One Plants, Another Waters, and God Gives the Increase

By Ron Halbrook

I have planted, Apollos watered; but God gave the increase. So then neither is he that planteth any thing, neither he that watereth; but God that giveth the increase (1 Cor. 3:6-7).

We are not to “glory in men” or to “think of men above that which is written,” but we are to glorify God alone for the good accomplished in the salvation of souls through the gospel of Christ (1 Cor. 3:21; 4:6). At the same time, we can be thankful for men who faithfully plant and faithfully water, and we can “consider one another to provoke unto love and to good works” (Heb. 10:24).

Otto Alvarez

Otto Alvarez of Merida in the Yucatan area of Mexico is doing the work of ten men in Mexico and neighboring countries. There are few preachers in Latin America who arc supported on a full-time basis because many people do not have regular work, and when they do, salaries are very low. Brother Alvarez gave up a lucrative job with a Japanese pharmaceutical company in order to begin the work of full time preaching. This was in 1987. He began immediately working with brethren over an area of some nine hundred miles. As brother Wayne Partain once said, brother Alvarez “is perpetual motion, and is all over the country.”

When Otto left the pharmaceutical firm for which he used to work, fie received $25,000 severance pay. He used half of it to get a van to use in his preaching travels and has spent all the rest in the Lord’s work. He has a wife and two children who share his labors and sacrifices. He is working with seventeen different churches, and travels hundreds of miles to reach many of them. So many poor brethren call him collect to ask Bible questions that he has considered disconnecting his phone in an effort to save on expenses, but he does not want to cut off his brethren from this avenue of study. Quite frankly, Otto is getting in desperate straits financially and yet does not complain!

Living costs in the Yucatan area where Otto lives are inflated by the tourist industry. He hopes to move to another location soon to open up additional labors from a more central location, but living costs are inflated in that area by the oil industry. In preparation for his move he is diligently trying to get some of the churches ready to stand on their own without his regular visits. He is preparing printed materials to help preachers and other brethren to be able to equip themselves to teach others (2 Tim. 2:2). He occasionally goes into Guatemala to preach, sometimes staying a month or six weeks at a time, but expenses for such trips are very high.

Otto is a veritable modern-day Paul in the nature and plan of his work as an evangelist. He desperately needs more regular support but is virtually unknown to American brethren. His work is well known to sound men in America who help with the work in Latin American countries, such as Bill Reeves (312 E. Zipp Road, New Braunfels, TX 78130) and Wayne Partain (806 Charming, San Antonio, TX 78210). His work is also well known to the churches at Pecan Valley (268 Utopia Road, San Antonio, TX 78223) and West Avenue (106 Sherwood Drive, San Antonio, TX 78201), both in San Antonio, Texas, and also the church here at West Columbia (15th and Jackson, West Columbia, TX 77486). These three churches have been helping with his support on a limited basis, but we are all aware that this is inadequate for the work he is doing.

Because of their confidence in Otto and their recognition of his desperate need, the elders of the church here (Charley Alexander, J.D. Harris, and James Moore) asked that this brief report and appeal be printed in hopes of stirring up other brethren to take an interest in this work. Otto’s sincerity, ability, and devotion are very evident in both his reports and his visits with us. In addition to all of his other work, he has been determined to learn English and to speak to us in English. When he visited us on 31 March 1991 he spoke to us in English part of the time by reading from a prepared manuscript, and we had Carlos Antunez to translate the rest of the time.

Not only is he reaching the alien sinner with the gospel, but also he has many opportunities to teach brethren from a liberal background, some of whom are so untaught as to be involved in Pentecostal practices and to defend social drinking. In view of all the work Otto is doing and the way he pushes and taxes himself, we pray that his physical health will hold up. May God continue to bless his labors and may God open our hearts to help, encourage, and support this faithful brother in every way we can! (Otto is now moving to a new area, I just learned, and Mexican mail is not forwarded. Write him in care of Bill Reeves, Wayne Partain, or myself and we will get your letters to him as soon as we get the new address.)

