Parents in the Home (1)

By Mike Willis

When God created the world, he chose a variety of ways for young to be brought into the world. Some animals lay eggs and depart, never seeing their own young. Some animals are nearly self-sufficient from birth. God created man in such a fashion that the young are dependent upon their parents for nearly two decades. Consequently, the role of parenting is one of life’s most important tasks.

The Changing Role of Women

The fashion of the world is constantly changing. Nowhere is change more evident than in the role of women. The Feminist Movement in America has reshaped the values and thinking of many American women. One area drastically affected has been the attitude women take toward the home and parenting.

At a former time, women believed that their highest role in life was the work of bearing and rearing children. One of the proverbs of that day emphasized that role: “The hand that rocks the cradle rules the world.” Some women who were not content serving in the role of “mother,” began a movement to reshape the attitudes of American women. The movement has had so much success that a woman who decides to stay at home and rear her children is sometimes thought to be an unproductive member in our society. Society standards make the mother who decides to stay home and rear her children to ask if her life has been truly fulfilling.

Every year, a larger number of women leave the home to enter the work place. In order for the mother to work, the children must be placed in day care centers, stay with baby sitters, or some place other than mother’s knee. Regardless of how conscientiously those working with other’s children may be, they are a poor second to a mother’s tender loving care, her constant oversight and guidance.

We need to unabashedly re-emphasize the importance of mothering and parenting. By design, God ordained that children be born in a family environment, to receive the training that a God-fearing mother and father can provide. Paul emphasized the sanctity of a mother’s role in such passages as the following:

Notwithstanding she (the woman) shall be saved in childbearing, if they continue in faith and charity and holiness with sobriety (1 Tim. 2:15).

A widow could be enrolled in the church’s role for permanent support if, among other things, “she had brought up children” (1 Tim. 5:10). Younger widows were encouraged to “marry, bear children, guide the house” (1 Tim. 5:14).

Older women should train the younger women to “love their husbands, to love their children, to be discreet, chaste, keepers at home, good, obedient to their own husbands” (Tit. 2:4-5).

I recognize that some women have been forced by financial circumstance to enter the world of business; many are conscientious mothers and wives, striving to be all that God would want them to be. These women who juggle a heavy schedule to do double duty have my respect and sympathy. However, some other women who enter the world of business have been infected with the values of the feminist movement. They work because they want their own career (as if rearing a family were not a career), they want the material things extra money can buy, and they want to be recognized and respected by the world.

America is paying a high price for this newly found in, dependence as a generation of latch-key children are grow ing up. In the absence of parental oversight, latch-key children experiment with drugs, sex, and alcohol. Problem of drug and alcohol addiction and illegitimate babies destroy teenagers. Children graduate from high school hardly knowing how to read. Where are the parents during these years?

Precious Privileges

Being a parent to our children is a precious privilege. Socrates is reported to have said over 2000 years ago, “Could I climb to the highest place in Athens, I would lift my voice and proclaim: ‘Fellow citizens, why do ye turn and scrape every stone to gather wealth and take so little care of your children to whom one day you must relinquish it all?'”

A poet wrote,

I saw tomorrow look at me

From little children’s eyes,

And thought how carefully we would teach

If we were really wise.

Along the same train of thought, Clifton Rogers wrote,

I may never be as clever as my neighbor down the street;

I may never be as wealthy as some other man I meet;

I may never have the glory that some other men have had;

But I’ve got to be successful as a little fellow’s Dad.

There are certain dreams I cherish that I’d like to see come true;

There are things I would accomplish ere my working time is through;

But the task my heart is set on is to guide a little lad,

And to make myself successful as a little fellow’s Dad.

I may never come to glory; I may never gather gold;

Men may count me as a failure when my business life is told;

But if he who follows after shall be manly, I’ll be glad,

For I’ll know I’ve been successful as a little fellow’s Dad.

It’s the one job I dream of; it’s the task I think of most;

If I’d fail that growing youngster, I’d have nothing else to boast;

For though wealth and fame I’d gather, all my future would be sad,

If I failed to be successful as that little fellow’s Dad.

As you pause to think about the important things of life, what can you truthfully say is more important than your children?

