Truth Magazine

By Olen Holderby

When I approached a fellow-Christian in California to ask about his gambling, he was astonished to learn that I thought he would gamble. Then, I wanted to know if he did not play bingo, for money, at the club. He explained that such was only nickel and dime stuff and that it was not gambling. ” Oh! ” Finally I got him to see (at least say he saw) that it was wrong. I went home almost as happy as if I had good sense. But, the glee was short-lived; a few days later he was witnessed buying a lottery ticket. I suppose that if some are permitted to redefine repentance, that others ought to be permitted to redefine such activities as gambling. It makes for an easier conscience. Mr. Webster might go crazy trying to keep his dictionary up to date. I don’t know how it happened, but some of us have gotten to be awfully “dumb,” not knowing how these new definitions work.

Now comes an Associated Press item out of Chicago (The Press Democrat, Santa Rosa, Ca., 5-18-92), telling about a real humdinger invention that will permit people to gamble, and with ease deny it all the time. It has its good points: You will not have to carry change around in your pocket or purse, it could help the economy (he says), it simplifies the life of a business person, and the real clincher says “there’s no perceived cost to the consumer.” What is this fantastic machine? I haven’t seen one, but the article paints an exciting picture. It will, shall we say, set in your grocery store. When you are checking out and the cost is tallied, you step forward and gamble as to whether your bill will be rounded off to the dollar above or the dollar below the actual amount. If you win, you could save anywhere from one cent to ninety-nine cents. If you lose, your loss would have the same range. If you are worried that it might really be gambling, don’t worry; the machine weighs the odds in such a way that, in the long run, you will be paying the right price and not have to be inconvenienced by all that old change. Of course the “long run” might be five years, twenty years, or maybe a life time. You might not even live long enough to get even. They call it the “law of probability,” and no doubt it is. Probability of what? They say, “The real question is whether people will buy it.” I think I can answer that. They will! It doesn’t make any difference that it is gambling; for it involves all that pocket change which you do not like to carry around anyway. I can almost picture some of my fellow-Christians, who want changeless pockets or purses, taking the leap, and getting a gleeful kick from the activity. Such people would probably never think of going to Reno or Las Vegas and spending money at the gaming tables -that is big stuff! But, this nickel and dime stuff – Why that isn’t gambling.

Seriously, dear reader, what would you do if confronted with that choice? Have you ever tried to follow 1 Thessalonians 5:21? What passage would you use to prove gambling to be acceptable to God? What about considering 1 Corinthians 4:2 -“Moreover it is required of stewards, that a man be found faithful.” A “steward” is one who has been entrusted with the possessions of others. The word is used in reference to the Apostles (1 Cor. 4:1), in reference to elders (Tit. 1:7), and in reference to Christians in general (1 Pet. 4:10). According to James 1:17, every good and perfect gift comes from God. And, God has said,”The world is mine and the fullness thereof” (Psa. 50:1). If these passages state the truth (and they do), every Christian has in his care the possessions of God. How are we going to use those possessions? Will we be a good steward or be condemned for wasting his goods?

“Thou shalt not covet” and “Thou shalt not steal” (Rom. 13:9) are two commands violated when one gambles. Gambling is an expression of a covetous heart. To steal is to take without authority, right, or permission. Ephesians 4:28 is another passage that is violated when we gamble. The idea that a “little bit of sin” isn’t so bad did not come from God’s book. Sin, any unrepented of sin, separates us from God (Isa. 59:2). See the progress of sin in James 1:14-15. First there is the temptation, then there is lust, next is the sin, and finally there is death (Ezek. 18:20). Some say, “Life is a gamble. “I affirm that life is not a gamble, it is a stewardship in which the individual makes God his partner. “Let no man deceive you with vain words: for because of these things cometh the wrath of God upon the children of disobedience” (Eph. 5:6). Let us recognize gambling for what it is; and it is sin! Referring to gambling by some other name does not, in the least, change the fact that it is gambling.

Guardian of Truth XXXVI: 21, p. 662
November 5, 1992

By Connie W. Adams

With the December, 1992 edition, Searching the Scriptures will cease publication. That issue will complete 33 years of service to our readers. Several things have combined to bring us to this decision. The continual financial pressure from printing and postal costs, plus other necessary expenses certainly have been a factor. But the principal cause for this decision is the need for relief from the taxing deadlines with which this editor and publisher has lived for the last 191/2 years.

Since 1975 I have been involved in gospel meeting work for nine months of each year. Every time I have returned from a meeting, there has been one or two monthly deadlines to face. Some work had to be done on the road along with the busy activities of gospel meetings. The years have taken their toll. It is necessary to relieve some of the pressures under which I have been working so I may devote my remaining days to the work which has always been first with me – preaching and teaching the gospel.