Thomas G. O’Neal

Torn O’Neal was born in 1938, was baptized in 1952, and began preaching the gospel of Christ in June of 1954. He has preached regularly for churches in Alabama, Florida, and Tennessee, has had several debates, has authored or coauthored tracts and booklets, and has written for gospel papers. For many years he diligently used every ability and opportunity to spread and to defend the gospel of Christ in its purity and simplicity. Younger preachers desiring to walk in the old paths of divine revelation have found Tom to be a warm friend and helper.

Tom held up the hands of H.E. Phillips and James P. Miller in the work of the gospel paper Searching the Scriptures almost from its beginning. Beginning in 1968 and continuing through December of 1983, his regular columns appeared in Searching the Scriptures.

All of his teaching and preaching has been noted for three elements. First, he has been characterized by Script ure- filled reaching and teaching. He once told me that when he hears speaker go the first two or three minutes into his sermon ithout introducing passages of Scripture as the basis of the ermon, he immediately begins to wonder where the speaker headed. Secondly, a strong stand for the truth of the ospel has been characteristic of Tom’s work in the ingdom. No one has ever had to wonder whether he would and or where he would stand when false doctrine and err have raised their ugly heads. Tom has been noted as a iend of truth but also an enemy of error. Those who teach ror know it well. Thirdly, simplicity has always aracterized Tom’s teaching. The common man can derstand the truth as preached by Tom O’Neal.

Few Bible characters are beloved as King David and the apostle Peter, partly because the mistakes and failings of such men are recorded and we can so easily identify with in. David became guilty of unrestrained lust, adultery, deception, and even murder. Passages like Psalm 32 and Psalm 51 reflect the genuine repentance of David as he was restored back to his Lord. After Peter denied the Lord three times, and became conscious of his great failure, he “wept bitterly” (Lk. 22:62). The Bible does not record the tragic failures of these men in order to embarrass them but in order to forewarn us of the bitter sorrows of sin and to help those fall to find their way back.

During the spring of 1984 Tom O’Neal quit preaching and left the Lord. Many who loved him and benefitted from his labors were crushed, but we continued to plead with Tom to pray unto God that he might be recovered from the snare of the devil. On 3 December 1989 Tom made the following confession before the Vestavia church of Christ Birmingharn, Alabama:

Dear Brethren:

My purpose in coming before the congregation on this Lord’s Day is to make acknowledgment and repent of each and every sin of which I have been guilty. I am sorry for the reproach that has come upon the name of Christ as a result of my sins. I ask forgiveness and your prayers that God might forgive me. Should you see fit, I am willing to serve in any way you may in time request.

I ask for your love, understandings, friendship and encouragement. Through a very difficult period in my life, I am thankful for the encouragement of Connie W. Adams, Ron Halbrook, H. E. Phillips and Ida Cogdill Terrell.

I plan to cause this statement to be circulated in other places where I think brethren will have an interest.

“The Lord wants men to change in the right direction” (Searching the Scriptures, December 1983, p. 561). Tom wrote those words and Tom has applied them to himself. Like David and Peter before him, Tom has taken a step which forewarns us all not to leave the Lord and which encourages those who have fallen to return to the Lord. Welcome home, Tom!

Tom has tremendous talents to give in the service of the Lord. As he has steadied his course, he has been used in the teaching program at the Vestavia church and has preached in the pulpit both there and elsewhere as needed. He has revived his excellent publication Walking in Truth, dated January-February-March 1991, an effective tool for teaching the truth in years past. The publication is free, Those who wish to be added to the mailing list can write Tom at P.O. Box 723, Bessemer, Alabama 35021. Please write him a note of encouragement that he may go forward in the work of the Lord, redeeming the time, planting and watering, so that God may use his life for the increase of the kingdom of heaven.