I have witnessed the sorrow of parents whose children have grown up away from God as they lamented the years of neglect in rearing their children. How often they wish they could recall those years, reorder their priorities, and mold their children’s lives to worship and serve God. That time has passed and never can be recalled.

To spare you that grief, I exhort you parents who have younger children and have the financial ability to make a hoice to order your priorities. Is that new car and larger house worth what it will cost in the absence of the mother from home during those early, formative years of your child’s life? Can you voluntarily relinquish those material ossessions to provide a better spiritual foundation for your hildren? Do you truly think the personnel at the day care center can provide the attention, care and oversight that you would provide as a parent to your own offspring?

Conclusion

I treasure the memories of Jenny and Corey’s childhood. I remember the tears in the eyes of my wife Sandy and me when Jennifer boarded the bus for the first day of kindergarten. I remember her first performance in a school play. I remember her baptism at Dayton, Ohio. I remember her singing “The Rose” at a junior high performance. I remember Corey’s joy at learning to ride a bicycle. I remember how much he enjoyed playing. I remember his baptism. What would I trade for the memories? A better car? A bigger house? More clothes? No thanks!

I am content knowing that a bond of love joins our hearts together with each other – and together also with Christ.

Guardian of Truth XXXV: 6, pp. 162, 184-185
March 21, 1991

Young People Need “No Skills” (2): Helping Young People Overcome Sexual Pressure

By John Smith

The Human Distinction (2)

Since we have the ability to reason, make choices and practice self-control, it is reasonable that we be held accountable for our actions. God is exceptionally clear in this regard (Ezek. 18:20; 2 Cor. 5:10).

There is no one else on whom we can blame our mistakes. Adam tried, but it didn’t work (Gen. 3:12). When we sin we stand guilty before the Lord. It’s not Mom and Dad’s fault, society’s fault, or your friend’s fault. It’s your own fault! We will live out the “reap what you sow” principle.

Human beings are to operate according to a system of morals and values. We have the ability to know right from wrong if our conscience has been properly trained (Heb. 5:14). God will judge us according to whether we have done good or bad (2 Cor. 5:10). He expects us to make proper use of our conscience and moral nature. This ability is not shared with the rest of creation. Only man, the best of God’s creation, can reason according to a moral standard, making decisions that respect the inherent value of their fellow human.

Values such as respect, self-control, honesty, responsibility and purity are rooted in God’s word and essential for proper relations with the opposite sex. Choices, regarding our sexuality, need to be made with respect for these values. For instance, will a young man or woman ask their partner to risk life-changing or life-ending consequences in order for them to have a few moments of pleasure?

In a recent national survey, a cross-section of young people were asked what influenced their sexual decisions. The results of this survey may surprise you. The number one influence was the morals and values that they had inherited from their parents. “Train up a child in the way that he should go and when he is old he will not depart from it” (Prov. 22:6).

As human beings we are to have commitment to and love for our mates. “Easy sex and one night stands” not only violate God’s laws, but also do insult to the nature of mankind. When man mates with whomever he can, hopping from bed to bed, he acts like an animal, not one made in the image of God.

God’s design for the human family is most respectful. In Matthew 19:4-6 God calls for one man for one woman for life. Husbands and wives are to love and serve one another (Eph. 5:21-23). Wives are told to learn to love their husband (Tit. 2:4). This is not some soft, soapy, sentimental, syrupy type of toe-tingling emotional response, but rather a learned, disciplined response to an imperfect man. They are look out for the best interests of one another while serving one another.

Finally, human beings are expected to take responsibility for their offspring. If a man won’t take care of his ow God declares that he has “denied the faith and is worse than infidel” (1 Tim. 5:8). Many young men today have lo sight of the fact that it doesn’t take a man to father a child but it does take a man to accept the responsibility of rearing the child he fathered. If you father a child or become a mother out of wedlock, you are expected by God to take on all the responsibility for the child’s well being. Are you ready for that?

Conclusion

Man was made in the image of God, but sadly many can not reflect it. There was a commercial a few days ago which several people were seen walking dogs that they resembled. While looking like a dog might be humorous acting like one is not.

