He Died In His Own Sin

By Norman E. Fultz

Under Moses’ leadership, Israel had made her exodus from Egypt, and received the law at Mt. Sinai. She then came to the very border of the “promised land,” but because of the incident involving the spies (Num. 13-14), was then made to wander for 40 years. Ultimately Moses brought the survivors to the plains of Moab, and he and Eleazar were instructed of God to number the people – the second numbering since leaving Egypt (Num. 26:63-65).

The daughters of one Zelophehad come to Moses and Eleazar to request the possessions that would have fallen to their father when the land should be divided (Num. 27:1-4). They did then receive it after reminding Joshua and Eleazar of their right (Josh. 17:3). But our attention here is turned to something they said as they made their request of Moses. “Our father died in the wilderness, and he was not in the company of them that gathered themselves together against the Lord in the company of Korah; but died in his own sin, and had no sons” (Num. 27:3).

The Stark Admission

Most folk don’t want to admit of a loved one who has died that he died in sin, much less to be so specific as to say “his own sin.” The tendency rather is to want to exonerate, at least in speaking with others about the deceased, if not in one’s own mind. Some might even try to convince themselves that in dying, the person’s own death took care of his sin. Not so these daughters of Zelophehad. They admit it. But they want it understood that he was not in the “company of them that gathered themselves together against the Lord in the company of Korah,” the account of which is recorded in Numbers 16. Moses implied that Korah and company sought the priesthood (v. 10), and they are later referred to as “wicked men” (v. 26). Jude calls it a sin of rebellion (Jude 11).

Why did the daughters of Zelophehad, if they weren’t going to admit that their father died in sin, seek to make it clear that it was not in Korah’s uprising? We can only speculate, but it was perhaps because Korah was thereafter held in such disdain that one would want to put as much distance between himself and that rebellion as he possibly could. Did they seek to imply it was less tragic to “die in his own sin” than along with Korah? Surely no one in our day would try to play such mental games, would they?

What was Zelophehad’s sin? We are not told, but there are two strong possibilities that might be suggested from Israel’s history. Could it have been the sin of believing the evil report of the ten spies. After all, that was murmuring against God (Num. 14:2,37; 1 Cor. 10:10) and that congregation was said to be characterized by iniquity and is called an evil congregation (Num. 14:34,35). Or could it be that his sin was, along with many others, committing “whoredom with the daughters of Moab” (Num. 25)? Perhaps so, if their encampment in the “plains of Moab” is considered a part of “the wilderness” wandering. But while we can only surmise what his sin may have been, there are some lessons we may plainly draw from the narrative.

Jesus said to the Jews of his day, “I said therefore unto you, that ye shall die in your sins: for if ye believe not that I am he, ye shall die in your sins” (Jn. 8:24). From Paul we learn that one can walk and live in sin (Col. 3:5-7). One in that state is dead in sins (Eph. 2:1-2) and, dying in that state, thus dies “in” sin. And if so, it will be “his own sin” (Ezek. 18:20).

One Need Not Die In Sin

A way of escape has been provided, because “God who is rich in mercy” loved us with such great love (Eph. 2:4-5; Jn. 3:16). He “commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us” (Rom. 5:8). “Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures” (I Cor. 15:3), and in so doing “gave himself a ransom for all” (1 Tim. 2:6), giving himself “for us, that he might redeem us from all iniquity, and purify unto himself a peculiar people, zealous of good works” (Tit. 2:14). Deliverance then is provided, and the Master himself invites, “Come unto me” (Matt. 11:28). However,

One Must Die “To” His Sin

Paul said, “How shall we that are dead to sin, live any longer therein? . . . For he that is dead is freed from sin” (Rom. 6:2,7). That death to sin is accomplished in repentance wrought in the heart by “the goodness of God” (Rom. 2:4) and “godly sorrow” (2 Cor. 7:10). Upon dying to sin, he who would be delivered is then “baptized into Jesus Christ . . . baptized into his death . . . (and) raised to walk in newness of life” (Rom. 6:34). Having accepted the provision of God in Christ to deliver him from his sins, that one will then be, as was Paul, turned from “0 wretched man” to “no condemnation in Christ” (Rom. 7:24; 8:1).