East Memphis Church and Larry Hafley

During the week of 15-21 April 1991 1 had the privilege of laboring with the church in East Memphis, Tennessee in a gospel meeting. I met young people and young couples who are devoted to the Lord and who are developing their talents in the kingdom. I met middle-aged men and women who love the truth and are raising godly children. I became acquainted with older men and women who are stable in their faith and represent a stablizing influence for good. Above all, I was impressed with this congregation because it has endured a great trial of afflictions in order to maintain the purity of the gospel. Although such trials are always heartrending, they serve a purpose by purifying and strengthening the church.

For there must be also heresies among you, that they which are approved may be made manifest among you (1 Cor. 11:19).

They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would no doubt have continued with us: but they went out, that they might be made manifest that they were not all of us (1 Jn. 2:19).

The East Memphis church is smaller than it was a few months ago, but it is spiritually stronger and more united in the truth than ever before.

After seven years with the church in Pekin, Illinois, Larry Hafley and his family moved to East Memphis in the summer of 1988. A dark cloud began to gather on the horizon in the fall of 1989, and the storm broke in its full fury in November and December of 1990 when an effort was made to fire Larry.

Larry’s preaching did not suit the tastes of those who wanted a generalized, sophisticated, all-positive gospel. Larry was adhering too closely to the concept of Jeremiah, that the Word of God is designed “to root out, and to pull down, and to destroy, and to throw down, to build, and to plant” (Jer. 1:10). Brethren in some churches today have the idea that it is possible to plant without rooting out. Larry’s positive, faith-building sermons were balanced and matched with lessons which reprove sin and rebuke error (2 Tim. 4:2). Themes such as the cross of Christ, the conditions of pardon, and the Christian’s hope were regularly also presented from the pulpit, but the doctrines and commandments of men were exposed as the cause of souls falling into the ditch.

Murmurers and complainers said that they did not mind the truth being preached, but it should not be so plain, so pointed, and so direct. For instance, preaching against worldliness should not involve specific applications to the modern dances and proms, to gambling, to social drinking, and to immodest dress, especially immodest dress! Preaching against denominationalism must be sanitized to remove all direct references to denominations, their preachers, and their errors. Catholics who visit our services should not be offended by preaching that Peter was not the first Pope. We should not observe Christmas religiously but neither should we preach plain and pointed lessons exposing the sin and error of the religious observance of Christmas. False teachers and false doctrines among us should not be specified and identified in the pulpit. In other words, the time had come when some would “not endure sound doctrine” (2 Tim. 4:3).

Brethren at East Memphis who came out of denominationalism insisted that they had already heard the kind of preaching which the murmurers and complainers demanded, and had heard it in denominational churches. They did not care to hear it in the pulpit at East Memphis. The brethren at East Memphis are to be commended for stopping the mouths of those who would subvert the truth and subvert souls and for their determination not to compromise with error, “no, not for an hour; that the truth of the gospel might continue ” (Tit. 1:10-11; Gal. 2:4-5). Finally, the false brethren who could not endure the truth left and, as always happens, others left because they could not endure the battle between truth and error.

Even though the attendance and contribution have suffered, the brethren at East Memphis are standing strong for the truth of the gospel. They want Larry to stay, and he has agreed to do so if at all possible, even though it means raising outside support for the first time in his life. Make no mistake about it, brethren, other churches among us are in to face the same battle because a spirit of compromise is slowly but surely creeping in among us. By standing in the gap, the church at East Memphis and Larry Hafley have set an example which should strengthen all of us for the days that lie ahead. We must remember that God will give the increase which is according to his will only who we teach the truth of the gospel with boldness and great plainness of speech. Write a note of encouragement to the East Memphis church of Christ, P.O. Box 341535, Bartlett, Tennessee 38134.

Stan Adams

While some young preachers have defected from the faith, others have been growing stronger and stronger in the Lord, My wife and I first became well acquainted with Stan and Carla Adams when we preached for the Midfield, Alabama church and they were working with the brethren at Calera, both near Birmingham. The Midfield church had suffered a division while resisting a rebellion against the elders in the form of such political tactics as petitions. Because the church had been through this problem, some brethren had a sort of “hands-off” policy and stood off from us, but Stan was not afraid of that stigma and was a true friend to Midfield and to my family. Whereas some brethren professed confusion over whether petitions might be right or wrong, Stan never once faltered but recognized the petitions to be a challenge to God’s ordained pattern of church government, This should be no surprise because his father who trained him in the truth is a faithful gospel preacher of many years, J. Wiley Adams.