Let us determine to live up to our design. Know that what we do make mistakes, God still loves us and desires our salvation. Don’t give up – turn to the Lord.

Guardian of Truth XXXV; 6, p. 164
March 21, 1991

An Exegesis of 1 Corinthians 13:2: Knowing As I Am Known

By Max E. Tice

Since charismatic zealotry has been the rage of the last three decades, the need to grasp and defend God’s truth on issues related to the movement should be apparent to all disciples of Christ. Not only must we answer staunch devotees of the glossolalia (tongues-speaking) fad, we must also aid the unsettled querist as well. A quick and decisive response to arguments advocating the perpetuation of charismatic gifts may cool the fervor of some pseudo-gifted enthusiast or deter some honest inquisitor (possibly a brother in Christ) from falling prey to this mania.

Obviously, a complete expose of Neo-Pentecostal apologetics exceeds the bounds of the present study. Nonetheless, an inspection of one small portion of the charismatic dispute is a realistic objective. Attention will be centered upon one of the most debated passages in the controversy.

As most readers are aware, many brethren consider 1 Corinthians 13:8 one of the strongest proof texts attesting to the current cessation of supernatural gifts of the Spirit. Ironically, the charismatic camp considers it the opposite. Exponents of the latter movement see it as irrefutable evidence that these gifts are still operative among Christians today. Differences in perception of this crucial text result from disagreements over the identity of “that which is perfect” (v. 10). While many see it as a reference to completed revelation, others scoff at this position as ludicrous. They see it as a clear reference to Christ (the perfect one) or to the perfect age which he will usher in at his return.

As the two opposing sides meet, the conflict begins. A zealous brother may argue that the expression “that which” is not “he who” and, therefore, cannot be applied to Jesus. If he knows a little Greek, he may point out that this expression (to teleion) is also neuter in the original language. This may be met with the response that Matthew 1:20 and 1 John 1:1 plainly apply the neuter gender to Jesus [to and ho (nominative, singular, neuter of hos) respectively].

From here the battle may move to contextual considerations, The argument is made that the “perfect” does not necessarily refer to one’s character. It may be rendered as “the whole” or “complete.” Since it stands as the antithesis of partial knowledge and partial prophecy (v. 9), it is urged that Paul must have had complete revelation of knowledge and prophecy in mind. At this point, the opposing side rallies with what appears to be a powerful counterattack. It is time for the “unanswerable” passage. Verse 12 is brought into the discussion. The KJV renders the latter as follows:

For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known.

The ASV, NASV, and NIV may seem to make this counterpunch even more devastating by rendering epignosomai as “I shall know fully.”

From this text the Neo-Pentecostal apologist now forges the following argument: “We do not yet see Jesus face to face. Neither do we fully know anything, much less know ourselves as God knows us. Therefore, the perfect has not yet come, and this means that miraculous gifts have not ceased.”

Well, is this the knockout punch? What can be said about verse 12? Although it has perplexed many Bible students, it is not the validation of present-day charismatic gifts which some think it is. The truth is that such arguments made off the verse demonstrate shallow analysis. First of all, Paul does not say one word about seeing Jesus or God face to face. The key to understanding the meaning is to take a closer look at the term “glass.” What kind of glass does Paul have in mind? The answer is – none at all. The Greek word for glass is esoptrou and means “mirror.” Since silvered glass was not invented until the 13th century, a modern-day mirror is not in view at all. The ancients used polished metal for mirrors. These gave imperfect reflections of objects, which is conveyed here in the term “darkly” (Greek: ainigmati). Thus, Paul has introduced an analogy which pictures early Christians looking into an imperfect mirror and seeing an imperfect reflection. Whose face would be in the mirror in this analogy? God’s? Christ’s? Of course not. Yet, the popular Pentecostal explanation has Paul and others looking into a mirror in order to see the literal face of Jesus or God? Incredible! The true meaning will be evident shortly.

