Truth Magazine

By Mike Willis

Ye have heard that it hath been said, Thou shalt love thy neighbour, and hate thine enemy. But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you; that ye may be the children of your Father which is in heaven: for he maketh his sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust. For if ye love them which love you, what reward have ye? Do not even the publicans the same? And if ye salute your brethren only, what do ye more than others? Do not even the publicans so? Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect(Matt. 5:43-48).

A person’s conduct toward his enemies frequently reveals a dark side of his character. Some men stoop to lying, misrepresentation, mud-slinging, and other vicious activities commonly characterized as “character assassination” to destroy their enemies. On some occasions hatred for one’s enemies actually results in murder, as reading the daily newspaper commonly demonstrates. What was Jesus’ conduct toward his enemies? We read above what he preached, but how did he live?

1. Jesus held no grudges. He taught his disciples to forgive as often as a person repented and asked his forgiveness, even until 7 times 70 (Matt. 18:21-35). He emphasized that one’s own forgiveness is contingent on whether or not he is willing to forgive his brother. He did not allow his disciples to nourish grudges, resulting in bitterness of spirit, hatred, and spite. But more than mere teaching, Jesus demonstrated that he held no grudges when he prayed to the Father saying, “Forgive them; for they know not what they do” (Lk. 23:34). His conduct manifested the proper attitude one should hold toward his enemies. Jesus’ willingness to die on the cross, even for those who crucified him, demonstrates the active good will that love mandates.

2. Jesus bore injury without malice. Peter described Jesus’ attitude toward his enemies when he wrote, “For even hereunto were ye called: because Christ also suffered for us, leaving us an example, that ye should follow his steps: who did no sin, neither was guile found in his mouth: who, when he was reviled, reviled not again; when he suffered, he threatened not; but committed himself to him that judgeth righteously” (1 Pet. 2:21-23). Jesus did not walk around with a chip on his shoulder because of wrongs previously suffered. He never hated anyone, nor did he cruelly mistreat his enemies. He lived what he taught when he said that love “thinketh no evil” (i.e., does not keep an account, a running ledger of wrongs suffered, 1 Cor. 13:5).

3. Jesus was kind to his enemies. The spirit of the world is to be kind to one’s friends and do whatever evil one can to his enemies. Plato described Cyrus saying, “No one did more good to his friends and more harm to his enemies” (cited in Boles’ Outlines 57). There is no evidence that Jesus was ever unkind to his enemies.

As a matter of fact, one of the things that created enemies for him was the kindness he showed those to whom the religious world was generally unkind. The Pharisees condemned Jesus for eating with the publicans and well-known sinners of the world (see Luke 15:1-2). They were appalled that he would be kind to such people. Their criticism itself is a compliment to Jesus’ character. He did not reflect a holier-than-thou attitude toward those whose lives were consumed with sin. Like the Great Physician that he was, he stooped to heal the sick and broken-hearted, rather than contemptuously looking down on them.

He treated the Samaritan woman with kindness (John 4). The Samaritans were considered “dogs” by the Jews. Jesus’ kindness to this woman startled her. She said, “How is it that thou, being a Jew, askest drink of me, which am a woman of Samaria? For the Jews have no dealings with the Samaritans” (John 4:9). Jesus was no enemy to the Samaritan woman.

4. Jesus was forgiving. I know that is true, for he has forgiven me. Paul was truly amazed at the grace of God manifested in Christ. He wrote, “For when we were yet without strength, in due time Christ died for the ungodly. For scarcely for a righteous man will one die: yet peradventure for a good man some would even dare to die. But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us” (Rom. 5:6-8).

Jesus’ attitude toward his enemies was shown when he prayed for those who crucified him to be forgiven of their sins. It is shown in his coming to this earth and dying on the cross for us  sinners who were alienated from God.