Perhaps some younger preachers are weak and compromising because they have never been through the fires of controversy. I have had the opportunity to watch Stan’s dedicated and consistent work in a context of peace. He did a good work at Calera and then also a good four years at the Southern Oaks congregation in Lake Jackson, Texas. Stan is the same dedicated, consistent person when passing through the trials of controversy. The same spirit of humility and patience is there. He is soft-spoken in personality and yet firm in faith and convictions. One of his strengths is the willingness to engage in self-examination, so that if he needs to make corrections he is ready and willing to do it. Whether in a context of peace or controversy, both his love for truth and his hatred of error are evident.

Stan is to be commended for his family life. As he faces the opportunities and pressures of preaching the gospel, he is mindful of his wife and children. While preaching the truth to others, he is also putting it into practice by raising a godly family.

Stan is currently working with the good church at Edna, Texas. We are fortunate to have the example and influence of this godly man in our area. He is not alone in the characteristics which are mentioned here. Other young men are walking in the old paths of divine revelation and are planting and watering by preaching the gospel of Christ in its purity and simplicity. It is evident through men like Stan Adams that the torch of truth will be passed to a new generation. If all of us will resolve to preach the Word of God, God will indeed continue to give the increase.

Guardian of Truth XXXV: 18, pp. 562-564
September 19, 1991

Report on Eastern European Trip

By Gary Ogden

For three weeks in June 1991, brethren Harry (“Buddy”) Payne, Gary Ogden, Joe Rose, Lonnie Fritz and David Teel went on another scouting trip into the recently opened door of Eastern Europe. Many of you, no doubt, have heard of the effort last year which led to a work being established in Prague, Czechoslovakia. Since the interest is strong for establishing works in that region of the world, brother Payne was desirous of “testing the soil” in some of the countries that he did not visit last year.

The objectives of the trip were: (1) To distribute Bibles and correspondence courses in English and various languages; (2) To have Bible studies with as many who were interested; (3) To let brethren Rose, Fritz and Teel get a first hand look at places to which they might move; (4) To make contacts for brethren who were ready to move to Budapest, Hungary. Each of these objectives were met and it was a most rewarding experience.

We went to Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria and Yugoslavia. We had studies with about sixty people, some of them more than once. We distributed 1200 Bibles and several hundred correspondence courses. We placed ads in newspapers offering free Bibles and lessons. The response to the ads has been great.

From all we can gather, it does seem that Eastern Europe is indeed ripe for the preaching of the gospel. The opportunities for teaching the truth to people who can speak English well are many. There is plenty of work to do. Let us rise up and be about our Father’s business. If you would like to know what you can do to help spread the word in Europe, just give us a call. (Buddy Payne 813-988-9426; Gary Ogden 813-752-2227).

Guardian of Truth XXXV: 18, p. 557
September 19, 1991

Will This Save Our Children?

By Lewis Willis

On Monday, June 24, 1991, the National Commission on Children issued its 500-page report, offering suggested solutions to problems of children in American life. The Commission was created by President Reagan and Congress, consisting of leading health, education and social welfare experts, children’s advocates, business representatives, Bush administration officials and elected office holders. On many TV news programs, the head of the Commission, Sen. John D. Rockefeller IV, of West Virginia, was interviewed.

Basically, the Commission recommended a $56 billion package. No one knows where this money is supposed to come from, but the big problem regarding children, according to the Commission, is money – we are not spending enough money on the well-being of our children. Commission member Marian Wright Edelman said, “It is very clear that millions of Americans out there understand that something has come loose and that we need to invest in children and families” (Akron Beacon Journal, 6-25-91).