The task before God’s people is to make men see the tragedy of dying in their sin and to call them to salvation in Jesus. Preaching on sin may not be pleasant, and most may not desire to hear it, but it must be clearly proclaimed.

Guardian of Truth XXXVI: 24, p. 748
December 17, 1992

Part Verses Perfect

By William V. Beasley

Most gospel preachers with whom I am acquainted are more than happy to answer questions and/or preach on a requested subject. Especially is this true when the question/request is specific, and asked/requested in written form. A verbal “How about a sermon on repentance?” can be forgotten, and it is a bit discouraging, after a lesson on “Repentance in the Gospel Plan of Salvation” (Lk. 24:47; Acts 2:38) to learn that the questioner was really wanting to know what was meant when Judas “repented himself” (Matt. 27:3).

A sister-in-Christ, nearly fifteen years ago, asked the following question(s), in written form, requesting that the response be given in a sermon. “Discuss meaning of the verse: ‘. . . when that which is perfect is come, when that which is in part shall be done away. . .’ (a) What is ‘that which is perfect?’ (b) What is ‘that which is in part’ (c) When did (will) spiritual gifts cease?” A verbal response (sermon) was -liven shortly after the request; now, in order to share the study with others, a written response (article) is also presented.

A second reading of the request shows that there were really three specifics asked. Each of these we will attempt to answer, but in a different order. She understood, or assumed rightly, that the subject of the passage (1 Cor. 13:8-12) is spiritual gifts. This we intend to prove, by turning to the word of God.

“What Is ‘That Which Is In Part’?”

Notice that “that which is in part shall be done away” (1 Cor. 13:10b). This, to me, is the key to understanding the passage. The actual doing away was to be accomplished “when that which is perfect is come”; thus, we begin to establish the time. The context tells us plainly what was to be “done way” and thus what was “in part.” That which was to be done away was “prophecies … .. tongues,” and “knowledge” (1 Cor. 13:8). Each of these is a gift of the Spirit: (1) The “word of knowledge” (miraculous knowledge) is presented in 1 Corinthians 12:8; (2) “prophecy” is listed two verses later; as also is (3) “divers kinds of tongues.” These stand not for the individual, specific gift of the Spirit, but for the whole of spiritual (miraculous) gifts. This is a good example of a figure of speech called synecdoche (a part given for the whole). At the Pima County Adult Detention Center we take a head-count of the inmates at least four times each day. We are, in reality, counting the whole of the inmates and not just the heads. If we had a two-headed inmate that would still be counted as only one inmate. If we had a Herodias (“Give me here on a platter the head of John the Baptist” – Matt. 14:8) the extra head would not be counted. The miraculous gifts of the Spirit (all of them, and not just the three mentioned) were, in the days of the apostle Paul, to cease in the future.

This part being done away was, once again, to be accomplished “when that which is perfect is come” (1 Cor. 13:10). We can learn when these were to cease by learning when “that which is perfect is come”; or we can learn when “that which is perfect is come” by learning when these (the miraculous gifts of the Spirit) did cease. The two events are tied together.

“When Did (Will) Spiritual Gifts Cease?”

The common/denominational view of this is that spiritual gifts (miraculous gifts) will continue until either Christ comes again, or we are in heaven. The basis for so arguing is the use of the words “perfect” (1 Cor. 13:10a – both Christ and heaven could be described as perfect), and also the use of “face to face” (1 Cor. 13:12 – in heaven we will see Christ face to face).

Miraculous gifts of the Spirit were given by the laying on of the hands of the apostles (Acts 8:17-18; 19:6; Rom. 1:8-11). When the last apostle (evidently John) died, the age of passing on miraculous gifts ceased; when the last man on whom an apostle had bestowed such a gift died, the age of miraculous gifts was totally gone. When the last of these men died, that which was in part was gone, and, of necessity “that which is perfect” had come . . . and it wasn’t the second coming of Christ, nor was it heaven.

