. The Universalist Church stressed this idea, but many people have believed the theory without joining the Universalist Church. The Universalist’s plea and Church has been merged with the Unitarian Church in the Twentieth Century, but the concept is still very common on every hand. John G. Adams wrote The Universalism of the Lord’s Prayer with a chapter on “God’s Glory In the Completion of Grace.” He taught that the influences of Christ’s kingdom “are to reach all, — all who ever did, who do now, who ever will need it . . . the kingdom of God in the Gospel dispensation . . . is universal.” Our “main ground of confidence and hope . . . is the Father’s grace . . . It is not by works of righteousness which we have done or may perform” (pp. 119-120). By the sating power of Christ, “all souls (shall) be blest with God’s salvation . . . we have no reason to doubt the salvation of the most hardened offender” on account of “this saving grace of the Eternal” (pp. 124-125).

Thirdly, there are two extreme views on the relation of works to salvation. The first extreme is represented by Roman Catholicism. God’s grace is transmitted to man through the seven “Sacraments” (confirmation, baptism, marriage, extreme unction, etc.). The sacrament is not only a sign of grace and a condition of grace, it is the means of grace. For instance, the baptism of a baby or a dying person can bring the “grace” of forgiveness-though neither subject can believe or repent. Likewise, extreme unction brings “grace” to a person who may be unconscious. The work itself becomes the means or channel of grace. The Bible teaches no such thing; it teaches that obedience must be of faith to avail with God, and then obedience is not a mechanical means of grace but only the condition of grace-i.e., grace is conditional.

The other extreme is represented by Protestant Reformationism. The Protestant denominational idea is salvation by faith only or at the point of faith, before and without any other act of obedience. If one must do anything, then salvation is not of grace. For instance, in the Methodist “Articles of Religion,” under part IX, “Of the Justification of Man,” we read, “Wherefore, that we are justified by faith only is a most wholesome doctrine, and very full of comfort” (Doctrines & Discipline of the Methodist Church 1944, p. 29). W. T. Conner, well known Baptist preacher, said, “. . , faith, and faith alone, is the condition of salvation” (Christian Doctrine, p. 198). “The New Hampshire Confession of Faith” has been recognized by the Southern Baptist . Convention with some revisions since 1925. It says that justification “is bestowed . . . solely through faith in the Redeemer’s blood” (W. R. White, Baptist Distinctives, p. 86). Luther’s Small Catechism poses the question (No. 139), “How do you accept this forgiveness :)f sins?” The answer given is I accept this forgiveness, by believing the Gospel” (p. 139). Question No. 256 asks, “Can anyone be saved without Baptism?” Answer, “It is unbelief only that damns . . . saving faith . . . can exist when for some reason Baptism cannot be obtained” (p. 176). The Westminster Shorter Catechism, 1647, is recognized by several Presbyterian and Baptists bodies. It claims in answer to question No. 33, “Justification is an act of God’s free grace . . . received by faith alone:” This concept is shared by nearly every Protestant denomination in existence, and is a point of major distinction between denominational doctrine and Bible teaching. The Bible teaches we are saved by obedient faith, not faith before or without obedience (Jas. 2:24).

The fourth example of grace abused is the theory of the imputed obedience or righteousness of Christ. Many denominations teach this, including Presbyterian, Reformed, Lutheran, Baptists and others. Yet most of these groups have some in them who would dissent from the idea. The concept that the obedience of Christ can be transferred to the account of disobedient men can be traced to John Calvin. Calvin said in Institutes of the Christian Religion, Book II, Chapter XVII, “For the righteousness found in Christ alone is reckoned as ours.” In Book III, Chapter XI, he explained, “. . . the righteousness of Christ is communicated to him (man) by imputation . . . the obedience of Christ is reckoned to us as if it were our own” (emphasis added). Following that line, The Westminster Confession of Faith, 1647 said in Chapter XI, “Of Justification,” God justifies man “by imputing the obedience and satisfaction of Christ unto them . . . .” Question No. 33 in the Westminster Shorter Catechism, 1647, asks, “What is justification?” Answer, “Justification is an act! of God’s free grace, wherein he pardoneth all our sins, and accepteth us as righteous in his sight, only for the righteousness of Christ imputed to us, and received by faith alone.”