5. Jesus forbade revenge. In the same vein as Jesus’ words in the Sermon on the Mount, Paul wrote, “Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but rather give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance is mine; I will repay, saith the Lord. Therefore if thine enemy hunger, feed him; if he thirst, give him drink: for in so doing thou shalt heap coals of fire on his head. Be not overcome of evil, but overcome evil with good” (Rom. 12:21). When men set out on a mission to retaliate for injuries (or imagined injuries) suffered, they are guilty of vindictiveness. Such actions proceed from a malevolent spirit. The spirit of malice is itself a work of the flesh (Rom. 1:29; Eph. 4:31).

The modern movies extol revenge in many of the Rambo type of movies. Gang wars are the result of a spirit of vengeance. Many inner city youths die in gang wars for the purpose of avenging oneself of his enemies. We may pour millions of dollars into the inner city problems but unless the spirit is cleansed of its sinful vengeance, the problems will not disappear.

Sometimes local churches are the battlefields of wounded pride. One man is committed to opposing anything promoted by another man with whom he has become crossed, regardless of how good an idea might be proposed by the man. This is just one way of “getting even.” It is a spirit born of the Devil and not of Christ.

Conclusion

Let us learn from the example of Jesus what our conduct toward our enemies should be. Let us not gloss over sin by excusing our hatred and bitterness of spirit because of some offense or supposed offense against us. Let us pray for our enemies and not nurture a grudge, hold spite, or excuse hatred.

Guardian of Truth XXXVIII: 4, p. 2
February 17, 1994

By Mark Mayberry

America is no longer at a crossroads. We have been traveling down the wrong path for years. Many of our current societal problems stem from the dramatic shift in attitudes that occurred in the 1960s, a decade marked by the deification of freedom, and widespread rebellion against social institutions, traditional values and established authority. In the last thirty years, many of the central institutions of our society (including the judicial, educational, welfare and mental health systems) have become permeated with the values of the Sixties. However, the idealistic dream of the 1960s has turned into a terrifying nightmare in the 1990s.

Our society has rejected the Bible as God’s absolute standard. Cut loose from the anchor of biblical morality, modern man is adrift in a sea of relativity. Disorder, disintegration and chaos have inevitably followed. Let us consider several areas where the relative morals of secular-ism have brought us to the brink of ruin.

1. The Criminal Justice System

God ordained civil government to maintain an orderly society. The first responsibility of government is the swift and sure punishment of evildoers (Eccl. 8:11; Rom. 13:1-4). However, our modern judicial system is a complete failure. It coddles criminals! Judges appear more concerned with the “rights” of lawbreakers than the rights of innocent victims. As a result, crime and violence are at epidemic levels. In 1929 Chicago’s St. Valentine’s Day massacre shocked the nation when several gangsters were gunned down in a hail of bullets. Nowadays, this type violence is considered normal. On Valentine’s Day in 1993, there were 12 homicides in New York City  six in one Bronx apartment. “While population has increased only 41 percent since 1960, the violent crimes have in-creased more than 500 percent and total crimes have increased over 300 percent. The rate of violent crime in the U.S. is worse than in any other industrialized country. In addition, eight out of every ten Americans will be a victim of violent crime at least once in their lives.” We have sown to the wind, and we are reaping the whirlwind!

2. The Educational System

Christ taught that religion should be a central part of our lives (Matt. 6:33; John 6:27). The fear of the Lord is the very foundation of knowledge and wisdom (Ps. 111:10; Prov. 1:7; 9:10). Yet, our modern educational system is governed by a humanistic philosophy that is opposed to religious belief and openly hostile to Christianity. God has been banned from the classroom. The Three R’s have been replaced by the Three C’s (Condom distribution, Clarification of values, and Courses in self-esteem). Instead of teaching children that 2+2=4, Joseph Fernandez, Chancellor of New York City Public Schools, proposed that first-graders be taught the “positive aspects” of homosexual families. Heather has Two Mommies and Daddy’s Roommate were offered as suggested reading material for kindergartners. What is the result of this insanity? SAT scores have dropped steadily over the last 30 years. A recent survey revealed that nearly half the adults in America are functionally illiterate. The fundamentals of learning have been neglected. It should be obvious to all but the most blind adherents of the N.E.A. that our educational system is badly broken. Again, we have sown to the wind, and are reaping the whirlwind.