“What Is ‘That Which Is Perfect’?”

Already we know what is not. Neither the second coming of Christ nor heaven appeared with the cessation of the miraculous gifts of the Spirit. Niether of these meets the divine requirement.

The purpose of miracles was to confirm the spoken word; miracles produced faith (Acts 9:42; 1 Cor. 14:22) in those who beheld or heard of the miracle. Today we have the written word of God, a record of the miracles (Jn. 20:30-31; 2 Tim. 3:16-17) to produce faith. When we see the what (the written word of God, the New Testament) and the why (it begets faith unto salvation) we can readily understand James speaking of the “perfect law, the law of liberty” (Jas. 1:25). James is speaking of the very same thing as was Paul (1 Cor. 13:10); both are perfect. Does the New Testament meet the divine time qualification? The “perfect” was to come at the cessation of “the part.” The New Testament was fully written by the time of the death of the last apostle, or by the time of the death of the last man who received the laying on of apostolic hands.

There are two “now . . . then” comparisons in 1 Corinthians 13:12. It is not a comparison of physical, earthly life (“now”) versus spiritual, heavenly life (“then”). It is “now” (the condition in Corinth, with the miraculous spiritual gifts, that which was “in part”) compared with I ‘then” (the time when “that which is perfect is come,” the condition possible when men would have “the perfect law, the law of liberty” – Jas. 1:25). In actuality, it is a comparison between Paul’s now and our now,- we have, beloved, the perfect law of liberty. God has given us, the recipients of the “perfect law,” complete instructions (2 Pet. 1:24) on how to live before him.

Guardian of Truth XXXVI: 24, pp. 750-751
December 17, 1992

Ask and Receive: Believe and Be Saved

By Randy Harshbarger

Many people in the religious world subscribe to the doctrine of salvation by faith alone. It is sometimes expressed thusly: “Just accept Jesus Christ into your heart as your personal Savior; at the point of faith you enter a saved relationship with the Lord.” A passage often used to justify such a notion is Acts 16:31. “And they said, Believe on the Lord Jesus, and thou shalt be saved, thou and thy house.” From a study of this chapter, clearly, Paul and Silas told the Philippian jailor to believe. Did they mean that was all he had to do in this obedience to the Lord? Many are quick to say yes! But, consider another passage that will help us better understand this matter.

In Matthew 7:7 Jesus said, “Ask, and it shall be given you; seek, and ye shall find; knock, and it shall be opened. unto you.” Jesus said ask and then it will be given; seek and then you will find; knock and then it will be opened to you. Can we not see that the giving, the finding, arid the opening are all predicated upon asking, seeking, and knocking? In other words, Jesus is stating the conditions that must be met before one is blessed as per this verse.

James 1:5-6 says, “But if any of you lacketh wisdom, let him ask of God, who givetb to all liberally and upbraideth not; and it shall be given him. But let him ask in faith, nothing doubting: for he that doubteth is like the surge of the sea driven by the wind and tossed.” James says we must ask in faith nothing doubting. Other passages shed light on our asking. For example, we must ask but also keep the commandments of the Lord (1 Jn, 3:22). Do we see that a failure to do so hinders our receiving? Also, we must ask according to the Lord’s will (1 Jn. 5:14-15); we must ask in recognition of what the Lord’s will is for us. We might ask about something in prayer that we have no business asking or we might ask in a way that is contrary to truth. James 4:2 says: “Ye lust, and have not: ye kill, and covet, and cannot obtain: ye fight and war; ye have not, because ye ask not.” James speaks to the attitude of one’s heart. When men are consumed with devouring each other their prayers are going to be hindered. The conditions of acceptable prayer must be met. If we do not meet these conditions we cannot expect our prayers to be heard or answered, we may reason otherwise but do so in conflict with the word of God.