Several reasons were given in explanation of the current status of many children. While most American children are “healthy, happy and secure,” many have serious problems. Those problems are caused by the disintegration of the family, poverty, the lack of health care, divorce, teen-age pregnancy and single-parent families, alcohol, drugs, lack of child support payments, working mothers and parents who have too little time to spend with their children. For all of these problems, the Commission suggests that $56 billion will give us the solutions. Will throwing money at these situations solve them?

Dr. Elizabeth Specht of Akron commented that the report gave little attention to “the No. 1 priority,” which she identified as the prevention of teen-age pregnancy. She said, “If a 14-year-old sexually active girl walks into the office, she needs help with birth control.” Is that really what she needs? Will we solve her problems with birth control pills? Mark Real, Director of Children’s Defense Fund-Ohio, said the proposal for a $1,000 tax credit for children will lead the way to provide a steady income supplement to help poor children. Does this man actually think that needy children will receive that $1,000? Everyone can feel confident that an alcohol or drug addicted parent will buy $1,000 worth of food and clothes for each of his children as soon as the check arrives. Right? We have been doling out millions of welfare dollars to those same parents for years and we still have the problem. Will $56 billion more solve the problem? Is it remotely possible that we are moving in the wrong direction in our search for a solution to this national dilemma?

I do not wish to make this a political statement, or, for that matter, a social welfare statement. However, there is one more thought I wish to emphasize. The national Center for Disease Control in Atlanta reported on June 13, 1991 that over I million babies, or 26 percent of U.S. newborns, were born to unmarried women in 1988. We are told that people fear the spread of AIDS, and that this is helping control immorality in our country. If this is so, one wonders what the percentage of births to unmarried women would otherwise be.

Friends, we have a major problem in America regarding these matters. However, $56 billion – or $56 trillion, for that matter -will not solve it. Too many people do not realize that God restricted sex to the marriage relationship (Heb. 13:4). Sex outside of marriage is condemned as a sin which will prevent entrance into heaven (Gal. 5:19-21). We can solve about 26 percent of this national problem if people would stop committing the sin of fornication! And that would not cost a dime!

God teaches parents that they have a responsibility to care for their children. He teaches mothers to love their children and keep the home (Tit. 2:4-5). He teaches fathers to provide for the needs of their families (I Tim. 5:8). If fathers do not do this, they are worse than infidels, according to the Scripture. Parents are taught to bring up their children in the nurture and admonition of the Lord (Eph. 6:4). The Federal Government will not have to spend a dime on most of these problems if parents will only do what God told them to do!

The National Commission on Children is looking in the g place for a solution to this problem. They are looko money, and trusting in it, to solve this problem. Inthey should be looking to God and his Law as the solution (1 Tim. 6:17). This happens too often. Men go to the wrong well in search of thirst-quenching water. It seems we learn. No amount of money will rebuild shattered dreams. The solution is to instill the Law of God which will prevent their collapse occurring, with all of the attendant that such brings. Until parents accept their obligations discharge them, they sentence themselves and their children to the horrors that this Commission seeks to address. Again, it must be said, the Bible is simple, and it full of solutions that common people can understand, which will elevate us from the pitfalls of sin, and give meaning and to life. Unfortunately, the “wise” men of the world ignore the only workable solution to our problems. The Bible solution is unthinkable to such men of “wisdom” (1 Cor. 1:19-20).

I shall close with two passages: “Because the foolishness of God is wiser than men, and the weakness of God is stronger than men” (1 Cor. 1:25). “Righteousness exalteth a nation: but sin is a reproach to any people” (Prov. 14:34).