3. The Welfare System

The book of Proverbs affirms the need for personal diligence and industriousness (Prov. 6:6-11; 20:4, 24:30-34). The apostle Paul taught the importance of hard work and honest labor (1 Tim. 5:8; 2 Thess. 3:10-12). These Bible principles formed the basis of the “Protestant Ethic” that made our country great. However, today self-sufficiency has been replaced by government subsidy. Measured in constant 1990 dollars, welfare spending jumped from $28.9 billion in 1960 to $211.9 billion in 1990. Yet, despite its noble aspirations, our welfare state is a dismal failure. Why? Because it destroys the inner character of those it purports to help. Government should obviously provide assistance in certain situations, but people must learn to take responsibility for their own lives. Self-respect comes from carrying one’s own weight. Unfortunately, public assistance, as it is practiced in our country, has created a permanent under-class, who are mired in poverty and despair. Again, we have sown to the wind, and are reaping the whirlwind.

4. The Family Unit

The Bible is quite clear in its teaching regarding marriage: God’s ideal is one man and one woman for life (Gen. 2:23-24; Matt. 19:3-9). The roles of husbands, wives, parents and children are clearly delineated in the Scriptures. However, the family unit is under assault in America.

The number of divorces has increased nearly 200 percent in the last 30 years, while the percentage of people marrying is at an all-time low. This explosion in divorce has had a devastating effect on children. Less than 60 percent of all children today are living with both biological parents. The number of children living in single-parent homes has more than tripled in the last three decades. Today, 17 million children live in single-parent homes.

It is currently fashionable to glorify this trend toward single-parent families. Many would argue that divorce is invariably the best alternative to a bad marriage and that single parenthood carries no risk to children. Yet, as Mortimer Zuckerman says, “This selfish rationalization substitutes the happiness of the adult in our moral codes for the well-being of the children. Career and self-fulfillment have got ahead of caring responsibility. The results on children have been devastating. The developing child needs love, stability, constancy, harmony and permanency in family life. These needs have been casuistically sacrificed in the adult’s quest for freedom, independence, and choice. The mantra should be this: Marriage matters.”

In a recent article in Atlantic Monthly, Barbara Dafoe Whitehead summarizes much of the current research on the breakup of the family. She says that the social-science evidence is in. Though it might “benefit” the adults involved, the dissolution of intact two-parent families is harmful to large numbers of children. Furthermore, family diversity in the form of increasing numbers of single-parent and step-parent families does not strengthen the social fabric, but rather, dramatically weakens and undermines society. Again, we have sown to the wind, and are reaping the whirlwind.

5. Personal Morality

The decline in personal morality that our nation has experienced in recent years is almost breathtaking. The philosophy of situation ethics has permeated our culture. There are no limits, no rules, no standards. Like Israel of old, everyone is a law unto themselves (Judg. 17:6; 21:25). Anything goes! If it feels good, do it! Deviancy has been redefined so as to make it appear normal. As a result, sexual promiscuity, teen pregnancy, abortion, alcoholism, and drug addiction are at epidemic levels.

The number of unmarried teenagers getting pregnant has nearly doubled in the past two decades. Rare in the early 1960s, by the late 1980s nearly one unmarried teenage girl in ten got pregnant. Since 1960, illegitimate births have in-creased by more than 400 percent. Only 5.3% of all births were out-of-wedlock in 1960, but by 1990, 28% of all births were illegitimate.

While the exact number of abortions performed before 1973 is unknown, today nearly one in four pregnancies end in abortion. There were 1.6 million abortions in 1990. Since the 1973 Supreme Court Roe v. Wade decision legalizing abortion, there have been more than 28 million abortions in the United States. One-third of a generation has perished!