Paul told the jailor to believe. Other verses such as 14ank. 1:14-15, Luke 13:3 and Acts 17:30 speak about the need to repent. Romans 10:9-10 speaks about confession. Are repentance and confession necessary? Jesus said, “He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; and he that disbelieveth shall be condemned” (Mk. 16:15-16). Can a person be saved without baptism? Not if the Lord knew what he was talking about! Is obedience necessary (1 Pet. 1:22)? Some say that if you have to do anything regarding your salvation then you are working arid salvation then is no longer a matter of grace.

Which is it? Ask and receive or do not ask and you will receive anyway? Believe to be saved or believe, repent, confess and be baptized to be saved? Yes, the Lord knew what he was saying in each passage, Do we believe it and will we accept it?

Guardian of Truth XXXVI: 24, p. 745
December 17, 1992

Listening to the Experts or God 9

By Robert Wayne La Coste

Some of you probably watched the television show 20-20 not long ago that called into question the use of corporal punishment for children. I watched with amazement. My amazement was only beginning! Immediately after this production, the local news did a feature story also on physical punishment that called such practice into question. “Physical violence only begets physical violence,” they said. There were other “pearls of wisdom” such as “Being physical with a child creates a disdain for those older and bigger.” Then there was “How do we teach children violence is wrong when we exhibit such?” By this time I could only shake my head. When the host of the show was asked, “Does this mean the Bible is wrong?” The response was, “according to the experts, the Bible is wrong.”

Dear reader, that can be equated with stating that our Creator who made us and knows us stated an untruth or lied (something impossible for God to do – Heb. 6:17)! God however s the expert. He is the expert in all things.

God has commanded the following: “He that spareth his rod hateth his son; but he that loveth him chasteneth him ” (Prov. 13:24). “Chasten thy son while there is hope and let not thy soul spare for his crying” (Prov. 19:18). “Foolishness is bound in the heart of a child; but the rod of correction shall drive it far from him” (Prov. 22:15). “Withhold not correction from the child; for if thou beatest him with the rod, he shall not die” (Prov. 23:13).

Men however think they are wiser than Almighty God. They would use little or no discipline at all and certainly not any physical punishment when it comes to correcting children. Certainly as godly parents we are not talking about abuse, but today if you say you beat your child (using the word Solomon did) you may well be reported for abuse! I learned while preaching in Canada recently, they have outlawed any form of corporal punishment. You paddle or take a switch or belt to your child there and you will be fined or imprisoned or both! Our country is not far behind! When the time does come when it is against man’s laws to use corporal punishment, we must stand and say with the apostle Peter, “We ought to obey God rather than men” (Acts 5:29).

What do these people mean when they use the word “violence”? When a child misbehaves or disobeys that’s not violence, no more than it is violence to correct such. See how evil works though? Convince someone that corporal punishment is violent and you make the punishing parent look like a beast.

What do we have in our society as a result of following this “Dr. Spock mentality”? We have the prisons and reform schools filled to the brim with young people who grew up being allowed to do whatever they desired and whenever they desired to do it. Worse, the cemeteries are also full. They are filled with the bodies of youngsters who were never taught to respect authority -young people who never had parents who said “no” and if necessary who reinforced their word with “Solomon’s rod” of chastisement.

God said that a man who spares the rod of chastisement hates his son. Looks like a lot of folks hate their children.

Admittedly, there were times when I thought my dad was going to “love me to death.” When administering the punishment, he would always tell us how he regretted he had to do it. I didn’t believe him then. Now I do! For now I find the same regret present when I must spank my children. It didn’t take us boys long though to realize that his word was law and he was ready to back it up with a 38. A 38 inch belt that is! By way of this belt, this gentle man stood ready to impress upon us the folly of disobedience, when words failed. Parents, when words fail, listen to God’s words, not the “experts.”

Our God, who is our heavenly parent chastens us who are his children. Why does he do it? “. . . for our profit, that we might be partakers of his holiness” (Heb. 12:10).

Proper discipline, yes even physical discipline will always “bring forth the peaceable fruit of righteousness unto them which are exercised thereby” (Heb. 12:11).

Guardian of Truth XXXVI: 24, p. 749
December 17, 1992