Truth Magazine

By Richie Thetford

I was raised in the church of Christ and through the years I have noticed in many cases that our children are not receiving the kind of discipline that God would want children to receive by the hands of their loving parents. As a result, children are being raised without any clear standard and often times the discipline they receive is inconsistent.

First of all, let us define discipline. Webster’s New World Dictionary defines discipline as: (1) Training that develops self-control, character or efficiency. (2) The result of such training; orderly conduct. (3) Submission to authority and control. (4) A particular system of rules or methods. (5) Treatment that corrects or punishes.

What is discipline? It means “the treatment suited to a disciple.” The word disciple basically means “a learner” such as “taught or trained one” (Young’s Analytical Concordance). Dr. Clyde Narramore, author of Understanding Your Children, has written, “A mother and father cannot avoid the role of a teacher. Parents teach by what they say, what they do and what they don’t do.” Grant Caldwell once wrote that the design of discipline is to produce obedience in purpose and fact. Parental authority should be:

(1) With firmness to make obedience advisable.

(2) With wisdom to make obedience natural.

(3) With consistency to make obedience uniform.

(4) With love to make obedience pleasant.

One must have a discipline (standard) before effective discipline can be administered. Look back at the definition of discipline. One needs to have a particular system of rules or methods (No. 4) before effective treatment can be administered that will correct or punish (No. 5). In other words, before we can have effective disciple in the home, there must be a standard to go by (Ps. 127:1). As parents, God must be our standard and our discipline should be to follow that standard! Without God’s standard, we’ll aimlessly strive to guide the footsteps of our beloved children. We need fathers like Joshua who will say: “… as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord” (Josh. 24:15).

A home that does not use the Bible as its guide in ruling the home and raising the children will be a home with no direction and, as a result, the children will often times be punished under different rules and guidelines depending upon how the parents feel at the time. Notice the following poem entitled “A Home Without A Bible.”

A Home Without A Bible

“What is a home without a Bible?

Tis a home where day is night,

Starless night, for o’er life’s pathway

Heaven can shed no kindly light.

“What is home without a Bible?

Tis a home where daily bread

For the body is provided,

But the soul is never fed.

“What is home without a Bible?

Tis a family out at sea,

Compass lost and rudder broken,

Drifting, drifting, thoughtlessly.”

(Author Unknown)

Godly Instruction

We should want to work hard to produce homes that will glorify God and save the world. Are you letting God set the discipline (the standard) in your home? Are God’s words being echoed by each of us fathers to all the members of our household? “And these words, which I am commanding you today, shall be on your heart; and you shall teach them diligently to your sons and shall talk of them when you sit in your house and when you walk by the way and when you lie down and when you rise up” (Deut 6:6-7). This is where the home environment is breaking down today. Fathers are not letting God dictate to them how the home should be governed. As a result, the children wonder “Who’s in charge of this home anyway, mom or dad?” We fathers have a God-given role and are responsible for how we operate our homes. We should diligently teach our children the ways of the Lord. Why? Because their soul and our soul depend upon it!

Some parents, when their child leaves home and no longer attends church, are often heard to say, “I just don’t understand, I trained them in the ways of the Lord.” But did they really? The proverb writer says, “Train up a child in the way he should go, Even when he is old he will not depart from it” (Prov. 22:6). We can see from Deuteronomy 6:6-7 what kind of training one is to receive and I would say that most of us parents are not giving our children that kind of Bible training. Do we as parents really sit down and read the Bible with our children? Do we talk about how the Bible applies to their life during the day? Do we put time aside to help them with memory work and their Bible lessons? If not, is it any wonder our children eventually leave God’s service? We can also read other passages from Scripture concerning godly instruction in Proverbs 1:2-5; 2 Timothy 4:2; and Titus 2:15. What are you doing today to ensure that your child is getting God’s instruction? Are you, as head of the house, making sure God is taking priority and is setting the discipline in your home? Is the Lord ruling your home-life today?

Guardian of Truth XXXIX: 5 p. 20
March 2, 1995

By Steve Wallace

The most good in mission work, in cases with which I am familiar, comes when a man (or men) moves to the mission field of his choice and stays for an extended period of time preaching the gospel. Churches that have been planted by such efforts in various places in the U.S. and around the world testify to the effectiveness of this method of evangelism. Surely all would agree with the above assessment.