Guardian of Truth XXXV: 18, pp. 558-559
September 19, 1991

It Won’t Work

By Bobby Holmes

J.W. McGarvey died in 1991 at the age of 82. He was the author of several commentaries and other works on Bible subjects. He was recognized as a Bible scholar far and wide. He lived in a critical period of the church’s history – a period when the church was being divided over the introduction of instrumental music and missionary societies. Like all human beings he was capable of mistakes; some of them he recognized, some of them he probably did not. On one occasion he gave this advice:

You are on the right road, and whatever you do, don’t let anyone persuade you that you can successfully combat error by fellowshipping it and going along with it. I have tried. I believed at the start that was the only way to do it. I’ve never held membership in a congregation that used instrumental music. I have, however, accepted invitations to preach without distinctions between churches that used it and churches that didn’t. I’ve gone along with their papers and magazines and things of that sort. During all these years I have taught the truth as the New Testament teaches it to every young preacher who passed through the College of the Bible. Yet, I do not know of more than six of them who are preaching the truth today. It won’t work.

As already noted, McGarvey lived at a time when churches were being divided over the introduction of instrumental music. The disturbance was not caused by those who opposed the introduction of the instrument. The disturbance was caused by those who introduced the instrument. Note what McGarvey said that he learned. He had tried to “go along with” those who were “for” the instrument even though he personally did not agree with it. About such action as “going along,” he said, “it won’t work. ” You can’t “go along” with something when it is unscriptural: it must be opposed.

Someone has said that those who will not learn from history are destined to repeat its mistakes. How true this is today. The church is being disturbed about human institutions tied to the church treasury. Today, as in McGarvey’s day, the disturbance is not caused by those who oppose the introduction of these human institutions. Today, as then, the disturbance is caused by those who introduce them. They must bear the stigma of “dividing the church. ” But just as in McGarvey’s day, so it is today. There are people who do not believe that such human institutions tied to the church are scriptural and yet they attend churches that either support such or else support preachers who teach that the support of such is scriptural . . . like McGarvey, they are “going along.” Others think that we ought not to object and that it is best to just “go along.” Like McGarvey, at the start I (they) believed that was the only way to do it. To those who are attending such congregations, who are just “going along with it,” listen to what this man learned! “It won’t work!” There is but one remedy for error. Teach against it. Actively oppose it. Error will not die out; it must be fought out; it must be taught out.

But we do not want to take the word of any uninspired man as the rule of faith and practice. Let us suggest some reasons given in the Bible to show that “going along with it” won’t work.

(1) In 2 John 9- 10 the apostle tells us: “Whosoever goeth onward and abides not in the teaching of Christ, hath not God . . . . If any one cometh unto you, and bring not this teaching (the teaching of Christ – bh) receive him not into your house, and give him no greeting (or bid him Godspeed, AV) for he that biddeth him Godspeed is partaker of his evil deeds.” This verse shows plainly that a person is forbidden to teach anything that Christ has not authorized. But it shows that we cannot encourage, endorse, or support financially, morally or vocally what Christ has not authorized. Why? We are partakers of the evil deeds. We become just as guilty as he is. He is wrong for what he teaches, but those who support and endorse him are equally at fault.

(2) “A man that is a heretic after a first and second admonition reject,” says the inspired apostle Paul in Titus 3:10. A heretic is a man who chooses his opinion and substitutes it for truth. Some of those who are advocating the church support of human institutions admit that this is not a matter of faith to them. Well, if it is not a matter of faith, it must be opinion . . . and it is one they have chosen. Those who oppose such church support of human institutions do not do so as a matter of “opinion” but as a matter of conscience, and faith. It is not an “opinion” with them. Now those who have chosen their “opinions” have done so to the dividing of the church. This verse says they are not to be “gone along with.” They are to be admonished, once, even twice. But “after a first and second admonition reject.” No, we can’t just “go along with such” and remain true to God and keep the church pure.

These are just two of several reasons that could be given to show that McGarvey had scriptural basis for urging people to oppose error and not to just “go along with it.” And then he had the personal experience of having tried to go along. To those of you who read these lines and are in churches which support either financially or morally human institutions from the Lord’s treasury, learn a lesson from the Scriptures and history. “It won’t work.” (Adapted from Bible Bulwarks, Feb. 1965.)

Guardian of Truth XXXV: 18, p. 561
September 19, 1991