Before saying more about the mirror, something should be said about the expression “know fully” which is used in many translations. This is an accurate representation of the Greek word. However, people often draw the wrong conclusion from it. It is often argued that nobody can know anything fully in this life. Thus, Paul must refer to a time after Christ’s return. This may sound impressive. However, it is inaccurate. The fact is that the Bible repeatedly uses this same Greek word translated “know fully” for knowledge we can have in this life. In Romans 1:32 Paul uses the word to describe the knowledge that the Gentiles had possessed of God’s moral law. In 1 Timothy 4:3 he uses it for the knowledge of truth which enables a person to give thanks for his food. Colossians 1:6 applies it to the knowledge of God’s grace which the Colossians already had. Peter uses it in 2 Peter 2:21 for knowledge of the way of righteousness which apostates possessed, but ignored in turning back to the world. Many other examples could be cited. However, this should suffice to demonstrate that the “know fully” argument is fallacious.

Finally, what is meant by knowing “even as I am known”? Many people assume that this refers to knowing God or to knowing ourselves as well as God knows us. Yet, the text says nothing about such an idea. An alternative explanation which better fits the context is to see this expression as the culmination of the mirror analogy. Other explanations render Paul’s statement as nonsensical. They have Paul introducing an analogy and then dropping it without ever making a point. On the other hand, if the words in question are seen as the completion of Paul’s picture, they make a great deal of sense. Consider the position of someone who had never seen his own face, except as reflected by a piece of polished brass. He would not know himself as well as everyone else who saw his face directly. If he could somehow get a clearer picture (as with our mirrors), he would see himself (externally) as others saw him. He would know that part of himself as he was known by other people. It would be a face-to-face meeting with self.

Someone may ask, “What is Paul’s point in such an analogy?” It is not that he will one day get to know himself better. What would this have to do with a context that is discussing the cessation of revelations, prophecies, and tongues? The point is that Paul would one day know something better than he knew it at the time 1 Corinthians was written. That something certainly could be completed revelation, no matter how much modern charismatic advocates scoff at the idea. This means that verse 12 does not prove that the “perfect” is yet to come.

Guardian of Truth XXXV; 5, pp. 147-148
March 7, 1991

Can We Gamble? (2)

By Keith Greer

“If we then be risen with Christ, seek those things which are above, where Christ sitteth on the right hand of God. . . Mortify therefore your members which are upon the earth; fornication, uncleanness, inordinate affection, evil concupiscence, and covetousness, which is idolatry” (Eph. 3:1-5).

Many try to justify gambling by saying that they know when to stop. “I just set myself a $20 limit for the night. When that is gone, it is gone. It is just my entertainment. It is no different than going to the movies.”

Do most people know “when to stop”? Statistics would tell otherwise. There are many chapters of Gamblers Anonymous, not only in Las Vegas, but throughout the United States. Many young airmen at Nellis get into trouble because they get started gambling and don’t know when to stop. More than one young person has written bad checks thinking, “If I just play one more time, I’m going to win the big jackpot.”

Ask any gambler who has destroyed his home and turned to crime to support his gambling. Many start something that they cannot stop. Las Vegas has many “homeless” – many as a direct result of those who came to Las Vegas thinking that they were going to be the one to “strike it rich.” Rather than getting rich, they do not even have a bus fare home.

I get many calls at the building here every week from people who are in just such circumstances. I recently had a call from a Christian from Texas who had come here with his family and, even though his wife and children had pleaded with him, he spent two days “at the tables” and lost all of his money. He was crying and asked me to pray with him, not only for God to forgive him, but for the terrible example he had set for his family.

If you don’t care about yourself, think about this. “Just as teenagers are beginning to show signs of curtailing risky sex, illicit drug use and drunk driving, another potentially destructive behavior – gambling – is threatening to become the teen vice of the ’90s. . . The most popular forms of gambling among teenagers include betting on sports, card playing, lotteries and slot machines. . . For teen and other problem gamblers, betting fever may lead to serious crimes as well as self-destruction. . . The social and personal factors that cause compulsive gambling, such as widespread materialism and unstable families, continue unabated” (U.S. News & World Report, June 18, 1990, p. 51).

“But the fruit of the spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, gentleness, goodness, faithfulness, meekness, self-control: against such there is no law” (Gal. 5:22-23).

Guardian of Truth XXXV: 6, p. 163
March 21, 1991