The following is typical of many Baptist statements of this doctrine. God “imputes or reckons his (Christ’s) righteousness to every one of them, and it becomes their own just as really as if they had ‘wrought it out’ for themselves.” “By the righteousness of Christ we are to understand his complete submission to the precepts and penalties of the law of God, his perfect earthly obedience, and his unparalleled anguish; these he places to the credit of each member of his elect family” (The Baptist Encyclopedia, Vol. I, p. 631). A Baptist preacher says in Preaching the Doctrine of Grace, “The Spirit brings a crisis with respect’ to sin, but immediately he reveals the grace of God in salvation. He makes man conscious of his lack of righteousness for the sole purpose of offering to impute to us Christ’s righteousness” (p. 49).

Some of our own brethren have picked up this denominational dogma, as can be seen in “Truth, Error, and the Grace of God.” “Because of His obedience, those who are in Him can be saved although they never do achieve perfect obedience themselves.” “But there is a sphere where sin is not imputed to the sinner and that sphere is ‘in Christ.’ ” Christ is “a representative lawkeeper who justifies others by His obedience” (Edward Fudge, Gospel Guardian, Vol. 21, No. 44 (Feb..12, 1970), pp. 689-690). Nowhere does the Bible teach that God will transfer the obedience or faith of one person to another, whether it be the obedience of the living or the dead or the Christ! “The righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him” (Ezek. 18:20). Christ obeyed the will of God in death-the Righteous dying for the forgiveness of the sins of the unrighteous. Because he did that, it is now possible for all who obey him to have forgiveness, righteousness, or justification (Heb. 5:8-9).

The fifth abuse of grace we will mention also can be traced back to Calvinism: once in grace, always in grace. The most blunt statement of this doctrine made in modern times is that of Missionary Baptist preacher Sam Morris; he claimed no sin from idolatry to adultery could separate the elect from God’s grace. The doctrine has been watered down by some teachers to say once in grace, always in grace EXCEPT in cases of idolatry, immorality, or sin by malice aforethought. To cover the cases who do “fall back,” the dodge is used which claims they never were truly in grace anyhow! Though Paul said he was living “by the faith of the Son of God,” he said it is possible to “frustrate the grace of God” (Gal. 2:20-21). He went on to say some had done that very thing: “ye are fallen from grace” (Gal. 5:4). Peter warned those who “have escaped the pollutions of the world” that they may be “again entangled therein, and overcome” (2 Pet. 2:20-22).

Sixth, and last, consider the preposterous claim that we are saved sola gratia, by grace alone! Those who say this generally add by faith alone, somehow missing the fact that one thing PLUS another thing is not any thing alone. It would be correct to say salvation begins in the grace of God, but the Bible never attributes salvation to anything alone.

Is There A Contradiction Between God’s Law & Grace?

John 1:17-18 tells us that Christ came to declare God and His word, grace and truth in all fulness. “For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ. No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him.” But the passage is sometimes cited to prove there was law only under the Old Covenant, and there is grace only under the New. The comparison errs on both sides. Noah, David, and Mary all lived before the New Covenant had gone into effect, but all found grace in the sight of God. Grace in its fulness and completion is revealed in Christ. In view of His eternal plan and therefore the coming death of Christ, God granted the grace of forgiveness to those under the Old Law (Ps. 32). There was both law and grace.

The fulness of grace is revealed in the New Covenant, but is it by removing all law and giving unconditional grace? By no means! Through his obedience in death Christ “became the author of eternal salvation unto all them that obey him” (Heb. 5:8-9). When the Romans “obeyed from the heart that form of doctrine which was delivered” to them, they became “then . . . free from sin” (Rom. 6:17-18). Christians must serve the Lord according to “the law of faith,” “the law of the Spirit,” “the law of Christ,” “the perfect law of liberty,” “the royal law” (Rom. 3:27; 8:2; 1 Cor. 9:21; Gal. 6:2; Jas. 1:25; 2:8). Yet this is the covenant in which the fulness of grace is revealed! “Grace and truth came by Jesus Christ” (Jn. 1:17). “And of His fulness have all we received, and grace for grace” (Jn. 1:16).