Left to his own devices, man always sinks to a lower level. Yet, through following the Bible, we are lifted up to a higher moral plain (Deut. 4:7-8; 10:12-13; Prov. 14:34). Unfortunately, men have turned a deaf ear towards the Scriptures. Again, we have sown to the wind, and are reaping the whirlwind.

6. The Entertainment Industry

The Bible stresses the value of wholesome entertainment and recreation (Ps. 23:1-2; Mk. 6:31-32; 1 Tim. 4:8). It affirms that lasting happiness can only be found through virtue and godliness (Ps. 1:1-6; Matt. 5:3-10; John 10:10). However, filth has invaded the television, movies, music, and many other forms of entertainment. The entertainment and advertising media exploit sex for sales and ratings. A recent survey revealed that 86% of all sex presented on prime-time programming on ABC, CBS and NBC is depicted outside marriage. Comedians think the only way to get a laugh is to drag their audience through a cesspool of crudeness and vulgarity. Film makers no longer believe they can entertain without filling the screen with wickedness and depravity. Truth and righteousness are ridiculed while sin and perversion are glorified. Again, we have sown to the wind, and are reaping the whirlwind.

Conclusion

Our society, having lost its religious and moral underpinnings, has become both amoral and immoral. Will Durant, the late world historian, effectively demonstrated that no nation in history has survived without a strong religious moral code. Yet, religion and morality are under relentless attack in the United States. As Chuck Colson said, “We are stripping religion away from public life to our great and everlasting peril. It is the most self-destructive process the nation could embark on. We are trying to erase the indispensable role of religion in informing the moral consensus by which civilized society has survived. We live in a post-Christian age. We have embarked into a `brave new world’ without moral directions, of values erased from teaching, of tolerance elevated above truth. . . We’re no longer neutral about religion but hostile to religion. On almost every front there is an increasing secularizing of America.” Unfortunately, the process continues unabated. Those who now control the reigns of government hold to a philosophy that will only exacerbate the situation. We stand on the brink of an evil abyss.

How long will this evil be allowed to continue? We cannot say. Man can barely discern the present, while God can see the end from the beginning. Creatures limited by time and space cannot understand the doings of an infinite Creator, except as he chooses to reveal himself to us (Deut. 29:29; Isa 55:8-9). However, we do know that God does not allow sin to go unpunished. The Old Testament teaches that, when a people persist in wickedness, divine chastisement becomes inevitable. If our nation continues its downward spiral into immorality, he will most certainly deal with us as he dealt with the nations of antiquity.

What then can we do? Let your light shine. Point the way to God. Raise your children up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord. Withstand the temptations of the devil. Renounce the corrupt influence of our deforming culture. Keep your eye on the goal: Through the eye of faith, look past the bleak future of man’s increasing wickedness to that glorious eternity which God has promised to the faithful.

Guardian of Truth XXXVIII: 3, p. 3-4
February 3, 1994

By Tom M. Roberts

To please no one will I prescribe a deadly drug, nor give advice which may cause his death. Nor will I give a woman a pessary to procure abortion. . . (excerpt from Hippocratic oath).

Just as I choose a ship to sail in or a house to live in, so I choose a death for my passage from life (Seneca, 4 B.C. – A. D. 65).

Not only is there conflict between truth and secularism regarding death, there is an ambivalence within secular circles regarding the proper esteem one is to have regarding his own death, that of his loved ones, and that of society at large. The Hippocratic Oath (though pledged to all the gods and goddesses of Hippocrates’ day) seems to be at conflict with some philosophers of ancient Rome. This early confrontation between approaches to death is the precursor to a modern conflict of enormous proportions: pro-life or pro-euthanasia/abortion. In no arena of philosophical discussion is the difference between faith in God and secularism more pronounced than that of attitudes toward death. Many are struggling with this mysterious and often tragic passage from life to death and have no ethical foundation upon which to choose. Is suicide an alternative? Is abortion murder? Do we withhold life support from aging parents? These are significant questions. But where are the answers?