But what if a man who cannot move to a foreign country is able to spend a period of weeks or months spreading the Word there? Can this be productive good? Some have objected to such efforts, and they have objected at a bad time. Doors have opened in more places than we would have ever thought possible 10 years ago and, speaking from experience, it is generally difficult to find men to commit to either short or long stays. If a man cannot be found to move to a prospective field of labor is there no other way to spread the gospel in that field? Are brethren who oppose short efforts right? I agree that some short preaching efforts are  as far as can be outwardly judged  a waste of time and money, and would even admit to having participated in some such efforts in the past in ignorance. However, can short trips produce good results? The following points are in defense of such efforts

1. They are scriptural. Paul and his companions were only in Thessalonica for a very short time and yet were able to establish a church there (Acts 17:1 ff).

2. They are effective. In my own experience I know of two churches that have been established as the result of short trips by a number of brethren. Such brethren have planned their trips to a given city so as to overlap with one another and thus make a lengthy effort at reaching the lost in that city. As people were convened other brethren were stirred to come and work with the small churches that sprang up. Two men, having seen the need, moved to one of the cities. What I have described above is the preaching efforts that have taken place in Vilnius and Kaunas, Lithuania.

3. More cost effective than our modern gospel meetings. Everyone is concerned that money be spent wisely, that we get the “most bang for the buck.” Short term preaching efforts, when properly done, touch thousands more lost souls with the gospel than the average gospel meeting in the U.S. And yet they cost only a few hundred dollars more than the average gospel meeting! The dollar is still ridiculously high against most East European currencies. Lecture halls can be rented, tracts can be printed, and interpreters hired for very low prices. “Moreover, it is required in stewards that a man be found faithful” (1 Cor. 4:2).

4. They bring long term workers to the mission field. A good number of men who have moved to foreign fields have done so after having first worked for a short time in the place they eventually moved to. Some, including this writer, had no intention of ever moving away from the U.S. when they first ventured abroad.

Conclusion

Short term workers are needed in the mission fields just as much as are long term workers. Please do not be misled by well-meaning brethren who argue to the contrary. Facts show that such trips can be productive of observable good results if they are carried out correctly. So, can you come?

Guardian of Truth XXXIX: 5 p. 15
March 2, 1995

By Lewis Willis

A sad awakening has occurred among those brethren who left us 40-plus years ago so that they could have church-supported benevolent institutions, unscriptural congregational cooperation which produced sponsoring-churches and sponsoring-elderships for programs like Herald of Truth, and activities such as fellowship halls and church dinners. It is increasingly apparent that many of the same brethren who promoted these unauthorized practices are distressed over the direction their efforts have taken them. I heard several years ago that “the student always goes further than the teacher.” That was the warning issued to these brethren years ago. They were told that they could fight the war that would introduce these unscriptural practices, but that they would be left behind by the next generation that would go even further into apostasy. These advocates of liberalism, without repentance or apology, have learned, but have not admitted, that those warnings they heard were justified.

For the last 8-10, years several indications. of concern over what is happening in liberal churches have surfaced. This article will mention three specific statements from those brethren, with an accompanying word of caution concerning us.

1. In 1986, the Firm Foundation, a liberal paper that led the fight for institutionalism, printed a special issue, mailing it to churches across the nation. It was a 48-page study of “the fellowship question.” They identified the problem they were addressing. They were trying to stop a movement to fellowship the Christian Church, accept instrumental music and women preachers/elders, and to oppose those who would deny the inerrancy of the Scripture (Firm Foundation, Alan E. Highers, Vol. 103, No. 6, March, 1986, pp. 1,5-7). To thwart this effort, they argued: (1) Authority was necessary before the church can act, (2) The New Testament is that authority, (3) The N.T. authorizes practice with commands, approved examples, and necessary inferences, (4) The authorization may be either specific or generic, and (5) They wrote of the law of inclusion/exclusion. Ironically, this was the same argumentation they had rejected as invalid years earlier, when they insisted on introducing unauthorized activities which they wanted into the church. Back then they argued, “We do many things for which we have no authority” and they issued tracts on “Where there is no pattern.” Now, they suddenly have decided that we need authority for our practices after all.

2. A front-page article in another liberal paper, Christian Chronicle (Vol. 46, No. 1, January, 1989), lamented what was happening to urban churches. The article described “survival-based competition” driving churches to add pro-grams and facilities to assure their own growth. An Oklahoma City preacher said, “A grandparent church knows it can’t survive financially without young people, so they have to try to do what’s necessary to get them.” The problem was, they borrowed money to provide facilities for Day Care, Christian Schools, gymnasiums, swimming pools, and about anything else the membership wanted. Unfortunately, when a new congregation started, they offered “better” facilities than the other, so the young members left, leaving the older brethren overwhelmed with debt. That would be a problem, wouldn’t it?