We must understand the true weakness of the Old Law in order to understand the fulness of grace revealed in the New. The law of Moses is called a “ministration of death” (2 Cor. 3:7). Why? Some would have us believe it is because it involved law. The weakness of the Old was not that it required obedience to God’s will. There was no fulness of grace in that there was no final forgiveness, which in turn means no one could have been saved under that system except by simply never doing anything wrong in the first place. The fact is there was forgiveness and grace under that system only in view of the coming death of Christ. Once he came and died, that Old system availed nothing — for he inaugurated the New Covenant in which forgiveness is full, complete, and final! “For it is not possible that the blood of bulls and of goats should take away sins . . . But this man, after he had offered one sacrifice for sins for ever, sat down on the right hand of God” (Heb. 10:4,12). The contrast between the systems is not in having law under one and no law under the other, but in not having full forgiveness under the one and having it under the other. “For I will be merciful to their unrighteousness, and their sins and their iniquities will I remember no more. In that he saith, A new covenant, he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away” (Heb. 8:12-13).

It is more, not less, important that we observe God’s every command under the New! In the New Covenant sealed with Christ’s blood, “how much sorer punishment” should be expected than under “Moses’ law” (Heb. 9:16,22; 10:28-29). Indeed, for we have a perfect “mediator of a better covenant, which was established upon better promises” (Heb. 8:6). “For if that first covenant had been faultless, then should no place have been sought for the second,” but we today serve God under “the perfect law of liberty” (Heb. 8:7; Jas. 1:25). Serving under that which is so far better, we are so much more responsible.

Christ himself underscored this point. “Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven . . . Therefore whosoever heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them, I will liken him unto a wise man . . . (Matt. 7:21-27). “The words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life,” but only as, we partake of them do we partake of that life — “whoso eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, hath eternal life” (Jn. 6:63, 64). No wonder Christ said, “He that rejecteth me, and receiveth not my words, hath one that judgeth him: the word that I have spoken, the same shall judge him in the last day” (Jn. 12:48).

Conclusion

“And now, brethren, I commend you to God, and to the word of his grace, which is able to build you up, and to give you an inheritance among all them which are sanctified” (Acts 20:32).

Truth Magazine XXI: 25, pp. 394-397
June 23, 1977

Miscellaneous Meditations

By Larry Ray Hafley

Paul said,”Beware of dogs” (Phil.3:2). The “dogs” he referred to were the two legged, human species. Further, his reference was not to a cuddly puppy or a friendly family pet. Paul equated certain men with ferocious, savage dogs. The dogs that often roamed in snarling packs as scavengers and destroyers were the objects and subjects of Paul’s analogy, He likened men unto such dogs. These canines professed piety and purity, but they were, in reality,”the enemies of the cross of Christ” (Phil. 3:18). These dogs are not licensed. They have not had their shots. They feed on the putrid. They attack the weak and the infirmed. They seek the favor of the unlearned and immature. Them teeth are bared against the righteous, but they are capable of feigned sweetness if it will allow them to get close to their prey. Some areas and congregations are fearful of the dogs that seek to intimidate and rule in fear. They cower and quiver before their fierce growls. They do not stand and fight the dogs. They are led by them. And they wonder why the church has fleas.Whose Child Am I?

The apostle John tell us how we can know whose child we are, the Lord’s or the devil’s (1 Jn. 2:29; 3:10). Another related passage is Romans 6:16,”Know ye not, that to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey; whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness?” Two texts commonly overlooked in establishing who one’s spiritual Father is are John 8:39 and 1 Peter 3:6. Our Father is the one we imitate and emulate. A woman is a daughter of Sara as long as she is pious and submissive as was Sara and as long as she does well. One is not a child of Abraham if his works are evil. To be a child of Abraham is to live a life of trusting, obedient faith. The same principle is involved in determining whether or not one is a child of God or a child of the devil (Cf. Jn 8:44; Acts 13:10.)

Truth Magazine XXI: 25, p. 392
June 23, 1977