Does Secularism Hold the Answer?

“… Secularization is the process by which the world is de-divinized.” “To call someone secular means that he is completely time-bound, totally a child of his age, a creature of history, with no vision of eternity. Unable to see anything in the perspective of eternity, he cannot believe that God exists or acts in human affairs. Moral standards, for example, tend to be merely those commonly accepted by the society in which he lives, and he believes that everything changes, so that there are no enduring or permanent values.”

If one does not believe that he possesses an eternal spirit, how is it possible to make a rational decision about its disposition? Such is the position of the secularist/humanist. One might as well ask a horse or cow about eternity as to ask a secularist about the value of life.

“We find insufficient evidence for belief in the existence of a supernatural; it is either meaningless or irrelevant to the question of the survival and fulfillment of the human race. As non-theists, we begin with humans and not God, nature not deity.”

Believing that man is but a “naked ape,” secularism has spawned a host of aberrant behavioral problems. Since “there are no enduring or permanent values” in their view, life itself has no moral connection to death. Like the Epicurean philosopher of old (Acts 17), he advocates, “if it feels good, do it.” Consequently, every facet of the American way of life is being contorted, as well as the American way of death. Education, entertainment, religion (limited to the social gospel), the home, politics, the courts, congress, the media and many individuals are being warped and fueled by an insatiable desire for materialism and self-gratification with a philosophical rationale. The “me, too” generation has come of age with a vengeance. From Madonna (the “Material Girl”) to Phil Donahue (Mr. “Do Anything For A Rating”), America has embraced adultery, homosexuality, promiscuous sex, the drug culture, live-in “relationships,” skin-heads, filthy speech (under guise of free speech), and pornographic “artistry” supported by tax dollars. While the popular vernacular expresses it as “let it all hang out,” or “get in touch with yourself,” this life style is the end result of secular Marxism, Darwinism and Freudism. From Friedrich Neitzsche to John Dewey, Betty Friedan to Roseanne Barr, Shirley MacLaine to Madelyn Murray O’Hair; from the National Endowment for the Arts to the National Education Association, from Hollywood to the National Organization for Women (NOW), all these and many more have one common denominator: secular-ism. Is it any wonder that Shirley MacLaine supposes that she has been re-incarnated dozens of time? Is anyone surprised that NOW is led by a lesbian? Can anyone so enamored of a hedonistic life-style (spiritual death) really propose serious consideration of physical death? However, let there be no doubt that for one to understand the secularist view of death, one must acknowledge the secularist view of life. While the Christian recognizes that the manner of life on earth will affect the destiny of existence hereafter (“For if ye live after the flesh, ye shall die: but if ye through the Spirit do mortify the deeds of the body, ye shall live” [Rom. 8:13]), the opposite view does not. “The continuity of a human body is a matter of appearance and behavior, not of substance. The same thing applies to the mind. We think and feel and act, but there is not, in addition to thoughts and feelings and actions, a bare entity, the mind or the soul, which does or suffers these occurrences.” One’s view of life, therefore, will affect one’s … Its View of Death .. . view of death, as cause and effect.

Secularism and Death: Abortion and Euthanasia

While a lack of biblical faith (typical of secularism) does affect every second of human existence, it also adversely affects a view of and preparation for death. Not only does the deceptive philosophy keep one from a moral preparation for life after death, it actually hinders one from a humane consideration of death during life. Two examples are noteworthy: abortion and euthanasia.