Again, we have noticed that practically every issue of Firm Foundation for the last two years has been fighting a battle over the “new hermeneutic” among liberal brethren. Primarily the advocates who reject New Testament authority, seeking a new way of interpreting the Scriptures, are the professors of Bible in the so-called Christian colleges. These professors are repeatedly accused of not believing in the inspiration and inerrancy of the Scriptures. Administrators are challenged to dismiss these “heretics,” only to discover they defend and support what the professors are teaching.

3. The editor of the current issue of The Spiritual Sword (Vol. 26, No. 1, October, 1994) is again bemoaning what has happened to liberal churches. The theme of the issue is “Who Are We?” Alan Highers, the editor, describes their “loss of spiritual identity.” He said”… it is not uncommon to hear about members leaving the church and uniting with a denomination . . . their action represents a lack of understanding about the nature and identity of the church. We are reaping the harvest of twenty-five years of non-distinctive preaching. Many of our young people no longer know the difference between the church of the New Testament and the ecclesiastical kingdoms of men.”

What has caused this to happen? Highers said these members have not been taught at all. “They have never heard the old arguments relating to Bible authority, speaking where the Bible speaks, and remaining silent where the Bible is silent. They have grown up in `socialized’ churches where the youth program was strong, but the teaching program was weak.” ” Do you suppose these younger members are able to see the inconsistency of opposing human missionary societies, while endorsing human benevolent societies? Or, possibly they do not agree that you can support, from the treasury, a benevolent society, but it is sinful to support a missionary society. The reason they do not know the difference between liberal churches and denominations is because there is no difference. When a church decides to act without authority (Col. 3:17), it becomes a denomination! That is precisely what Highers and his liberal brethren persuaded churches to do when they abandoned N.T. authority on institutions and cooperation. Now, they have created a monster of modernism, and they are afraid of it. It is devouring them, and they cannot stop it.

Highers condemned his own brethren, quoting from the Baptist Messenger, “We have raised a generation of sissy preachers. Nobody … is preaching that the Word of God is the Word of God and that Hell is hot. God has not called us to be ambassadors of good will; he has called us to be ambassadors of God’s will.” Thus, he sadly concludes, “Churches of Christ are facing an identity crisis as we near the end of the twentieth century.” I would suggest that their movement is not facing an identity crisis, but it is facing the fact that they are the fathers of yet another exodus into denominationalism. Their only hope is to come back where we all used to stand; where conservative churches of Christ have remained through these years following the division the liberals manufactured and directed. It is sad to see their liberal baby bite them!

4. Within conservative churches there is a need to be alert! We read too many articles giving the latest quotations from a host of denominational authors, with little Scripture basis, if any at all. These pleasing little platitudes that describe how to feel good and get along better with our peers are replacing plain-old-Bible-teaching. If these sectarian authors have such an outstanding grasp of the truth, why are they still in denominationalism? Sermon topics are now advertised with catchy titles that amuse, or offer self-help philosophies, instead of being based in the terminology of the Scriptures. Have these men discovered a pattern of words which is better than Scriptures? Or, are they mimicking the same errors that institutional preachers made? Before it is too late, preaching brethren, let’s examine our sermons and determine if the emphasis is on a “thus saith the Lord” or on the wisdom of men. We are eyewitnesses of what human wisdom produces, and we must not allow history to repeat itself among us!

Let us never forget that God’s people were once destroyed for lack of knowledge (Hos. 4:6); that they were sent into captivity for lack of knowledge (Isa. 5:13). Amos prophesied that a famine of hearing the word of the Lord was coming (Amos 8:11). Let us not be guilty of helping the Devil in his destructive work (1 Pet. 5:8). We must never become a people who love it when preachers “prophesy falsely,” speaking smooth things that deceive and tickle our ears (Jer. 5:31; Isa. 30:10; 2 Tim. 4:2-4). If your preacher is more impressed with modem writers than he is with God’s word (and you can easily tell), send him a direct message to “preach the word,” and accept nothing less.

Guardian of Truth XXXIX: 5 p. 10-11
March 2, 1995

By Ron Halbrook

In an era of worldwide wickedness, Paul wrote by the inspiration of God and admonished the young Christian Timothy,

Let no man despise thy youth; but be thou an example of the believers, in word, in conversation, in charity, in spirit, in faith, in purity (1 Tim. 4:12).

Young people should not be ashamed of their youth nor of their service to God. Their souls and their roles in God’s service are just as important to God as the roles of older people.