Agreement With Guardian of Truth

I have entered into an agreement with the Guardian of Truth to the effect that all rights to the name Searching the Scriptures will be owned by them to prevent any further publication under that name and to guarantee that our subscribers will receive their money’s worth for any unfulfilled portion of their subjections. Guardian of Truth has agreed to supply one and a half issues of their magazine for every one that was due from Searching the Scriptures. In other words, if you still have six months remaining on your subscription to STS, you will receive nine issues of GOT. All church ads will be fulfilled in GOT on a one-for-one basis. Our readers will get more than their money’s worth from this agreement. Guardian of Truth is ably edited by Mike Willis with a staff of capable writers. That magazine is published twice a month and contains 32 pages per issue. We have only had 24 pages once a month.

Editor to Write for Guardian of Truth

I have been asked to write regularly for GOT and have consented to do so. I am comfortable working with Mike Willis and the able men who assist him in his work. The two papers have cooperated with each other through the years. Our general aims and purposes have been the same. It was my privilege to serve as an associate editor for what was then known as Truth Magazine (which later became Guardian of Truth) from 1965 until June, 1973 when I became editor and owner of Searching the Scriptures. I left the staff of that paper with goodwill and continued to urge people to subscribe and read it. It will be a great pleasure for me to do the same again. Those who have followed my writings in STS for the past 191/2 years will now be able to find what I write in GOT. In addition to a column which will appear frequently, though certainly not in every issue, I will continue to write the short items which have appeared in STS under the heading “Editorial Left-Overs. ” This has been a popular feature in STS and many readers have told me that they always look for that first.

In addition to that, it is hoped that many of the writers for Searching the Scriptures will continue to write and submit their good material to GOT. Without the faithful work of these men, we would have been out of business long ago. Their reward for their labors has been the good they have done for their readers.

Our final issue will include a history of the paper from first to last by H.E. Phillips, who, along with James P. Miller began this work in January, 1960. As you might expect, we will take a nostalgic look back and then we will consign Searching the Scriptures to the archives of history where its merits or demerits will be judged by those who have read it through these years, or those into whose hands bound volumes may fall. I will sit down to write that last editorial with mixed feelings. But I am thankful for the opportunity to teach the word through these pages and grateful for the good men who have helped in so many ways and for those who have subscribed for themselves and for others. Over the years many kind words have been written and spoken about this paper (and some not so kind). We will cherish the kind words and try to learn from the other kind.

“Therefore, my beloved brethren, be ye steadfast, unmoveable, always abounding in the work of the Lord, forasmuch as ye know that your labor is not in vain in the Lord” (1 Cor. 15:58).

Guardian of Truth XXXVI: 22, pp. 673, 695
November 19, 1992

By Glendol McClure

Suppose you decided not to go to work because you didn’t feel good, so you called your boss and told him that you were too sick to come in. Suddenly, around 4:30 p.m. you start to feel a lot better so you decide you will go and pick up a few needed items at the local K-Mart, and who do you run into at the store, but your boss! When he asks you how you are feeling, you tell him how much better you began to feel around 4:30 p.m., explaining that you thought it would be good to get out of the house for a while. How convenient! Do you think your boss would really believe your story?

Yet, many “Christian” (so-called) follow a similar pattern regarding their attendance. They often don’t call anyone when they are “sick” and miss services. Many times they don’t attend for several consecutive services. When it comes time to go work or go somewhere they want to go, they suddenly start feeling better. When another member calls to inquire why they were absent for services, they usually respond by telling how sick they were and how their condition improved, all of a sudden! Oh, how they make a habit of being “sick” conveniently and recovering “miraculously.”

Doesn’t the Bible teach somewhere that miracles have ceased in this age? (1 Cor. 13:8-10)

Guardian of Truth XXXVI: 21, p. 644
November 5, 1992

By Marvin Cossey

Evil causes must rely on lies and deception for their defense. Such is the case with abortion. Let’s look at some of the deceptive terms and arguments used by abortion advocates:

In order to avoid the stigma of being pro-abortion they label themselves “pro-choice.” This sounds better! The word choice suggests liberty or freedom. This is the image they want you to see. They fail to emphasize that the choice they are advocating is the choice to kill unborn children!

Another deceptive term is “reproductive choice.” This is an attempt to equate abortion with acceptable forms of birth control. Abortion is not a reproductive choice, it is choosing to kill that which has already been reproduced! The time to exercise reproductive choice is before conception.

The argument is made that a woman should have the right to control her own body. This is misleading; it implies that only the woman’s body is involved. In reality they are demanding the right to destroy a separate human body, that of the baby.

Abortion advocates appeal for sympathy by saying that thousands of women would die in illegal abortions if abortion is outlawed. Question: Which is the greater loss, the loss of thousands who die while killing their babies or the loss of millions of innocents who die with no ability to choose?

There is a legal right to abortion but no moral right. When forced to choose between the legal and the moral, the right thinking person will ever choose morality. Likewise, whenever two rights are in conflict the greater right should always prevail. The right to life is far superior to any perceived “right” to avoid childbirth.

Guardian of Truth XXXVI: 21, p. 647
November 5, 1992