“The Silent Scream” is an apt epitaph for :r fetus being cut apart in the womb. Not yet able to voice its pain, the unborn baby opens its mouth to grimace its anguish. Dry statistics of millions upon millions of abortions in America and around the world carry the message of innocent blood that cries out to God (Gen. 4:10). Used as a form of birth control, abortion has received the stamp of approval of the United States Supreme Court in the Roe v Wade decision (1973). The Women’s Liberation Movement demands abortion as one method of freeing its advocates from the bondage of motherhood into the freedom of a secular career. While early decisions of the court allowed abortions in the first trimester of pregnancy, advocates are challenging for abortions in the last trimester (up to the actual moment of delivery!) even when viability (ability to survive outside the mother) is possible.

Let me raise a warning: a baby in the womb and a baby in the crib are neither viable in the true sense of the word. If we can become so hardened to death in the womb, what is to keep us from becoming hardened to death in the crib (in the case of diseased or retarded babies)? Hitler’s Germany has shown us how far a “civilized” nation can go into madness. The madness of abortion is upon us. Secularism has America in its grip on a national level. “Pro-choice” (a misnomer, since it only allows one choice: abortion) is as American as the Clinton/Gore Administration, as Ann Richards in Texas, as the U. S. Supreme Court.

But we are not finished yet. At the other end of the spectrum of life there are other persons who are not viable: the aged, infirm and mentally impaired. It should not be surprising that a calloused and cold-hearted person that would not have natural feelings (Rom. 1:31) toward babes in the womb would also not have natural feelings toward the aged. Euthanasia is now becoming an accepted alter-native to nursing homes.

Dr. Jack Kevorkian, a Detroit pathologist with an inventive streak, has built a “Mercitron” killing machine (which is, in the finest American tradition, becoming “new and improved”) so that patients can commit suicide. While some states in America are passing laws aimed at making “mercy killings” illegal, some nations (the Netherlands, for example) allow it. Again Hitler’s Germany comes to mind. Malcolm Muggeridge, an opponent of euthanasia, commenting in “The Humane Holocaust,” said, “It took more than three decades to transform a war crime into an act of mercy.”

We have, in this country, an organization dedicated to “mercy killings” (within the law, of course), the National Hemlock Society. Dr. Kevorkian is committed to aiding suicides even if he breaks the law. ‘The leader of the Hemlock Society, Derek Humphrey, has written an explicit “how-to” manual on suicide entitled, Final Exit. There are over 500,000 copies in print and it has made the New York Times best seller list. Not to be outdone, Dr. Kevorkian has written Prescription: MedicideThe Goodness of Planned Death.

A more pragmatic approach to suicide than one of “goodness” is that of the American wit, Dorothy Parker. She wrote:

Razors pain you;

Rivers are damp;

Acids stain you;

And drugs cause cramp.

Guns aren’t lawful; Nooses give;

Gas smells awful;

You might as well live.

Recognizing that there is a legitimate area of concern for those who are opposed to the extra-ordinary and mechanical continuation of body functions after death has occurred, there remains a distinction between preserving life and taking life. Euthanasia is the planned, premeditated taking of life, whether that of yourself or another.

The Bible Holds the Answer

Though secularists reject the Word of God out of hand, wise men seek its counsel. “The fool has said in his heart, `There is no God’ (Ps. 14:1). Those who “give up the knowledge of God” think they are wise, but they are fools (Rom. 1:22).

A reverence for life is incompatible with the secularist agenda. But whether in the womb or on aged feet, life is a sacred gift from God and must not be treated with contempt nor discarded without compassion. God has said, “Whoso sheddeth man’s blood by man shall his blood be shed: for in the image of God made he man” (Gen. 9:6). It is a short step from the denial of God to a maltreatment of those made in his image.

Our nation is deep into the practice of both abortion and euthanasia. It has embraced secularism and has denied the God of Heaven. Believing, as I do, that God judges nations in time and raises nations up and deposes them (Dan. 4:17), I tremble when I consider the sure judgment of a righteous God upon the blood that cries from the ground. There has never been a time when God has overlooked evil. I don’t believe he will start now to do so. Let us pray that the gospel of Jesus Christ will have free course in our land once again and that people will come to repentance before we go beyond the reach of his patience and reap the bitter fruits of wickedness.