God sends each precious soul into this world pure and free from sin. Sometime after reaching an age of accountability to God, each person chooses to sin against God’s will in thought, word, or deed (Rom. 3:23; 9:11). “For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord” (Rom. 6:23). From the beginning until now, God has addressed young people to direct them away from sin with its guilt and sorrow, and to lead them in the blessed paths of righteousness. God is personally and directly conscious of every young person on the face of the earth, and seeks to save them for all eternity!

The Bible abounds with examples of young people who faithfully served the Lord. Time would fail us to tell of Joseph, David, the young maid of Naaman’s wife, Daniel, Timothy, and others who were an inspiration to their generation and to many generations to follow. They have taken the counsel of the Word of God as the guide of their lives:

Wherewithal shall a young man cleanse his way? by taking heed thereto according to thy word.

With my whole heart have I sought thee: 0 let me not wander from thy commandments.

Thy word have I hid in mine heart, that I might not sin against thee (Ps. 119:9-11).

The fear of the Lord is the beginning of knowledge: but fools despise wisdom and instruction.

My son, hear the instruction of thy father, and forsake not the law of thy mother:

For they shall be an ornament of grace unto thy head, and chains about thy neck (Prov. 1:7-9).

Remember now thy Creator in the days of thy youth, while the evil days come not, nor the years draw nigh, when thou shalt say, I have no pleasure in them; … .

Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter: Fear God, and keep his commandments: for this is the whole duty of man (Eccl. 12:1, 13).

Children, obey your parents in the Lord: for this is right. Honour thy father and mother; which is the first commandment with promise; That it may be well with thee, and thou mayest live long on the earth (Eph. 6:4).

We live in a time of worldwide wickedness, but there are still many young people who are faithfully serving the Lord. I remember them from the days of my own youth. I have known them in every congregation where I have lived and labored in the gospel, including the church here at West Columbia. I meet them all over the country when traveling in gospel meetings. They have made an indelible impression on my life for good and they constantly exert an influence in my life which will help me to reach heaven by the grace of God.

It is well for young people to sit at the feet of mature teachers and to learn about God’s Word from their parents, elders, deacons, preachers, Bible class teachers, and other adult saints. It is also well for young people to share their faith with other young people, and even with adults when they have the opportunity. With this in mind, it has been my privilege to work with young people around the country during the past year to put together a series of fifteen articles on the theme “Let No Man Despise Thy Youth.”

All fifteen writers are in their teenage years or in their early twenties. Some are in high school, others in college, and some high school graduates who did not attend college. They participate in a wide range of scholastic and extra-scholastic activities, and some have part-time or full-time jobs. Josh Gurtler, who worked with the church here in a preacher training program in the summer of 1993, and Heather Harshbarger, who is my niece, attend Florida College. Scott Wiginton attends Texas A & M University and Jonathan Halbrook Western Kentucky University. Holly Turner recently graduated from W.K.U. and joined her parents to help in spreading the gospel in Kenya, East Africa.

Writers still in high school include Jeremy Sweets, David Halbrook, Jason Hosfield, Ryan Lindsey, John Isaac Edwards, Deborah Halbrook, and Alan Roskos (who is the youngest, at 14). Kevin Maxey and Jarrod Jacobs are out of school and preach the gospel full time, while several other young men who are in high school or college do part time preaching. Missy Ing is married, Cindy Bryant soon will be, and both are members of the Hebron Lane church in Shepherdsville, KY.

Five authors have some tie to the church here (Ryan Lindsey is a member, Josh Gurtler spent a summer, and my three children). David Halbrook and Ryan Lindsey pre-pared their material on the prom in a training class here and preached their lessons before the church last spring. David then presented his lesson in a speech class at school, where it led to some lively discussion. Heather Harshbarger is the daughter of Randy and Marilyn Harshbarger; Randy preaches for the Mound and Starr church in Nacogdoches, TX, and Marilyn is a sister of my wife, Donna. Jeremy Sweets is the son of Richard and Alice Sweets; Richard is an elder in the Overland church in Lawrenceburg, KY, and Alice is my sister. I know from “up close” that the faith of Heather and of Jeremy reflects the training of godly homes.

These fifteen authors are to be congratulated for their work. Most of them have never written such an article before, and some may never have an occasion to write again, but all of these articles will bear fruit for good in both time and eternity. None of these young men and young ladies claim perfection in their lives, but each is still growing in the service of the Lord just like all of us. May they never be ashamed of their youth or of their youthful efforts to serve the Lord. May all who read take to heart the truth taught in these fine articles, and take heart in the fact that God still has his 7,000 faithful servants among the youth of our nation. “Thy word have I hid in mine heart, that I might not sin against thee (Ps. 119:9).”

Guardian of Truth XXXIX: 6 p. 2
March 16, 1995