Guardian of Truth XXXVIII: 3, p. 5-7
February 3, 1994

By Wilson Adams

Let’s set the record straight (no pun intended!)  I like music. Always have. I have a stereo in my house, exercise with a Walkman on my side, and drive with an Infinity sound system in my car. I grew up on 8 Tracks, Casey Kasem’s “Top 40 Countdown,” and a pretty good album collection (which has gone the way of the yard sale). I also believed that having a car with a quadraphonic speaker system was more important than having one with an engine. Sound typical?

Today, depending on the mood, I may listen to pop-rock or country tunes. (Although I’m getting partial to the latter. A sign of maturity?) Sometimes I’m even into classical. (A sign of real maturity!) Why am I telling you this? Because I want you to know that I’m not some out-of-touch preacher who hates music or who believes that his kind is the only kind. Quite the contrary.

And something else. Young people need to know that the Bible isn’t against music either. From the first genealogical record of Genesis which mentions Jubal as “the father of all those who play the lyre and pipe” (4:21), to an entire collection of songs occupying more space in the Bible than any other book, music has played a key role in the history of man. And wasn’t it King Saul who hired a young “skillful musician” named David to play in the palace? (See 1 Samuel 16:14ff.)

Music isn’t the problem. Like other things, there is good and bad. Country songs which glorify drinkin’ and cheatin’ and “Tight Fittin’ Jeans” are not much different than some of the suggestive lyrics of Rock `n’ Roll. Such songs should be avoided. Thus, it’s not music style or preference that concerns me. It’s content. And influence.

The Influence of Music

There is no question that music influences. Ask the creators of Sesame Street or Barney who have found music to be the key factor in learning and memorization. The success of these programs proves that children do learn from what they see role modeled before them. All of which raises an important question: At what age does a child cease to learn from the use of music, words and images? Answer: Never.

August, 1981 ushered in the age of music television with the birth of MTV  a powerful cultural force that has influenced a generation and boosted music sales like nothing before. Maybe you’re kids don’t watch it (Good for you!) but chances are they have been influenced from peers who do.

Here are two questions I would like to ask parents: (1) How many hours per day does your child listen to music? (The average for today’s teen is 4-6 hours!) (2) What are they listening to? (You’re probably thinking that, with obnoxious sound and incomprehensible lyrics, who knows?) But please don’t ask: Who cares?  because you should.

Some of today’s musicians are communicating positive messages in their music. Some aren’t. All too often what kids are hearing from CD’s, MTV and live concert performances is that drugs are okay, sex is great and violence is acceptable. In fact, Heavy Metal, the most disturbing element in contemporary music (and fast becoming the music of choice among pre-teens and adolescents) deals with themes that would (and should!) shock most parents, if they knew.

Five Major Themes of Heavy Metal Music

1. Alcohol and drug abuse. After Vince Neil, lead singer of Motley Crue, was arrested in 1985 for drunk driving in which one person was killed and two others critically injured, he explained his thought on alcohol: “I love to drink … but I’m not going to drive anymore. And I think we should tell our fans . . . Don’t drink and drive, not don’t drink. Do whatever you want to do man … shoot up heroin, I don’t care, do it, have fun, it’s your life.” Amazing. It’s no surprise that their songs reflect the same attitude.

In License to Ill, the debut album of The Beastie Boys, there are 95 references to drug and alcohol consumption. Newsweek reported on the group by saying, “Among other things, the boys lustily hymn the joys of girls, gunplay, and getting high. ” The beasties are quoted as saying, “The band only wants to bring a little fun into the lives of all the 13-year-old girls who buy their records.” This is the same group that encourages all girls in the audiences of their concerts to bare their breasts while at the same time hoisting a twenty foot long hydraulic penis on stage. (I’m sorry if that is offensive but it’s about time we open our eyes to reality.)

2. Suicide and death. Here are the words to Ozzy Osbourn’s Suicide Solution: “Breaking laws, knocking doors, but there’s no one at home. Made your bed, rest your head, but you lie there and moan. Where to hide, suicide is the only way out. Don’t you know what it’s really about?”

The cult band, Suicidal Tendencies, sing Suicide’s An Alternative from their debut album: “Sick of life . . . Sick and tired . . . no one cares. Sick of myself . . . don’t wanna live. Sick of living . . . gonna die! Suicide’s an alternative!”

The suicide rate among teens have tripled in the last three decades. 600,000 teens attempt suicide every year and many succeed. True, not every young person who listens to heavy metal music is going to commit suicide. But some will. And some have.

3. Graphic violence. WASP is a band whose concert violence includes the simulated execution of a nude woman. Lead singer Blackie Lawless said, “After we use the rack, I’ll cut the girl down, throw her over my shoulder, take her to the center of the stage and drop her in this contraption. It’s like a meat grinder . . . It’ll spray her all over the audience. We’ll even pass out raincoats. The sicker they get, the sicker we’ll get.” Their song Anything Goes from their album Appetite For Destruction glorifies rape. (WASP carries the label of Capitol Records, a leader in the music industry.)

Another group, Guns N’ Roses, released an album with an explicit rape scene on the cover and their song “It’s So Easy” also glorifies rape. The Misfits sing: “I’ve got something to say, I killed your baby today. It doesn’t matter much to me . . . as long as it’s dead. I’ve got something to say, I raped your mother today. It doesn’t matter much to me . . .” (This at a time when rape is rampant.)

4. Fascination with the occult. The group AC/DC invites their fans to join them on the Highway to Hell. Other bands such as Megadeath, Slayer, Venom and Merciful Fate provide “how to” guides in their songs dealing with themes from sacrifice to sex with the dead. Venom sings: “Candles glowing, alters burn, virgin’s death is needed there. Sacrifice to Lucifer, my Master . . . Bring the chalice, raise the knife, welcome to my sacrifice!” Tom Jarriel on ABC’s 20/20 program noted, “The Satanic message is clear, both in the album covers and in the lyrics, which are reaching impressionable young minds.”

5. Explicit Sex. In the sixties it was Mick Jagger of the Rolling Stones singing, “Let’s Spend the Night Together,” which caused such a major uproar that some radio stations refused to air the song. That’s nothing compared to some of the lyrics of today.

In the song Sister, from the album Dirty Mind, rock star Prince sings, “My sister never made love to anyone but me. She’s the reason for my sexuality.” (Other Prince songs and lyrics from the group Van Halen, Madonna and others, go beyond what can even be printed!) When 2 Live Crew released their debut album, a Florida store clerk was arrested for selling obscenity to a minor.

The Dead Kennedys, a punk rock band, released an album in 1986 with an enclosed poster entitled “Penis Landscape.” Labeled as “a work of art” this poster was so hard-core that Playboy Magazine when reporting on the story blacked out the explicit parts of the poster. There was a time when hard-core pornography was available only in porn shops to those over age 21. However, a growing number of record companies have succeeded in making explicit material available to anyone at any age.

P.M.R.C.

Through the work of Tipper Gore and others, the Parents Music Resource Center has fought to force the music industry to print lyrics on the covers of all records, tapes and CD’s so that parents can be aware of the content. They have succeeded. But it will do no good if parents continue to look the other way. That is the one thing we cannot afford to do.

Let’s talk, look, and listen. Let’s encourage our teens to enjoy good songs with positive, uplifting lyrics. (They do exist!) Let’s turn off MTV (or have it disconnected if it is a problem) and teach our kids the art of selectivity when it comes to music . . . and then practice it ourselves (Phil. 4:8). (For more information, contact: P.M.R.C., 1500 Arlington Blvd. Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22209.)

Guardian of Truth XXXVIII: 3, p. 15-16
February 3, 1994